HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » For Reasons They Will Nev...

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 07:12 PM

For Reasons They Will Never Admit Republicans Are Responsible For The Attack on Benghazi

http://www.politicususa.com/2014/06/20/reasons-admit-republicans-responsible-attack-benghazi.html

For Reasons They Will Never Admit Republicans Are Responsible For The Attack on Benghazi
By: Rmuse
Friday, June, 20th, 2014, 6:25 pm


snip//

First, it is now a fact, right from the captured mastermind of the Benghazi attack’s mouth, that the attackers were driven by religious rage over an American-made anti-Muslim video that “depicted the Prophet Muhammed, Islam’s founder, as a homosexual, villainous child-molesting buffoon.” Republicans rejected, out of hand, the idea the anti-Islam video played any role in the Benghazi attack despite reporting in the New York Times the day after the attack that protesters were enraged over the slight to Islam they first learned of from watching coverage of anti-American protests in Cairo Egypt. Now, it is true Republicans probably did not secretly fund the production of the anti-Islam video, but they have incited anti-Muslim sentiments in America over the past thirteen years beginning shortly after the terror attacks on 911 and continuing to this day.

If anyone believes Republicans and their conservative masters at the Heritage Foundation have not portrayed Muslims as terrorists and sub-humans, they have been comatose over the past decade.
On Monday, the day before the White House announced the suspect in the Benghazi attack had been captured by American special forces, the Heritage Foundation hosted an Islamic hate-fest documented in the Washington Post that focused on abusing a Pakistani Muslim, Saga Ahmed, for suggesting that some attending the Heritage conference readily stereotyped all Muslims as violent and anti-American. Add to the perpetual Muslim bashing the Republican predilection for military intervention in the internal affairs of Muslim nations such as Iran, Syria, Libya, and once again Iraq that from a Muslim, and many Americans’, point of view is just a reason to kill Muslims as part of what George W. Bush called a “crusade” replete with American troops carrying weapons emblazoned with Christian bible verses. There are also several Republican state legislatures passing absurd bans on what they call “barbaric” Sharia Law. It is little wonder that after a decade of defaming Islam and Muslims as sub-human monsters intent on killing good American Christians in a Holy War, that a devout evangelical did not appropriate funding to produce an anti-Islam video that drove Islamist militants to seek revenge and attack the nearest Americans at an embassy outpost lacking adequate security that is solely the fault of House Republicans.

Hillary Clinton, then Secretary of State, requested additional funding for embassy security early in 2011 to protect American diplomats working in Muslim countries. Republicans in the House rejected Mrs. Clinton’s request because as proud Republican Jason Chaffetz of Utah boasted upon being asked if he voted against increased embassy security funding, “Absolutely. Look, we have to make priorities and choices in this country. When you’re in tough economic time, you have to make difficult choices how to prioritize this.” Not only did the Republican House not increase embassy security funding, they voted to cut $300-million from the U.S. embassy security budget as part of their priorities due to what they call “tough economic times. Remarkably, Republicans never prioritize prioritize funding anything whether it is for Veterans, food assistance, infrastructure repair, or embassy security and yet there is always money for tax cuts for the rich and corporations and subsidies for the oil, tobacco, and pharmaceutical industry; the things most important to Republicans.

Republicans will never take any responsibility for their integral complicity in driving anti-Muslim sentiments that led to the anti-Islam video that incited the attack on Benghazi the captured Islamist militant said enraged Muslims after seeing protests against America in Cairo. He clearly admitted he and his militia sought retribution against the nearest American establishment; the Benghazi outpost. Instead of decrying the video’s role in driving the Benghazi attack, or Republicans’ role in withholding funding for embassy security, Republicans covered their guilt by claiming President Obama and Hillary Clinton are responsible for murdering four American diplomats. Besides refusing to take responsibility for their role in the deaths of the Americans, Republicans are hypocrites for never investigating George W. Bush for the deaths of thousands of Americans on 911, or the deaths of Americans in any of the several attacks on American embassies around the Middle East due to the war of aggression in Iraq and Afghanistan.

There does need to be an in-depth investigation into the Benghazi attack, but the focus should be on Republicans for their significant thirteen-year role in inciting anti-Muslim anger that drove the production of the video that led to anti-American rage and the attack that killed four Americans. Republicans should also be held accountable for deliberately withholding funds for increased embassy security; particularly after then-Secretary of State Clinton requested help to protect American diplomats and then lying that tough economic times meant leaving Americans to die while the oil industry received millions in subsidies. It is time for Democrats to turn the tables on Republicans and lay out their case to the American people about why four Americans were killed and who is responsible.

It is true Islamist militants attacked and killed four Americans in Benghazi, but without two wars of aggression to kill Muslims, thirteen years of fear mongering leading a Christian malcontent to produce a virulent anti-Islam video, and Republicans withholding funding for embassy security, Americans would have never heard of Benghazi and four American diplomats would be alive. Republicans may not have pulled the triggers or launched rocket-propelled grenades that killed Americans in Benghazi, but they are responsible for the Benghazi attack and for that they must be held to account for killing four American diplomats.

12 replies, 3153 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 12 replies Author Time Post
Reply For Reasons They Will Never Admit Republicans Are Responsible For The Attack on Benghazi (Original post)
babylonsister Jun 2014 OP
Thinkingabout Jun 2014 #1
randys1 Jun 2014 #2
Thinkingabout Jun 2014 #3
AAO Jun 2014 #8
L0oniX Jun 2014 #4
Jenoch Jun 2014 #5
WillyT Jun 2014 #6
Cha Jun 2014 #7
Liberal_Dog Jun 2014 #9
sheshe2 Jun 2014 #10
ReRe Jun 2014 #11
Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #12

Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 07:24 PM

1. It seems more reasonable they were upset about the film, other countries was having an uprising

At the same time. The GOP could be just as wrong as the administration. Romney came out with a statement before an investigation, perhaps Romney was totally wrong.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #1)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 07:52 PM

2. Can you think of another time in American history that the challenger to the prez in a campaign

used REAL TIME american deaths on foreign soil against the sitting prez?

Never

At least when Raygun committed treason and Nixon, to get elected, nobody was dying, wait...yes, they were dying then too

somethings never change

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to randys1 (Reply #2)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 07:57 PM

3. We have had opposite with W telling vote for me, i'm gonna keep you safe.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to randys1 (Reply #2)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:22 PM

8. Thank you for a good dose of truth.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 07:58 PM

4. K & R

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:02 PM

5. I agree that the Republicans have been spouting

 

B.S. on this topic since the attacks occurred. I do have a question however, why was our ambassador not in Tripoli on September 11th? They must have better security measures, and it was the anniversary of the attacks on U.S. soil.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:03 PM

6. K & R !!!

 


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:06 PM

7. Thanks, babylonsistah.. glad it's out there in black and white.

thanks RMuse

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:29 PM

9. The Benghazi Conspiracy Nonsense Was Always A Distraction

It simply serves to keep the focus off of the Republican's cutting of money for embassy security.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 10:00 PM

10. KnR

For the truth.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 10:06 PM

11. K&R

We have met our enemy: Republicans.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 10:11 PM

12. Kicked and recommended.

Thanks for the thread, babylonsister.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread