HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » To Mitt's Chagrin "H...

Thu Jun 19, 2014, 07:20 PM

 

To Mitt's Chagrin "Haas v Romney" 9th Cir. Appeal is Moving Forward.

I've sued Romney & his RICO in Los Angeles federal court for Racketeering (civil) - case # 2:13-cv-7738.

Judge dismissed the case utilizing 130 old "Barton doctrine"
http://petters-fraud.com/clocked_di_66_apr9_2014_order_to_dismiss_via_barton_doctrine.pdf

I timely filed a Motion for Reconsideration and an Appeal (that was somehow premature).

https://twitter.com/MittRomney

The 9th Circuit has put forth the following scheduling Order;
with a caveat that I explain why I haven't (yet) filed a full case appeal.
http://petters-fraud.com/9th_cir_notice_of_appeal_and_schedule_barrygold_mnat_gww.pdf


It is due by Monday (in Los Angeles Fed Court);
and I'm filing it there and sending a copy to the 9th Circuit.

22 replies, 3348 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 22 replies Author Time Post
Reply To Mitt's Chagrin "Haas v Romney" 9th Cir. Appeal is Moving Forward. (Original post)
laserhaas Jun 2014 OP
malokvale77 Jun 2014 #1
Cha Jun 2014 #2
msanthrope Jun 2014 #13
Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2014 #17
msanthrope Jun 2014 #18
SidDithers Jun 2014 #3
OnyxCollie Jun 2014 #4
marble falls Jun 2014 #5
msanthrope Jun 2014 #6
laserhaas Jun 2014 #11
msanthrope Jun 2014 #14
Scuba Jun 2014 #7
Dreamer Tatum Jun 2014 #8
Victor Ward Jun 2014 #21
gopiscrap Jun 2014 #22
laserhaas Jun 2014 #9
laserhaas Jun 2014 #10
msanthrope Jun 2014 #12
laserhaas Jun 2014 #15
msanthrope Jun 2014 #16
laserhaas Jun 2014 #19
laserhaas Jun 2014 #20

Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Thu Jun 19, 2014, 08:41 PM

1. Good luck

Not sarcasm.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Thu Jun 19, 2014, 09:09 PM

2. Yes, Good Luck, laserhaas!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #2)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 09:44 AM

13. Mr. Haas was hired to move furniture during the bankruptcy 12 years ago, and insists he has not been

 

adequately paid. That is the gravamen of his complaints.....which have already gotten him kicked from the DE federal courts.

I swear to you, Cha....his filings make Orly Taitz's look reasoned......Nuclear Unicorn and jberryhill have some hysterical posts on this case.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to msanthrope (Reply #13)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 01:43 PM

17. I stopped treating it as humor after Mr. Haas

stated acquaintances of his had been charged with murder. I'm certain the murder is wholly unrelated but in his mind they are linked. We're dealing with someone who needs help not enabling or even ridicule. Someone who convinces themselves that people are being killed over their cause could easily act out in a similar manner.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nuclear Unicorn (Reply #17)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 02:08 PM

18. Indeed. Excellent point. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Thu Jun 19, 2014, 09:18 PM

3. Please, keep posting updates...nt

Sid

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Thu Jun 19, 2014, 09:30 PM

4. Still alive.

 

Keep up the fight.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Thu Jun 19, 2014, 10:11 PM

5. A boil on Romney's ass. I wish I could put another one there right along next to it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Thu Jun 19, 2014, 10:19 PM

6. Um, no. Your 'appeal' is not moving forward. You need to file the proper

 

paperwork before anything happens.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to msanthrope (Reply #6)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:51 AM

11. You neatly forget to mention the court gave 20 days (extra) for the "paperwork"

 

and have no idea that the original deadline was Monday the 24th (as the Minutes Orders was on the 23rd { a Sunday}).

I filled it out on Wed (as everyone seems to submit it at the last moment - thus SO do I)

Therefore I'm in no need of the extra 20 days;
but do appreciate the 9th Circuit sending a clear message

the case is going to be kosher (Finally).

