Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 10:58 AM Aug 2013

Builder of skyscraper forgets the elevator


The Builders of This Spanish Skyscraper Forgot the Elevator


The Intempo skyscraper in Benidorm, Spain—standing proud in this image—was designed to be a striking symbol of hope and prosperity, to signal to the rest of the world that the city was escaping the financial crisis. Sadly, the builders forgot to include a working elevator.

In fairness, the entire construction process has been plagued with problems, reports Ecnonomia. Initially funded by a bank called Caixa Galicia, the finances were recently taken over by Sareb – Spain’s so-called "bad bank" – when the mortgage was massively written down.

In part, that was a function of the greed surrounding the project. Initially designed to be a mere 20 storeys tall, the developers got over-excited and pushed the height way up: now it boasts 47 storeys, and will include 269 homes.

http://gizmodo.com/the-builders-of-this-spanish-skyscraper-forgot-the-elev-1065152844

Wouldn't you think you would need an elevator at 20 floors as much as 47?

38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Builder of skyscraper forgets the elevator (Original Post) liberal N proud Aug 2013 OP
One word.. Fumesucker Aug 2013 #1
That picture makes me sad. Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #24
Elevators are for Slackers! One_Life_To_Give Aug 2013 #2
So much for US leading the Olympics in medals in the future HereSince1628 Aug 2013 #31
The architect gave them his word as a Spaniard... riqster Aug 2013 #3
LOL! woo me with science Aug 2013 #4
Stuff like this happens more than you'd think Drale Aug 2013 #5
When they built the courthouse in the city where I am they forgot to put in Raine Aug 2013 #23
That's not actually true. Codeine Aug 2013 #29
What kind of bad planning is that? Aristus Aug 2013 #6
Yes, really, because the construction crews use those elevators to haul tools and construction up RC Aug 2013 #32
How confident would you feel living in a 47 story building designed by an architect hughee99 Aug 2013 #7
Even in my prime, I would never have made it up 47 floor stairway. nt Mojorabbit Aug 2013 #22
I hope those extra 20 floors or so don't overload the original floors ryan_cats Aug 2013 #35
Rapunzel needs the job. n/t L0oniX Aug 2013 #8
Code enforcement zipplewrath Aug 2013 #9
Slides and fireman's poles. Trebuchet. Problem solved. PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 #10
chutes and ladders Motown_Johnny Aug 2013 #25
Obviously false story turns out to be false. What a shock. cthulu2016 Aug 2013 #11
Yeah, the reality is that they didn't redesign for larger elevator lifting machinery muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #13
Not quite a lie... TreasonousBastard Aug 2013 #14
It just doesn;t have *enough* elevators cthulu2016 Aug 2013 #17
Did you miss this in the article... TreasonousBastard Aug 2013 #18
No, I did not. cthulu2016 Aug 2013 #19
Yes, that shows cthulu2016 is correct muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #26
Nobody said they didn't go above the 20th floor... TreasonousBastard Aug 2013 #33
The claim that they don't work above the 20th floor is incorrect muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #36
Really stretching... TreasonousBastard Aug 2013 #37
The Gizmodo title and claim are incorrect and highly misleading muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #38
Part of the allure of having the multi-million dollar penthouse is the workout you get climbing all KittyWampus Aug 2013 #12
Shrug... my employer just bought a four storey building that doesn't have a working elevator Sen. Walter Sobchak Aug 2013 #15
Same Spanish Engineer that designed the too heavy submarine? lpbk2713 Aug 2013 #16
Sounds like a success sarisataka Aug 2013 #20
Sounds like somebody got the shaft. Orrex Aug 2013 #21
Look on the bright side... KansDem Aug 2013 #27
I guess we all get forgetful at times - especially as we grown older Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #28
And NOW....A word from OUR SPONSOR..... MADem Aug 2013 #30
Maybe they can sell it as a health spa CanonRay Aug 2013 #34

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
24. That picture makes me sad.
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 05:45 AM
Aug 2013

It makes me sad because we should be able to have real fuckin' jetpacks, not this thing that vacuums water up from the river and then spits it out so you can fly 10 feet over the water, never mind the big hose dangling down, briefly mimicking the appearance of an actual jetpack.

Yes, yes, I know, a real jetpack is horribly dangerous, aerodynamically unwise and would probably burn one's ass to a crisp. But still. Sigh.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
31. So much for US leading the Olympics in medals in the future
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 08:07 AM
Aug 2013

Not only will there be people with calves the size of cantelopes, think of their biceps and pectorals after a life of carrying groceries up 47 flights.

