Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
214 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breaking: The Dutchess Kate is in labor!!! (Original Post) Lil Missy Jul 2013 OP
HA... Pelican Jul 2013 #1
I was in a sleepy haze last night while the TV was on when "Late Breaking News" happened at chelsea0011 Jul 2013 #96
From Twitter... Tx4obama Jul 2013 #2
+1 TDale313 Jul 2013 #6
OMG...... Historic NY Jul 2013 #7
Me too, I hope it is a girl... Alexandra. secondwind Jul 2013 #49
My gut says JoDog Jul 2013 #88
I was hoping for Diana. ananda Jul 2013 #98
I don't think Wm will have Mrs. Middleton's name "Carol" in any way given pride of place. Why WinkyDink Jul 2013 #116
"Caroline" also is one of the feminine versions JoDog Jul 2013 #144
Maybe "Elizabeth Victoria Diana." I do hope that Diana is represented somehow anneboleyn Jul 2013 #149
I'm rooting for a girl as well davidpdx Jul 2013 #67
That's great news! I usually don't follow stuff like this, but I remember liberal_at_heart Jul 2013 #3
God bless her and her baby! And her husband! hrmjustin Jul 2013 #4
I hope all goes well. It'd be devasting to Kate if something went wrong w/ the whole world watching Tx4obama Jul 2013 #11
She has good doctors so hopefully things will go well. hrmjustin Jul 2013 #13
More ... Tx4obama Jul 2013 #5
AP article Tx4obama Jul 2013 #8
Dr. Marcus Setchell, On Her Majesty's Secret Cervix. Bosonic Jul 2013 #121
Funny! CTyankee Jul 2013 #148
Fuck royalty. Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #9
Amen to that! This labor will be the only work she ever does in her life. byeya Jul 2013 #71
+237 Atman Jul 2013 #80
We sure did fight and defeat them. I have 5 ancestors who fought in the Revolution who had byeya Jul 2013 #83
LOL!! Whisp Jul 2013 #95
that isn't totally fair treestar Jul 2013 #190
Thank you! The response to this post is embarrassing! n-t Logical Jul 2013 #75
Thread note Shivering Jemmy Jul 2013 #85
To Hell with the Monarchy! Chan790 Jul 2013 #93
Indeed. It's fucking humiliating that in the West in 2013, we have people who still expected to be NuclearDem Jul 2013 #108
CONGRATULATIONS to Will & Kate!! nt Raine Jul 2013 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author LumosMaxima Jul 2013 #12
I think it would be awful for the twin that was born second... Tx4obama Jul 2013 #14
I have a niece who IS pregnant with twins! ;-) n/t ReRe Jul 2013 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author LumosMaxima Jul 2013 #21
She is ecstatic with expectancy. Everything is going great. 22 weeks in now. n/t ReRe Jul 2013 #24
It's probably not twins kdmorris Jul 2013 #68
You just gave birth to twins on June 19? Did I read that right? Voice for Peace Jul 2013 #151
Yep! They will be 5 weeks old on Wednesday kdmorris Jul 2013 #162
Congratulations! (nt) PotatoChip Jul 2013 #163
Thank you! n/t kdmorris Jul 2013 #174
grand double congratulations and best of luck Voice for Peace Jul 2013 #182
Thank you kdmorris Jul 2013 #192
Congrats to the welfare mother to be! n/t Moses2SandyKoufax Jul 2013 #15
Gawd I LOVE You! HangOnKids Jul 2013 #26
It seems like most people think it will be a girl. Boudica the Lyoness Jul 2013 #16
I'm rooting for a girl, just to shake things up. Gotta test drive that "First born gets it" rule!! MADem Jul 2013 #17
NBC News: Prince William's wife Kate admitted into hospital in early stages of labor Rhiannon12866 Jul 2013 #18
cute pictures! liberal_at_heart Jul 2013 #19
I remember him with Princess Diana, was a very cute baby... This is the pic I remember: Rhiannon12866 Jul 2013 #22
Baby Watch! ReRe Jul 2013 #23
I understand she's planning a water birth. Crunchy Frog Jul 2013 #29
Oh, well... that changes everything, doesn't it? ReRe Jul 2013 #32
You understand wrong. WinkyDink Jul 2013 #111
Maybe. Maybe not. Crunchy Frog Jul 2013 #193
Pitocin sucks xmas74 Jul 2013 #41
It doesn't do those things if.... ReRe Jul 2013 #42
My child was overdue. xmas74 Jul 2013 #46
Sister had C-Sections.. ReRe Jul 2013 #50
I had that happen too. I was a week and a half overdue, my water broke and I went to the hospital. bravenak Jul 2013 #52
My water hadn't broken but I was a week overdue. xmas74 Jul 2013 #197
I had pit/c-section with our 1st and unmed vbac for my 2nd woodsprite Jul 2013 #63
My c-section was not the best experience for me. xmas74 Jul 2013 #198
My c-sect started with my water breaking 3 wks early woodsprite Jul 2013 #206
Everything I've read and heard states that pic and cytotec is a no-no in a VBAC. xmas74 Jul 2013 #214
IMO PADemD Jul 2013 #207
That's how I felt after the c-section. xmas74 Jul 2013 #211
I'm with you PADemD Jul 2013 #100
I felt rushed by everyone xmas74 Jul 2013 #196
I had 3 deliveries newfie11 Jul 2013 #65
Pitocin is EVIL kdmorris Jul 2013 #73
