General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe New Yorker: SNOWDEN CALLS RUSSIAN-SPY STORY “ABSURD”
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2014/01/snowden-calls-russian-spy-story-absurd.htmlSnowden told me that having a go bag packedsomething that Rogers described as highly suspiciousreflected his work deployed overseas for the C.I.A. Hed had a go bag packed since 2007. Its not an exotic practice for people who have lived undercover on government orders, Snowden said.
Its not the smears that mystify me, Snowden told me. Its that outlets report statements that the speakers themselves admit are sheer speculation. Snowden went on to poke fun at the range of allegations that have been made against him in the media without intelligence officials providing some kind of factual basis: ?We dont know if he had help from aliens. You know, I have serious questions about whether he really exists.?
The Nixon admin tried to smear Ellsberg as a Russian spy...
https://pressfreedomfoundation.org/blog/2014/01/russian-spy-tactics-used-rep-rogers-snowden-were-pioneered-nixon-admin-against-daniel
Before Snowden, Nixon Admin Pioneered Evidence-Free 'Russian Spy' Smears Against Daniel Ellsberg
Ellsberg is commonly looked at as the quintessential whistleblower today, but shortly after he leaked the top secret Vietnam War study, the Nixon administration made a concerted effort to paint him as a Soviet spy in the press, using anonymous quotes and non-existent secret evidence. (Sound familiar?)
This is from the New York Times on August 11, 1973:
An attorney for Dr. Daniel Ellsberg has chided the Senate Watergate committee for failing to challenge what he called totally false and slanderous testimony by the former White House aide, John D. Ehrlichman, suggesting that Dr. Ellsberg delivered copies of the Pentagon papers to the Soviet embassy.
During his testimony before your committee, Mr. Ehrlichman repeatedly asserted that the Pentagon papers had been given in 1971 to the Soviet Embassy and implied that this might have been done by my client, Dr. Daniel Ellsberg, or with his knowledge, the attorney, Leonard B. Boudin, who wrote the committee. These allegations are made of whole cloth; they are totally false and slanderous of Dr. Ellsberg.
pscot
(21,024 posts)the more they remain the same.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Smearing is generally regarded as acceptable around here.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Snowen's leaks.
bobduca
(1,763 posts)each of them bringing their very special 4-5 friends along to also Rec Smears.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)But calling the notion 'absurd' makes no sense. From an objective standpoint, it's a reasonable hypothesis.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)"Okey-doke, but first I am going to hand them over to American reporters!"
Yeah, right. Totally reasonable.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)"Comrade Vlad ... There's an American with information we can use ... Let's accommodate him."
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)our Government is lying, far more reasonable.
Why did the US Govt force Snowden to stay in Russia IF they thought he was a spy?
randome
(34,845 posts)Why is that hard to understand?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]
struggle4progress
(118,273 posts)was properly revoked under the regulations 22 CFR 51.60, as the holder was "the subject of an outstanding Federal warrant of arrest for a felony" and was "the subject of a request for extradition or provisional request for extradition which has been presented to the government of a foreign country." It may further have been properly revoked on the grounds that the holder's "activities abroad are causing or are likely to cause serious damage to the national security or the foreign policy of the United States"
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)If they didn't want him Russia, seems odd they made sure to keep him there. I guess they weren't worried about him being a 'russian spy'. It's just laughable, really. We are embarrassing ourselves around the world.
