Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 06:20 PM Jun 2014

To Mitt's Chagrin "Haas v Romney" 9th Cir. Appeal is Moving Forward.

I've sued Romney & his RICO in Los Angeles federal court for Racketeering (civil) - case # 2:13-cv-7738.

Judge dismissed the case utilizing 130 old "Barton doctrine"
http://petters-fraud.com/clocked_di_66_apr9_2014_order_to_dismiss_via_barton_doctrine.pdf

I timely filed a Motion for Reconsideration and an Appeal (that was somehow premature).

https://twitter.com/MittRomney

The 9th Circuit has put forth the following scheduling Order;
with a caveat that I explain why I haven't (yet) filed a full case appeal.
http://petters-fraud.com/9th_cir_notice_of_appeal_and_schedule_barrygold_mnat_gww.pdf


It is due by Monday (in Los Angeles Fed Court);
and I'm filing it there and sending a copy to the 9th Circuit.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
To Mitt's Chagrin "Haas v Romney" 9th Cir. Appeal is Moving Forward. (Original Post) laserhaas Jun 2014 OP
Good luck malokvale77 Jun 2014 #1
Yes, Good Luck, laserhaas! Cha Jun 2014 #2
Mr. Haas was hired to move furniture during the bankruptcy 12 years ago, and insists he has not been msanthrope Jun 2014 #13
I stopped treating it as humor after Mr. Haas Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2014 #17
Indeed. Excellent point. nt msanthrope Jun 2014 #18
Please, keep posting updates...nt SidDithers Jun 2014 #3
Still alive. OnyxCollie Jun 2014 #4
A boil on Romney's ass. I wish I could put another one there right along next to it. marble falls Jun 2014 #5
Um, no. Your 'appeal' is not moving forward. You need to file the proper msanthrope Jun 2014 #6
You neatly forget to mention the court gave 20 days (extra) for the "paperwork" laserhaas Jun 2014 #11
Please keep posting updates!! nt msanthrope Jun 2014 #14
We're pulling for you laserhaas! Scuba Jun 2014 #7
What a coincidence - my lottery win is moving forward. Dreamer Tatum Jun 2014 #8
This is the closest analogy I can find Victor Ward Jun 2014 #21
Welcome to DU gopiscrap Jun 2014 #22
Thanks for all the well wishes guys/gals. It ain't easy, taking down big sleazies. laserhaas Jun 2014 #9
It's amazing how legal eagles know EVERYthin about my case and when my filings are due; BUT laserhaas Jun 2014 #10
Well, I actually took the time to skim your Amended Complaint, and I haven't msanthrope Jun 2014 #12
the curent amended. co,plaint is only 58 pages laserhaas Jun 2014 #15
Look....you don't reach Twiqbal. The court properly dismissed on Rule 8(a), 9(b) and 12(b)(6). msanthrope Jun 2014 #16
only ttolls delight in beating up on a victim and helping RICO Romney win laserhaas Jun 2014 #19
Sorry about comment typos frm my cell phone. Tomorrow I'm posting criminal statutes and proof laserhaas Jun 2014 #20
 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
13. Mr. Haas was hired to move furniture during the bankruptcy 12 years ago, and insists he has not been
Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:44 AM
Jun 2014

adequately paid. That is the gravamen of his complaints.....which have already gotten him kicked from the DE federal courts.

I swear to you, Cha....his filings make Orly Taitz's look reasoned......Nuclear Unicorn and jberryhill have some hysterical posts on this case.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
17. I stopped treating it as humor after Mr. Haas
Sat Jun 21, 2014, 12:43 PM
Jun 2014

stated acquaintances of his had been charged with murder. I'm certain the murder is wholly unrelated but in his mind they are linked. We're dealing with someone who needs help not enabling or even ridicule. Someone who convinces themselves that people are being killed over their cause could easily act out in a similar manner.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
6. Um, no. Your 'appeal' is not moving forward. You need to file the proper
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 09:19 PM
Jun 2014

paperwork before anything happens.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
11. You neatly forget to mention the court gave 20 days (extra) for the "paperwork"
Sat Jun 21, 2014, 07:51 AM
Jun 2014

and have no idea that the original deadline was Monday the 24th (as the Minutes Orders was on the 23rd { a Sunday}).

I filled it out on Wed (as everyone seems to submit it at the last moment - thus SO do I)

Therefore I'm in no need of the extra 20 days;
but do appreciate the 9th Circuit sending a clear message

the case is going to be kosher (Finally).

In a kosher realm of justice -

Pitten's loses big time!
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
9. Thanks for all the well wishes guys/gals. It ain't easy, taking down big sleazies.
Sat Jun 21, 2014, 07:37 AM
Jun 2014

Justice comes slow;
but the truth never wanes!

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
10. It's amazing how legal eagles know EVERYthin about my case and when my filings are due; BUT
Sat Jun 21, 2014, 07:45 AM
Jun 2014

they are totally obtuse to the fact that Romney

Benefited from frauds (gets millions from Bain every year)

is a partner in Stanford scandal
(while his attorney Paul Traub was partners in Petters Ponzi, Marc Dreier and both sides Okun 1031 Tax Group)

That Romney/Traub's partner (Larry Reynolds) laundered $12 BILLION;
while in Witness Protection (and setting only 25 feet away from my desk)

And

Romney's law firm (MNAT) was also eToys law firm when eToys assets were sold to Bain/Kay Bee.

That eToys CEO (Barry Gold) was Traub's partner (Traub being eToys Creditors counsel);
after Barry Gold and Paul Traub worked under Romney and Michael Glazer at Stage Stores

and Michael Glazer was the CEO also of Kay Bee that paid himself $18 million/Bain $83 Million before filing bankruptcy;
which MNAT represents Bain in that crime and Paul Traub asked to prosecute
(while Traub was partners with Barry Gold in ADA that worked the Kay Bee bankruptcy)

and that the whole reason there's NO prosecution of these crimes
is that MNAT's partner (Colm F Connolly)
became the Delaware U.S. Attorney on August 2, 2001

the same exact time that Romney claims to have "retroactively" retire from Bain Capital.

[br][hr][br]

Only crooked lawyers/their ilk - wish to see Romney do an Al Capone
"retroactively" retire from his organized crimes.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
12. Well, I actually took the time to skim your Amended Complaint, and I haven't
Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:36 AM
Jun 2014

read such legal competence since the last Orly Taitz filing. I admit, though...I have no idea why the Delaware Courts would toss you out on your ear and declare you vextatious.

I think the ALL CAPS is an underused device of rhetoric.

Any DUer can now read the complaint......all 150 pages of it....


http://petters-fraud.com/haas_v_romney_1st_amended_complaint_filed_november6_2013.pdf

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
15. the curent amended. co,plaint is only 58 pages
Sat Jun 21, 2014, 11:24 AM
Jun 2014

Theres a conundrum of sorts acter the Iqbal case. Complaints need only allege enough facts. Prima facie; but Iqbal requires extensive p as rticularitno matter how you slice it. 100 felonies. Transpirei,ll podt the correct complaint latter.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
16. Look....you don't reach Twiqbal. The court properly dismissed on Rule 8(a), 9(b) and 12(b)(6).
Sat Jun 21, 2014, 12:19 PM
Jun 2014

Orly Taitz's old law clerk Charles Lincoln is probably looking for work.....

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
19. only ttolls delight in beating up on a victim and helping RICO Romney win
Sat Jun 21, 2014, 02:59 PM
Jun 2014

If your for them openly breaking the law and getting away with it due to corruption then you are (im)properly in this progressive realm.

Every time you openly support the cronyism and corruption is a testimony to your shame.

Nothing taitz about that

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
20. Sorry about comment typos frm my cell phone. Tomorrow I'm posting criminal statutes and proof
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 10:49 AM
Jun 2014

Each separate counts - one by one.

Pathetic naysays and trolls can see "look at all this, is not possible" - when its all bunched together.

Will be much harder a task for them to assuage people from seeing the truth;
which will also have federal record archive - Proof!

One at a time...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»To Mitt's Chagrin "H...