Fri Oct 10, 2014, 02:47 PM
When a politician answers with, "I am not a scientist," the follow-up should be:Last edited Fri Oct 10, 2014, 03:17 PM - Edit history (1)
Is that a recusal?
Maybe abstention? 
--imm
|
6 replies, 1928 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
 6 replies |
Author | Time | Post |
 When a politician answers with, "I am not a scientist," the follow-up should be: (Original post) |
immoderate | Oct 2014 | OP |
| Ilsa | Oct 2014 | #1 | |
| immoderate | Oct 2014 | #2 | |
| wyldwolf | Oct 2014 | #3 | |
| immoderate | Oct 2014 | #4 | |
| Nay | Oct 2014 | #6 | |
| TBA | Oct 2014 | #5 |
Response to immoderate (Original post)
Fri Oct 10, 2014, 02:54 PM
Ilsa (61,225 posts)
1. Nice! And, "Yes, that's why we listen to scientists about
Response to Ilsa (Reply #1)
Fri Oct 10, 2014, 03:06 PM
2. Yes. I also considered, "And you have no informed opinion?" but ...
|
A true weasel can have dinner on that one.
--imm |