Drale

(7,932 posts)
5. Stuff like this happens more than you'd think
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 11:16 AM
Aug 2013

When they built AT&T Park in San Francisco, they forgot to put in a Bullpen, that's why they are on the field.

Raine

(30,540 posts)
23. When they built the courthouse in the city where I am they forgot to put in
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 05:13 AM
Aug 2013

the jury's waiting room so they ended up sticking it in the basement. The juriors have to use the restrooms that are for the bailifs because of course there was no restrooms put in for them either.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
29. That's not actually true.
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 07:56 AM
Aug 2013

The designers wanted many of the classic elements of Wrigley Field and Candlestick Park to be reflected in the design of the park, and both of those stadiums had bullpens on the field.

Aristus

(66,316 posts)
6. What kind of bad planning is that?
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 11:19 AM
Aug 2013

Whenever I see new buildings going up in Seattle, the elevator shafts are always the first things completed.

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
32. Yes, really, because the construction crews use those elevators to haul tools and construction up
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 09:35 AM
Aug 2013
and down. That should have been the first thing someone noticed wrong.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
7. How confident would you feel living in a 47 story building designed by an architect
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 11:26 AM
Aug 2013

who FORGOT to include elevators, and with project planners who didn't notice this little mistake. Would you feel confident that sprinklers would work properly if there was a fire?

Even at 20 floors you need an elevator unless you're planning to only provide apartments for young, health professional athletes with plenty of time on their hands, never have any visitors, and have no large furniture.

ryan_cats

(2,061 posts)
35. I hope those extra 20 floors or so don't overload the original floors
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 10:43 AM
Aug 2013

I hope those extra 20 floors or so don't overload the original floor's design limits. The article makes it sound like they got to 20 floors and then decided to add 20+ more floors. If the first 20 floors were only designed to take the weight of a 20 story building, I don't think I'd like to live there, besides the no elevator thing.

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
9. Code enforcement
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 11:32 AM
Aug 2013

Dunno how far along the project got, but really, one is surprised that some sort of building permit/code enforcement didn't catch this long ago. The care little about most of the functional features, but tend to pay attention ALOT to things like stairwells, parking spaces, fire suppression, handicap access and ELEVATORS. (A public building around here pulled a fast one on them when they had sufficient elevators put in for the size of the building, and then reserved 2 of them for the folks on the top floors. There weren't that many on the top floors and it left the other floor woefully under served.)

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
11. Obviously false story turns out to be false. What a shock.
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 11:50 AM
Aug 2013

The sentence "Sadly, the builders forgot to include a working elevator" is just a lie.



muriel_volestrangler

(101,306 posts)
13. Yeah, the reality is that they didn't redesign for larger elevator lifting machinery
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 12:12 PM
Aug 2013

and that was realised in January 2012. Which means their promotional material doesn't look accurate (El Pais isn't precise on this, but it may mean that some roof space that should have been available for public use has to contain machinery instead). And during construction they didn't have a 'montecargas' (automatically translated as 'forklift', but I suspect it means 'cargo elevator' here) for the workers until it was 23 floors high.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
14. Not quite a lie...
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 12:14 PM
Aug 2013
http://www.inquisitr.com/895561/intempo-47-story-skyscraper-no-elevator-benidorm/

They have a working elevator to the 20th floor, but not beyond.

But, more to the point, who would trust anything in a building with this sort of screwup?

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
17. It just doesn;t have *enough* elevators
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 12:35 PM
Aug 2013

Here's the actual story. A 20 story building needs, say, 5 elevators (to pick a number). A 40 story building needs, say, 12 elevators because there are more people in it and the elevator trips are longer.

So simply adding 20 stories to a design for a 20 story building means you end up with a 40 story building with only 5 elevators.

And that is not enough for the traffic.

But the claim that there are no elevators, or even no elevators to the top, is just a lie. Not from you, but from the author of the article. I am not blaming you here.

"Not enough" elevators does not mean "no elevators" and never will mean that.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
18. Did you miss this in the article...
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 12:43 PM
Aug 2013

"How did elevator access get overlooked? According to El País, there were multiple elevator problems — including a serious accident.

But the short version is that the original project was intended to be 20 stories. Then the builders decided to make Intempo 47 stories tall but forgot to properly rescale their plans. So the elevators are too small and the motors not powerful enough."

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
19. No, I did not.
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 01:03 PM
Aug 2013

It does mean what you apparently think it means.

Had the author said "without a sufficient elevator system" it would be true, but that wouldn't generate many views.

