Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 12:58 PM Mar 2012

Senate Votes 51-48 To Kill Blunt Amendment (updated 2x)

Senate Votes 51-48 To Kill Blunt Amendment

The Democratic-led Senate voted on Thursday to table the Blunt amendment aimed at rolling back the Obama administration's birth control mandate. The tally was 51-48 to strike it down.

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/senate-votes-51-48-to-kill-blunt-amendment


Updated to add...

Senate Kills Blunt’s Anti-Contraception Amendment

By Igor Volsky

By a vote of 51-48, the Senate agreed to table a Republican amendment offered by Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO) that would have empowered employers to deny coverage of health services to their employees on the basis of personal moral objections. The measure represented the GOP’s response to President Obama’s rule requiring employers to provide contraception and other preventive health services as part of their health insurance plans. Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe (ME) — who announced her retirement earlier this week — was the only Republican to join Democrats in “tabling” the amendment, while three Democrats, Sens. Ben Nelson (NE), Joe Manchin (WV), and Bob Casey (PA) voted to preserve it.

During the nearly two hour debate, Republicans attempted to frame the issue as an attempt to prevent religious organizations from the Obama administration’s overreach and, despite supporting efforts to defund Planned Parenthood, maintained that women could obtain birth control from public sources. Blunt took to the floor to argue that employers would be discouraged from denying certain treatments by existing state mandates and a provision in the amendment requiring employers to replace the benefit with another service.

The most surprising support came from Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), a pro-choice Republican who has previously supported contraception equity measures without conscience exemptions for religious organizations. Collins expressed skepticism about the wide scope of Blunt’s amendment, but said the administration’ incomplete rule — specifically its lack of detail about how to treat self-insured plans — compelled her to support the measure. “I feel that I have to vote for Sen. Blunt’s amendment with the hope that the scope will be narrowed and refined,” she said, adding, “I do this with a lot of conflict.”

- more -

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/03/01/435524/senate-kills-blunts-anti-contraception-amendment/


Update 2...

Hall of Shame: See the 48 Senators who voted against tabling the Blunt amendment

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=112&session=2&vote=00024

...because a woman's employer should be making these decisions for her.




13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate Votes 51-48 To Kill Blunt Amendment (updated 2x) (Original Post) ProSense Mar 2012 OP
Way too close for comfort? Mass Mar 2012 #1
I know they needed 50 to table it, but would they have needed 60 to add it? karynnj Mar 2012 #11
It's close ProSense Mar 2012 #12
I can see why Snowe is retiring marlakay Mar 2012 #2
All but her... Mass Mar 2012 #4
She can finally vote like she wants to now. Nt marlakay Mar 2012 #5
I think Collins and also Manchin voted for it as cover... joeybee12 Mar 2012 #3
Too close for comfort. LiberalAndProud Mar 2012 #6
Granted, I thankful to Casey for defeating Santorum sadbear Mar 2012 #7
Dear Senators Nelson, Manchin and Casey gratuitous Mar 2012 #8
Getting rid of "moderate" Susan Collins should be our next priority. Dawson Leery Mar 2012 #9
Casey Robbins Mar 2012 #10
Exactly ProSense Mar 2012 #13

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
11. I know they needed 50 to table it, but would they have needed 60 to add it?
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 01:20 PM
Mar 2012

Both Casey and his father were right to life Democrats. Here, I wonder if the problem is the inclusion of emergency contraception, which he likely equates to abortion. I looked at his site and there is no statement on this vote.

Does anyone know why this was a vote to table rather than a straight up/down vote on the amendment? Does tabling it do more than rejecting it - maybe in terms of ending all discussion on variants of it? If not, why take the vote that needs 50 against vs 41 against?

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
12. It's close
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 01:24 PM
Mar 2012

because Democrats only have a three-vote cushion.

Republicans cannot be counted on.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
3. I think Collins and also Manchin voted for it as cover...
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 01:02 PM
Mar 2012

Knowing beforehand it would fail...they were number counting and figured they could get away with it...I still ahte them, but that explains whyt hey did it.

LiberalAndProud

(12,799 posts)
6. Too close for comfort.
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 01:06 PM
Mar 2012

Why am I not surprised that Ben Nelson was one of the three Depublicans. It's as well he is retiring, because I couldn't cast another vote for him in good conscience.

sadbear

(4,340 posts)
7. Granted, I thankful to Casey for defeating Santorum
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 01:08 PM
Mar 2012

Can we not do better than Casey in Pennsylvania now?

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
8. Dear Senators Nelson, Manchin and Casey
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 01:09 PM
Mar 2012

I pray to God that you do not know or love any women ever in your lives, and that if you do, that none of them ever require the services of a physician. You are heartless beyond description, and the women in your lives deserve better treatment.

Love and kisses,
Your friendly neighborhood
gratuitous

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
10. Casey
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 01:14 PM
Mar 2012

While I know he Is pro-Life I am surprised he would allow all businesses to deny coverage to woman for Birth control.Especilly since a lot of catholics supported the compromise.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
13. Exactly
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 01:52 PM
Mar 2012

"While I know he Is pro-Life I am surprised he would allow all businesses to deny coverage to woman for Birth control.Especilly since a lot of catholics supported the compromise."

His vote and Collin's make no sense.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Senate Votes 51-48 To Kil...