HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Food Stamp Cuts: A Bipart...

Sat Nov 2, 2013, 08:45 AM

Food Stamp Cuts: A Bipartisan Scandal

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/11/02-1


A farmers market in Roseville, California, where electronic Benefit Transfer cards are accepted. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli)


Starting Friday, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program will see a $5 billion reduction in funding. This means families of four who rely on food stamps will receive $36 less each month, starting now—a serious blow to struggling families, but also the economy, since every federal dollar spent on food stamps generates $1.74 in economic activity.

This is just a prelude to deeper food stamp cuts likely to come, as Congress debates a five-year farm bill. So it is important to get the political dynamics of Friday’s cut correct. There is a troubling trend among some left-leaning writers to blame the big bad GOP. See for example Jonathan Capehart in the Washington Post: “Oh SNAP, veterans get dissed by the GOP.” But that’s not the entire story.

SNAP benefits were boosted by the 2009 stimulus bill, and were to remain at that higher level until the annual inflation adjustments overtook it. But in 2010, Congress (controlled of course, at the time, by Democrats) passed a bill that took $2.2 billion from SNAP and applied the funds to one of Michelle Obama’s pet projects: a healthy lunch initiative for low-income children. This is what created Friday’s abrupt drop in benefits.

At the time, many House Democrats refused to punish food stamp recipients and would not agree to the funding offset, especially since SNAP had already been raided once before to help fund a round of emergency aid to states. This lead to clashes with the White House and phone calls from Michelle Obama, as a contemporary Politico story notes:

Despite heavy lobbying by the first lady, more than 100 House Democrats have balked at approving the Senate’s $4.5 billion version of the nutrition bill because it is funded in part with $2.2 billion in cuts to SNAP, the federal food stamp program. They want assurances from the Obama administration that the funding cuts the Senate approved will be restored in the near future.

14 replies, 3088 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 14 replies Author Time Post
Reply Food Stamp Cuts: A Bipartisan Scandal (Original post)
xchrom Nov 2013 OP
jsr Nov 2013 #1
unhappycamper Nov 2013 #2
L0oniX Nov 2013 #6
davidthegnome Nov 2013 #7
Voice for Peace Nov 2013 #8
awoke_in_2003 Nov 2013 #9
Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2013 #3
SoapBox Nov 2013 #4
L0oniX Nov 2013 #5
liberal_at_heart Nov 2013 #10
hfojvt Nov 2013 #11
Autumn Nov 2013 #12
gulliver Nov 2013 #13
xchrom Nov 2013 #14

Response to xchrom (Original post)

Sat Nov 2, 2013, 09:05 AM

1. "Many House Democrats refused to punish food stamp recipients"

but the 1% faction won.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xchrom (Original post)

Sat Nov 2, 2013, 10:23 AM

2. I suspect a large part of the problem is our love of expensive war machinery:



The new, $40 billion dollar USS Gerald R. Ford




$7+ billion dollar Virginia-class submarines




$5+ billion dollar stealth destroyers




$243+ million dollar F-35


[h1]It is ALL about guns or butter.[/h1]

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to unhappycamper (Reply #2)

Sat Nov 2, 2013, 11:04 AM

6. You forgot one...

 



Obvious gorilla in the room.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to unhappycamper (Reply #2)

Sat Nov 2, 2013, 11:07 AM

7. Is it really just 1% in Food & Agriculture?

This is deeply shameful. 57% on military projects, with 6% being the highest, spent on Education, Government, and Veterans benefits. What falls under the food and agriculture category? Farm bills and subsidies? The food stamp program?

Jesus, we're spending more on the military than everything else combined. I think I've figured out where those "cuts" need to come from, in order to really balance the budget.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davidthegnome (Reply #7)

Sat Nov 2, 2013, 11:31 AM

8. truly. how insane is that military budget?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to unhappycamper (Reply #2)

Sat Nov 2, 2013, 11:41 AM

9. I bet the Ford...

 

trips when it is launched.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xchrom (Original post)

Sat Nov 2, 2013, 10:25 AM

3. This is a wiw/win for Republicans....

 

They get to kick the poor (for fun) and kill the economy (blame the black guy) in one move.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xchrom (Original post)

Sat Nov 2, 2013, 10:26 AM

4. Disgraceful.



p.s...another aspect,

"Cut in food stamps to hit retailers...Sales could be crimped by the $5-billion annual reductions in program." LA Times 11/02/2013

SO...PukeBaggers and DINOs, didn't think about that, did ya?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xchrom (Original post)

Sat Nov 2, 2013, 11:01 AM

5. But we're exceptional! Donchannoe. Military rah rah rah freedom rah rah rah

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xchrom (Original post)

Sat Nov 2, 2013, 12:47 PM

10. K&R

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xchrom (Original post)

Sun Nov 3, 2013, 10:22 AM

11. seems like I forgot to kick this

must have been late at night

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xchrom (Original post)

Sun Nov 3, 2013, 10:37 AM

12. Kick!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xchrom (Original post)

Sun Nov 3, 2013, 11:26 AM

13. Vote out Republicans.

Dems hedge their bets on some issues only because people with progressive leanings don't provide enough Dem votes. Commondreams.org is one of the worst offenders in terms of perpetuating this problem by spreading a lie of false equivalence.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gulliver (Reply #13)

Sun Nov 3, 2013, 11:30 AM

14. corruption isn't limited to 1 party.

the democratic party leadership is comprised of adults -- who can take responsibility for their failures to motivate and govern like grown ups should.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread