General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs Obama Stalling Until Republicans Can Bury the CIA Torture Report?
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/10/23/white-house-waiting-gop-senate-kill-feinsteins-torture-report/Is Obama Stalling Until Republicans Can Bury the CIA Torture Report?
BY DAN FROOMKIN
Continued White House foot-dragging on the declassification of a much-anticipated Senate torture report is raising concerns that the administration is holding out until Republicans take over the chamber and kill the report themselves.
Senator Dianne Feinsteins intelligence committee sent a 480-page executive summary of its extensive report on the CIAs abuse of detainees to the White House for declassification more than six months ago.
In August, the White House, working closely with the CIA, sent back redactions that Feinstein and other Senate Democrats said rendered the summary unintelligible and unsupported.
Since then, the wrangling has continued behind closed doors, with projected release dates repeatedly falling by the wayside. The Huffington Post reported this week that White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, a close ally of CIA Director John Brennan, is personally leading the negotiations, suggesting keen interest in their progress or lack thereof on the part of Brennan and President Obama.
Human-rights lawyer Scott Horton, who interviewed a wide range of intelligence and administration officials for his upcoming book, Lords of Secrecy: The National Security Elite and Americas Stealth Foreign Policy, told The Intercept that the White House and the CIA are hoping a Republican Senate will, in their words, put an end to this nonsense.
more...
tritsofme
(17,363 posts)During the lame duck.
This report needs to see the light of day.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Regarding the Senate report on CIA torture: When did this stop being a democracy?
Look forward to Horton's book:
State secrecy is increasingly used as the explanation for the shrinking of public discussion surrounding national security issues. The phrase thats classified is increasingly used not to protect national secrets from legitimate enemies, but rather to stifle public discourse regarding national security. Washington today is inclined to see secrecy as a convenient cure to many of its problems. But too often these problems are not challenges to national security, they involve the embarrassment of political figures, disclosure of mismanagement, incompetence and corruption and even outright criminality.
For national security issues to figure in democratic deliberation, the public must have access to basic facts that underlie the issues. The more those facts disappear under a cloak of state secrecy, the less space remains for democratic process and the more deliberation falls into the hands of largely unelected national security elites. The way out requires us to think much more critically and systematically about secrecy and its role in a democratic state.
http://www.publicaffairsbooks.com/book/lords-of-secrecy/scott-horton/9781568584881
Baitball Blogger
(46,655 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Isis recruitment?
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)He won't do anything to rock the boat.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)....there would be two hundred recs for this OP.