It's getting harder to post about current news...
because I can's stand to watch it anymore because Hillary Clinton or her supporters are always on telling me how much everyone loves her and what a great job she did as S of S.
I think Kerry is doing better, really trying to make peace, and I like him more every day.
The election isn't till 2016 and we already are being told that the Dems don't want a crowded nomination process to have more money for the election, and, of course, that means for Clinton.
I don't hate her, but I can't stand too much of her...
= new reply since forum marked as read
Oops!
Here are the people that didn't believe that stupid inevitability shit then either.
Would prefer to hear she IS!
None of that stuff works on news programs.
I've been IN many of those "Shit On Clinton" threads--it's not "snooping and judging" when one has been on the receiving end of some of the scathing commentary-and I've got some more news for you, Google isn't a "secret weapon"--everyone has it.
Where did I ever, once, say "This poster is a troll?"
Please point that out. Oh, wait--you can't...because you made that up. You leapt to an unfounded conclusion. You shouldn't do that.
All I'm saying is that this person despises Hillary Clinton, and her remarks need to be taken in that context. I proved what I asserted with LINKS--that is how most people do it, you know--or do you prefer that people make insinuations, or suggestions...and NOT back up what they're saying?
She's not a neutral "honest broker." Her vague little thread starting pot-stirring post would make one think otherwise, had they not encountered her many times before, as I have.
Right now, there's no "rule" that stops her from "Hillary Hating." If HRC is the nominee, though, she'll have to curb her enthusiasm.
You can take this factual information, and you can ignore it if that is your preference. I do suspect, though, that there are people here who support HRC who will find this information of use, even if you don't.
Insinuation and doing a list.
Why are you doing this? Just put this poster on Ignore...if you don't wish to read what they say.
Are you keeping tabs on others? Why would you do this?
Whatever...just put the person on ignore and you won't have to deal with whatever you find offensive. Just saying..........
others like to control it even if it means digging up shit to degrade people. Stalking??? Maybe, or just controlling the board.
But count me among those who appreciate information and can decide for themselves who is reputable or not. I also don't need MD to decide what I read or how to interpret it.
if this is an example of what goes on here from someone who is a long time DU'er who is keeping Lists of Posts and digging into DU'ers posting history.
Leave it up to the MIRT and let them decide. I would not have expected to see something like this kind of witch hunting here when we have resources. But...I guess those resources are just for the rabble of us.
I would not have expected this from MADem even though I 've had disagreements I've never gone and searched out their posts. I take them for what they say and try to figure out what I ignore and what I thought was worth a read. I'll definitely reconsider that after this.
I keep thinking of the movie, "Primary Colors"… when the Kathy Bates character reminds Bill and Hill about the persons they were GOING to be, before they sold out... then seeing the rationalization of bullshit.
This explains NAFTA, caving to the Republicans by destroying the dignity of those on relief (welfare reform, what an insult to those who were told needed a "leg up"
, and finally Hill in the Senate, in full bullshit mode, believing the lies of the Bush administration. Not too promising for a brilliant Democrat, if you ask me.
No, we can't take much more, frwrfpos… not much more.
If I recall, most don't declare until a year before, so anyone is on the table, anything is on the table.
The reason Clinton is gettng so much press is because.... she's a Clinton.
And pray to Dog she will be defeated yet again regardless of the illusion factors.
DU is not the real world.
this early in the game is great news. New faces and names will be a delight to have and hear.
The more people hear about what a wonderful SoS she was, the more time there is to Google and find out there isn't much there at all. Diplomacy, that is one bullet point. Yeh, diplomacy in the State Dept, so unique of her to do that thing there. lol.
And you know what else comes up in the top 5 accomplishments of Hillary Clinton as SoS? Those texts that were going around, where Hillary says something funny or snarky to various foes and friends. Can you believe that?
Apparently these texts make her an accomplished SoS. oh myyyyyyyyyy. 
I'm a Hillary supporter and I don't give a flying fig who you, and the rest of the posters here who form the anti-Hillary crowd, vote for in the primaries. Heck, I don't even care if you vote for her in the general election. They'll be enough of us who will have her back.
But, this is still a Democratic site. Therefore, those of us who do support Hillary have as much right as anyone else here to post threads in support of her potential candidacy. If she chooses not to run, then we'll cross that bridge when the moment comes.
As for the two super Pacs who support her, they are operating on their own.
As far as I'm concerned, they can support anyone they want. By the same token, so can we who support Hillary.
No one even knows whether she's running, so all these constant battles are a waste of time.
Ditto for Bill. So don't blame her if the media has created this buzz about her so early on.
As who you vote for in 2016? I don't care. If she happens to be the nominee and she doesn't meet your purity test requirements, then vote for someone who does.
On the other hand, if a Republican gets in, please spare us your bellyaching because you would have contributed to that person's win. There were quite a few of us who didn't want Obama in 2008, but he was the nominee and that was that. Life goes on.
They seem to live in a parallel world. No one can start a positive thread about certain Democrats that will not be immediately trashed by some folks.
This place always reminds me of the Freepers. They despise Christie so much that many of them proclaimed that they wouldn't vote for him if he became their party's nominee. Ditto for Jeb Bush. They would cut their nose to spite themselves. I see the same mindset here with some people. It's just crazy!!! I would vote for ANY Democrat over the Republican candidate in 2016. We will not have the majority in the House (that's a pipe dream) and we will be lucky if we don't lose seats in the Senate. It is extremely important that we try to keep the WH in Democratic hands. Since 2010, with the advent of the Tea Party, the Republican party has moved to the extreme Right. I cringe to think what will become of the nation if they hold Congress and the WH.
To have to hear the constant moaning about the Clintons, instead of looking at the long game, is frustrating. At this point, we don't even know whether she will run.
It's a free country. Don't think that you're all so important that anyone will try to "intimidate and bully" you.
if they are spewing RW bullshit!!!
Amazing the CRAP one has to read in a supposed Democratic board. One might as well be on Hot Air, Free Republic, Newsmax, etc.
You forgot to add "Benghazi" to your list of RW talking points.