struggle4progress
(118,273 posts)by anyone who wishes to obtain even the most rudimentary understanding US politics, as is distinction between the major political parties
Mike Rogers is a Republican representing Michigan's 8th Congressional district since 1994: as a Congressman, he has no direct Executive power and plays no immediate role in the agencies enforcing US law
The Executive branch is headed by President Obama, who has been in office since 2008: he is the boss of all the agency heads, including the State Department, which handles US passports and is headed by John Kerry. I have already provided reference to 22 CFR 51.60 governing passports; and application of 22 CFR 51.60 in the Snowden case seems entirely routine and by-the-book -- an indictment against him was unsealed on 21 June, his passport revoked on 22 June, and on 23 June Aeroflot allowed him to board a plane for Moscow
Also on 23 June,
so various people had been aware that Snowden could need special travel documents. Unfortunately for Mr Snowden, Ecuador disputed the validity of the special refugee travel document, that Assange had somehow obtained, and explicitly revoked it:
... In his Guardian interview, Correa said his government had not, and would not, give Snowden an authorised travel document to extract himself from Moscow airport ... He said the temporary travel document issued by his London consul on 22 June and publicly disowned five days later was issued without official authorisation ...
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Snowden should have been properly advised when he departed the US his passport would be revoked if he was charged and a warrant issued for his arrest. Charges wasn't immediately brought and for other reasons may not have been in place when he departed Hong Kong. He needs to cry on his advisors shoulder.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)n/t
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)That was funny!
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)can you not figure out why your premise is patently made up and silly?
You are saying the Gov't lies more often than people....prove it
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)of using his collaboration with the FSB as circumstantial evidence of motive...juries always like a motive. The longer he stays in Russia, the easier the job becomes.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)this guy and his supposed background story simply don't make sense...
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)who actually know him. Maybe you can tell us why the US Government forced Snowden to stay in Russia?
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)the media is an idiot. DiFi provoked him into responding...which means he's easily provoked.
Sabrina...I don't answer your questions.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)and to expose them as quickly as possible. At this point he has way more credibility than those who decide to lie.
Only an idiot would remain silent when they are being lied about.
Whistle Blowers like Ellsberg were also 'ACCUSED felons', but see the SC ruling on that case.
Snowden being accused of felonies and lied about, only makes the US Government look like they are desperate to hide something.
Here's what they can do. ABIDE BY THE CONSTITUTION of the US and they won't have to worry about Whistle Blowers.
randome
(34,845 posts)The difference is President Obama has class and dignity and style.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Ellsburg because of FBI malfeasance...not because he was innocent. He would have gone to jail but for the FBI helping out an analyst from Rand.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)don't try to pin that on them.....HE alone made THAT decision..
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)away making it impossible for him to leave. Odd isn't it, that if they thought he was a spy, they would force him to stay there?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)to help their "hero"?
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)have some chance of succeeding.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)plenty of fugitives like Snowden remain undiscovered for years...sometimes forever. Ask them how they do it...
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)whisking him out of Russia?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)How do other fugitives do it?
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)some powerful connections to get here. I don't know how other fugitives to it. I imagine they have a network of supporters prior to their actions. Mush like Ellsberg who went underground for a brief time.
Or they live in another country that won't send them back to the U.S. like canada did for draft evaders
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I mean Glenn Greenwald and company would help him right? They have "powerful connections" right?
By the way...any American fugitive wanted for high crimes such as this....would lose their passport. Some of them manage to get away for long periods of time...
Seems to me Snowden wants to live a "cushy life" of a non-fugitive.
You might find some examples of fugitives that seem to be able to hide for long periods of time here:
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten
randome
(34,845 posts)Why did Venezuela and Bolivia turn away?
You're right, he doesn't have powerful connections. Maybe there's a reason for that.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)One of Assange's closest confidants.
randome
(34,845 posts)Nothing that improved his situation, anyways. Why did all those other countries decide to turn him down? Most likely because he doesn't have anything beyond his super-earnestness. God, I do believe if Snowden laughed, the Sun would fall from the sky!
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]
struggle4progress
(118,273 posts)plans could be complicated - but not thwarted - by a lack of passport. The U.S. official said that if a senior official in a country or airline ordered it, a country could overlook the withdrawn passport ..."
State Department has revoked Snowden's passport
5:42 PM, Jun 23, 2013
Greg Rossino
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
struggle4progress
(118,273 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Thus. In the meantime, he is where he is.
