Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

last1standing

(11,709 posts)
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 11:09 AM Jan 2014

Are fat jokes and weight based insults appropriate for DU?

This is a simple poll, either they are or they're not.


22 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited
Yes, fat jokes and weight based insults are appropriate.
1 (5%)
No, fat jokes and weight base insults are not appropriate.
21 (95%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Are fat jokes and weight based insults appropriate for DU? (Original Post) last1standing Jan 2014 OP
Not necessary for Christy get the red out Jan 2014 #1
I am guessing that most of those posts are from trolls. Walk away Jan 2014 #2
Only if it is directed toward people whom we don't like Freddie Stubbs Jan 2014 #3
This. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2014 #9
Caribou Barbie is funny.... forthemiddle Jan 2014 #13
The 'C' word was in a Rude Pundit piece. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2014 #18
Rude Pundit posts are labeled as such Warpy Jan 2014 #33
When it is used as such BainsBane Jan 2014 #47
Agreed. n/t cherokeeprogressive Jan 2014 #51
It's hurtful to people on DU who happen to be overweight or obese. athena Jan 2014 #25
I think Christy is a bully... no need for a "big fat" in front of that. Adrahil Jan 2014 #4
I am really sick of the fat jokes here. redstatebluegirl Jan 2014 #5
Never appropriate anywhere MissMillie Jan 2014 #6
No. nt DLevine Jan 2014 #7
Hunh. I thought we only commented on the looks of female politicians The Straight Story Jan 2014 #8
Jesus, can your "the women are victimizing us poor men" routine take at least one day off? nt geek tragedy Jan 2014 #14
want some cheese to go with that whine? nt Capt. Obvious Jan 2014 #26
better asked of the person to whom I was responding. nt geek tragedy Jan 2014 #31
How about you give things a day off? I am simply a mirror. The Straight Story Jan 2014 #55
No. PasadenaTrudy Jan 2014 #10
slippery slope so next we can not attack republicans for being stupid because it is an insult to dembotoz Jan 2014 #11
^ this. Atman Jan 2014 #32
I suppose accurate criticism of policy is far too difficult LanternWaste Jan 2014 #44
I'll try to kick this on occasion so that as many posters as possible can vote. last1standing Jan 2014 #12
Are juries hiding them? Gormy Cuss Jan 2014 #15
Don Rickles was kicked out of DU. L0oniX Jan 2014 #16
They are immature, not funny, and stupid. boston bean Jan 2014 #17
I didn't choose yes or no crappyjazz Jan 2014 #19
There is a disconnect here TroglodyteScholar Jan 2014 #20
No, it's because for many, fat jokes in general aren't acceptable, hughee99 Jan 2014 #22
So if I don't like someone, inappropriate comments become appropriate? TroglodyteScholar Jan 2014 #40
I agree with you, but if someone made fun of Hitler for being short, hughee99 Jan 2014 #54
Well..."I don't want to be the one to defend" is a cowardly position. TroglodyteScholar Jan 2014 #56
I agree with you, hughee99 Jan 2014 #57
I am one of those disconnected people. Nye Bevan Jan 2014 #28
So is it okay to call a prominent black Republican a n****r if he's a jerk? TroglodyteScholar Jan 2014 #39
Nope. I think the fact that you typed "n****r" but would not type "f*t" Nye Bevan Jan 2014 #41
One word is offensive in and of itself TroglodyteScholar Jan 2014 #43
I'm really not trying to do a "gotcha" here. Nye Bevan Jan 2014 #49
What then is the precise and relevant difference between the two? LanternWaste Jan 2014 #46
I just admitted to being inconsistent. So I don't have a "precise yardstick". Nye Bevan Jan 2014 #52
Inappropriate, but to be fair Christie uses his girth Kingofalldems Jan 2014 #21
yep quinnox Jan 2014 #23
why? n/t BuddhaGirl Jan 2014 #29
always have been. quinnox Jan 2014 #37
When ppl stop laughing at them ppl will stop telling them Johonny Jan 2014 #24
Inappropriate. But nonetheless hard to resist in some cases. Nye Bevan Jan 2014 #27
Generalized fat jokes? Vashta Nerada Jan 2014 #30
But is it possible Spirochete Jan 2014 #45
Yes. Fuck republicans. lumberjack_jeff Jan 2014 #34
If the issue is Kristie, then yes. Rightly or wrongly, these people have chosen a life in the madinmaryland Jan 2014 #35
good post. Whisp Jan 2014 #50
Looks like DU BobUp Jan 2014 #36
When it is used with malice it is no longer a JOKE... Demo_Chris Jan 2014 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author CFLDem Jan 2014 #42
I love these polls..... NCTraveler Jan 2014 #48
who really cares?? beachbum bob Jan 2014 #53
kick for a later crowd. last1standing Jan 2014 #58

