General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo...if Christie was thin, the bridge thing would be OK?
Seems to be the assumption behind a hell of a lot of posts here recently.
firsttimer
(324 posts)I made a funny
OwnedByCats
(805 posts)I don't understand why it's an issue. There is plenty to pick on without resorting to commenting on his weight.
TlalocW
(15,379 posts)Overweight people are one or the other - extremely evil or extremely good. No middle ground. One extreme or the other other. Christie or Santa.
Just kidding.
TlalocW
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)but there is some truth in what you say...that's how a lot of society and media portrays fat people. Jolly/comedian or bully/evil.
arthritisR_US
(7,286 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Not the size he was when it was done.
arthritisR_US
(7,286 posts)delrem
(9,688 posts)that he has nothing to do with any bridge thing and his staffers are total swine because they did it and they lied to him.
Enough said!
Kablooie
(18,625 posts)What an ass that guy is.
And not because he's fat.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Those who use fat-shaming against Christie are, at least unconsciously, equating ALL fat people with Christie.
And that's just as bad as it would be to use imply that all Canadians are like Ted Cruz.
rocktivity
(44,573 posts)he'd be probably be addicted to something other than food.
rocktivity
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Look at Rob Ford.
6000eliot
(5,643 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Do the fat-shamers secretly want to PROTECT Christie?
6000eliot
(5,643 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)A Republican bully does not have to be fat. They come in all sizes. Being thin wouldn't improve right wingers and other Republicans in the least.
And we don't have any reason to reject fat liberals. The more liberals, the better, so let's not create categories of people to antagonize.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)according to a poll on another thread.
So you're making an issue where there isn't one.