And if revoking a passport is so meaningless, why did the U.S. do it?
struggle4progress
(118,273 posts)that her claim seems inaccurate.
You and I have already discussed effects of passport revocation. As I told you in #93
One difficulty for travelers without a passport is that carriers may refuse to transport the passenger, since they may be required to transport the passenger elsewhere if entry is denied at the destination. If Snowden had been taken by an airline somewhere and then denied entry, the airline would presumably have been in the awkward position of being responsible for a passenger from Hong Kong, whom they could not discharge and could not return to Hong Kong for discharge. But Aeroflot is only semi-private, with majority Russian state ownership. So Russian state willingness to accept Snowden without a passport could have made it easy to put him on the Aeroflot to Moscow
He would have had other options as well, had he been able to convince another government to issue him a travel document. In fact, such a travel document for Snowden at one point appeared from the now-famous Ecuadorian embassy in London -- though its provenance was subsequently loudly disputed by the Ecuadorian government, with the result that the document was useless to Snowden for travel purposes
I have nowhere described the revocation of Snowden's passport as "meaningless" -- in #62, I pointed out that the revocation was routine:
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)...makes for a good narrative, they think. Forget about damaged credibility.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Credibility issue, indeed.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Last edited Wed Jan 22, 2014, 08:58 PM - Edit history (1)
I've been interested in all of this and even I didn't know that his passport was revoked BEFORE he went to Russia. Not that this will slow down any of the BS from the BSers, you know.
I don't know if he was an official spy for Russia or not but this adds one hell of a wrinkle and damages his contention that he was NOT a spy even further.
Skraxx
(2,970 posts)He stole sensitive government data and then defected to Russia. That certainly could be considered espionage.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)think it means.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)for your position. You don't know that he hasn't in fact defected. None of us know either way. You choose not to believe that because you don't want to believe it, not because facts rule it out.
I find the Russian spy/defected arguments lacking in a number of ways, but we cannot rule them out either.
Skraxx
(2,970 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)how reasonable it is now that you know that being in Russia was NOT Snowden's plan at all.
They took away his passport waiting until he was in Russia, on his elsewhere, to stop him from leaving.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)he CHOSE Russia AFTER China said "hell no".
Skraxx
(2,970 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)have the facts on.
On his way to his final destination, with a stopover in Russia, the US Govt took away his passport, making it impossible for him to leave Russia.
No need to thank me. Facts are important.
Skraxx
(2,970 posts)Ok pal! Whatever you say!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)he was going and so did the US Government. So again, WHY did the US Government FORCE him to remain in Russia?
Now that you have the facts, perhaps you could try to answer that. A whole lot of other people are asking.
Skraxx
(2,970 posts)Whatever you say, pal!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)that there are official records of where Snowden was headed. Which WAS NOT RUSSIA!
Understand now? Documentation.
Here, let me give you a chance to PROVE, with documentation what you are attempting to claim.
Post proof that Snowden was headed for Russia.
This ought to be fun!
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)make up shit, presume to present it as fact and never provide supporting documentation. This lie has been debunked with actual supporting documentation, will you retract your statments, delete them or offer a correction so as not to mislead your followers? Doubt it.
Number23
(24,544 posts)to Russia.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4372055
Kind of blows some of these meek and weak arguments out of the water.
Skraxx
(2,970 posts)What did he care if he was defecting already?
You are arguing with people in this thread that have insisted that the only reason Snowden is in Russia is because that's where he was when his passport was revoked.
In fact, his passport was revoked before he'd even left Hong Kong which means that the "he's only in Russia by circumstance" crowd is wrong. Again. I showed you a post in the thread that clearly shows that the folks you are arguing with are wrong.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)It's a consistent theme.
The war on whistleblowers needs to end.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)do you?
struggle4progress
(118,273 posts)Surely you could provide a few links to enlighten us
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)struggle4progress
(118,273 posts)of his life and such
bobduca
(1,763 posts)intentional misreading ftw
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Puglover
(16,380 posts)"Useless political hacks" True of DI FI and many others.