get the red out

(13,461 posts)
1. Not necessary for Christy
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 11:11 AM
Jan 2014

He's the kind of asshole that generates material without resorting to his appearance.

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
2. I am guessing that most of those posts are from trolls.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 11:12 AM
Jan 2014

I can't believe a Democrat of any stripe could be so stupid.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
9. This.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 11:48 AM
Jan 2014

All language is accepted if it's directed at the right group. I remember seeing the 'C' word defended here when it was used to describe conservative women.

forthemiddle

(1,379 posts)
13. Caribou Barbie is funny....
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 12:28 PM
Jan 2014

Abortion Barbie is insulting.....

No different than any other website on the internet. It's only an insult if it is directed toward your side.

To me, both names (with emphasis on Barbie) is degrading.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
18. The 'C' word was in a Rude Pundit piece.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 12:39 PM
Jan 2014

It was defended pretty hard here if I remember correctly. It's not a word I would use to describe any woman, conservative or otherwise.

Warpy

(111,227 posts)
33. Rude Pundit posts are labeled as such
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 01:28 PM
Jan 2014

and that should be sufficient warning to those whose tender sensibilities require Bowdlerizing or flat out censorship.

I would rather wince at a few words here and there than have everything heavily censored because some people want to go through life without ever being offended by anything or anyone.

<plink, plink>

BainsBane

(53,026 posts)
47. When it is used as such
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 02:22 PM
Jan 2014

Many women take it as an insult against them. I find them personally insulting, and I always vote to hide such posts when called on jury duty. That some juries don't care about sexism isn't an excuse to allow other kinds of bigoted remarks.

athena

(4,187 posts)
25. It's hurtful to people on DU who happen to be overweight or obese.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 01:01 PM
Jan 2014

It makes them feel self-conscious. It makes them think people make disparaging remarks about them behind their backs. It ruins their day. How can that be a good thing?

What makes Chris Christie a bad politician has nothing to do with his weight. If he were a progressive, kind politician, I would be all for him. It's what's inside that counts.

redstatebluegirl

(12,265 posts)
5. I am really sick of the fat jokes here.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 11:37 AM
Jan 2014

I love seeing Christie in trouble but the references to his appearance are no different than the right always using Black to describe our President. We shouldn't lower ourselves to this.

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
8. Hunh. I thought we only commented on the looks of female politicians
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 11:47 AM
Jan 2014

At least that is what I have been told.

Apparently it's open season on anyone in the public eye over clothing (How nice Michelle looks in something she is wearing - ah...but no one comments on a dress if Obama wears one. Weird) , weight (Christy), looks (Obama without a shirt in the water), etc.

Just remember folks "Christie's eyes are up here" so stop glaring at his other areas (or is it leering?).

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
55. How about you give things a day off? I am simply a mirror.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 05:19 PM
Jan 2014

See you are over in a thread/poll about some certain words. Seems you think it is ok to voice your opinion but not for others.

And I post plenty of other things - but you never respond to those. And even in threads about generally stories some from a small group pop in and make it about the same thing over and over.

Sucks don't it?

