General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI was ambivalent about the death penalty until the Missouri story today
Apparently Missouri has been straight up lying about the methods they use for execution. Even if I maintain a theoretical ambivalence, as a practical moral matter, after this I have to say "no executions for the next century or so until we sort this out".
Sorry that took so long.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Regardless of what anyone thinks about whether God exists or not, my subject line is accurate.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]Treat your body like a machine. Your mind like a castle.[/center][/font][hr]
merrily
(45,251 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)I think people should have to live with what they did. Some people have no feelings about what they did. But, for them being locked up is even more difficult. People who have remorse have a measure of comfort eventually among the rest of the prison population that also has some humanity, but it's still very difficult to be in prison. Death releases people from those difficulties.
get the red out
(13,461 posts)I would certainly rather be dead than in prison.
I just get so angry when I hear about horrific murders that my brain almost explodes. I wish I could be against the death penalty all the time, I'm just not capable of the detachment necessary.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)If I was a young person under 30 and knew I could spend 60 or more years in jail I would rather be dead, maybe not in the next week, but after years of tedium in prison yeah I can see that being insufferable. So, I kind of smile at life in prison not a happy smile, but knowing they aren't going to like it much. But, I think life should be a true life sentence not well we sort of sentenced you to life but that really just means 20 years or so and with time off for good behavior sure we can have you outta here in 15.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)authoritarian government.
Removing the DP (while admirable) isn't the "fix" for the above.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Besides, as I said, whether anyone has the right to take a life cold bloodedly is a big issue for me.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)is the "humane" alternative.
merrily
(45,251 posts)really in deep do.
rock
(13,218 posts)to have the power of death over it's citizens? Just want to make sure I understand you.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)argument.
rock
(13,218 posts)Are you for or against the Death Penalty?
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)Reread that bit.
rock
(13,218 posts)A simple "for" would have done the trick and not have been so confusing. You do realize that the DP is power for the government and it means killing the citizens. So you are for the government taking the lives of its citizens. A government that you described as a brutally racist, and authoritarian government (which I completely agree with). I'm not trying to be harsh. Just tell me where I'm going wrong.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Last edited Thu Sep 4, 2014, 11:48 AM - Edit history (1)
Who wre just exonerated, but were on death row.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)One on death row, one with a life sentence.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)brothers who were convicted of raping and murdering a little girl about 30 years ago. One was on death row and fat Tony Scalia used him as an example of why his catholic ass really liked killing people in a case several years ago.
The other was serving a life sentence.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/04/us/north-carolina-death-row-dna.html
merrily
(45,251 posts)sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)to renounce his support for the death penalty at any moment now.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)It's easy to just 'accept the status quo' and assume because most people supported it in the past (or even still do) that it's a 'reasonable' position to hold. But the more you read about how it's applied in reality, the more it become apparent that humans are simply too fallible, and the justice system too slanted, to only apply it to those even to whom they feel it actually should apply, or even to apply it in the 'ways' it is supposedly applied.
Unless the reincarnationists are right, you only get one shot at life, and no matter how godawful you are at it, you should be allowed to try and live as long as possible. Who knows, maybe some of these guys (who actually were guilty, and not just railroaded) will evolve while in jail, and finally understand why they were wrong to do what they did to others.
Revenge killings help no one, and that's what our death penalty really is. The thousands of year old concept of 'an eye for an eye', just prettied up to try to avoid looking like what they are.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Heidi
(58,237 posts)Thank you.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Heidi
(58,237 posts)oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)It takes time for all this stuff to come to our awareness. I live in CA so have been watching AZ. argh. The clean up in the prison industry is another conversation. For now, I am glad we have one more person saying, 'no executions for the next century or so until we sort this out'. Thank you.
Raffi Ella
(4,465 posts)I've never understood how killing someone is a justifiable punishment when the act of killing someone is in and of itself against the law. Someone has to pull the lever or insert the needle. So, not only do they not have the right to do that under the law, but they will have to live with the fact that they did do it. They killed someone.
How can someone live with themselves if they kill someone like that, and who has the right to force that action from another?
Don't get me wrong here, Good Riddance to Bin Laden's sorry ass. I'm not a pacifist, I'm against the methodical slow process of killing another human being under the sanction of and by the order of a court of law; that process and the end result of death is as cruel and horrific as what ISIS did to those poor men. The case in Missouri demonstrates further why it is just so wrong.
In a civilized society the death penalty makes no sense. It needs to be abolished.