Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
75 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The DU jury system works (Original Post) MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 OP
Glad someones found work..... daleanime Nov 2013 #1
The Clinton trolls are keeping busy. Scuba Nov 2013 #2
But the agitating trolls are just fine. I'd say "ratfucking" instead of agitating... KittyWampus Nov 2013 #14
Not necessarily. You've had good luck with that in the past, e.g., MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 #19
and some not so good luck. I'd provide a link but can't be bothered. KittyWampus Nov 2013 #53
This is what I do to stay out of trouble over the winter. In_The_Wind Nov 2013 #33
Nailed it... SidDithers Nov 2013 #36
Why would someone who supports Hillary Clinton on sufrommich Nov 2013 #42
I thought the same thing. Beacool Nov 2013 #64
Stupid ass alert TheKentuckian Nov 2013 #3
We see a lot of them anymore. It's like the goal of some here B Calm Nov 2013 #4
And they're proud of it too. hobbit709 Nov 2013 #5
The gloating is what bothers me. Igel Nov 2013 #26
Knowing full well the poster can't reply because they B Calm Nov 2013 #55
Pathetic people n/t LuvNewcastle Nov 2013 #6
There likely is no mass conspiracy, and ProSense Nov 2013 #7
Yup. Games, games, and more games. TheKentuckian Nov 2013 #73
Great OP ProSense Nov 2013 #8
Your lucky the Bog goes to bed early bahrbearian Nov 2013 #9
I feel like I have a new lease on life MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 #10
Yeah, blame it on the bogie man. KittyWampus Nov 2013 #13
. Bobbie Jo Nov 2013 #56
The jury system is a joke. nt Logical Nov 2013 #11
True dat. ananda Nov 2013 #16
The admin method was much better. n-t Logical Nov 2013 #18
The mod system was light years better. We have a church lady, clown doctor system now. L0oniX Nov 2013 #32
Actually... pipi_k Nov 2013 #45
I agree. treestar Nov 2013 #58
Ah, you start an idiotic tasteless thread and then have to advertise it... KittyWampus Nov 2013 #12
Wrong again. MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 #15
No, it's obvious at this point that you are only here to be divisive. KittyWampus Nov 2013 #24
Couldn't be more obvious. Number23 Nov 2013 #67
So you respond to idiotic tasteless threads? Wow ...looks more like you are stalking Manny. L0oniX Nov 2013 #30
LOL. I pretty much ignore the divisiveness and antagonistic crap he posts. So is that "stalking"? KittyWampus Nov 2013 #49
Perhaps a map would help. woo me with science Nov 2013 #54
They alerted this thread as well Oilwellian Nov 2013 #17
New DU t-shirt "I alerted on that" L0oniX Nov 2013 #50
You'll need one of these t-shirts PasadenaTrudy Nov 2013 #20
Here it is! Oilwellian Nov 2013 #21
you just know someone is having a cow over this. hobbit709 Nov 2013 #22
Probably ... cause they can't alert again for 24 hours. In_The_Wind Nov 2013 #34
someone haz have sad over this, fer sure! idwiyo Nov 2013 #37
Someone change this to "Manny" and repost it please.... L0oniX Nov 2013 #51
what is that from? nt arely staircase Nov 2013 #61
Night of the Living Dead L0oniX Nov 2013 #62
that is what I thought but I wasn't sure. great movie I haven't seen in years. thanks nt arely staircase Nov 2013 #63
Hahaha Oilwellian Nov 2013 #69
I was a star member for years Oilwellian Nov 2013 #23
What problem? A Meta-thread gets alerted and stays in GD because those on the jury decide they like KittyWampus Nov 2013 #25
It's quite obvious Oilwellian Nov 2013 #28
So you have no problem with an OBVIOUS Meta-thread because you like Manny- KittyWampus Nov 2013 #39
I have a problem with the entire jury system Oilwellian Nov 2013 #47
So what is your solution to the jury 'problem'? randome Nov 2013 #71
Only the ones who are 'ratfucking' Hillary n/t hootinholler Nov 2013 #66
I won't until the bully system is confronted head on nadinbrzezinski Nov 2013 #75
BUT I'M POWERFUL ON THE INTERNETS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111 FatBuddy Nov 2013 #27
The Alert system needs to be reined in LittleBlue Nov 2013 #29
The admins have said repeatedly that alert stalking is just not an issue. tammywammy Nov 2013 #38
You don't need to be an alert stalker to make bad alerts LittleBlue Nov 2013 #43
Admins have PPRed posters for abusing the alert system. tammywammy Nov 2013 #44
I am on MIRT and we use the alert system alot. hrmjustin Nov 2013 #70
more results G_j Nov 2013 #31
Frivolous alerts will cost the jury system its credibility leftstreet Nov 2013 #46
How do you get semen stains out of a clown suit? n/t Fumesucker Nov 2013 #35
Okie dokie NuclearDem Nov 2013 #41
LOL n/t Oilwellian Nov 2013 #48
Manny, Embrace The Inevitability. Repeat: Embrace The Inevitability. jsr Nov 2013 #40
A term used to characterize something that is characteristically self-referential. LiberalAndProud Nov 2013 #52
this is meta treestar Nov 2013 #57
you're going to hell, Manny! warrprayer Nov 2013 #59
but apparently the rules for posting in GD don't arely staircase Nov 2013 #60
Actually - Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #68
What you really mean is the jury system isn't tied to what MannyGoldstein wants. randome Nov 2013 #65
I did not like your post but I would not have hidden it. hrmjustin Nov 2013 #72
The jury system is fair, probably one of the best features Johnny Ready Nov 2013 #74
 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
14. But the agitating trolls are just fine. I'd say "ratfucking" instead of agitating...
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 10:55 AM
Nov 2013

