Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,981 posts)
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 11:41 AM Feb 2012

Romney's Daytona 500: A speedway full of foreign cars



Today, the Daytona 500 will host its 54th race. These days, it's hard to imagine a NASCAR race without American cars. Four years ago, it seemed entirely possible. But President Obama made the tough decision to extend loans to Detroit automakers when they were in crisis, and today, NASCAR fans will be treated to the best stock car racing in the world, made possible by Detroit.

If Mitt Romney had had his way and we had "let Detroit go bankrupt," today we'd be watching a Daytona Beach speedway full of foreign cars. Detroit would not be producing stock cars—or any cars at all.

We made a few photos to remind everyone what Romney's position on Detroit would have meant for American car racing. Pass them along.



http://www.democrats.org/news/blog/romneys_daytona_500_a_speedway_full_of_foreign_cars
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Romney's Daytona 500: A speedway full of foreign cars (Original Post) kpete Feb 2012 OP
NASCAR cars are hand built and have almost nothing to do with Detroit (or Toyota) production cars FarCenter Feb 2012 #1
The point is that if GM Ford and Dodge were no longer in business NASCAR would use foreign cars liberal N proud Feb 2012 #2
Originally they were ALL Fords - and then a few other cars slipped in. HopeHoops Feb 2012 #3
Point of fact: Most moonshiners were hillbillies and most hillbillies were Fawke Em Feb 2012 #9
What the hell does that have to do with Fords? HopeHoops Feb 2012 #10
No, they'd still build them by hand in garages in places like Mooresville, NC FarCenter Feb 2012 #4
If GM didn't exist, there wouldn't be a GM brand name on the car liberal N proud Feb 2012 #5
Chrysler no longer exists, and there are still Dodges in NASCAR FarCenter Feb 2012 #8
Chrysler no longer exists? liberal N proud Feb 2012 #12
Fiat runs Chrysler FarCenter Feb 2012 #14
You said Chrysler does not exist. liberal N proud Feb 2012 #17
Chrysler no longer exists as an independent American auto maker FarCenter Feb 2012 #19
Chrysler is still making cars liberal N proud Feb 2012 #20
Chrysler is a brand of Fiat, not an independent company FarCenter Feb 2012 #21
symantics liberal N proud Feb 2012 #22
Facts! Chrysler was "rescued" by selling a majority interest to a foreign auto company FarCenter Feb 2012 #23
It would be the end of NASCAR as the rednecks will refuse to sponsor foreign cars. n/t DippyDem Feb 2012 #6
Toyota races in NASCAR. meaculpa2011 Feb 2012 #7
It doesn't matter. All of them look alike now. The logos are the only way to tell them apart now. HopeHoops Feb 2012 #11
Toyota built a plant in the south liberal N proud Feb 2012 #13
I thought it was *'s bailout? hughee99 Feb 2012 #15
And the IRONY of this is that while he is "watching the race" he will have to see an ad for Justice wanted Feb 2012 #16
building the cars today having nothing to do with Detroit Baclava Feb 2012 #18
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
1. NASCAR cars are hand built and have almost nothing to do with Detroit (or Toyota) production cars
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 11:48 AM
Feb 2012

They get a VIN number and the engine block from the manufacturer. Nothing else is production except that they all used to used the same Ford differential, and possibly still do.

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
3. Originally they were ALL Fords - and then a few other cars slipped in.
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 11:59 AM
Feb 2012

But even then, they were swapping in engines from other manufacturers. It was originally a contest of moonshine runners.

On Edit: ...which is why I don't see a problem with the General Lee being a pace car despite the confederate flag. It fits the history of NASCAR rather well.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
9. Point of fact: Most moonshiners were hillbillies and most hillbillies were
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 12:26 PM
Feb 2012

Northern sympathizers.

I really wish people on this board would learn more about the South and some of our history before typing crap they know nothing about.

The less prosperous nonslave-holding whites were known as "poor white trash" and "hillbillies." Next came the mountain whites who lived in the valley of the Appalachian range. Civilization hadn't reached them yet, and they supported Abraham Lincoln's Union party.

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
10. What the hell does that have to do with Fords?
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 12:32 PM
Feb 2012
It's a fact. NASCAR started as moonshiners racing on dirt tracks (mostly sand) and was almost entirely Fords because they were the best cars available for the job.

I really don't have a clue what your post is about, and I certainly didn't use the words "poor white trash" or "hillbillies". They made some damn good money running booze.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
4. No, they'd still build them by hand in garages in places like Mooresville, NC
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 12:05 PM
Feb 2012

Besides, you have two domestic and two foreign manufacturers -- GM and Ford, and Toyota and Fiat.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
8. Chrysler no longer exists, and there are still Dodges in NASCAR
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 12:24 PM
Feb 2012

The demise of the GM corporation would not necessarily mean the demise of the Chevrolet brand, which is an asset that would be sold out of bankruptcy.

