Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
Sun May 4, 2014, 06:23 AM May 2014

How Hedge Funds Are Pushing Companies To Leave America

http://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanvardi/2014/05/01/how-hedge-funds-are-pushing-companies-to-leave-america/

Prominent hedge funds are helping to fuel the wave of so-called inversion deals that are structured to lower tax rates by moving the domiciles of U.S. companies, particularly those operating in the pharmaceuticals sector, to foreign jurisdictions like Ireland. It’s pretty clear that Wall Street has cheered on the inversion trend, feasting on the investment banking fees generated by these deals, and that the markets even enjoy an increase in price of the stocks of both the seller and the buyer on the day the deals get announced. The business development offices of major U.S. pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer clearly know what they are doing. But hedge funds are playing a role in encouraging and even creating corporate deal machines that are engaging in tax-driven deals. For hedge funds, these deals are essentially a tax arbitrage trade. One place where these deals is less popular: Washington. The Obama Administration has said that “inversion transactions raise significant policy concerns because they facilitate the erosion of the U.S. tax base” and Pfizer’s recent $100 billion tax-lowering bid for AstraZeneca will only increase political attention.

But hedge funds are moving faster than Washington. Billionaire hedge fund manager William Ackman had never made a pharmaceutical investment before April. But last month his Pershing Square hedge fund made its biggest investment ever, taking a 10% stake in California-based Allergan. Ackman is making the $4 billion bet while working with Valeant, a company based in Canada whose senior executives work in New Jersey and has its tax-domicile in Barbados. Valeant has made a $45 billion bid that is driven by tax considerations to buy Allergan with Ackman.

Valeant itself is a hedge fund-created machine. ValueAct Capital Management, the activist hedge fund run by Jeffrey Ubben, has been a major shareholder for years and ValueAct’s Mason Morfit sits on the company’s board. Morfit even designed the highly-lucrative compensation package of Valeant CEO Michael Pearson, who has become a billionaire since he started running the company six years ago. When ValueAct got involved and Pearson started running the show, Valeant was based in California. Valeant then bought and folded the company into Canada’s Biovail to take advantage of Canada’s tax rules. Using Valeant’s lower tax structure, Pearson has done about 100 or so deals since 2008 and pushed Valeant’s stock up by some 800%.

Also in April, a group of high-profile hedge funds started to pressure Walgreen, America’s biggest pharmacy chain that is based in Illinois, to move to Europe for tax purposes. The Financial Times reported that activist hedge funds like Barry Rosenstein’s Jana Partners and Keith Meister’s Corvex Management, together with billionaire Dan Och’s Och-Ziff Capital Management hedge fund and Goldman Sachs, urged Walgreen’s senior management in a meeting in Paris to domicile its tax base in Europe as part of its $16 billion takeover of Alliance Boots, which is based in Switzerland.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Hedge Funds Are Pushing Companies To Leave America (Original Post) steve2470 May 2014 OP
the coolest part of the whole thing for me is onethatcares May 2014 #1
There was a time . . . Brigid May 2014 #2
Gosh, how can that be? Starry Messenger May 2014 #3
If you're an American company on American stock exchanges, why aren't tax domiciles KittyWampus May 2014 #4

onethatcares

(16,166 posts)
1. the coolest part of the whole thing for me is
Sun May 4, 2014, 06:46 AM
May 2014

I got a $27.00 income tax refund this year. After spending 1% of my income on health care problems and 10% to charity.

The united states, what a great place, huh?

Brigid

(17,621 posts)
2. There was a time . . .
Sun May 4, 2014, 09:45 AM
May 2014

When banks were locally oriented, tightly regulated, and not allowed to speculate with their depositors' money. Investment banks were small, privately owned partnerships whose members lived well but didn't want to bet the ranch on anything because they put the money up themselves. Bond traders took second jobs because they didn't earn enough to support their families. In 1972, Morgan Stanley had 110 employees, 1 office, and $12 million in assets. This is the way things were in the decades after WW II, and we didn't have a single financial crisis. Then came Raygun and deregulation, and it was off to the races. The financial industry has gotten completely out of control, and has destroyed the country.

See "Inside Job" for further details.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
3. Gosh, how can that be?
Sun May 4, 2014, 10:23 AM
May 2014

On DU we hear that it is corporate tax rates that are too high and those evil unions.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
4. If you're an American company on American stock exchanges, why aren't tax domiciles
Sun May 4, 2014, 10:27 AM
May 2014

required to be in the USA?

Answered my own question-

Obama Administration trying to write tax code so it stops, GOP not going along.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/04/30/us-usa-tax-treasury-crackdown-exclusive-idUSBREA3T0ZZ20140430

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Hedge Funds Are Pushi...