General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI once kicked the TV and it started working (TRUE STORY)
However, I fully understand that while those two things seem related, I cannot beyond a reasonable doubt make the claim that
1.kicking TV's cure them
2 my kick indeed cured the TV (maybe something else happened at the same time?)
3. also it does not help me understand how the TV was cured
This in short is why we use the scientific process.
1. No ensure that things are not random error
2. To understand how things work and how they are related
3. To make sure that following something doesn't lead to something worse (you kick the tv, and break it further, for instance)
marybourg
(12,586 posts)tubes. That was the standard first-strike repair effort back then. Worked about half the time, but usually only until the tube loosened up again.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)And even in a transistor TV, a jolt could reseat a loose port somewhere.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I fundamentally agree with you, but the scientific process has been having some serious problems of late, in the rare instances where it's used.
Frustrating!
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)i am just saying, at this point, this is still the best method we have before we say things like "X cures Y" or "X causes Y"
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)that the scientific method will be subverted time and time again until we make a clean sweep of our societal institutions.
There's a huge problem when the referees are deeply corrupt.
Gore1FL
(21,104 posts)it shakes out subversion through experiment.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)cohort, eh?
What do you suggest for a clean sweep? A purge of all researchers and orders to the gulag?
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)some researcher falsified efficacy studies
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)That's a problem with oversight and scrutiny. The issue is the essentially corrupt nature of the pharmaceuticals approval process and the relative weakness of the FDA, which acts more often in the interests of pharmaceutical companies than those of the public (see for instance the FDA recommendation that Tylenol have a label warning of possible liver damage...in 1978. McNeil's response was "but we'll lose a lot of money if we do that"...so, they didn't, until over 30 years later.)
ProgressSaves
(123 posts)Not science.
The FDA is a hen house watched by way too many foxes.
Taking medicine just because it's approved by the FDA is not advised.
But trying something just because it's not is equally ridiculous.
We need watchdogs with stronger jaws and sharper teeth.
firsttimer
(324 posts)Your question to number 3 can be explained .
progressoid
(49,951 posts)Water, fire, air and dirt
Fucking magnets, how do they work?
And I dont wanna talk to a scientist
Yall motherfuckers lying, and getting me pissed.
Heidi
(58,237 posts)kickysnana
(3,908 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)$120 advice.
So when it quit again, i thumped the thing hard. Car ran!!
My science inquisitiveness had me checking the computer. Disassembled it. Found a bad contact! 10 cents of solder.
One thing leads to another, unless you have a closed mind.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)I nearly passed out once blowing into a cartridge.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)I live in California, but still...
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)BarackTheVote
(938 posts)hitting malfunctioning equipment is the #1 go-to
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)Others on this thread have cured their TVs or have explained how that would cure the TV, and yet you doubt that kicking is an effective treatment?
After reading this thread I'm going to kick my flat panel TV once a week just as a precaution.
a2liberal
(1,524 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)Worked 3 times in a row.
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)I kicked him in the ass and he then got a job.