General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTo Mitt's Chagrin "Haas v Romney" 9th Cir. Appeal is Moving Forward.
I've sued Romney & his RICO in Los Angeles federal court for Racketeering (civil) - case # 2:13-cv-7738.
Judge dismissed the case utilizing 130 old "Barton doctrine"
http://petters-fraud.com/clocked_di_66_apr9_2014_order_to_dismiss_via_barton_doctrine.pdf
I timely filed a Motion for Reconsideration and an Appeal (that was somehow premature).
https://twitter.com/MittRomney
The 9th Circuit has put forth the following scheduling Order;
with a caveat that I explain why I haven't (yet) filed a full case appeal.
http://petters-fraud.com/9th_cir_notice_of_appeal_and_schedule_barrygold_mnat_gww.pdf
It is due by Monday (in Los Angeles Fed Court);
and I'm filing it there and sending a copy to the 9th Circuit.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)Not sarcasm.
Cha
(305,717 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)adequately paid. That is the gravamen of his complaints.....which have already gotten him kicked from the DE federal courts.
I swear to you, Cha....his filings make Orly Taitz's look reasoned......Nuclear Unicorn and jberryhill have some hysterical posts on this case.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)stated acquaintances of his had been charged with murder. I'm certain the murder is wholly unrelated but in his mind they are linked. We're dealing with someone who needs help not enabling or even ridicule. Someone who convinces themselves that people are being killed over their cause could easily act out in a similar manner.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)SidDithers
(44,273 posts)Sid
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)Keep up the fight.
marble falls
(62,421 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)paperwork before anything happens.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)and have no idea that the original deadline was Monday the 24th (as the Minutes Orders was on the 23rd { a Sunday}).
I filled it out on Wed (as everyone seems to submit it at the last moment - thus SO do I)
Therefore I'm in no need of the extra 20 days;
but do appreciate the 9th Circuit sending a clear message
the case is going to be kosher (Finally).
In a kosher realm of justice -
Pitten's loses big time!
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)I just have to go buy the ticket.
Victor Ward
(4 posts)for any of the Laser Haas stuff.
gopiscrap
(24,204 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Justice comes slow;
but the truth never wanes!
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)they are totally obtuse to the fact that Romney
Benefited from frauds (gets millions from Bain every year)
is a partner in Stanford scandal
(while his attorney Paul Traub was partners in Petters Ponzi, Marc Dreier and both sides Okun 1031 Tax Group)
That Romney/Traub's partner (Larry Reynolds) laundered $12 BILLION;
while in Witness Protection (and setting only 25 feet away from my desk)
And
Romney's law firm (MNAT) was also eToys law firm when eToys assets were sold to Bain/Kay Bee.
That eToys CEO (Barry Gold) was Traub's partner (Traub being eToys Creditors counsel);
after Barry Gold and Paul Traub worked under Romney and Michael Glazer at Stage Stores
and Michael Glazer was the CEO also of Kay Bee that paid himself $18 million/Bain $83 Million before filing bankruptcy;
which MNAT represents Bain in that crime and Paul Traub asked to prosecute
(while Traub was partners with Barry Gold in ADA that worked the Kay Bee bankruptcy)
and that the whole reason there's NO prosecution of these crimes
is that MNAT's partner (Colm F Connolly)
became the Delaware U.S. Attorney on August 2, 2001
the same exact time that Romney claims to have "retroactively" retire from Bain Capital.
[br][hr][br]
Only crooked lawyers/their ilk - wish to see Romney do an Al Capone
"retroactively" retire from his organized crimes.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)read such legal competence since the last Orly Taitz filing. I admit, though...I have no idea why the Delaware Courts would toss you out on your ear and declare you vextatious.
I think the ALL CAPS is an underused device of rhetoric.
Any DUer can now read the complaint......all 150 pages of it....
http://petters-fraud.com/haas_v_romney_1st_amended_complaint_filed_november6_2013.pdf
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Theres a conundrum of sorts acter the Iqbal case. Complaints need only allege enough facts. Prima facie; but Iqbal requires extensive p as rticularitno matter how you slice it. 100 felonies. Transpirei,ll podt the correct complaint latter.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Orly Taitz's old law clerk Charles Lincoln is probably looking for work.....
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)If your for them openly breaking the law and getting away with it due to corruption then you are (im)properly in this progressive realm.
Every time you openly support the cronyism and corruption is a testimony to your shame.
Nothing taitz about that
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Each separate counts - one by one.
Pathetic naysays and trolls can see "look at all this, is not possible" - when its all bunched together.
Will be much harder a task for them to assuage people from seeing the truth;
which will also have federal record archive - Proof!
One at a time...