PasadenaTrudy

(3,998 posts)
10. No.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 11:55 AM
Jan 2014

The comments in GD are just getting more and more immature as the days go on. Thankfully, I can trash threads and even words. Seems like fat folks are the last group to make fun of, i.e. fatshaming.

dembotoz

(16,797 posts)
11. slippery slope so next we can not attack republicans for being stupid because it is an insult to
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 11:56 AM
Jan 2014

folks who have limited intelligence


perhaps a compromise
i will be politically correct except when it comes to folks i don't like

Atman

(31,464 posts)
32. ^ this.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 01:18 PM
Jan 2014

We (democrats) are constantly mocked for being "politically correct." As if it's a bad thing. BUT...sometimes it is a bad thing.

My personal opinion is that Chris Christie is a fat fuck bully.

Now, that is enough to get many DUers' panties in collective wads. (I'm not making a collective sexuality judgment -- maybe some of the men are wearing panties, too!). But this is how I feel. You can look it up it psych books...Christie's serious, ongoing weight problem has caused him to lash out, to be an angry man. He seems to feel anyone questioning him is questioning his appearance.

Just my armchair observation. I don't know how anyone can deny that Christie is a bully. Where does that come from? Maybe defensive, after spending his life fighting off "fatty fat fat" jokes on the school playground? It doesn't make the reality any less reality. He is a bully. He is a mean, nasty bully. If it's because he's fat, so be it. Let's talk about like adults, and stop pretending we're not allowed to use the word "fat." He's fat. He's huge. He has a problem, just as you pass the same judgement on alcoholics or cutters or other who lash out, or internalize.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
44. I suppose accurate criticism of policy is far too difficult
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 02:20 PM
Jan 2014

I suppose accurate criticism of actual policy is far too difficult for many people who rely merely on the convenience of irrelevant vulgarities to validate their positions, and rationalize their petulance as a righteous stand against the political correct.

Grade school is often like that, but let's hope the children graduate and grow beyond that...

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
15. Are juries hiding them?
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 12:30 PM
Jan 2014

Yes>>>>>not appropriate
No>>>>>>appropriate
If some are hidden and some are not, it's apparently on the hidden ones that were against the "community standards" here.

What, you were expecting consistency?

boston bean

(36,220 posts)
17. They are immature, not funny, and stupid.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 12:32 PM
Jan 2014

And they are hurtful to people you love.

All reasons to avoid telling fat jokes and weight based insults.

TroglodyteScholar

(5,477 posts)
20. There is a disconnect here
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 12:44 PM
Jan 2014

Juries have been consistently allowing fat insults and jokes to stand. Are the same jurors voting against their own actions?

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
22. No, it's because for many, fat jokes in general aren't acceptable,
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 12:52 PM
Jan 2014

but when directed at someone we don't like, people are more willing to let them slide.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
54. I agree with you, but if someone made fun of Hitler for being short,
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 03:10 PM
Jan 2014

most people don't want to be "the one that defended Hitler" (as someone will inevitably claim), so many people will let such a comment slide.

TroglodyteScholar

(5,477 posts)
56. Well..."I don't want to be the one to defend" is a cowardly position.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 05:41 PM
Jan 2014

Either it's okay to attack someone for their weight or it's not.

And you and I both know which way it is.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
57. I agree with you,
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 05:46 PM
Jan 2014

but we both see that depending on the target, people might get away with comments they'd NEVER even think of posting otherwise, and I suspect this is why.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
28. I am one of those disconnected people.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 01:07 PM
Jan 2014

Last edited Fri Jan 10, 2014, 02:36 PM - Edit history (1)

I voted Inappropriate, but earlier today I voted as a juror to let such a post stay. The thing is, I just couldn't bring myself to vote to hide given that Christie was the target.

TroglodyteScholar

(5,477 posts)
39. So is it okay to call a prominent black Republican a n****r if he's a jerk?
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 02:02 PM
Jan 2014

Seems like a similar scenario to me, but I doubt many DUers would find that appropriate....

TroglodyteScholar

(5,477 posts)
43. One word is offensive in and of itself
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 02:19 PM
Jan 2014

The other is a kind of cell.

