Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTPM: Opposition to Common Core is rapidly becoming a “true conservative” litmus test
I found this article intriguing in terms of 2016.
Bush And Christie Stand Alone Amid GOP's Slow-Motion Revolt On Common Core
Until recently, the Common Core initiative looked to be the most successful assessment-based education reform effort in many years, with 45 states plus the District of Columbia signing onto set of English and math standards and assessments due to be implemented beginning in the 2015-16 school year. Its most important political secret was its careful sidestepping of conservative hostility to national educational standards (which eventually made the George W. Bush administrations No Child Left Behind initiative toxic on the Right). Drafted and promulgated by the National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers, Common Core had powerful backing from business interests and most Republican governors.
But for a variety of reasons, ranging from right-wing conspiracy theory agitprop to the Obama administrations highly visible efforts to encourage Common Core via relatively lavish federal grants, Common Core is in trouble at the very moment it is on the brink of its intended implementation. Yes, some of the trouble it is encountering comes from the Left, via teachers unions who formally support Common Core but dont like how it is being implemented, and more generally from teachers, parents, and educational specialists who dont like high-stakes-testing- based education initiatives. But the bigger problem is that despite its state-based origins, opposition to Common Core is rapidly becoming a true conservative litmus test, and a major factor in the invisible primary leading into the 2016 presidential cycle.
Over the last year, potential 2016 GOP presidential candidates have quietly and more recently, not so quietly been lining up against Common Core, in many cases flip-flopping or rationalizing prior support. In April of last year, nine Republican senators led by Chuck Grassley (and notably including Ted Cruz and Rand Paul) signed a letter asking appropriators to kill funding for federal grants that put a heavy hand on states to adopt the Common Core State Standards Initiative. Marco Rubio joined the opposition in June, in what was generally interpreted as part of a comprehensive effort to embrace every true-conservative shibboleth in sight after the debacle of his role in the immigration reform debate. (Paul Ryan is the one possible Washington-based 2016 candidate who has apparently avoided taking a firm position on Common Core).
Ambitious Republican governors and former governors have been defecting lately. Scott Walker disassociated his own states standards-and-assessment system from Common Core in January in what mainly seemed a change in labeling. Mike Huckabee put out a statement in February declaring Common Core dead thanks to alleged federal meddling. In March Indianas Mike Pence (a past chairman of the right-wing House Republican Study Committee before becoming a governor) made his state the first to formally repudiate its adherence to Common Core. And perhaps most spectacularly , earlier this month Louisianas Bobby Jindal, who has been casting about even more aggressively than Rubio for movement-conservative traction in preparation for a presidential bid, abruptly flip-flopped on Common Core , offering last-minute support for doomed legislation to take his state out of the standards and then boasting hed just take care of it himself. One other governor, Rick Perry, is from one of the handful of states that rejected Common Core from the get-go.
...
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/cafe/republicans-common-core
Until recently, the Common Core initiative looked to be the most successful assessment-based education reform effort in many years, with 45 states plus the District of Columbia signing onto set of English and math standards and assessments due to be implemented beginning in the 2015-16 school year. Its most important political secret was its careful sidestepping of conservative hostility to national educational standards (which eventually made the George W. Bush administrations No Child Left Behind initiative toxic on the Right). Drafted and promulgated by the National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers, Common Core had powerful backing from business interests and most Republican governors.
But for a variety of reasons, ranging from right-wing conspiracy theory agitprop to the Obama administrations highly visible efforts to encourage Common Core via relatively lavish federal grants, Common Core is in trouble at the very moment it is on the brink of its intended implementation. Yes, some of the trouble it is encountering comes from the Left, via teachers unions who formally support Common Core but dont like how it is being implemented, and more generally from teachers, parents, and educational specialists who dont like high-stakes-testing- based education initiatives. But the bigger problem is that despite its state-based origins, opposition to Common Core is rapidly becoming a true conservative litmus test, and a major factor in the invisible primary leading into the 2016 presidential cycle.
Over the last year, potential 2016 GOP presidential candidates have quietly and more recently, not so quietly been lining up against Common Core, in many cases flip-flopping or rationalizing prior support. In April of last year, nine Republican senators led by Chuck Grassley (and notably including Ted Cruz and Rand Paul) signed a letter asking appropriators to kill funding for federal grants that put a heavy hand on states to adopt the Common Core State Standards Initiative. Marco Rubio joined the opposition in June, in what was generally interpreted as part of a comprehensive effort to embrace every true-conservative shibboleth in sight after the debacle of his role in the immigration reform debate. (Paul Ryan is the one possible Washington-based 2016 candidate who has apparently avoided taking a firm position on Common Core).
Ambitious Republican governors and former governors have been defecting lately. Scott Walker disassociated his own states standards-and-assessment system from Common Core in January in what mainly seemed a change in labeling. Mike Huckabee put out a statement in February declaring Common Core dead thanks to alleged federal meddling. In March Indianas Mike Pence (a past chairman of the right-wing House Republican Study Committee before becoming a governor) made his state the first to formally repudiate its adherence to Common Core. And perhaps most spectacularly , earlier this month Louisianas Bobby Jindal, who has been casting about even more aggressively than Rubio for movement-conservative traction in preparation for a presidential bid, abruptly flip-flopped on Common Core , offering last-minute support for doomed legislation to take his state out of the standards and then boasting hed just take care of it himself. One other governor, Rick Perry, is from one of the handful of states that rejected Common Core from the get-go.
...
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/cafe/republicans-common-core
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 441 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post