General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSummers Suspends Citigroup Ties as Obama Weighs Fed Nominee
Source: Bloomberg Businessweek
By Craig Torres and Dakin Campbell September 14, 2013
Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers has suspended ties with Citigroup Inc. (C:US) while the White House considers nominating him to serve as the Federal Reserves next chairman, the company said.
Mr. Summers has withdrawn from participation in all Citi events while he is under consideration to be chairman of the Federal Reserve, Danielle Romero-Apsilos, a spokeswoman for the firm, said yesterday in an e-mailed statement.
Summers, a Harvard University Professor and former top economic adviser to President Barack Obama, was to give the keynote address on challenges to the global economy at a Citigroup research seminar Oct. 13, according to an invitation on the website for the firm, the third-biggest U.S. lender. The Washington event coincides with the annual meetings of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.
Citigroup hired Summers, 58, for small private-bank client and institutional client meetings, Romero-Apsilos said in an earlier e-mailed statement. He provided insight on a broad range of topics including the global and domestic economy.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.businessweek.com/news/2013-09-13/summers-suspends-ties-with-citigroup-while-considered-for-fed
bajamary
(450 posts)Poor Barack, he must have his boy Larry at the helm of the Fed. And it is looking like Larry-boy will be O's nominee.
oh, nooooooooo
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,560 posts)He should not be the next Chairman of the Fed.
PERIOD.
BootinUp
(47,135 posts)I am interested in why.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)NV Whino
(20,886 posts)If Summers is nominated, I'm heading o Washington with armed bears.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)Same as the old Boss
KoKo
(84,711 posts)and his ego had him do this....
But, does look like he's "gotten the word" and that the Senate will confirm him in spite of what we Dems who care about this have heard to the contrary about the 4 Dem Senators opposing him so that his nomination would not be approved.
Of course it could also be a trial balloon that Summers is putting up...saying "SEE THAT!...I'm not with Citigroup anymore...!" just hoping that makes a difference with the 4 Senate votes.
Raksha
(7,167 posts)I'm already through with Obama, and nothing's going to change that. There really isn't a whole lot left I can threaten with. The Obama administration has alienated me about as much as I CAN be alienated.
Triana
(22,666 posts)Seriously.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)I don't think Obama wants the knock-down, bruising battle in Congress over your nomination.
I expect Tim Geithner will take the job for one term.
seabeckind
(1,957 posts)Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)1: to debar temporarily especially from a privilege, office, or function
2a: to cause to stop temporarily
b: to set aside or make temporarily inoperative
3: to defer to a later time on specified conditions
4: to hold in an undetermined or undecided state awaiting further information
Can we hope for more transparency like this?
alp227
(32,013 posts)BootinUp
(47,135 posts)the Democratic Party will no longer be in existence after Summers is confirmed ( if he is confirmed). Because a significant majority of Democrats will abandon the party.
I will bet 1000 deniros that the Democratic Party would still be basically the same as today even if Summers is confirmed as Fed Chair.
Any takers? I need the money. lol.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)BootinUp
(47,135 posts)should be read with the knowledge that you are not even a Democrat.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)democrats have good social programs. The republicans want to do away with social programs and the democrats just want to whittle away at it little by little. I love politicians like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders who also just happens to be an independent. But you are not the first person today who has wanted to paint me with a negative brush so go ahead brush away.
BootinUp
(47,135 posts)I just want to know who is fighting with me or against me.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)RC
(25,592 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)RC
(25,592 posts)You are welcome to steal and it.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)The Democratic Party is now a business party. The Republican Party is a far right regional party.
We call these historic realignments. They happen every three generations or so. The old democratic coalition is pretty much broken, and I became an indie before I became a reporter. The fastest growing affiliation in California is the decline to state voter, otherwise known as independent.
Very much off the record...both parties in California fear a voter revolt. I see that as healthy. We need it. I mean that as a political system which is pretty stagnant, and in death spiral.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)He'd have to sut his ties to his past, which would be a neat trick if he could do it.
snot
(10,515 posts)RC
(25,592 posts)Besides the money is good.
TorchTheWitch
(11,065 posts)He was bought. They all were. Take corporate money and you're owned. He'll follow through just as they all do. That decision is made when they take that money. This is why the single biggest problem with our system of government is private money for campaigns and the need for so damn much of it.
We the working class are NEVER going to have our needs met until either the bulk of the money comes from the working class like it used to with union money or we get the private money out of politics. The politicians making the working class slay each other with the R vs. D game has worked in keeping us from doing anything effective to bring together all workers and make it a Labor vs. Elite fight again by rebuilding the huge unions Reagan killed and getting Labor money back in the game so they HAVE a choice anymore of who to get their money from and thus who to work for. R vs. D is a manufactured distraction so that workers can't get it together and get back to the only fight that matters and that works - Labor vs. Elite. It's NOT NOT NOT an R vs. D problem, it's a Labor vs. Elite problem, and the sooner we realize the workers have been purposely divided between two parties doing the same Elite economic shit and get back to the REAL fight of Labor vs. Elite the better. Both R and D voters - the vast majority of which are workers - want the same economic outcome but have listened to the lies from both R and D politicians who are working for the Elite because that's where their vast treasure of campaign money comes from on how to get there. The ONLY way to get there is to be in a position where workers through unions can offer campaign money that is just as green and plentiful as Elite money, and if neither party will take it then back a Labor party that will. Keep playing the R vs. D game that they encouraged us to play instead of Labor vs. Elite and we'll NEVER EVER EVER have a party that works for workers.
The name of the game of politics in this country is MONEY, and either that has to magically change or we need to go BACK to workers being able to provide enough of it for a party to WANT to take it thus be beholden to workers needs. The only reason the Dem party was ever a party of the worker was because they got the bulk of their campaign money from the workers, and the very moment they threw in the towel on trying to compete with Elite money vs. dwindling Labor money and went in for the Elite money was the same very moment the Dem party also threw in the towel on workers' needs and switched from working for Labor to working for Elite.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)Toonces is a goddamned moron and with his track record, he's lucky they're not repealing his Ph.D in economics.