General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThose gut-wrenching Olestra chips from the ’90s might have been good for us
By Rachel Feltman
Remember Olestra? The molecule has the same taste and mouthfeel as regular fat, but your intestines cant absorb it. That means delicious, satiating potato chips that essentially slide right through you. Olestra, which was marketed under the brand name Olean, was a dieters dream when it was marketed in the 1990s, during the low-fat craze.
It was also a massive painin the gastrointestinal area, to be precise. It became notorious for its warning of abdominal cramping and loose stools. But a new study has found that Olestra might actually be good for you, at least in one way: it could help rid your body of a dangerous toxin.
Like any 1990s child-of-the-calorie-conscious, I ate a lot of Wow! chips growing up. I still have the phantom stomach pains, and I still miss those damn chips. We now know that the fat substitute, which lost most of its popularity during the late 90s (sales dropped from $400 million in 1998 to $200 million in 2000), doesnt actually help you lose weight. Lay rebranded Wow! chips as Light products, presumably to get away from the bloat of negativity surrounding the additive.
A study (paywall) lead by Ronald Jandacek, an adjunct professor of pathology and laboratory medicine at University of Cincinnati, presents one possible benefit of the fake fat (other than utter deliciousness, that is). Patients with high levels of PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls), a man-made chemical and known carcinogen, were fed either regular Pringles or those containing Olestra. After a year, concentrations of PCBs in the body decreased significantly faster for the Olestra group than they had the year beforean increase eight times greater than the control group, who ate regular Pringles.
more
http://qz.com/197458/those-gut-wrenching-olestra-chips-from-the-90s-might-have-been-good-for-us/
Wonder if mineral oil would have the same effect on purging fat-soluble chemicals?
onehandle
(51,122 posts)I wish they still made them.
GoCubsGo
(32,078 posts)The only thing I ever ate that gave me "side effects" is "all-natural" papaya. Makes me sick as as can be. And, regular chips go straight to my hips, so I pretty much forgo them altogether. It would be nice to enjoy some Doritos again, and flush out some PCBs in the process.
TlalocW
(15,378 posts)For some reason he felt it was keeping in the conservative line to push Olestra.
I get the same cramps when I go crazy and eat two bags of apple chips so for those who miss Olean, you can at least get some of the experience back.
TlalocW
CincyDem
(6,346 posts)Having worked for these guys during the olestra days, it's close to home. Sucrose polyester - can you tell why the marketing guys call is olestra - became the bad boy for CSIP and their chair Michael Jacobson. The reason: he felt like the Olestra folks "dissed" him in a hearing when he pitched his scientific conclusions about olestra. Turns out they were based on far fewer people that what would be the norm for that kind of testing. He made it his life's work to protect America from this monster called Olestra. My POV - middle of the road issue in the grand scheme of things (at best) and given the trade offs versus the adverse conditions of obesity, losing Olestra was a disservice driven by this guys petty ego. In my book - he's the Ralph Nader of the food business. Did some good stuff AND did some really bad stuff. This falls into the bad stuff column.
If you think the chips were good, I gotta say the broader "testing menu" was amazing. Fried shrimp, french fries, kettle chips, chicken wings...you name it fried, the were making it with olestra in the test kitchens. Rumor is there were fried twinkies but I never got close to them.
The cramping and loose stools thing - yep. It happened. In my current life, it's the same as eating anything really really fatty when you've had gall bladder surgery. Nothing life shattering, just something to watch. In the Olean world, that means "don't eat 4 bags of potato chips - you'll have some issues".
Doesn't surprise me that it sucks up PCBs and it would surprise me if it was just a fat soluble thing that could be replicated by mineral oil. Sucrose polyester was a very specifically designed molecule that is really big (on a molecular scale) and acts like a scrub brush as it goes down. The PCBs are probably hooking up with the polyester chains - not something you're going to normally consume in any other way. That's why this stuff had such unique properties.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)GreenPartyVoter
(72,377 posts)SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)Good for ya or bad for ya?
I got so tired of trying to decipher who is telling me the truth, especially when it came to food and drugs. I finally gave up altogether, I just eat whatever I want, if it makes me feel bad.. I don't eat it again.
GreenPartyVoter
(72,377 posts)guilty about returning to butter, but I just don't care anymore. I don't.
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)For all I know all the "facts" about butter come from the margarine people.
KG
(28,751 posts)tavernier
(12,374 posts)I buy them all the time. Olestra never gave me any stomach problems.
Check your chip aisle.