ditto. Hated it. mainer Jul 2013 #155
Agreed. laundry_queen Jul 2013 #195
13 years later and my stomach still turns just thinking of it. xmas74 Jul 2013 #201
ugh, sounds familiar laundry_queen Jul 2013 #204
I was single and alone while in labor. xmas74 Jul 2013 #213
let me the first to say. . .(clears throat). . .WHO CARES!?!?!?! Nanjing to Seoul Jul 2013 #25
Well, some of us do. Me, for instance. calimary Jul 2013 #27
me too. It's nice to see a part of Princess Di living on in those boys. liberal_at_heart Jul 2013 #30
Kate, unlike Diana, is a true commoner, not an aristocrat duffyduff Jul 2013 #134
Well, I DO.... ReRe Jul 2013 #35
Yes I do consider it. . .everyone has the right to their own stupid loves Nanjing to Seoul Jul 2013 #47
It was interesting enough.... Inspired Jul 2013 #53
Long reply Shivering Jemmy Jul 2013 #89
Maybe You Could RobinA Jul 2013 #169
I don't care in the least. n/t RebelOne Jul 2013 #66
We seem to be in the minority. Nanjing to Seoul Jul 2013 #69
Apparently a whole shitload of people do based on the comments on DU's multiple threads and pretty Rowdyboy Jul 2013 #105
Millions of people. Your opinion is, however, in the "Who cares?" category. WinkyDink Jul 2013 #112
Worshippers with no life? American Idol is not on right now? L0oniX Jul 2013 #141
Anyone who invests the time to write in this thread... LanternWaste Jul 2013 #154
It's history treestar Jul 2013 #160
That's another point, too. History. We don't have that kind of history in this country. calimary Jul 2013 #168
The fascination for royalty is here in the USA....including the reasons you posted above Sheepshank Jul 2013 #181
Yeah, and it's human nature to want what you don't have. calimary Jul 2013 #183
Hoping for a girl! Crunchy Frog Jul 2013 #28
Safe delivery and a healthy baby and Duchess most important ... But a girl would be excellent. politicat Jul 2013 #31
Breaking: Ken Cuccinelli demands inquiry into W&K's sex life. edbermac Jul 2013 #33
. Cooley Hurd Jul 2013 #57
OMG....that pic is priceless! nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #72
Poor Harry npk Jul 2013 #34
Oh, but Harry's either at his brother's side or on his way as we speak. ;-) n/t ReRe Jul 2013 #36
I am sure he is very proud npk Jul 2013 #37
No poor Harry edbermac Jul 2013 #38
Yes there is always that npk Jul 2013 #39
Please. Like he ever before wished for his brother's early demise. WinkyDink Jul 2013 #113
Poor Andrew treestar Jul 2013 #161
Tracy Ulmann said it best Adenoid_Hynkel Jul 2013 #40
And why do Americans spend so much energy giving a shit about them? Didn't we kick Nanjing to Seoul Jul 2013 #48
Gov. Corbett wants to sell our lottery to them. PADemD Jul 2013 #101
Yup... we engaged in a revolutionary war to deny ourselves empathy for a foreign childbirth. LanternWaste Jul 2013 #156
there are millions of children born in foreign countries everyday. let's have empathy of them too Nanjing to Seoul Jul 2013 #210
+ + byeya Jul 2013 #90
Is there a pool? 8lbs 7 oz. nt TeamPooka Jul 2013 #43
There was a pool, but it was deleted. PADemD Jul 2013 #102
I think that was mine. I self deleted, primarily because it wasn't worth the hassle of moving it... CTyankee Jul 2013 #127
I called 8lbs 7oz and he came in at 8lbs 6oz. I win! TeamPooka Jul 2013 #180
And thus begins woo me with science Jul 2013 #44
Shiny Royal Baby Coverage. Keep an eye on the overlords - this is a dangerous period. chimpymustgo Jul 2013 #79
That's right. The baby is a planned BFEE, Rove distraction. Is she even pregnant? Renew Deal Jul 2013 #81
Don't worry LordGlenconner Jul 2013 #171
A 19-post sock opining on my life? woo me with science Jul 2013 #173
Again, don't worry LordGlenconner Jul 2013 #176
+1000 PADemD Jul 2013 #208
I'm not a big fan of Royalty, in concept or in actuality. That said, I like babies and it's always Warren DeMontague Jul 2013 #45
Yay!!!! bravenak Jul 2013 #51
The Great Kate Wait may be over as Kate begins to Dilate liberal N proud Jul 2013 #54
This message was self-deleted by its author LumosMaxima Jul 2013 #55
They aren't really going to do that, are they? Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #58
This message was self-deleted by its author LumosMaxima Jul 2013 #59
Then why isn't the media camped out at Buckingham? Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #60
The BBC has someone at the hospital AND Buckingham Palace muriel_volestrangler Jul 2013 #61
Oh, gotcha. Thanks. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #62
Its custom to do so. dipsydoodle Jul 2013 #76
I just saw the photo of the announcement, framed, on an easel Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #184
They even use a specific size piece of paper dipsydoodle Jul 2013 #185
Eh? Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #186