Note that saving GM did not save the Pontiac, Oldsmobile, and Saturn brands.

Pontiacs used to race in NASCAR.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
14. Fiat runs Chrysler
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 02:57 PM
Feb 2012
A Merger Once Scoffed At Bears Fruit in Detroit

DETROIT — The unlikely union of Chrysler and its Italian parent, Fiat, is beginning to produce new vehicles that combine the talents of both companies.

Industry analysts have been skeptical of the combined potential of the two automakers since Fiat took control of Chrysler after it emerged from its government-sponsored bankruptcy in 2009. Memories are strong of another overseas partnership — the German automaker Daimler-Benz’s merger with Chrysler — that ended unhappily in 2007.

But the integration of Fiat and Chrysler is nearly complete and some analysts now say it could become a model for trans-Atlantic cooperation in the auto industry. Sergio Marchionne, the chief executive of both Fiat and Chrysler, spoke enthusiastically of the combined company at the auto show in Detroit on Monday.

“We are making all the decisions together as one management team,” Mr. Marchionne said at a media briefing. “There is no question about who runs what. I run one company.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/10/business/chrysler-and-fiat-merger-shows-fruits-of-teamwork.html

Chrysler Corporation is no more as an independent corporation, even though the Chrysler brand is being preserved under Fiat management. Fiat owns 58% of the stock of the Chrysler subsidiary, and it will increase ownership to 100%.
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
19. Chrysler no longer exists as an independent American auto maker
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 04:10 PM
Feb 2012

Chrysler Group LLC is a majority owned and controlled susidiary of Fiat. Sergio Marchionne, the CEO of Fiat, runs Chrysler. Chrysler is starting to manufacture cars based on Fiat designs, such as the Dodge Dart.

Only GM and Ford remain as independent US automakers.

Fiat meets last fed goal for takeover of Chrysler

Fiat SpA today announced it has accomplished the last of three goals set for it by the U.S. government as a condition of its takeover of Chrysler Group LLC: commencing production of a vehicle with an unadjusted combined fuel economy rating of 40 miles per gallon.

That vehicle is the all-new 2013 Dodge Dart, which will be unveiled at the North American International Auto Show next week. Having "irrevocably committed" to producing the fuel-efficient compact, Fiat's ownership of once-bankrupt Chrysler has now been increased from 53.5 percent to 58.5 percent, in accordance with the 2009 bailout brokered by the Obama administration.
"The acquisition of a further 5 percent of Chrysler is a fundamental step in completion of the integration between our two groups," said Fiat-Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne in a statement released Thursday in Turin, Italy.

"We are particularly proud of this accomplishment because it represents repayment of the trust placed in Fiat to introduce its fuel-efficient cars and engines to the U.S. market," he said. "The commitment to ecological and sustainable mobility, which has made Fiat the most eco-performing automaker in Europe, is integral to our business strategy. Together with the know-how developed by Chrysler, we have formed a strong, competitive auto group with a technological capability among the most innovative in the world."

The United Auto Workers' retiree trust fund owns the remaining 41.5 percent of Chrysler.

http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20120105/AUTO01/201050399

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
20. Chrysler is still making cars
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 04:17 PM
Feb 2012

Chrysler is still an automobile company.

You said they do not exist. PERIOD!

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
21. Chrysler is a brand of Fiat, not an independent company
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 04:20 PM
Feb 2012

The Chrysler Group LLC is just a legal and accounting thing, not a real company.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
23. Facts! Chrysler was "rescued" by selling a majority interest to a foreign auto company
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 04:42 PM
Feb 2012

Of course, it had been owned by the German company Daimler previously, after what had been termed a "merger of equals". That idea lasted until Dieter Zeitsche arrived in Detroit.

But Daimler had never had much interest in integrating the Chrysler operations with the Daimler operations. A Hemi-Benz or a Gullwing Dart would probably not have worked.

But Fiat is intent on integrating the remains of Chrysler with Fiat.

Whether "Fix It Again Tony" can fix Chrysler remains to be seen.

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
11. It doesn't matter. All of them look alike now. The logos are the only way to tell them apart now.
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 12:34 PM
Feb 2012

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
13. Toyota built a plant in the south
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 12:39 PM
Feb 2012

this give them support of southerners who make up the largest population of NASCAR rednecks.

Justice wanted

(2,657 posts)
16. And the IRONY of this is that while he is "watching the race" he will have to see an ad for
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 03:22 PM
Feb 2012

Santorum on a car for however long it lasts on the track (and not get mixed up in a bunch of crashes)

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
18. building the cars today having nothing to do with Detroit
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 03:53 PM
Feb 2012

all the frames, bodies, engines are hand-built in private shops






Roush-Yates engines are built in Mooresville, NC

but the manufacturers do have their racing R&D subdivisions that support them

FR-9

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Romney's Daytona 500: A s...