but then MY post would get hidden.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
53. and some not so good luck. I'd provide a link but can't be bothered.
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 02:07 PM
Nov 2013

Happy to bump this thread, it's a great example of how some people can get away with BLATANTLY breaking the rules and get away with it.

I am happy to provide links to illustrate that.:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023971663
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023612572

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
42. Why would someone who supports Hillary Clinton on
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 12:29 PM
Nov 2013

a democratic board be considered a troll ? I swear DU is becoming one of the least relevant boards as far as democratic politics are concerned,it's beyond silly at this point.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
64. I thought the same thing.
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 03:16 PM
Nov 2013

As for alerting, I have never alerted once in my years here, nor have I placed anyone on ignore. Unlike the crybabies who can't take it and always run to the moderators.

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
4. We see a lot of them anymore. It's like the goal of some here
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 08:33 AM
Nov 2013

to see how many post they can get hidden.

Igel

(35,274 posts)
26. The gloating is what bothers me.
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 11:41 AM
Nov 2013

Used to be that you'd alert and if the post was hidden, so be it. If not, so be it.

Now people feel like they have to do a post-mortem on the play, pointing out how important they are and how they beat up the other person. "Look at me! I'm bad! I'm bad!" All that's missing is the victory dance.

It makes DU less of a civil community that gets out of hand from time to time and more of a rugby match where none of the refs showed up--or where the refs take to the field as a third team. It was worse over the summer, when DU was a distinctly unfriendly place for newbies and for old timers, with all the screaming and bullying going on between narrow-minded individuals on pathetic power trips and with cliques that were formed to throw their weight around and be the Deciders.

I want that, I can drop in at the local high school during change of classes.

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
55. Knowing full well the poster can't reply because they
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 02:19 PM
Nov 2013

had a post hidden, they'll pile on and you can't do a damn thing.

ananda

(28,835 posts)
16. True dat.
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 10:56 AM
Nov 2013

The jury system can be infiltrated by trolls seeking
to shut down liberals.

And from what I see here, they have succeeded to
way too large an extent.

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
45. Actually...
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 12:52 PM
Nov 2013

I believe Skinner has stated time and again that the jury system is not being infiltrated by trolls.

That it usually consists of decent DUers who do their best to be fair and reasonable.

And that the majority of juries are made up of people who are acting in good faith.

Honestly, I don't understand why people might think the admins would be lying about something like that.




PS...and I find it offensive that someone might consider me a "troll" when I always do my very best to be fair and reasonable in my jury decisions just because they didn't like the way I voted.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
12. Ah, you start an idiotic tasteless thread and then have to advertise it...
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 10:54 AM
Nov 2013

at least you are becoming even more transparent.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
49. LOL. I pretty much ignore the divisiveness and antagonistic crap he posts. So is that "stalking"?
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 01:40 PM
Nov 2013

No, this thread is illustrative of something.

It's hilarious so many can't see it.

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
21. Here it is!
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 11:13 AM
Nov 2013

At Sun Nov 17, 2013, 06:55 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

The DU jury system works
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024045850

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

This thread violates 2 rules on DU. 1. no whinning about DU and 2. Do not call out other members of DU. For the admins: why is someone allowed to be disruptive to DUers and Democrats on an every day basis? When will enough is enough time come?

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Nov 17, 2013, 07:11 AM, and the Jury voted 0-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: a - technically, it's not whining -- the OP agreed with the jury result they linked to; b - jury results are anonymous so how is it calling out other members of du? this is certainly not the first time I've seen jury results posted on du, nor is it the first time I've seen an OP linking to another post on DU

This post isn't violating any current rules nor is it inflammatory, unless you believe that saying "The DU jury system works" is in itself disruptive. So, let it stand.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Enough is enough time should come for the alerter who seems to be abusing the alert system to try to get a long time member banned.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Good effing grief. The alerter delayed my trip to Lolcats Sunday for this? Can we alert on the alerter?
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Now they're coming after you, Manny.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
23. I was a star member for years
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 11:19 AM
Nov 2013

and will be again when the jury system is dismantled. The only reason I participate in it is to help level the playing field. I predicted this exact problem when it was created.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
25. What problem? A Meta-thread gets alerted and stays in GD because those on the jury decide they like
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 11:28 AM
Nov 2013

Manny…. while someone else's Meta-thread in GD gets locked because they don't like a poster?

