Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

starroute

(12,977 posts)
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 04:25 PM Jan 2014

Larisa Alexandrovna is blogging again!

If you've been around these parts for a while, you may remember when Larisa's articles at Raw Story and blog entries at her own site were posted here regularly. She's been out of the action for a while, but now she's writing for The Progressive, and a piece by her just went up.

http://progressive.org/welcome-to-the-american-plutocracy

A man and his wife went to see a film at an Ohio movie theater recently. When they left, the man was being escorted by agents of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). What could he have possibly done to interest DHS? Was he plotting a terrorist attack? Was there indeed a threat to the “homeland” being neutralized here?

The DHS website states that, outside of its counter-terrorism mission, they are tasked with "safeguarding and securing cyberspace," which enumerates such crimes as bank fraud, data breaches and child pornography.

The man in question, who was not named by media reports on the incident, attracted the department’s scrutiny for wearing his prescription glasses, which happen to be enhanced with a wearable computer known as Google Glass. This clearly did not implicate him in a plot to bomb something, forge immigration documents, distribute child pornography, or any other serious threat to the “homeland,” so why did DHS step in?

It turns out, the theater was concerned that the man might be recording the film for black market distribution. An employee of the theater reportedly then contacted Hollywood’s lobby, the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), which in turn informed DHS. Amazingly, the feds jumped, dispatching agents to the theater before the movie was even over.

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Larisa Alexandrovna is blogging again! (Original Post) starroute Jan 2014 OP
THANKS! elleng Jan 2014 #1
Edited: Sorry, that was a different blogger. Warren DeMontague Jan 2014 #12
Good to know. Cleita Jan 2014 #2
+1 Blue_Tires Jan 2014 #3
I remember her shitting on atheists...nt SidDithers Jan 2014 #4
And the jury results are in... aikoaiko Jan 2014 #6
Heheh... SidDithers Jan 2014 #7
And the follow-up on the columnist who wanted atheists thrown out of the Dems: she voted for McCain muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #8
Figures... SidDithers Jan 2014 #11
Probably figured that "I'm voting for McCain-Palin" was such an egregiously idiotic thing to admit Warren DeMontague Jan 2014 #15
Barfitty barf barf Warren DeMontague Jan 2014 #13
Ah, yes, I knew the name sounded familiar. Warren DeMontague Jan 2014 #9
ok...wow Blue_Tires Jan 2014 #14
I've been wondering about her. hootinholler Jan 2014 #5
I remember her being a nasty writer. Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #10

elleng

(130,865 posts)
1. THANKS!
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 04:29 PM
Jan 2014

Good to hear! She was a friend of mine, and we lost touch after she took herself out of action! Progressive, GOOD!

aikoaiko

(34,169 posts)
6. And the jury results are in...
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 06:00 PM
Jan 2014

On Mon Jan 27, 2014, 03:50 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

I remember her shitting on atheists...nt
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4396325

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Maybe it's just Sid being a dithering asshole, but really, Larissa contributed way more to DU back in the day than Dithers has even thought about. She doesn't deserve to be shat upon here by one who exists on DU to shit upon people.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Jan 27, 2014, 03:54 PM, and the Jury voted 3-3 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Noxious.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: the alert needs an alert
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Larissa, being a blogger, does deserve to be shat upon should someone think so. She's an adult and can handle it.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Let me get this straight. You can call the poster an asshole in your alert comments but you want us to hide a post because you don't agree? Seriously?

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
7. Heheh...
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 06:13 PM
Jan 2014

not surprised. Probably someone who didn't remember the "atheist whackjob" column posted at RawStory, and the backflips that lala_rawraw and the editors at RawStory did to defend the columnist and dismiss the very legitimate concerns of offended atheists.

Here's some DU history for those who weren't around:

The RawStory column: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1007330

Larisa's half-assed attempt to extend an olive branch: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=214x64952

which included such bridge-building language as "People have the right to say what they will, of course and they also have a right to get a small group of pals together to make themselves seem important, despite the ugliness of their behavior."


Bully for Larisa for returning to blogging, but I won't be reading her. I hope she and her Libertarian husband are very happy.

Sid

muriel_volestrangler

(101,306 posts)
8. And the follow-up on the columnist who wanted atheists thrown out of the Dems: she voted for McCain
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 06:48 PM
Jan 2014
Saturday, November 01, 2008
Putting Country First

I feel like I should be writing this at some twelve-step meeting or, perhaps, at some ideological reeducation/rehab camp. It's just insane and will shock anyone who knows me either personally or professionally. So, let's just jump right in, shall we? Just rip off the band-aid. Okay.

I'm voting McCain/Palin.
...
(long list of offensive RW anti-Obama memes omitted to prevent DUers vomiting)
...
So, I'm voting McCain/Palin. With a balanced government and two leaders with a strong history of moderate, bipartisan rule, our country will be a lot better off and that's what matters.

http://cultofmelinda.blogspot.co.uk/2008/11/putting-country-first.html

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
11. Figures...
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 07:10 PM
Jan 2014

Thanks for that update. I went looking for Barton, and what she's doing, but didn't look very hard.

Sid

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
15. Probably figured that "I'm voting for McCain-Palin" was such an egregiously idiotic thing to admit
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 07:16 PM
Jan 2014

that unless she started blogging under a different name, she'd never be taken seriously again.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Larisa Alexandrovna is bl...