Tue Jul 1, 2014, 04:50 PM

truedelphi (32,324 posts)

What if all women everywhere who disagree with SCOTUS quit wearing their tops?

NO more shirts, no more bras, no more bikini tops, just our wonderful bare womanly torsos.

That would show how many of us there are!

It's true some of us older ladies might scare the horses, but it would definitely get media attention as to how backwards it is to have five elderly Jesuits running the nation.

106 replies, 9985 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

106 replies	Author	Time	Post
What if all women everywhere who disagree with SCOTUS quit wearing their tops? (Original post)	truedelphi	Jul 2014	OP
I, for one, am all for it.	Jackpine Radical	Jul 2014	#1
DUzy! n/t	winter is coming	Jul 2014	#4
Not.	Squinch	Jul 2014	#64
Not for the sentiment; for the reference to Arte Johnson's Dirty Old Man character. n/t	winter is coming	Jul 2014	#69
I love the character, but	Squinch	Jul 2014	#82
I'm having trouble with the suggestion that taking off our clothes would achieve anything	winter is coming	Jul 2014	#83
LOL	quinnox	Jul 2014	#80
Negative attention,	elleng	Jul 2014	#2
BLM here on DU has this citation about the Opus Dei end of things re: SCOTUS	truedelphi	Jul 2014	#8
I think Opus Dei is not Jesuit;	elleng	Jul 2014	#9
Opus Dei and the Jesuits are not the same thing at all. nt	Hekate	Jul 2014	#12
how'd that work out for Femen? Oh, it didn't , because people just talked about boobs.	bettyellen	Jul 2014	#3
PETA likes female nudity too. What was the message again? nt	Hekate	Jul 2014	#15
you should not own pets, so.... we will kill them for you?	bettyellen	Jul 2014	#18
and these people don't care about the issues either	JI7	Jul 2014	#16
komen is a scam.	bettyellen	Jul 2014	#20
What is this notion that everytime women need to protest it has to	Skidmore	Jul 2014	#5
It's really creepy and lecherous.	PeaceNikki	Jul 2014	#7
exactly, would people say the same to black civil rights activists, those fighting for gay rights	JI7	Jul 2014	#13
Wave your wangs against war!!	PeaceNikki	Jul 2014	#17
Nuts Against Nukes!!	pipi_k	Jul 2014	#84
Balls not Bombs!	PeaceNikki	Jul 2014	#85
You guys are cracking me up!	PasadenaTrudy	Jul 2014	#98
+1. As if the only weapon we have is our bodies. n/t	winter is coming	Jul 2014	#14
+1	theHandpuppet	Jul 2014	#70
This I the second op with this "idea":	Lars39	Jul 2014	#19
I bet the original source is some RW asshole, interesting....	bettyellen	Jul 2014	#21
yeah, the person who suggested it said earlier on	JI7	Jul 2014	#23
this from the guy calling women "hysterical" for being outrgaed	redqueen	Jul 2014	#24
Well that shows what this is all about	BainsBane	Jul 2014	#29
Shocking! I am SHOCKED that particular person suggestedsuch a thing!	Number23	Jul 2014	#87
When the objection is to our sexuality, flaunt that sexuality right in their faces	LadyHawkAZ	Jul 2014	#22
It's about healthcare, not sexuality, IMO. nt	redqueen	Jul 2014	#25
To us it's about healthcare. Their objection is not to healthcare.	LadyHawkAZ	Jul 2014	#31
I reject their sexist framing.	redqueen	Jul 2014	#32
yep, that is a suckers game.	bettyellen	Jul 2014	#34
exactly this	JI7	Jul 2014	#35
And that's worked well, has it?	LadyHawkAZ	Jul 2014	#41
I don't know how old you are, but the situation you're describing is entirely alien to me.	redqueen	Jul 2014	#75
I think she is saying what you are saying, redqueen.	truedelphi	Jul 2014	#104
So explain to me, if you would, the following:	truedelphi	Jul 2014	#49
that's about Breast Feeding itself so i don't see the connection	JI7	Jul 2014	#72
I have the right to walk around topless now. Know why I don't?	redqueen	Jul 2014	#74
I now understand the burkha societies.	truedelphi	Jul 2014	#105
It takes some imagination to see things that way.	truedelphi	Jul 2014	#36
Sad but true	LadyHawkAZ	Jul 2014	#66
Agreed	BrotherIvan	Jul 2014	#30
Because tits! WANT RIGHTS? sHOW ME YOUR TITS!!!	elehhhhna	Jul 2014	#43