Yeah, it's a problem.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
39. So you have no problem with an OBVIOUS Meta-thread because you like Manny-
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 12:26 PM
Nov 2013

so you are actually part of the problem.

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
47. I have a problem with the entire jury system
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 01:23 PM
Nov 2013

Like you said above, it's a problem.

On edit: Thinking long time DU'ers are a problem, is a problem.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
71. So what is your solution to the jury 'problem'?
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 10:23 PM
Nov 2013

And define 'long-term' while you're at it.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.
[/center][/font][hr]

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
75. I won't until the bully system is confronted head on
Fri Nov 22, 2013, 09:57 AM
Nov 2013

And I know it won't. Anyway I cannot afford that star, and prefer to give money to worthy causes. The jury system is part of the bully system. It is abused constantly by a certain group of people. This is by design.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
29. The Alert system needs to be reined in
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 11:53 AM
Nov 2013

A limit of one per day, and if the jury votes to leave it, prohibit the alerter from alerting for a week. Revoke the hopeful alerts that are really just attempts at settling scores or silencing legitimate political opinion. And with no repercussions, why should they stop abusing Alert?

There's nothing wrong with the jury system at DU, it's the alert system that needs examining.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
38. The admins have said repeatedly that alert stalking is just not an issue.
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 12:23 PM
Nov 2013

They're the ones that can see the metrics.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
43. You don't need to be an alert stalker to make bad alerts
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 12:30 PM
Nov 2013

Make people have a care about what they're alerting on. Right now I can just spam alert and as long as I get one juror to agree, I can carry on rolling the dice like a DA with no oversight.

It would cause people to only alert when they think that the rules have been truly broken.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
44. Admins have PPRed posters for abusing the alert system.
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 12:34 PM
Nov 2013

I think all of the concern over abuse of the alert system is much ado over nothing.

G_j

(40,366 posts)
31. more results
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 11:56 AM
Nov 2013

At Sun Nov 17, 2013, 06:55 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

The DU jury system works
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024045850

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

This thread violates 2 rules on DU. 1. no whinning about DU and 2. Do not call out other members of DU. For the admins: why is someone allowed to be disruptive to DUers and Democrats on an every day basis? When will enough is enough time come?

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Nov 17, 2013, 07:11 AM, and the Jury voted 0-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: a - technically, it's not whining -- the OP agreed with the jury result they linked to; b - jury results are anonymous so how is it calling out other members of du? this is certainly not the first time I've seen jury results posted on du, nor is it the first time I've seen an OP linking to another post on DU

This post isn't violating any current rules nor is it inflammatory, unless you believe that saying "The DU jury system works" is in itself disruptive. So, let it stand.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Enough is enough time should come for the alerter who seems to be abusing the alert system to try to get a long time member banned.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Good effing grief. The alerter delayed my trip to Lolcats Sunday for this? Can we alert on the alerter?
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Now they're coming after you, Manny.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

leftstreet

(36,100 posts)
46. Frivolous alerts will cost the jury system its credibility
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 01:06 PM
Nov 2013

Good grief

Time after time I log on to see eyerolling and lol-ing over stupid alerts that should never have been brought to a jury

When will enough is enough time come?


Indeed


arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
60. but apparently the rules for posting in GD don't
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 02:52 PM
Nov 2013

I guess we have decided to let this be meta 2.0. fwiw I agree with the jury in that one. Your Hillary hate is anoying but not hideable until she is the nominee.

Ms. Toad

(33,992 posts)
68. Actually -
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 08:34 PM
Nov 2013

Juries don't decide whether something is Meta or not - hosts do. That is a different radio button in the alert box.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
65. What you really mean is the jury system isn't tied to what MannyGoldstein wants.
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 03:43 PM
Nov 2013

[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.
[/center][/font][hr]

Johnny Ready

(203 posts)
74. The jury system is fair, probably one of the best features
Fri Nov 22, 2013, 09:40 AM
Nov 2013

of the DU. I posted a thread that was hidden by a jury 4-2. It was my 99th post and I was banned for a week or so. I was offered the chance to email Skinner with potential reasons to reinstate my account. So I did, and much to my surprise I was given a second chance. Thank you Skinner.

I guess I really appreciate the second chance having been banned from another website just weeks before. Lines...lines everywhere so hard to stay between the lines.

Thank you DU!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The DU jury system works