Nice attempt at a "gotcha," but not good enough.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
49. I'm really not trying to do a "gotcha" here.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 02:24 PM
Jan 2014

I admitted upfront that I have an inconsistent approach to this issue. And while as a juror I would always hide a racial slur (even about someone like Clarence Thomas) sometimes I cannot resist letting a fat joke about someone like Christie stay.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
46. What then is the precise and relevant difference between the two?
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 02:22 PM
Jan 2014

What then is the precise and relevant difference between the two?

And on what objective measure is that difference predicated on?

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
52. I just admitted to being inconsistent. So I don't have a "precise yardstick".
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 02:35 PM
Jan 2014

I would always vote to hide a racial slur, even if it is directed at someone like Clarence Thomas. I may well hide a "fat" comment, especially if it is very nasty, even if it is directed at someone like Christie. But sometimes I cannot resist leaving a post that jokes about Christie's weight. So I am embarrassed to say that I do not have a precise, measurable and relevant yardstick. I did realize a long time ago that I sm not a perfect person, and I accept that. Your criticism of me certainly has validity.

Kingofalldems

(38,442 posts)
21. Inappropriate, but to be fair Christie uses his girth
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 12:47 PM
Jan 2014

to intimidate people. One can see it in his body language.

Johonny

(20,827 posts)
24. When ppl stop laughing at them ppl will stop telling them
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 01:00 PM
Jan 2014

the DU is not a great barometer for what is considered funny material. Tell jokes here at your own risk.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
27. Inappropriate. But nonetheless hard to resist in some cases.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 01:06 PM
Jan 2014

I voted to leave a Christie fat joke earlier today and the final vote was 3-3. I guess we are not all perfect, myself included.

 

Vashta Nerada

(3,922 posts)
30. Generalized fat jokes?
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 01:13 PM
Jan 2014

No.

But when they're directed at Christie, I don't give a shit. He's a vile and disgusting human being. All's fair in love and politics.

Spirochete

(5,264 posts)
45. But is it possible
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 02:21 PM
Jan 2014

someone might use a loathsome specimen such as Christie to cut loose with some fat jokes he/she had always wanted to tell, but hadn't had the opportunity before?
On the other hand, people have a tendency to emphasize all the negative things about someone they hate. (president looks like a chimp, chinless, turtle-headed senator, orange guy, etc)


 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
34. Yes. Fuck republicans.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 01:31 PM
Jan 2014

There's only two kinds of politics, not "nice" and "not nice" but effective and ineffective.

If ridiculing Chris Christie for looking like Popeye's Wimpy, is effective politics, that's okay.

madinmaryland

(64,931 posts)
35. If the issue is Kristie, then yes. Rightly or wrongly, these people have chosen a life in the
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 01:31 PM
Jan 2014

public. All politicians have been mocked (or caricatured) going back two centuries or more. Whether it be President Obama with huge ears or Bush as a chimpanzee in recent history. Funny, but I heard no complaints when Bush was called a chimp because of his looks (does any remember Bush or Chimp??). I read the toons yesterday, with a grossly overweight man sitting on the GW Bridge, and heard no complaints.

In fact, there were several DUer's with "chimp" in their screen name, and there was no argument with that. Also, how do you feel when The Rude Pundit talks about the "fat piece of shit that cannot even reach..."??

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
50. good post.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 02:26 PM
Jan 2014

pretty well how I see the subject, esp: political cartoonists that get a pass (I have not noticed any outrage in toon threads lately, maybe I missed it tho!) and what the Rude One can say.

I do not go around telling fat jokes - the Girth Certificate thing was my vent against that monster of an evil piece of shit Christie and if people take it personally, like I am somehow calling them to have the same qualities of that evil piece of shit Christie, it's just out of my hands.

 

Demo_Chris

(6,234 posts)
38. When it is used with malice it is no longer a JOKE...
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 01:44 PM
Jan 2014

I can handle a joke about ANYTHING. Insulting people based upon their appearance or lifestyle choices is unacceptable with me.

Response to last1standing (Original post)

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
48. I love these polls.....
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 02:24 PM
Jan 2014

because a select few are willing to publicly out themselves as being cold and callous.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are fat jokes and weight ...