150 years ago, knees were too sexy to be seen, as were ankles.	truedelphi	Jul 2014	#58
Is the point protesting Hobby Lobby?	BainsBane	Jul 2014	#86
cause and effect? nope. sorry.	elehhhhna	Jul 2014	#99
No shit. I'm so fucking sick of the	MerryBlooms	Jul 2014	#45
^^^^ This. You are absolutely right. The assholes are coming out of the woodwork on this one.	Squinch	Jul 2014	#60
And "The Deep End" has been thoroughly gone over.	WillowTree	Jul 2014	#62
I had a post hidden for naming names...	MerryBlooms	Jul 2014	#88
I'll take the hides at this point. I am fed up with these self-deluding sexist infants.	Squinch	Jul 2014	#90
amen, sister.	MerryBlooms	Jul 2014	#94
Right there with you. n/t	MadrasT	Jul 2014	#95
We'd all get skin cancer	Jane Austin	Jul 2014	#6
Indeed, why wear anything? nt	bemildred	Jul 2014	#10
Dumb. n/t	demmiblue	Jul 2014	#11
It would be completely ineffective in terms of getting people	mindwalker_i	Jul 2014	#26
Exactly that. ^ (n/t)	Lefta Dissenter	Jul 2014	#102
The Lysistrata approach is better	BainsBane	Jul 2014	#27
+1	redqueen	Jul 2014	#33
Exactly. Stop having sex with men until they "get it."	Ilsa	Jul 2014	#40
Not a big deal....us men got plenty of porn to keep us busy for awhile	davidn3600	Jul 2014	#67
Now I see why this idea is bullshit	randys1	Jul 2014	#28
it's "I hate feminists + want to trick them into exploiting themselves for my amusement"	bettyellen	Jul 2014	#91
It infuriates me we have to fight the enemy on the right but now on the left too	randys1	Jul 2014	#92
I am grossed out by the trolls here getting off on trying to humiliate women.	bettyellen	Jul 2014	#93
I think SCOTUS should quit wearing their tops	tularetom	Jul 2014	#37
With friends like you who needs enemies...	nolabear	Jul 2014	#38
Great response...	TDale313	Jul 2014	#103
Fuck that. nt	Ilsa	Jul 2014	#39
Nope. Too many people would like that.	Laffy Kat	Jul 2014	#42
This will work if hundreds of women go topless	Zorra	Jul 2014	#44
Yes it would.	truedelphi	Jul 2014	#55
Congrats! This is officially the Stupidest Thing on the Internet Today!	LeftyMom	Jul 2014	#46
Sorry I couldn't tickle your funny bone, stimulate your imagination or any of	truedelphi	Jul 2014	#51
.	Separation	Jul 2014	#47
Thank you.	truedelphi	Jul 2014	#48
It's not funny!	Phentex	Jul 2014	#50
Name change expected in near future:	truedelphi	Jul 2014	#53
you should start that!	Phentex	Jul 2014	#54
LOL!	kpete	Jul 2014	#59
. .	lovemydog	Jul 2014	#61
Okay... if this is as far as your worldly intellect goes... DO IT!	Quantess	Jul 2014	#52
I get leered at enough as is. Thanks. nt.	NCTraveler	Jul 2014	#56
good info to have just in case....	kpete	Jul 2014	#57
See, this is the issue.	redqueen	Jul 2014	#76
My life would improve tremendously	KamaAina	Jul 2014	#63
I'm mostly worried about black eyes.	davsand	Jul 2014	#65
Best idea I've heard in a long time	LittleBlue	Jul 2014	#68
We'll Just get Limbaugh Shots with Putin-like Expressions.	Xyzse	Jul 2014	#71
Well you certainly haven't struck a nerve	CreekDog	Jul 2014	#73
Well, I for one think it's a fine idea	quinnox	Jul 2014	#77
Also, here's a hint - look at the most enthusiastic supporters here.	redqueen	Jul 2014	#78
What if all men everywhere who disagree with SCOTUS quit wearing their pants? n/t	Scout	Jul 2014	#79
Mah nishtanah, ha-laylah ha-zeh, mi-kol ha-leylot?	Warren DeMontague	Jul 2014	#89
Tit for Tat. nt	clarice	Jul 2014	#81
So sexist jackasses can leer at me like a piece of meat?	MadrasT	Jul 2014	#96
To heck with scaring the horses - it would dazzle the troops!	csziggy	Jul 2014	#97
So how's going topless working out for you?	greatauntoftriplets	Jul 2014	#100
How about a scarlet letter?	DetlefK	Jul 2014	#101
You need to talk OVER the SCOTUS but TO the people	ck4829	Jul 2014	#106

Response to truedelphi (Original post)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 04:57 PM

What if all women everywhere who disagree with SCOTUS quit wearing their tops?

