Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Mon Feb 27, 2012, 10:57 AM Feb 2012

No big pickup in job growth in 2012, forecasters say

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-economic-outlook-20120226,0,5491303.story


The recent acceleration in hiring may have brightened consumers' spirits and the recovery's outlook, but professional forecasters still see just moderate growth ahead for jobs and the economy.

In their latest outlook, forecasters at the National Assn. for Business Economics said they expect job growth to average 170,000 a month this year. That's up from the 127,000 that the group's panel projected for 2012 in November.

Even so, if the new forecast to be released Monday pans out, many people are likely to be disappointed.

The economy added 203,000 net new jobs in December and 243,000 last month. That knocked down the unemployment rate to a three-year low of 8.3% and raised hopes that the hiring momentum may be building. The February jobs report comes out March 9.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

tridim

(45,358 posts)
2. I know why.. I just turned down a job that pays a low 40 hour/week wage..
Mon Feb 27, 2012, 11:08 AM
Feb 2012

That requires 55 hours of work minimum. I was shocked when I heard this.

I know it's technically legal, but requiring 15 hours of overtime every week will keep the hiring numbers down. The bean counters must be so proud of themselves.

I'd bet that lots of companies are doing this because it's good for the bottom line. Worker happiness (and the 40 hour/week law) doesn't matter, obviously. Loophole exploited.

MANative

(4,112 posts)
6. The company my husband works for has been doing this for years...
Mon Feb 27, 2012, 11:23 AM
Feb 2012

And was recently acquired by a much larger firm. Supposedly, they are not in favor of this practice and will be "reducing hours" to 50 instead of 55. Oooh, we're so grateful. This practice is especially common in the retail world, where the "management" team is worked to the bone so they don't have to pay hourly people. It's not uncommon that my hubby is "encouraged" to work up to 65 hours a week with no pay over his 40-hour base.

Then, in Saturday's mail, he got a notice of a class action suit against the company for requiring unpaid, excess work for "salaried" pay. This happened once before, about three years ago, and the company settled out of court, paying the class an average of about $8000. It'll be interesting to see how this round plays out, but it seems clear that the so-called reduction in extra hours was probably a preemptive move if they knew this lawsuit was coming.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
8. Yea, I went there ... nothiing there to make me take them seriously one way or the other.
Mon Feb 27, 2012, 07:02 PM
Feb 2012

I also found it interesting that most of the data the include in the article shows improvement ... and that right there on their home pages says ...

NABE Outlook: Underlying Economy Improving - While Economists Remain Measured on Expectations for Overall Economic Growth, Uncertainty Is Diminishing


Which to me sounds positive. Certainly not glowing, but positive none the less.

libtodeath

(2,888 posts)
5. Too much money
Mon Feb 27, 2012, 11:22 AM
Feb 2012

being hoarded with companies determined to undercut the economy to hurt President Obama.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No big pickup in job grow...