Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ButterflyBlood

(12,644 posts)
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 11:46 PM Mar 2012

Breitbart was NOT simply we disagreed with on politics

I think that's the distinction. His problem wasn't so much his views, as awful as they were. He was a horrible, destructive human being who preyed on wrecking the lives of others. If any liberal equivalent of him existed that was just as dishonest and destructive I wouldn't ever defend them either.

Seriously, fuck Breitbart. I'm going to mourn him as much as I mourned bin Laden, Gaddafi or Kim Jong-il.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breitbart was NOT simply we disagreed with on politics (Original Post) ButterflyBlood Mar 2012 OP
Yep he was slime Kalidurga Mar 2012 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author backscatter712 Mar 2012 #2
Certainly. Dawson Leery Mar 2012 #3
He was trash. I don't wish death on anyone, but I didn't cause his death Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2012 #4

Response to ButterflyBlood (Original post)

Sarah Ibarruri

(21,043 posts)
4. He was trash. I don't wish death on anyone, but I didn't cause his death
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 12:53 AM
Mar 2012

And his death doesn't erase the fact that he was a mean asshole.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breitbart was NOT simply ...