Talk about stuck in the 80's.
Progressive dog
(6,900 posts)to avoid prosecution. The Nixon stuff is particularly relevant, especially since he is the only President to ever resign in disgrace.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)stopover for him? Why would they have wanted to make him stay there of all places?
Progressive dog
(6,900 posts)He can go anywhere he wants, just not on a US passport. He's the one who fled to communist China when he claims he really wanted to be in S. America.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)presenting not a shred of evidence, 'if' he 'might' be a Russian spy, also creating the impression, lie to be blunt, that he had 'fled' to 'COMMUNIST China' and Russia. Which is a lie. Thanks, I love it when I am proven to be right. See here.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4368268
Progressive dog
(6,900 posts)and I don't believe he worked for the Russians until he got there with the data. Probably includes a lot of the same data that he thought was so horrible for the NSA to have.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)I he has, it is highly unlikely that he would be stuck in an airport for 5 weeks.
randome
(34,845 posts)So who knows where he really was?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)The 41-year-old Assange has been going out with Harrison for a while, according to someone who has seen them together. In an interview recently, he claimed that the security considerations in his embassy residence have caused severe difficulties to a relationship that was important to me, although he refused to be drawn on who the person was. Recently the blow-up bed he slept on in his Knightsbridge room has been replaced with a proper mattress.
http://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/london-life/the-court-of-king-julian-assanges-loyal-supporters-8205161.html
Sarah also lost the bail money she put up for her prince. Poor thing...Eddie might suit better.
Progressive dog
(6,900 posts)It would be highly unlikely that he would flee to Hong Kong when he wanted to go to S. America, but he did (by his account).
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)he had any intention of outing himself? Maybe he made that decision after he got there?
Progressive dog
(6,900 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)We know that the REAL FELONS like War Criminals and Wall St Criminals get off scott free in this country. So the word 'felon' has no meaning anymore.
The words Whistle Blower however have come to have huge meaning and majority support.
If you have some evidence that he is 'working for Russia' then present it. Otherwise you are spreading false rumors and nothing more.
Progressive dog
(6,900 posts)when did he flee to Hong Kong? The majority of Americans want Snowden to come home and face trial. Hey, he can sue me for expressing my opinion He has a lot of experience as a spy, he was at it a lot longer than he's been blowing whistles.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Ellsberg among others know that in today's world, Whistle Blowers will have to leave this country in order to get the truth out.
Ellsberg didn't have to do that back then because we still had a semblance of the rule of law.
And Ellsberg among others, have stated that.
You can keep trying to claim that Snowden's destination was Russia or China, but the FACTS are always going to make that difficult for you. But knock yourself out.
Progressive dog
(6,900 posts)I know where Ellsberg stands on Snowden. Why would Ellsberg's opinion count for more than most of the government's?
The "semblance of rule of law" crap is just that, crap. How many psychiatrist's offices and opposition headquarters has this president had broken into? How many people has the FBI sent letters to, encouraging them to commit suicide or else? How many enemies are on the list that the President has the IRS" investigating". How much money has this president illegally obtained to pay hush money?
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)The US Government lied to the American about some of the MOST IMPORTANT issues that a Government can lie about.
Ellsberg exposed some of those lies. The Government ACCUSED HIM of being a liar and a felon.
Snowden has also exposed lies told by the Government. The Government has ACCUSED HIM of being a FELON.
See why Ellsberg is more trustworthy??
Progressive dog
(6,900 posts)that's a simple question.
When you won't answer a simple question, you can't expect me to trust Snowden because Ellsberg is trustworthy because you say so.
That's quite a leap of faith, you expect, when I have yet to see you post anything other than repetitive generalities.
Ellsberg not only did not flee to escape prosecution, he allowed the documents he released to speak for themselves. He gave the papers to a real reporter at a real newspaper in USA. There are other differences between what Snowden and Ellsberg did, but I won't waste my time since facts seem to have no affect on your faith based reasoning.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)You should educate yourself about the difference between the two.
struggle4progress
(118,273 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)struggle4progress
(118,273 posts)been originally agreed upon about thirty years ago
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)and their governance is far more complex than your pithy wiki citation.
struggle4progress
(118,273 posts)I suspect my decision, to decline the challenge, might have somewhat reduced his esteem for me
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)I am a professional bovine artificial insemination technician.
And my profession has nothing to do with the FACT that Hong Kong is not communist China. I grasp the arrangement between the two. Apparently, you do not.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Do you really do that for a living? And if you mock me for being gullible I will claim diminished capacity based on Texas legal alcohol limits for driving. (I am at home and not driving btw)
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Back to arguing then.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)gives her services to small start up businesses that emphasizes an open book cooperative model.
I am extremely proud of the work that I do and have shaped multiple businesses away from top down model.
It is not as sexy as steer insemination for sure.
Progressive dog
(6,900 posts)I'll bet other parts of China have very nice hotels, too.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)THAT is all on his own...
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)I am curious. What kind of connections do you think he has that are powerful enough to go up against the U.S. government?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)we are talking about connections to get whisked out of a country if he wanted to be....he is where he is because he chose to be there...and chooses to stay.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)enough to go up against the U.S. government that would be able to safely whisk him away.
Name one.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)to be whisked away....to a secret undisclosed location....
It took us years to find Osama Bin Laden
struggle4progress
(118,273 posts)his US passport having been revoked before his Aeroflot flight to Moscow
One difficulty for travelers without a passport is that carriers may refuse to transport the passenger, since they may be required to transport the passenger elsewhere if entry is denied at the destination. If Snowden had been taken by an airline somewhere and then denied entry, the airline would presumably have been in the awkward position of being responsible for a passenger from Hong Kong, whom they could not discharge and could not return to Hong Kong for discharge.
But Aeroflot is only semi-private, with majority Russian state ownership. So Russian state willingness to accept Snowden without a passport could have made it easy to put him on the Aeroflot to Moscow
He would have had other options as well, had he been able to convince another government to issue him a travel document. In fact, such a travel document for Snowden at one point appeared from the now-famous Ecuadorian embassy in London -- though its provenance was subsequently loudly disputed by the Ecuadorian government, with the result that the document was useless to Snowden for travel purposes
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Maybe his "laundress" can find another airline that will allow him safe passage without one.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)decided to wash socks for Eddie, but she certainly bragged about doing it for Assange.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)washing someone's socks transforms a women into a laundress
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)choose to introduce ourselves to the world, but you shouldn't judge her.
struggle4progress
(118,273 posts)would allow him onto their flight
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)He can get on a plane to New York right now.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Hmmm.
Sid
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)would help Eddie home.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)in Rio if it weren't for Obama!!!!
It's Obama's fault Eddie had to buy a parka, damn it!!!!
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Quito is 65F
Caracas is 86F
Havana is 72F
Eddie needed a better travel agent.
Sid
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)he is denied one of the primary coping mechanisms for getting through it.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4015636
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)flamingdem
(39,313 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)this "forced" is ridiculous....he was trying to broker asylum all over the world.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)They would simply have him vanish from the map and quiet him away to an out of the way place in Russia. There would have been no sensationalized leak, or temporary stay in Hong Kong etc., if he was a Russian spy, IMHO.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)But it's fun to watch the denials.
Sid
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_King,_Jr
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)And I thought he was Paul Revere, with his thumb drive full of the news that tyranny is coming.
Personally, I've always considered him to be a combination of Jesus, Gandhi and Johnny Cash.
Sid
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)It is quite amusing.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Wonder what name that one is operating under these days.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)LOL, what was her name?
randome
(34,845 posts)You can buy a lot of thumb-drives with that kind of moolah!
