General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOh, the melodrama! Newt cries about negative ads from his opponents!
DAVENPORT, Iowa - More than $1 million in negative advertising - much of it bankrolled by Mitt Romney's allies - has eroded Newt Gingrich's standing in Iowa and thrown the Republican presidential race here wide open two weeks before the first votes.
The former House speaker's Iowa slide mirrors his newfound troubles nationally, and it has boosted Romney's confidence while fueling talk that libertarian-leaning Texas Rep. Ron Paul could pull off a win in the leadoff caucus state on Jan. 3.
"The only person who profits from Republican ads attacking other Republicans is Barack Obama and I think it is pretty reprehensible behavior on the part of some of the candidates," Gingrich said Monday as he arrived in Davenport, jabbing his opponents even as he insisted he was running an upbeat campaign.
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/gop-contender-newt-gingrich-complains-negative-junk-house-speaker-loses-ground-iowa-weeks-caucus-article-1.994141#ixzz1h5Ks8kt6
snooper2
(30,151 posts)He's trying to be the male version of Sarah Palin but massive fail...
No show or host spots for you slimy little salamander
woodsprite
(11,911 posts)aletier_v
(1,773 posts)Most everything about newt *is* negative.
it's not his opponents fault.
Bake
(21,977 posts)God forbid anyone tell the truth about him!
Keep on telling the truth about New, GOPers!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Bake
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)He didn't have what he needed when Herman Cain left the race. He doesn't have a strong organization in any state--particularly in a state like Iowa where to win a caucus you need it and he didn't have the money to compete and take advantage of his gain in the polls. So negative advertising, as usual, works.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)I suggest the cause of action be styled "Definition of character."
zbdent
(35,392 posts)When he faces anybody?
Oh, wait ... it won't really apply because it "won't be him" ... it will be the "living, breathing" corporations exercising their first amendment rights ...