In any event, if you don't think that the headline and lead paragraph are an intentional attempt to deceive the reader then that is what you think and that's just what it is.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,306 posts)
26. Yes, that shows cthulu2016 is correct
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 06:45 AM
Aug 2013

This is not about the elevator not reaching above the 20th floor; the elevators are too small - ie they have the capacity for a 20 floor building, not a 47 floor one. The more floors you have, the more people there are in a building, wanting to use the elevators at a given time, and the longer the average journey in the elevator. And you need more powerful motors for more people, and longer cables (if the cables are 27 floors longer, they have a significant weight of their own).

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
33. Nobody said they didn't go above the 20th floor...
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 10:14 AM
Aug 2013

the story said they don't work above the 20th floor.

To claim that is a falsehood, or that the title is a lie, rather than somewhat sensationalist is ridiculous.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,306 posts)
36. The claim that they don't work above the 20th floor is incorrect
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 10:50 AM
Aug 2013

Go to the El Pais article, and you find:

En enero de 2012, una nueva sorpresa: no se había tenido en cuenta el hueco del ascensor, como bien se ve en los diseños promocionales donde no constan los típicos espacios dedicados en las azoteas a los motores elevadores. “El espacio estaba calculado para un bloque de 20 plantas”, narran las mismas fuentes.


Google translation:
In January 2012, a new surprise was not taken into account the elevator shaft, as is well seen in the promotional designs which consist not typical rooftop spaces dedicated to lifting engines. "The space was calculated for a 20-storey block," tell the same sources.

These are not elevators that stop working above floor 20 (how would that happen?). They are elevators whose floor area and time of travel was designed for a building of 20 floors. Although construction of the 47 floor building was under way by 2009, and they'd put in the top floor by 2011, it took them until January 2012 to realise that the number of people wanting to use the elevators in the much taller building was going to be far more, and for longer journeys, and so the elevators will be over-crowded - and they needed more powerful machinery, which will take up more space on the roof, than they had designed; the promotional designs show the original situation.

Notice that El Pais says nothing like " they don't work above the 20th floor". If they hadn't changed the elevator machinery, they might not work at all (or they'd have a severely restricted weight capacity); they did change it, but the point is that the designing and building of the tower has been extremely incompetent, for years, which doesn't inspire confidence.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
37. Really stretching...
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 11:23 AM
Aug 2013

my initial objection was calling the story a lie for spurious reasons since the simple fact is that the elevators were a design flaw-- probably one among many.



muriel_volestrangler

(101,306 posts)
38. The Gizmodo title and claim are incorrect and highly misleading
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 12:04 PM
Aug 2013

"the builders forgot to include a working elevator" - not at all true. During building, the lifting capacity of the machinery had to be increased. "Forgot the elevator" is even more inaccurate.

If the title had been accurate - "architects have to install bigger lift machinery during construction, and elevators may be crowded in use" - then there would be no interesting story at all. The inaccurate title is there to attract clicks - and it works because the original is in Spanish, so few people will check it.

Basically, it's a lie.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
12. Part of the allure of having the multi-million dollar penthouse is the workout you get climbing all
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 11:52 AM
Aug 2013

those stairs… OR I KNOW>>>

Have rock climbing rungs on the outside of the building. It's a new feature. Pretend you are Spiderman every day.

 

Sen. Walter Sobchak

(8,692 posts)
15. Shrug... my employer just bought a four storey building that doesn't have a working elevator
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 12:18 PM
Aug 2013

It is also missing telephone conduits, most of the 20 amp wiring, it is also missing the top two floors. Nobody can really explain why they stopped at four, but it is supposed to be six. There is a hole between the third and fourth floors for a fancy glass staircase that was never finished. Sheetrock was just hammered up around it.

Built in 2004, abandoned in 2007. We mostly bought it for the parking structure but will gut it and renovate it at some point in the future when needed.

sarisataka

(18,600 posts)
20. Sounds like a success
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 01:10 PM
Aug 2013
striking symbol of hope and prosperity, to signal to the rest of the world that the city was escaping the financial crisis

This building will provide health benefits to occupants by the opportunities to incorporate exercise into their daily routine. A forward looking energy saving green design...

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
27. Look on the bright side...
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 07:32 AM
Aug 2013

Just think of the money saved by not having to have these:



(The building does have stairs, doesn't it?)

CanonRay

(14,101 posts)
34. Maybe they can sell it as a health spa
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 10:27 AM
Aug 2013

carrying your groceries up 47 flights of stairs has got to do you some good.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Builder of skyscraper for...