Maybe you called it foolscap folio ? dipsydoodle Jul 2013 #187
Never heard that term before Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #188
If it's a girl I hope they name her "Honey Boo Boo" B Calm Jul 2013 #56
Why can't a boy be Honey Boo Boo too? Silent3 Jul 2013 #70
I like Bubba better for a boy, it just sounds B Calm Jul 2013 #91
Are you under the impression the British royal family is American? WinkyDink Jul 2013 #114
two live feeds: steve2470 Jul 2013 #64
Who gives a crap? This is lounge crap! n-t Logical Jul 2013 #74
What if it turns out to be a baby alien hybrid? darkangel218 Jul 2013 #77
........................... WinkyDink Jul 2013 #115
Niagara Falls will be dyed blue for a boy or pink for a girl. dipsydoodle Jul 2013 #78
Breaking: People Getting Excited Over Nothing Daemonaquila Jul 2013 #82
+1000, unbelievable. n-t Logical Jul 2013 #86
It's just a baby Franker65 Jul 2013 #84
Great. Another welfare receipient having a baby on the public's dime. Orrex Jul 2013 #87
In the oppressive monarchy of the United Kingdom, everyone has their baby on the public's dime muriel_volestrangler Jul 2013 #92
Whoa! Orrex Jul 2013 #94
Breaking: Latisha Monroe from Detroit is in labor! nt Zorra Jul 2013 #97
My guess from another post that was removed PADemD Jul 2013 #99
Charlotte! Byronic Jul 2013 #104
It would be appropriate. Charlotte is my favorite of the potential female names though Rowdyboy Jul 2013 #107
Too many "Charlottes" and "Charlenes" already, in the Grimaldis. WinkyDink Jul 2013 #109
but not in the House of Windsor Byronic Jul 2013 #118
But some would still prefer REP Jul 2013 #167
Indeed! Byronic Jul 2013 #170
I wondered if perhaps there was a 'th' missing from your username REP Jul 2013 #191
Aversion to sunlight! Byronic Jul 2013 #199
Y Drych has been published since 1851 REP Jul 2013 #205
Are you originally from PA? PADemD Jul 2013 #209
Missouri REP Jul 2013 #212
I hope to god that kid is black. JNelson6563 Jul 2013 #103
No, actually you don't, so your joke fails. Sorry! WinkyDink Jul 2013 #110
My day is ruined, my conscience heavily burdened... JNelson6563 Jul 2013 #123
Nope. UnseenUndergrad Jul 2013 #172
I'm hoping it's a girl. nt City Lights Jul 2013 #106
I don't get the excitement.... Marrah_G Jul 2013 #117
Is this the equivalent of Snow White having a kid? S.A.M Jul 2013 #119
Hmm... Byronic Jul 2013 #120
Is it me or is this labor going on Le Taz Hot Jul 2013 #122
Average labor is 10 hours. PADemD Jul 2013 #131
Oh my god why should I care? Apophis Jul 2013 #124
If you find out, please let me know. Currently I find watching grass grow more interesting. (n/t) spin Jul 2013 #126
You shouldn't care Byronic Jul 2013 #129
What's it to you? Le Taz Hot Jul 2013 #132
Whether or not you care is entirely your choice. City Lights Jul 2013 #135
Because zOMG BABEEZ!! and we're all bestest BFFs with "Kate" REP Jul 2013 #165
Not sure, yet you do. Renew Deal Jul 2013 #178
It's Official!!! CJCRANE Jul 2013 #125
OMG. Please tell me this is really the Onion... CTyankee Jul 2013 #128
Had you going there for a minute CJCRANE Jul 2013 #130
You sure did! CTyankee Jul 2013 #133
It's the anti-christ. Trashing Dutchess & Kate L0oniX Jul 2013 #136
Me, too. Iggo Jul 2013 #139
I think she's having a baby just so she can collect more welfare!! lastlib Jul 2013 #137
The duchess of who? nadinbrzezinski Jul 2013 #138
Why do you hate the worshippers? L0oniX Jul 2013 #140
It's possible for many of us to be excited about the baby AND concerned about the poor Beaverhausen Jul 2013 #142
Ok... do so nadinbrzezinski Jul 2013 #143
Well done! Byronic Jul 2013 #146
Cambridge Byronic Jul 2013 #145
if this was my gig to cover I would be happy . olddots Jul 2013 #179
I would not, having come from another media circus nadinbrzezinski Jul 2013 #189
Absolutely right Byronic Jul 2013 #200
Over 12 hours now. She'll be exhausted mainer Jul 2013 #147
Argh. I have never had children but twelve hours of labor just sounds anneboleyn Jul 2013 #150
Royal Labor is an oxymoron markiv Jul 2013 #152
Ha! Iggo Jul 2013 #164
No, she's in Labour nt markiv Jul 2013 #153
BREAKING: George Zimmerman just showed up to the delivery room to deliver the baby. phleshdef Jul 2013 #157
lol treestar Jul 2013 #159
Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #158
She's gone into labour? Then she joined MILLIONS of other women worldwide who went into labour Ecumenist Jul 2013 #166
It's a boy! PotatoChip Jul 2013 #175
Live now! A healthy boy, weighing 8lbs 6oz anneboleyn Jul 2013 #177
Congratulations to Will and Kate! I'm sure Princess Di would be a proud and thrilled grandmother! liberal_at_heart Jul 2013 #194
Monday was a very good day. Major Hogwash Jul 2013 #202
And I thought she would have been a Torie WCGreen Jul 2013 #203
 