In a kosher realm of justice -

Pitten's loses big time!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to laserhaas (Reply #11)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 09:56 AM

14. Please keep posting updates!! nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Thu Jun 19, 2014, 11:09 PM

7. We're pulling for you laserhaas!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Fri Jun 20, 2014, 01:01 AM

8. What a coincidence - my lottery win is moving forward.

I just have to go buy the ticket.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dreamer Tatum (Reply #8)

Sun Jun 22, 2014, 06:39 PM

21. This is the closest analogy I can find

for any of the Laser Haas stuff.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Victor Ward (Reply #21)

Mon Jun 23, 2014, 04:10 PM

22. Welcome to DU

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:37 AM

9. Thanks for all the well wishes guys/gals. It ain't easy, taking down big sleazies.

 

Justice comes slow;
but the truth never wanes!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:45 AM

10. It's amazing how legal eagles know EVERYthin about my case and when my filings are due; BUT

 

they are totally obtuse to the fact that Romney

Benefited from frauds (gets millions from Bain every year)

is a partner in Stanford scandal
(while his attorney Paul Traub was partners in Petters Ponzi, Marc Dreier and both sides Okun 1031 Tax Group)

That Romney/Traub's partner (Larry Reynolds) laundered $12 BILLION;
while in Witness Protection (and setting only 25 feet away from my desk)

And

Romney's law firm (MNAT) was also eToys law firm when eToys assets were sold to Bain/Kay Bee.

That eToys CEO (Barry Gold) was Traub's partner (Traub being eToys Creditors counsel);
after Barry Gold and Paul Traub worked under Romney and Michael Glazer at Stage Stores

and Michael Glazer was the CEO also of Kay Bee that paid himself $18 million/Bain $83 Million before filing bankruptcy;
which MNAT represents Bain in that crime and Paul Traub asked to prosecute
(while Traub was partners with Barry Gold in ADA that worked the Kay Bee bankruptcy)

and that the whole reason there's NO prosecution of these crimes
is that MNAT's partner (Colm F Connolly)
became the Delaware U.S. Attorney on August 2, 2001

the same exact time that Romney claims to have "retroactively" retire from Bain Capital.

[br][hr][br]

Only crooked lawyers/their ilk - wish to see Romney do an Al Capone
"retroactively" retire from his organized crimes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to laserhaas (Reply #10)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 09:36 AM

12. Well, I actually took the time to skim your Amended Complaint, and I haven't

 

read such legal competence since the last Orly Taitz filing. I admit, though...I have no idea why the Delaware Courts would toss you out on your ear and declare you vextatious.

I think the ALL CAPS is an underused device of rhetoric.

Any DUer can now read the complaint......all 150 pages of it....


http://petters-fraud.com/haas_v_romney_1st_amended_complaint_filed_november6_2013.pdf

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to msanthrope (Reply #12)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 12:24 PM

15. the curent amended. co,plaint is only 58 pages

 

Theres a conundrum of sorts acter the Iqbal case. Complaints need only allege enough facts. Prima facie; but Iqbal requires extensive p as rticularitno matter how you slice it. 100 felonies. Transpirei,ll podt the correct complaint latter.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to laserhaas (Reply #15)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 01:19 PM

16. Look....you don't reach Twiqbal. The court properly dismissed on Rule 8(a), 9(b) and 12(b)(6).

 

Orly Taitz's old law clerk Charles Lincoln is probably looking for work.....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to msanthrope (Reply #16)

Sat Jun 21, 2014, 03:59 PM

19. only ttolls delight in beating up on a victim and helping RICO Romney win

 

If your for them openly breaking the law and getting away with it due to corruption then you are (im)properly in this progressive realm.

Every time you openly support the cronyism and corruption is a testimony to your shame.

Nothing taitz about that

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Sun Jun 22, 2014, 11:49 AM

20. Sorry about comment typos frm my cell phone. Tomorrow I'm posting criminal statutes and proof

 

Each separate counts - one by one.

Pathetic naysays and trolls can see "look at all this, is not possible" - when its all bunched together.

Will be much harder a task for them to assuage people from seeing the truth;
which will also have federal record archive - Proof!

One at a time...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread