Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Amerigo Vespucci

(30,885 posts)
Sun Apr 1, 2012, 05:59 PM Apr 2012

Arizona law would criminalize being lewd or annoying on the Internet

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/03/30/arizona-law-would-criminalize-being-annoying-on-the-internet/

As summarized by the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund, “The bill is sweepingly broad, and would make it a crime to communicate via electronic means speech that is intended to ‘annoy,’ ‘offend,’ ‘harass’ or ‘terrify,’ as well as certain sexual speech. Because the bill is not limited to one-to-one communications, H.B. 2549 would apply to the Internet as a whole, thus criminalizing all manner of writing, cartoons, and other protected material the state finds offensive or annoying.”

The bill is currently awaiting Governor Jan Brewer’s signature, and the Media Coalition, which defends first amendment rights in the media, has sent her a letter outlining some of the problems with the legislation.

“H.B. 2549 would make it a crime to use any electronic or digital device to communicate using obscene, lewd or profane language or to suggest a lewd or lascivious act if done with intent to ‘annoy,’ ‘offend,’ ‘harass’ or ‘terrify,’” the letter notes. … ‘Lewd’ and ‘profane’ are not defined in the statute or by reference. ‘Lewd’ is generally understood to mean lusty or sexual in nature and ‘profane’ is generally defined as disrespectful or irreverent about religion or religious practices.”

It appears that the Arizona law could criminalize the recent interview in which Meghan McCain — daughter of Arizona senator John McCain — told Playboy, “I’m strictly dickly. I can’t help it. I love sex and I love men.” Or any random atheist saying, “There is no god” — provided some official was prepared to conclude it was done with the intention of annoying believers.
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Arizona law would criminalize being lewd or annoying on the Internet (Original Post) Amerigo Vespucci Apr 2012 OP
This is bad news for Malaise. Scuba Apr 2012 #1
Well hell, Amerigo, you might have to go outside now Noodleboy13 Apr 2012 #2
I hear ya Amerigo Vespucci Apr 2012 #7
There goes Free Republic and Fail Blog. Initech Apr 2012 #3
Yay for FREEDOM! silverweb Apr 2012 #4
WTF is the point of being on the internet? tularetom Apr 2012 #5
I don't fuckin know lovemydog Apr 2012 #21
The party of "small government" strikes again. Son of Gob Apr 2012 #6
nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah ... zbdent Apr 2012 #8
annoying -- trollgate. Downwinder Apr 2012 #9
For people that profess to read, understand, and revere the Constitution, Ikonoklast Apr 2012 #10
Damn guitar man Apr 2012 #11
I'm glad I left. boppers Apr 2012 #12
Give them a little time. Texas has been at it longer. SNAFU. Downwinder Apr 2012 #13
Oh, I love Tucson and Flag. boppers Apr 2012 #25
Agree on Tucson, considering that Flag started as a real estate rip off it has improved somewhat. Downwinder Apr 2012 #28
Uh-oh! 80% of the Intertubes is in big trouble. my longship Apr 2012 #14
well, that's it then. Capn Sunshine Apr 2012 #15
Of course they realize the state of Arizona nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #16
yup lovemydog Apr 2012 #18
There should be penalties for stupid laws that are clearly unconstitutional. LiberalFighter Apr 2012 #17
I agree lovemydog Apr 2012 #19
I am... LadyHawkAZ Apr 2012 #20
No elected AZ Republican will be safe if this law passes. EFerrari Apr 2012 #22
Lol! sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #24
Seriously -- Joe Arpaio? Check. Jan Brewer? Check. EFerrari Apr 2012 #26
I agree, I was just picturing them being exposed by their own law. sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #29
There are a THOUSAND churches i am going to apply this to the moment it passes. slampoet Apr 2012 #23
Did Jan Brewer change the state motto to "I'm against it"? EFerrari Apr 2012 #27
Arizona is the new Florida. BlueIris Apr 2012 #30

Initech

(100,043 posts)
3. There goes Free Republic and Fail Blog.
Sun Apr 1, 2012, 06:05 PM
Apr 2012

This will get thrown out in the Supreme Court as a free speech issue anyways.

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
4. Yay for FREEDOM!
Sun Apr 1, 2012, 06:06 PM
Apr 2012

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]Yay for small government, getting its nose out of people's business!

Yay for job creation, hiring more government employees to monitor the "intertubes," arresting and prosecuting violators of this new freedom law!



These people are seriously whacked.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
10. For people that profess to read, understand, and revere the Constitution,
Sun Apr 1, 2012, 07:43 PM
Apr 2012

Republican Teabaggers sure pass a lot of laws that are in direct contradiction to that document.

boppers

(16,588 posts)
25. Oh, I love Tucson and Flag.
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 12:43 AM
Apr 2012

It's that huge cesspit of mediocrity and hatred between the two that seems to be the problem.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
16. Of course they realize the state of Arizona
Sun Apr 1, 2012, 08:43 PM
Apr 2012

Cannot go after a Californian, let alone a foreign national posting from...well abroad right?

toothless, feel good piece of shit.

LiberalFighter

(50,795 posts)
17. There should be penalties for stupid laws that are clearly unconstitutional.
Sun Apr 1, 2012, 11:33 PM
Apr 2012

The Arizona legislative body and the governor should faced fines.

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
20. I am...
Sun Apr 1, 2012, 11:43 PM
Apr 2012

going to jail, then. I am often profane, frequently lewd and always annoying.

Glad I moved out of that hellhole.

EFerrari

(163,986 posts)
26. Seriously -- Joe Arpaio? Check. Jan Brewer? Check.
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 12:48 AM
Apr 2012

That idiot school superintendent that was comparing The Pedagogy of the Oppressed to Mein Kampf?

I say, we lobby for this one!

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
29. I agree, I was just picturing them being exposed by their own law.
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 01:40 AM
Apr 2012

It reminds me of Foley who signed the law which was supposedly meant to protect minors on the internet from predators. He was right there in the photos in the Rose Garden with Bush taking credit when the law was signed. And not long afterwards, he was 'exposed' as the predator the law was meant to catch.

I have a feeling this law will definitely be challenged if it passes. Sometimes you have to wonder how these people ever got into the positions they are in.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Arizona law would crimina...