Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 02:41 PM Jul 2014

CNBC’s climate-denying ‘expert’: Carbon is demonized ‘just like the poor Jews under Hitler’

By David Edwards
Tuesday, July 15, 2014 14:05 EDT

A Princeton professor who CBNC billed as an “industry expert” on the climate said this week that scientists were demonizing carbon dioxide “like the poor Jews under Hitler” in order to perpetrate a global warming hoax.

During a Monday interview on the cable business channel, professor William Happer asserted that all climate models which showed the Earth getting warmer were wrong, and compared his fight against the scientific community to Galileo’s imprisonment for insisting that the Earth was round.

CNBC host Andrew Ross Sorkin pointed out that he had a problem with Happer being presented as an expert because the professor did “not believe in climate change at all.”


“Just a minute!” Happer interrupted. “I believe in climate change. Shut up!”

Sorkin reminded the professor that he had compared climate change to the Holocaust in 2009.

“Are you suggesting that — when you made that comment — that climatologists and climate scientists are the equivalent of Hitler and Nazis?” Sorkin wondered.

“You know, I get called a denier, and anyone who objects to all of the hype gets called denier,” Happer opined. “That’s supposed to make me a Holocaust denier. You know, I’m getting tired of that.”

“The comment that I made was, the demonization of carbon dioxide is just like the demonization of the poor Jews under Hitler,” he added. “Carbon dioxide is actually a benefit to the world, and so were the Jews.”

Watch the video below from CNBC’s Squawk Box, broadcast July 15, 2014.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/07/15/cnbcs-climate-denying-expert-carbon-is-demonized-just-like-the-poor-jews-under-hitler/

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CNBC’s climate-denying ‘expert’: Carbon is demonized ‘just like the poor Jews under Hitler’ (Original Post) DonViejo Jul 2014 OP
The fuck? nt conservaphobe Jul 2014 #1
I didn't realize the Princeton staff had degraded that far? ananda Jul 2014 #2
Just when you think they can't come up with a Hitler angle... BeyondGeography Jul 2014 #3
Poor CO2, falling victim to climate science's moleculocide. arcane1 Jul 2014 #6
What an embarrassment. nt Xipe Totec Jul 2014 #4
Wow. When they're not shilling for the 0.001%, they're trying to out-batshit Faux. HughBeaumont Jul 2014 #5
Wow! Next thing you know, those evil climate scientists will be sending CO2 thucythucy Jul 2014 #7
Classic case of Michael Shermer's Why do smart people believe weird things Johonny Jul 2014 #8

BeyondGeography

(39,370 posts)
3. Just when you think they can't come up with a Hitler angle...
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 02:45 PM
Jul 2014

There's always a Hitler angle. They love him so.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
5. Wow. When they're not shilling for the 0.001%, they're trying to out-batshit Faux.
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 02:52 PM
Jul 2014

Classy. A sign of a true propaganda arm. There is no low they won't stoop to. I imagine some Austrian School guys are next, followed by some gold bugs and birfers.

thucythucy

(8,047 posts)
7. Wow! Next thing you know, those evil climate scientists will be sending CO2
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 03:15 PM
Jul 2014

off to be gassed.

Really, is this about the most stupid Holocaust analogy ever?

Johonny

(20,840 posts)
8. Classic case of Michael Shermer's Why do smart people believe weird things
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 03:29 PM
Jul 2014

He's an atomic physicist that is highly skilled in convincing himself fantasy is reality but there is no need to argue with him. If he had a good case to make he'd do it in the science literature and not the editorials of the Wall street Journal.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CNBC’s climate-denying ‘e...