Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Burgman

(330 posts)
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 12:53 AM Dec 2011

No, Obama's not perfect for a progressive voter.

Not even close. But he's the best chance I feel we have at this moment in time. There doesn't seem to be a snowball's chance of a Dennis Kucinich or Bernie sanders winning a presidency next year as much as I wish it were so.

I doubt there is going to be a serious contender running in the primaries against Obama so I have to consider the obvious. I can vote for Obama or I can throw my vote away. He's not going to have the level of support that he had from me before... unless one of these fools in the R category looks like a possible win. Then the game changes.

Obama has many good things working for me, I do wish he had a bit more Harry Truman in him which I think (hope) may very well happen in a second term. He's heads and heels above in intelligence than most other politicians in the field today R or D and I really do believe his heart is in the right place. I also feel that his spine could use a little more steel.

He'll have my support eleven months from now as long as I'm on this side of the ground. I don't want this to come across as a "lesser of two evils" sort of thing. It's not. It's a place where I have to pick from the menu where I have a choice of pure shit or something that won't leave me with dysentery.

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No, Obama's not perfect for a progressive voter. (Original Post) Burgman Dec 2011 OP
You could decide just to drink the water. Bonobo Dec 2011 #1
But eventually, we all have to eat. Burgman Dec 2011 #2
You can survive for weeks without food. You'd be surprised. Bonobo Dec 2011 #6
I feel that the down side of seeing Dem #'s dropping off enough to get the Plutocracy's Burgman Dec 2011 #8
And I totally hear you about that. Bonobo Dec 2011 #10
I very much feel we may be on the same page here. Burgman Dec 2011 #11
+1 nt Bonobo Dec 2011 #15
If we alone were eating DonCoquixote Dec 2011 #17
Both parties look at results Scootaloo Dec 2011 #20
Or you could go to the other restaurant, where they only cater to the rich. Kurmudgeon Dec 2011 #3
again, another supporter telling people they either ARE Republican or should vote Republican StarsInHerHair Dec 2011 #5
Yeah, it was too idiotic to even deserve a reply. nt Bonobo Dec 2011 #7
they are skeered Skittles Dec 2011 #9
what is that, a slang term? I'm unfamiliar with it StarsInHerHair Dec 2011 #12
skeered=scared ScreamingMeemie Dec 2011 #13
Same as skeert. Burgman Dec 2011 #14
ok, thanks ScreemingMeemie & Burgman StarsInHerHair Dec 2011 #16
Well, when that's what their position amounts to, why not call them on it? Scootaloo Dec 2011 #21
K'd & R'd DeathToTheOil Dec 2011 #4
After the difference between how he campaigned in 2008... dreamnightwind Dec 2011 #18
You must be new, you will be eaten alive! akbacchus_BC Dec 2011 #19
NO!! he is either the prince of righteousness or the spawn of satan - there is no room for the Douglas Carpenter Dec 2011 #22
K & R Scurrilous Dec 2011 #23
I consider voting for a centrist to be "throwing my vote away". Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2011 #24

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
1. You could decide just to drink the water.
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 01:00 AM
Dec 2011

Perhaps the failing restaurant will eventually realize that it could make a lot more money by serving some palatable food.

Maybe the restaurant actually needs to go further downhill before it comes to that realization.

But if you order the pure shit and so does everyone else, it is a guarantee that it is all they will continue to serve.

After all, it is selling and there's no reason at all to change.

 

Burgman

(330 posts)
2. But eventually, we all have to eat.
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 01:03 AM
Dec 2011

and while this isn't the only restaurant in town, it's the only one I can afford to go to.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
6. You can survive for weeks without food. You'd be surprised.
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 01:23 AM
Dec 2011

You can last 3 weeks with no food but only 3 days with no water.

Yes, you have to eat eventually, but you cannot deny that ordering shit is a guarantee that the kitchen will only continue to serve shit.

But by refusing it and clamoring for better options, you MAY still have some bargaining power.

Of course, we are only talking about restaurants here. It is no perfect analogy and I know that.

However, I DO think that if the Dem party suddenly saw that "likely" voters had dropped off in huge numbers, they would come to the realization soon that they needed to do better.

But when your vote is taken for granted, IMHO, that is the time that you REALLY lose your influence. Seems obvious in fact.

 

Burgman

(330 posts)
8. I feel that the down side of seeing Dem #'s dropping off enough to get the Plutocracy's
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 01:28 AM
Dec 2011

attention would be a death sentence for the country and allow the far right to fuck things up beyond all recognition. We would revert back to th 19th century socially if we even survived.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
10. And I totally hear you about that.
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 01:32 AM
Dec 2011

I am not sure I disagree... but still... I have been watching this slow turn to the right for 30 years and it the direction seems to be just the slow, steady turn to the right...

It seems something different must be done -it seems that we can longer expect hopeful results the way we are doing things.

 

Burgman

(330 posts)
11. I very much feel we may be on the same page here.
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 01:35 AM
Dec 2011

I agree there must be more than "change we can believe in." There must be change that we can see.

