Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,984 posts)
Mon Jul 21, 2014, 07:03 PM Jul 2014

CNN Poll: Liberals, Dems, Poor, Women Most Likely To Oppose Israeli War, White Men Most Supportive

Posted by Zaid Jilani at 6:34 pm Tagged with: israel, palestine
Jul
21
2014

There is a reorientation going on right now with respect to the Israel Lobby. It used to be that it found its base of support among Democrats, with Republicans like Ronald Reagan and George HW Bush being the ones most likely to be critical of Israeli policy.

A new CNN poll finds that things are changing. Check out these crosstabs on whether people think Israel is using “too much,” “too little” or just the right amount of violence (its like porridge):



A few interesting things: the bulk of support for Israel comes from whites, with slightly more coming from those with incomes above the median. The majority of liberals oppose Israel’s level of violence, and 50 percent, a plurality, of minorities do the same. Women are also considerably more opposed.

In other words, the issue of Israel and the Palestinians is being polarized — with liberals increasingly believing that Israel is mistreating the Palestinians, and conservatives holding the opposite view.


MORE:
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2014/images/07/21/rel7b.pdf
http://www.balloon-juice.com/2014/07/21/cnn-poll-liberals-democrats-poor-women-most-likely-to-oppose-israeli-war-white-men-most-supportive/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CNN Poll: Liberals, Dems, Poor, Women Most Likely To Oppose Israeli War, White Men Most Supportive (Original Post) kpete Jul 2014 OP
color me surprised. KG Jul 2014 #1
It is difficult for some liberals to justify slaughtering civilians 4now Jul 2014 #2
White men most supportive? I wonder how many of those men even served in the military? alp227 Jul 2014 #3
's how it always goes: Cheney got deferments, Heinlein washed out of the Navy with nary a shot, MisterP Jul 2014 #5
Sign 'em up and ship 'em over. GeorgeGist Jul 2014 #4

4now

(1,596 posts)
2. It is difficult for some liberals to justify slaughtering civilians
Mon Jul 21, 2014, 07:17 PM
Jul 2014

while blaming them for their own deaths.

alp227

(32,018 posts)
3. White men most supportive? I wonder how many of those men even served in the military?
Mon Jul 21, 2014, 07:32 PM
Jul 2014

Most of the "yes" responders are probably little more than armchair warriors.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
5. 's how it always goes: Cheney got deferments, Heinlein washed out of the Navy with nary a shot,
Tue Jul 22, 2014, 12:46 AM
Jul 2014

Last edited Sun Apr 19, 2015, 02:50 PM - Edit history (1)

Kipling was afraid of horses and was physically incapable of lifting a fieldstone, H.G. Wells imagined littérateurs in plus-fours and duck trousers taking up rifles to keep the Hun off the Isle (after forcing visitors to play battles with him, G.A. Henty was perpetually sickly, Frederic Farrar was a mild parson and Liberal Party founder, Social Darwinists John Ruskin and Edmund Gosse were the most gentle and sensitive researchers, Henry Newbolt was a timid eunuch, and the septicemic Rupert Brooke lived his life by a lilting death-wish, his unit carrying Herodotus as guidebooks to the Aegean en route to Gallipoli, hoping it'd be like the stories of Troy and the Crusades

militarism is a game for people who don't know what bile smells like

ink:

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CNN Poll: Liberals, Dems,...