1. I, for one, am all for it.

4. DUzy! n/t

64. Not.

69. Not for the sentiment; for the reference to Arte Johnson's Dirty Old Man character. n/t

82. I love the character, but

83. I'm having trouble with the suggestion that taking off our clothes would achieve anything

80. LOL

2. Negative attention,

8. BLM here on DU has this citation about the Opus Dei end of things re: SCOTUS

9. I think Opus Dei is not Jesuit;

12. Opus Dei and the Jesuits are not the same thing at all. nt

3. how'd that work out for Femen? Oh, it didn't , because people just talked about boobs.

15. PETA likes female nudity too. What was the message again? nt

18. you should not own pets, so.... we will kill them for you?

16. and these people don't care about the issues either

20. komen is a scam.

5. What is this notion that everytime women need to protest it has to

7. It's really creepy and lecherous.

13. exactly, would people say the same to black civil rights activists, those fighting for gay rights

17. Wave your wangs against war!!

84. Nuts Against Nukes!!

85. Balls not Bombs!

98. You guys are cracking me up!

14. +1. As if the only weapon we have is our bodies. n/t

70. +1

19. This I the second op with this "idea":

21. I bet the original source is some RW asshole, interesting....

23. yeah, the person who suggested it said earlier on

24. this from the guy calling women "hysterical" for being outrgaed

29. Well that shows what this is all about

87. Shocking! I am SHOCKED that particular person suggestedsuch a thing!

22. When the objection is to our sexuality, flaunt that sexuality right in their faces

25. It's about healthcare, not sexuality, IMO. nt

31. To *us* it's about healthcare. Their objection is not to healthcare.

32. I reject their sexist framing.

34. yep, that is a suckers game.

35. exactly this

41. And that's worked well, has it?

75. I don't know how old you are, but the situation you're describing is entirely alien to me.

104. I think she is saying what you are saying, redqueen.

49. So explain to me, if you would, the following:

72. that's about Breast Feeding itself so i don't see the connection

74. I have the right to walk around topless now. Know why I don't?

105. I now understand the burkha societies.

36. It takes some imagination to see things that way.

66. Sad but true

30. Agreed

43. Because tits! WANT RIGHTS? sHOW ME YOUR TITS!!!

58. 150 years ago, knees were too sexy to be seen, as were ankles.

86. Is the point protesting Hobby Lobby?

99. cause and effect? nope. sorry.

45. No shit. I'm so fucking sick of the

60. ^^^^ This. You are absolutely right. The assholes are coming out of the woodwork on this one.

62. And "The Deep End" has been thoroughly gone over.

88. I had a post hidden for naming names...

90. I'll take the hides at this point. I am fed up with these self-deluding sexist infants.

94. amen, sister.

95. Right there with you. n/t

6. We'd all get skin cancer

10. Indeed, why wear anything? nt

11. Dumb. n/t

26. It would be completely ineffective in terms of getting people

102. Exactly that. ^ (n/t)

27. The Lysistrata approach is better

33. +1

40. Exactly. Stop having sex with men until they "get it."

67. Not a big deal....us men got plenty of porn to keep us busy for awhile

28. Now I see why this idea is bullshit

91. it's "I hate feminists + want to trick them into exploiting themselves for my amusement"

92. It infuriates me we have to fight the enemy on the right but now on the left too

93. I am grossed out by the trolls here getting off on trying to humiliate women.

37. I think SCOTUS should quit wearing their tops

38. With friends like you who needs enemies...

103. Great response...

39. Fuck that. nt

42. Nope. Too many people would like that.

44. This will work if hundreds of women go topless

55. Yes it would.

46. Congrats! This is officially the Stupidest Thing on the Internet Today!

31. To us it's about healthcare. Their objection is not to healthcare.