Pelican

(1,156 posts)
1. HA...
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:43 AM
Jul 2013

Middle of the US night...

You thought the Trayvon coverage was bad? Wait for the new coverage of the royal baby!

chelsea0011

(10,115 posts)
96. I was in a sleepy haze last night while the TV was on when "Late Breaking News" happened at
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 09:26 AM
Jul 2013

2:30 AM. It woke me from my haze as I wondered what could have happened at this hour. It was a bulletin of Kate entering the hospital. Jeesh!

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
2. From Twitter...
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:44 AM
Jul 2013


Breaking NewsVerified account ?@BreakingNews

Duchess of Cambridge admitted to hospital in London in the early stages of labour, palace confirms - Statement via @NBCNews

https://twitter.com/BreakingNews/status/359200791187308544



I hope it's a GIRL.

She would be in the line of succession to the throne - after Charles and William.



JoDog

(1,353 posts)
88. My gut says
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 08:33 AM
Jul 2013

it will be a girl.

Caroline Victoria Elizabeth. Queen Victoria the Second has a nice ring to it.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
116. I don't think Wm will have Mrs. Middleton's name "Carol" in any way given pride of place. Why
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 11:19 AM
Jul 2013

not Queen Diana I?

JoDog

(1,353 posts)
144. "Caroline" also is one of the feminine versions
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 12:56 PM
Jul 2013

of "Charles". So the name would honor a grandparent from both sides. There also is recent history of "Caroline" among European royals.

"Diana" would be lovely, and while I adored her, there were times when she was a divisive figure in British culture. This kid, no matter what the gender, will probably end up having about 6 names. If they do decide to use "Diana" it could be in third place or later.

Remember, the order of names has no bearing on what the child will be called by friends and family or what he/she will chose to be called after possible future coronation. Edward VIII's full name was Edward Albert Christian George Andrew Patrick David. He preferred to be called "David". His younger brother was Albert Frederick Arthur George. At home he answered to "Bertie". When he ascended to the throne, he took the crown as George VI. To today's addition to the family, he will be known as "my great-great-grandfather".

anneboleyn

(5,611 posts)
149. Maybe "Elizabeth Victoria Diana." I do hope that Diana is represented somehow
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 01:26 PM
Jul 2013

if the baby is a girl (which for some reason we all seem to be thinking will be the case). And since the Brits use middle names -- I believe that would make for Queen Victoria II.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
3. That's great news! I usually don't follow stuff like this, but I remember
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:45 AM
Jul 2013

watching tv early in the morning when they broke with the news that Princess Di had died in a car crash. I'm just so thrilled that her boys are growing up with some of her quailities of working with the poor and I think it is great they serve their country. Not too many American politician's sons or daughters serve in the military. I am also thrilled to see them so happy. I wish both boys all the happiness in the world.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
11. I hope all goes well. It'd be devasting to Kate if something went wrong w/ the whole world watching
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 03:02 AM
Jul 2013



Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
5. More ...
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:46 AM
Jul 2013

Breaking NewsVerified account ?@BreakingNews

Duchess of Cambridge admitted to hospital in London in the early stages of labour, palace confirms - Statement via @NBCNews

https://twitter.com/BreakingNews/status/359200791187308544

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
8. AP article
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:50 AM
Jul 2013

Palace: Prince William's wife Kate in labor

July 22, 2013 02:40 AM EST | AP

LONDON — Palace officials say Prince William's wife, Kate, has been admitted to the hospital in the early stages of labor.

Royal officials said that Kate travelled by car to St. Mary's Hospital in central London. Kate – also known as the Duchess of Cambridge – is expected to give birth in the private Lindo Wing of the hospital, where Princess Diana gave birth to William and his younger brother, Prince Harry.

The baby will be third in line for the British throne – behind Prince Charles and William – and is anticipated eventually to become king or queen.

The medical team will be led by royal gynecologist Dr. Marcus Setchell.

-snip-

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20130722/eu-britain-royal-baby/

p.s. I've posted it in DU LBN.

