Anyone else expect the Republicans to impeach Obama over the ISIS war?

[Kablooie]

My feeling is that one of the reasons the Republicans refuse to vote on war authorization is so they will have another issue to attack Obama on after the elections.

If it can be demonstrated that he committed America to a war without Congressional authorization, and it's likely that it could, an impeachment would be an easy thing to instigate since this goes against the Constitution.

Of course the Republicans are delighted that we are starting another war and wouldn't want to stop it but they could authorize continuing the war based on the fact that we are already in it but still impeach Obama for starting it without their authorization.

Could this be a possibility or am I just whistling Dixie?

[TheNutcracker]

1. I thought they voted on it? Sanders and Warren voting NO

[Yupster]

5. That vote was just to train the

Free Syrian Army.

It was limited to that because they knew that part would pass.

[Thinkingabout]

2. I think even the Republicans got the message during the security briefing, ISIS is

not to be taken lightly. I don't know how delighted we may be about having to take action, does not delight me but sometimes it becomes a necessity.

[CJCRANE]

3. I don't think they will. They like war.

They want more war, more shock and awe.

[Yupster]

4. If they wanted to do that they would have

over Libya.

He didn't get authorization for that one either.

[CJCRANE]

8. Exactly. They don't want to delve too deep into real issues

because they all lead back to neocon manipulation behind the scenes.

[spanone]

6. fuck the worthless house of repugnants

[SheilaT]

7. It's easy to throw the word

impeachment around. To actually do it is another thing entirely.