Tue Nov 12, 2013, 09:26 PM
WillyT (72,631 posts)
Well... Hillary Has Definitely ONE Benefit Up On Warren...
Moneyed Republicans will DEFINITELY start contributing to Hillary Clinton if Warren decded to run.
They'd have no other option. ![]()
|
13 replies, 1153 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
WillyT | Nov 2013 | OP |
longship | Nov 2013 | #1 | |
WillyT | Nov 2013 | #2 | |
madrchsod | Nov 2013 | #4 | |
northoftheborder | Nov 2013 | #10 | |
longship | Nov 2013 | #5 | |
Beacool | Nov 2013 | #13 | |
madrchsod | Nov 2013 | #3 | |
NYC_SKP | Nov 2013 | #6 | |
dionysus | Nov 2013 | #8 | |
NYC_SKP | Nov 2013 | #9 | |
dionysus | Nov 2013 | #11 | |
dionysus | Nov 2013 | #7 | |
Beacool | Nov 2013 | #12 |
Response to WillyT (Original post)
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 09:29 PM
longship (40,416 posts)
1. Also Hillary has not said that she isn't interested in the Presidency. Warren has.
So there's that. Conveniently ignored by many, I might add.
|
Response to longship (Reply #1)
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 09:33 PM
WillyT (72,631 posts)
2. Not Being A Challenging Asshole...
but do you have a link for that?
I'd LOVE to see it. ![]() ![]() |
Response to WillyT (Reply #2)
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 09:37 PM
madrchsod (58,162 posts)
4. hillary said she "wasn't interested"
which means she hasn't said a flat no.
http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/11/03/21297123-hillary-flattered-by-schumer-endorsement-but-no-decision-on-2016 |
Response to madrchsod (Reply #4)
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 09:49 PM
northoftheborder (7,419 posts)
10. I didn't see where she said "she wasn't interested."
"has made no decision about running for president in 2016"
"Clinton's office appreciated Schumer's gesture but said Clinton had not made up her mind." |
Response to WillyT (Reply #2)
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 09:41 PM
longship (40,416 posts)
5. Posted right here on DU.
You're here as much or more than I am. And you likely have broadband. I do not. (There's no such thing here in rural Michigan.)
It was widely reported here. Try the Google. |
Response to longship (Reply #1)
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 09:33 PM
madrchsod (58,162 posts)
3. i forgot about that.....
my problem is hillary is my age and warren is in her early 60`s. i really would like to see someone in their mid to late 50`s run for president.
does the democratic party have anyone waiting in the wings? |
Response to madrchsod (Reply #3)
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 09:41 PM
NYC_SKP (68,644 posts)
6. Wendy Davis. ny
Response to NYC_SKP (Reply #6)
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 09:42 PM
dionysus (26,467 posts)
8. is that a wish or a fact?
Response to dionysus (Reply #8)
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 09:44 PM
NYC_SKP (68,644 posts)
9. It's a dream.
But you never know-. It could come true.
![]() |
Response to NYC_SKP (Reply #9)
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 10:18 PM
dionysus (26,467 posts)
11. not a bad dream.
![]() |
Response to madrchsod (Reply #3)
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 09:42 PM
dionysus (26,467 posts)
7. thats the million dollar question, right there.
Response to madrchsod (Reply #3)
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 11:06 PM
Beacool (30,121 posts)
12. Warren is less tahn two years younger than Hillary.
She's 64.
![]() |