 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
83. We sure did fight and defeat them. I have 5 ancestors who fought in the Revolution who had
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 08:23 AM
Jul 2013

ancestors who were kicked out of their own country - Ireland - by the Brits. Throw 'em down a well.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
95. LOL!!
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 09:14 AM
Jul 2013

yeh, not into this royal thing either. I think it's nauseating.

I'm sure Kate and whatshisface think so too - not a private moment to be had.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
190. that isn't totally fair
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 07:53 PM
Jul 2013

She will cut a lot of ribbons and probably work for some causes.

And raise her children.

She could even start some sort of career if she chose.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
93. To Hell with the Monarchy!
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 08:46 AM
Jul 2013

F*ck the monarchists and the entire royal family. Deadbeat lot of them don't do a damn thing and sponge off the public...they should have left the royal tradition to rot with Charles II's head.

I hope she has a gremlin.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
108. Indeed. It's fucking humiliating that in the West in 2013, we have people who still expected to be
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 11:08 AM
Jul 2013

called "Your Majesty" or "Your Highness" without any hint of sarcasm.

So fine, Kate's giving birth. It'll just add another human being that gets tons of media coverage for no greater achievement than being born/married into the right family.

Response to Lil Missy (Original post)

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
14. I think it would be awful for the twin that was born second...
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 03:07 AM
Jul 2013

... having to live life knowing that he/she missed the throne by only a couple of minutes.

I think Kate's belly didn't look big enough for there to be twins.

Response to ReRe (Reply #20)

kdmorris

(5,649 posts)
68. It's probably not twins
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 07:50 AM
Jul 2013

She doesn't seem big enough and she seems to have made it to her due date. (90% of twins are born before 39 weeks). I just gave birth to twins (via c-section because they wouldn't both get head down) and by the end (37 weeks and 5 days), I measured 53 weeks pregnant (by measuring fundal height). They were due on July 5th, but due to high blood pressure, I was delivered on June 19. Of course, my twins were the biggest ever born at that hospital - 8 lbs 1 oz (21 inches long) and 8 lbs 5 oz (20 inches long) - so maybe I was just huge because my sons were!

I didn't "go into labor" (though I'm not saying it doesn't happen)... I had a scheduled delivery. Most twins are scheduled - whether by induction or by c-section, to better manage the staff that needs to be present and the risk factors involved.

I think it would be great if they have a daughter.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
151. You just gave birth to twins on June 19? Did I read that right?
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 01:43 PM
Jul 2013

If so, wondrous congratulations are in order.

kdmorris

(5,649 posts)
162. Yep! They will be 5 weeks old on Wednesday
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:21 PM
Jul 2013

First week was tough, but we are getting the hang of this now

kdmorris

(5,649 posts)
192. Thank you
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 08:29 PM
Jul 2013

We take shifts... I sleep at night, my husband sleeps in the morning. But I still take naps when possible

 

Boudica the Lyoness

(2,899 posts)
16. It seems like most people think it will be a girl.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 03:10 AM
Jul 2013

I hope it is. The Queen has done such a wonderful job. The Queen mum was brilliant during the war. Then there's the other Queens.... all hard workers.

Here's a link to the Royal Baby Monitor.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/royals/royalbaby/5017568/The-Suns-Royal-Baby-live-blog.html

MADem

(135,425 posts)
17. I'm rooting for a girl, just to shake things up. Gotta test drive that "First born gets it" rule!!
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 03:11 AM
Jul 2013

Also, the only English monarchs that have made a real impression upon me, save Henry VIII, were female. I think they do a better job, by and large.

Rhiannon12866

(205,161 posts)
18. NBC News: Prince William's wife Kate admitted into hospital in early stages of labor
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 03:22 AM
Jul 2013

The Duchess of Cambridge, 31, was admitted into a London hospital early Monday in the early stages of labor, a palace official confirmed.

With her husband, Prince William, at her side, Duchess Kate was taken to a private wing of St. Mary’s hospital, the same London facility where William and his brother, Prince Harry, were born.

“The duchess traveled by car from Kensington Palace to the Lindo Wing at St Mary’s Hospital with the Duke of Cambridge,” according to a statement released by royal officials.

<snip>

A birth announcement written on official Buckingham Palace letterhead will then be driven to the palace, where it will be placed on the same easel used to announce Prince William’s birth 31 years ago. In addition, the UK Ministry of Defence will mark the royal baby's birth with two gun salutes – a traditional sign of respect – at London's Green Park and on Tower Wharf at the Tower of London.

http://www.today.com/news/prince-williams-wife-kate-admitted-hospital-early-stages-labor-1C9846018



Getty Images Europe / Middleton family via AFP - Getty Images

Too cute: Prince William and Duchess Kate are shown in their early years.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
23. Baby Watch!
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 03:40 AM
Jul 2013

OK... it's a first baby, so if it's a totally nat-ur-al birth, it will be a while. Say.... 12 hours? God, this is a tiny woman. I can't imagine they would make her lay in such pain for so long. I hope they give her a pytosin (sp?) drip and an epidural and get it over with. (After all, she IS overdue!) Better all the way around for the Princess AND the baby.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
32. Oh, well... that changes everything, doesn't it?
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:11 AM
Jul 2013

I don't know anyone who has delivered that way. My niece is going to have her twins that way. Guess I need to study up on this way of birthing! If you know anything about it, do tell us!