DonCoquixote

(13,746 posts)
17. If we alone were eating
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 02:14 AM
Dec 2011

that might be half palatable, though still suicidal. However, the Iranians will be the main course if the GOP gets in.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
20. Both parties look at results
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 09:30 AM
Dec 2011

When you stayed home and helped elect the tea party in 2010 to "teach Obama a lesson," the message the Democratic party got was "duh, America likes right-wing lunatics!" No doubt you think that when you run your apathy campaign for the republicans again this cycle, it'll force the Democrats to make a hard left turn! Third time's the charm, right?

So hey, thanks for helping sell our nation down the river, I hope you enjoyed your brief moment of "sticking it to the man" before having it stuck to you for a few years running.

Tell me, do you feel better that your vote is utterly ignored because you refused to cast it at all, than you would if you went ahead and voted for one of those low-down dirty scumbag motherfucker Democrats you hate so much?

 

Kurmudgeon

(1,751 posts)
3. Or you could go to the other restaurant, where they only cater to the rich.
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 01:05 AM
Dec 2011

The ones who allowed their psychopathic family friend to crash a plane into your house and several while their other friends raided the cash register and picked a fight with some folks that had nothing to do with the plane or the crash.
I remember the Dubya years all too well, and the pack of loonies the GOP have running for nomination now make him look good.
Oh yeah, go vote for them, see what happens. Oh wait, we already HAVE.

StarsInHerHair

(2,125 posts)
5. again, another supporter telling people they either ARE Republican or should vote Republican
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 01:20 AM
Dec 2011

wth is wrong with you people?

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
21. Well, when that's what their position amounts to, why not call them on it?
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 09:33 AM
Dec 2011

"I REFUSE TO VOTE FOR OBAMA OR DEMOCRATS!!!!!!!!!" kind of boils down to support for the other guy, after all.

So I ask, what the hell is wrong with you, that you find this sort of moronic behavior acceptable? if it were merely self-destructive behavior, i'd leave them to it, but for the sake of ego and their narrow edge of ideological purity, they're more than happy to make sure everyone else gets royally fucked, too.

dreamnightwind

(4,775 posts)
18. After the difference between how he campaigned in 2008...
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 04:54 AM
Dec 2011

and how he's governed, I think we as a party have no self-respect if we don't do everything in our power to primary him from the left.

I can see that it ain't gonna happen (barring a miracle), but that doesn't diminish the need for it to happen.

I watched Democracy Now (as usual) during the week they were broadcasting from the recent climate change summit in South Africa. The whole week, it was one person after another with their jaw wide open (or their jaw clamped fearfully shut) wondering why the hell the U.S. wouldn't get out of the way of meaningful greenhouse gas reduction. Finally one of them spoke up and said behind the scenes they are calling him George W. Obama, because his policies re climate change are pretty much identical.

This is true on issue after issue. Those that don't agree are entitled to their opinion, as I am to mine. But this president is an order of magnitude worse than anything I can support in good conscience. His policies aren't even in the correct direction, they're just getting us to the same horrible places, perhaps a little slower and boiling us frogs a little more gradually than the inartful Republicans would do.

When the general election comes around, I have no idea if I'll vote for Obama or not. Probably not, I don't think I can. For me the primaries are where it's at. We need to take this party back from the corporations, who could not care less about any of us unless there's a buck to be made. There's no way around it, they rule by coercion, by deceit, by eliminating all meaningful alternatives, and by the brute force of their wealth.

We must Occupy the Democratic Party, because the party has shown itself incapable or unwilling to serve the interests of the 99%, which is its raison d'etre.

akbacchus_BC

(5,805 posts)
19. You must be new, you will be eaten alive!
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 05:02 AM
Dec 2011

Anyways, am on your side, I support President Obama to some extent but you have to be blind to not see how compromising he is! Rich people do not care for poor people!

Let me refresh your memory, he took office with a majority in the Senate and the House and no, he wanted bipartisan ship! And his first fuck-up was having an anti gay guy at the inauguration and am thinking, what the fuck is wrong with this guy! He should have never done that! He had the balls to close Gitmo, what did he do? Compromise!

Now carry on! He fucked up and still fucking up even though he knows the rethugs hates him!

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
22. NO!! he is either the prince of righteousness or the spawn of satan - there is no room for the
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 09:38 AM
Dec 2011

slipery slope of reason. If everyone started being reaonsonable - what would come of this world?

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
24. I consider voting for a centrist to be "throwing my vote away".
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 01:07 PM
Dec 2011
"I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men whatever, in religion, in philosophy, in politics, or in anything else, where I was capable of thinking for myself. Such an addiction is the last degradation of a free and moral agent. If I could not go to heaven but with a party, I would not go there at all." Thomas Jefferson to Francis Hopkinson, 1789.

"Were parties here divided merely by a greediness for office,...to take a part with either would be unworthy of a reasonable or moral man." Thomas Jefferson to William Branch Giles, 1795.

“Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost." John Quincy Adams
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No, Obama's not perfect f...