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)What was the three trillion you reckon? Cost of Iraq? Had to be something the y thought was clever.
randome
(34,845 posts)It's a hidden diss against the postal service.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)today's generation. They need some new talking points, the ancient ones aren't working anymore.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)Xolodno
(6,390 posts)If he was spying for Russia, he would still be here and still spying for them. They would have encouraged and supported him to stay and pump for info until he got caught. Not have him fly to Hong Kong and go public.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)but its hardly absurd...
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)By that measure, the NSA should be seeking asylum in Russia or, preferably, Antarctica.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)weaklings run away...
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Perhaps, the Real Men at NSA aren't fleeing because they aren't being pursued.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Oh by the way...I have twin Uncles who served in Viet Nam...one tried to run to Canada first...
who do you think deserves more respect?
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)What's a "wannabe" weakling?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)but heroes don't run in the face of danger...Heroes have the courage of their convictions...
see Muhammed Ali for an example.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Or, at least, convictions.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)is a very old phrase...
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)What's this talk of heroes and crushes on faceless NSA agents? You're posting as though we're arguing about 2-dimensional comic book people and which of them should be wearing the white cowboy hat. You're helping to bring the discourse here to a low and ridiculous place. And is doesn't even begin to cover your viciousness and duplicitousness in the 500-post rape thread from earlier today. What, specifically, gives?
struggle4progress
(118,273 posts)appearance, Mike Rogers suggested Snowden "was ready to go, he had a go bag, if you will
In fact, Snowden himself has just confirmed this suggestion, by Rogers on Meet the Press, that he kept a packed go-bag, in an interview with Jane Mayer published in the New Yorker yesterday: Mayer quotes Snowden as saying he had kept a "go-bag packed" since 2007
In the Mayer interview, Snowden further explains that the packed "go-bag" is common for people living undercover. But here he may simply be standing in a hole, digging himself in deeper. According to a timeline published in the Washington Post, Snowden himself claims he was posted by the CIA to Geneva in 2007 but left the CIA in 2009 to work for a private NSA contractor in Japan. An August 2013 Reuters report by Mark Hosenball indicates Snowden worked for Dell from 2009 until early 2013
So from 2009 on, Snowden apparently was not living undercover on government orders. And it's not immediately clear why a civilian contractor would consider himself to be living undercover and would therefore keep a "packed go-bag." There are, however, indications suggesting interpretations unfavorable to Snowden. In an October 2013 New York Times article, Eric Schmidt reported that Snowden's CIA supervisor send Snowden home from Geneva, in part due to suspicions "that Mr. Snowden was trying to break into classified computer files to which he was not authorized to have access". Moreover, there seems to be reason to believe that "Snowden began downloading documents describing the U.S. government's electronic spying programs while he was working for Dell ... and left an electronic footprint indicating when he accessed the documents". In June 2013, the South China Morning Post published an interview in which Snowden himself stated that My position with Booz Allen Hamilton granted me access to lists of machines all over the world the NSA hacked:
These facts might provide a rather different view of the "packed go-bag" Snowden now admits having:
The natural take on Snowden's "packed go-bag" is that he wanted to be ready to skedaddle
randome
(34,845 posts)I, myself, have one for the zombie apocalypse. One for Tea Party insurrections. One for alien invasions.
And one in case my ex-wife develops super-powers.
You can never be too prepared!
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)right after the weather! Got to know if I need a parka in my Go bag!1?11
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Doesn't it?
struggle4progress
(118,273 posts)So if you've been dropped from CIA employment due to suspicions you're attempting unauthorized access to classified files, then taken up a job with an NSA contractor where you are accessing classified files without authorization, and then switch to another NSA contractor position with the aim of collecting classified info on NSA activities worldwide and ask coworkers for their passwords to facilitate your hobby, then having a packed go-bag could fit tidily into the mens rea
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)blowers.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Lol
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)a system or planned way of doing things, esp. one imposed from above.