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
41. Pitocin sucks
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:46 AM
Jul 2013

It speeds up the labor yet doesn't allow the body time to adjust to the increase in labor naturally. Pitocin shows an increased risk of c-sections too, possibly for the reason listed.

I had pitocin. I also had cytotec. I'd never do it again.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
42. It doesn't do those things if....
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 05:01 AM
Jul 2013

... the baby is REALLY due. And heck, I'm talking marvels that were new and wonderful 30 YEARS AGO! Never had a C-Section. I am sure they are going to take excellent care of Kate and baby.

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
46. My child was overdue.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 05:14 AM
Jul 2013

It can happen. It's best not to use any of it if not necessary. Letting nature take its course unless absolutely necessary is always the best. It's better for the mother and child, though not as convenient.

Besides, if she's far enough into labor that she's going to the hospital she probably won't need the pitocin, unless her labor stalls.

I had a c-section. It made me realize that one child was enough, especially since every hospital within an hour's drive still has a "one and done" policy in ref to them. No VBAC allowed in this neck of the woods and no doctor will take you on unless you drive into the city.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
50. Sister had C-Sections..
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 05:41 AM
Jul 2013

Always had them that way, as sis is the straight up and down kind. Tall and thin. No curves. "OliveOil" (er Popeyes girlfriend.) Sis only had two, and she is still tall and thin.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
52. I had that happen too. I was a week and a half overdue, my water broke and I went to the hospital.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 06:01 AM
Jul 2013

I asked them not to give me pitocin again but the gave it to me anyway. Almost died. Couldn't stop bleeding. I was sooo pissed I made my husband get me my last meal and ate it while they were screaming at me not to eat or drink anything. Once I was full the bleeding stopped. No more kids for me.

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
197. My water hadn't broken but I was a week overdue.
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 02:05 AM
Jul 2013

(Ex had been out of town for a couple of weeks and the night he came back was conception. We knew the exact date of conception.)

They started me on cytotec for nearly 24 hours, then moved me to pitocin. While on pitocin they stripped my membranes. I was in labor for a few days and eventually had a c-section. Funny thing was when they went to strip the membranes it was pretty easy, since I found out that they were ready to break on their own. In other words, if they hadn't decided to speed things up I was probably on the verge of natural labor but that would have had me delivering on a Sunday morning, which no one wanted.

woodsprite

(11,911 posts)
63. I had pit/c-section with our 1st and unmed vbac for my 2nd
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 07:29 AM
Jul 2013

I think I healed better and was up/ around easier with
my first. I think it was being 7 yrs younger and not dealing
with the pushing and all the bonuses that come with it.

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
198. My c-section was not the best experience for me.
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 02:12 AM
Jul 2013

I was overdue but ready to go into labor at any time when they decided to start inducing with cytotec. After 24 hours the cytotec had me in early labor but it wasn't fast enough. I was then given pitocin, which brought on severe back labor in short order and failed to progress me beyond a 5. 16 hours after the pit was first administered it was decided that I would have my membranes stripped. When they began to strip them they actually broke. So, after all the meds they gave me they realized that I was ready to go into a natural labor within a couple of days anyway. The only problem was that it would have more than likely been a weekend delivery and my hospital doesn't seem to have many of those anymore.

The 7 years younger would have made a big difference for you. VBAC is also a bit harder to go through, at least from what I've been told by others who've actually done it. As of this time, there are still no hospitals that will do it in my neck of the woods.

woodsprite

(11,911 posts)
206. My c-sect started with my water breaking 3 wks early
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 09:51 AM
Jul 2013

My regular dr was on vacation, so I had the drs who were on call that night. They tried to get my contractions into a regular pattern by hooking me a pitocin drip. After 17 hours, they said they'd only let me labor another 3 before doing a c-sect. They had my IV running at the highest dose of pit and I still hadn't progressed past 4 cm, so we went for the c-sect before there was any sign of increased distress from our daughter.

When my dr. came back from vacation and checked in on me, he had it out with the team of docs on call. He said if they had laid off the pit and let me rest over night, he said that's usually all it takes to give active labor a chance to set in, then they could have started the pit again, if needed. He was not happy.

The VBAC with our son was easy, but I didn't realize how serious the my bleeding issue (retained placenta) had been or that our son had stopped breathing until I got out of surgery. I had been on heparin the whole pregnancy. They usually stop it a few weeks before your due date, but he was 5 wks early and we didn't get that chance. A tumble on some uneven driveway started the ball rolling. My doc was apologizing profusely to me because I had to be checked for drugs due to my "precipitous labor". Apparently it's the law in DE.

I had chosen the repeat c-sect option for our son, but ended up with a forced unmedicated VBAC. It would never had been my choice since I had a friend who died during a VBAC attempt (but her docs had used pitocin during the VBAC -- which is a huge no-no according to my doc).

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
214. Everything I've read and heard states that pic and cytotec is a no-no in a VBAC.
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 01:43 AM
Jul 2013

Supposedly it's a lawsuit waiting to happen, since it increases the chance of both maternal and fetal death.

PADemD

(4,482 posts)
207. IMO
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 10:24 AM
Jul 2013

VBAC was a breeze compared to C-section. The day after pit-induced C-section, I felt like I'd been run over by a truck. The staff kept telling me that I wasn't moving enough, but every muscle hurt.

After the 10-hour VBAC labor, I was up and walking around. C-section baby weight 8 pounds 10 ounces; VBAC baby weight 9 pounds 11.5 ounces.

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
211. That's how I felt after the c-section.
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 12:16 PM
Jul 2013

I've always heard that, no matter 1st or VBAC, healing time is much quicker and that just stands to reason.

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
196. I felt rushed by everyone
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 02:00 AM
Jul 2013

and I felt like every time they increased it was to rush me along. One of the nurses even made a comment about me and bed space, since maternity was full that night and they were putting new admits into swing rooms.

newfie11

(8,159 posts)
65. I had 3 deliveries
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 07:40 AM
Jul 2013

All Lamaze but one using pitocin.
I can tell you pitocin is not something I would choose just to make a normal delivery faster.
Using this stuff the contraction hits will full force, there is no start and peak, only peak.

kdmorris

(5,649 posts)
73. Pitocin is EVIL
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 08:01 AM
Jul 2013

I had it with my first because my labor had stalled at 4 cm. Instead of having nice valleys and hills on the contraction monitor, the contractions went INSTANTLY to peak and stayed there for 2 minutes. Then I'd get 30 seconds between contractions and then it would go immediately back to full pain. Normal labor "ramps up" from the valley to the peak, so you really only have 30 seconds of intense pain per contraction, instead of the full 3 minutes of intense pain per contraction.

I would never wish that stuff on my worst enemy.

mainer

(12,022 posts)
155. ditto. Hated it.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 01:57 PM
Jul 2013

I went through 12 hours of labor and they wanted to speed things up so they gave me pitocin, but no epidural. Never had such pain in my life.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
195. Agreed.
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 01:49 AM
Jul 2013

it gave me 'double peaking' contractions - meaning one ctx would be ending and the next was already going. I had a 3 hour long contraction at one point. ugh, makes me sick to think about how awful it was (I had no epidural and I ended up with a C-section and ptsd)

My next labor - a vbac - was also long, but no augmentation and it was totally bearable and I made it through. There was a HUGE difference. I think Pitocin caused my C-section b/c I just lost it and couldn't cope.

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
201. 13 years later and my stomach still turns just thinking of it.
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 02:23 AM
Jul 2013

After being up for a couple of days between the cytotec/pitocin cocktail in my system it was decided that I needed to nap. I was given fentanyl as an iv push. I immediately passed out but woke back up 20 minutes later, vomiting. After nearly 3 days in the hospital I was given a c-section and moved from my room in maternity to the med-surg ward. Med-surg wouldn't allow my baby in the room with me so I got up and pulled myself back over to maternity and tried to take her with me. Finally, they found a bed for me in maternity and put me back.


I hate even thinking about the crap they pushed me.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
204. ugh, sounds familiar
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 03:37 AM
Jul 2013

my child is 16 and it's just like yesterday when I think of it. Sorry you had to go through that too - it's insane what some hospitals will push on you in the name of protocol.

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
213. I was single and alone while in labor.
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 01:41 AM
Jul 2013

They knew I didn't have the support to back me up and that they could get away with it.

calimary

(81,209 posts)
27. Well, some of us do. Me, for instance.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:01 AM
Jul 2013

It'd be nice to have some genuinely pleasant news for a change. I'm just so worn-down.

And hey, say what you will, but I like her. I like the idea that the royals can be like regular folks and marry for love. I like that she's a commoner. I like the idea that they want to give their offspring a normal life. I like that someone like him - who was raised to be closer to the people - is gonna be monarch someday. How can he be a good king, even as a figurehead, if he doesn't have a sense of understanding his people?

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
30. me too. It's nice to see a part of Princess Di living on in those boys.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:06 AM
Jul 2013

And we have to remember that it is a different culture than ours. The people over there do fight for fairness just as we do, but they also have a great sense of pride in their country, and the Royal family is a deep part of their identity as a country.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
35. Well, I DO....
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:17 AM
Jul 2013

I am a woman, first. And secondly, I am of British descent. Thirdly, I AM HUMAN. Each to their own interests, do you ever consider that before you boast "Who Cares??"

 

Nanjing to Seoul

(2,088 posts)
47. Yes I do consider it. . .everyone has the right to their own stupid loves
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 05:23 AM
Jul 2013

You care about toe royals?

First: I'm a woman? So because I am a man, I don't care about kids? Sexist. . .nice!