Because you totally meant any benign or even democratic form of government in no way implying that Obama is a tyrant imposing his will from above on poor Mr. Snowden. You just meant generic form of government.
lol
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)I suppose the benign Mr. Obama is doing so to congratulate Mr. Snowden on his determination to fight the fascism of the NSA.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)So are you outright saying the Obama Administration is a fascist regime? Are you willing to own that? Or are you just mentioning two things together without explicitly saying they are connected and hoping people will make the connection on their own? see Iraq-9/11.
again, lol
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Democratic? Benign? Altruistic? Humorous? Unavoidable?
Is not our government a regime?
Maybe you better check with your war criminal icon.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)ever thought I might not have a world view in which Obama is a sweeter talking Dick Cheney?
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)The fact is, you make choices when you work for the federal government.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Do you consider Daniel Ellsberg a whistle blower? Daniel Elsberg considers Edward Snowden a whistle blower and a patriot.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)actually have done your sworn duty and exposed wrongdoing to people who can do something about it.
I consider Bunnatine Greenhouse a patriot. And she has the settlement to prove it.
Number23
(24,544 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)pseudo-lecture circuit and she won't trash-talk the President. So of course she isn't talked about. She did more to stand up to Bush than any of the 101st Chairborne here.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)issued a statement that Snowden should not be prosecuted.
National Whistleblower Center Issues Statement in Support of NSA Whistleblower
Until Congress enacts a law, setting forth reasonable procedures by which civil servants can disclose national security violations to the American people, the government should not prosecute these whistleblowers. Congress and the President must do their jobs, and stop destroying the lives of civil servants who try to report misconduct
http://www.whistleblowers.org/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=1442
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)that Mr. Snowden has not made his list of "whistleblowers," and I suspect that is because Mr. Snowden is still a fugitive.
But you could not have pointed out that Mr. Snowden needs to face the music and join that pantheon any more clearly....thank you.
frylock
(34,825 posts)struggle4progress
(118,273 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)did you catch the post I replied to? oh, wait......
struggle4progress
(118,273 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)He may have heard of that and added that to his props to his "adventure hero" persona.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]
struggle4progress
(118,273 posts)Odds are he won't live to see tomorrow.
System Administration Man!
System Administration Man!
They've given you their passwords and taken away your passport! ...
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Thanks Luminous!
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)Also enjoying this blast from the recent past.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)HipChick
(25,485 posts)HipChick
(25,485 posts)I knew it!.. Putin BFF....
Number23
(24,544 posts)Good, clean, family fun.
great white snark
(2,646 posts)It's like you're being told that it's an altruistic espionage thriller while you're watching a Cheech & Chong movie.
Number23
(24,544 posts)You nailed it
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Thank you, Mr Snowden.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Thank you, Edward Snowden.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)The relentlessness of the propaganda brigade in smearing Edward Snowden in every single thread where he is mentioned continues to show the level of fear his revelations have created among the PTB. When exposing a crime is treated as committing a crime, then you are ruled by criminals.
The existence, ugliness, and dishonest relentlessness of the propaganda machine at this point serves only to reveal how deeply corrupt, creepy, and authoritarian this government and its messaging have become.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)its always a conspiracy...
bobduca
(1,763 posts)on full ignore.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)did you by chance count the number of times the falsehood of when Snowden's passport was revoked, was promulgated by the pro-Snowden crowd? Talk about propaganda. And not one word of a correction or retraction of the lie.
RC
(25,592 posts)I can see no other actual reason to do so. And on a supposedly progressive/Liberal web site, no less.
The information Snowden exposed is destroying the credibility of the US government around the world. Even more so than our terrorist policies involving drones on wedding parties and funerals, in countries we are not at war with.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)excuse. Also his past background says this was not about telling American Citizens NSA was collecting data, we already knew this information, his as a past activist is to disrupt and cause problems. He has played right into the hands of our enemies, I do not feel sorry for his problems today. Let Russia keep him, he will not live through this crap in Russia.