Second: British descent, meaning you are not a British citizen. Meaning you're American. I have Iroquois ancestry. What's your point?

Third: You are human. Okay, so because I don't give a shit about the royal's birth, I am not human. Sexist and elitist.

Why don't I care? Because it does not affect my life or the lives of anyone outside their family. WHO GIVES A RAT'S ASS???.

I didn't care about Beyonce's little bashion of goodness either. I didn't care about American "royalty" either. Why should I care about someone in another country, especially someone who doesn't do shit?

If an American's interest is in royal sponges that make oodles of money and produce nothing, so be it. And I can look at the news and say "NEXT!"

Inspired

(3,957 posts)
53. It was interesting enough....
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 06:46 AM
Jul 2013

for you to open this thread, read through it, and post a snarky comment. To make yourself feel, somehow, better...more enlightened...than those who are excited about this. How very elitist and somewhat 'royal' of you.

I think this is a good human interest story. I wish Will and Kate all the best.

I hope they have a girl and they name her Diana.

Maybe you could have said "NEXT" when you read the title of this thread?

Rowdyboy

(22,057 posts)
105. Apparently a whole shitload of people do based on the comments on DU's multiple threads and pretty
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 11:05 AM
Jul 2013

much everywhere else on the internet and in the media and around water coolers etc throughout the world.... But feel free to hate on....Because,.....

let me be the first to say...(clears throat)...WHO CARES!?!?!?!

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
154. Anyone who invests the time to write in this thread...
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 01:54 PM
Jul 2013

"WHO CARES!?!?!?!"


Anyone who invests the time to write in this thread regardless of the rationalizations to the contrary, I would think.

calimary

(81,209 posts)
168. That's another point, too. History. We don't have that kind of history in this country.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 03:04 PM
Jul 2013

By age alone, we're an unruly teenager in the family of nations. We haven't outgrown the kiddie table or sippy cups in comparison to some of them - that have been around for one or two or three THOUSAND years. We don't have that, here. And sometimes there's something in me that yearns for that kind of long chain of connectivity through the ages.

Maybe it's because I myself am adopted. I don't have a family history, except for one that was grafted on when I was two weeks old (as I've been told). At least until very recently, when I did an adoption search and after almost a year, finally found some information that connects me partially - somewhere.

I have no blood lines connecting me to anyone but my own two children who both came outta me. I can't look back to any ancestors or generational elders who hold any personal connection to me, or who passed on their eye color or the shape of their chins - OR their propensity for breast cancer or bad teeth, or their ability to sing, or their tendency toward personality disorders, or ANY of that. I have no clue as to what "runs in my family" because it's never applied to me. Try filling out a medical history form and having to put N/A (Not Applicable) when you're asked whether your mother, sister, grandmother, aunt, or someone else in your biological family had cancer or diabetes or depression or any of that. Try looking at your personal file in elementary school (that you weren't really supposed to see) and notice that, high up there near the top, somebody typed in "ADOPTED" - in big red capitol letters. A scarlet letter indeed. Seven of them, as a matter of fact. I am a living, breathing, walking, talking sequester, if you will. John Donne once wrote that "no man is an island." But I've felt like one for my whole life (my adoptive parents, who were the only parents I ever knew, told me when I was four, I think - really young).

So I willingly concede that point - about history and connectivity through the ages - and how it resonates with me personally. And pretty deeply, too, if you really wanna know.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
181. The fascination for royalty is here in the USA....including the reasons you posted above
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:43 PM
Jul 2013

I'd venture that 1/2 of all daughters born here are refered to as princess during their early years. Many of the wealthy continue to treat their daughters as princesses for a very long time after adulthood.

There is a curiosity for sure.

calimary

(81,209 posts)
183. Yeah, and it's human nature to want what you don't have.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:59 PM
Jul 2013

Gotta admit, when my daughter was born, I secretly felt - "gee, she's eligible for Prince William..."

Heck, we've all been through at least SOME of that, especially us girls.

Btw - she actually preferred Prince Harry.

politicat

(9,808 posts)
31. Safe delivery and a healthy baby and Duchess most important ... But a girl would be excellent.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:09 AM
Jul 2013

Because that would be a great line of succession. Royalty has had millennia of no girls aloud. It's time to put the change in law into practice.

edbermac

(15,937 posts)
38. No poor Harry
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:24 AM
Jul 2013

The closer you are in line to the top, the more restrictions you have. Wills has to keep his nose clean while Harry parties hearty and gets laid every chance he gets.

 

Adenoid_Hynkel

(14,093 posts)
40. Tracy Ulmann said it best
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:40 AM
Jul 2013

Why do the British continue to pay people millions of pounds a year to think they're better than everyone else?

 

Nanjing to Seoul

(2,088 posts)
48. And why do Americans spend so much energy giving a shit about them? Didn't we kick
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 05:28 AM
Jul 2013

the royals out in 1781 after Yorktown?

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
156. Yup... we engaged in a revolutionary war to deny ourselves empathy for a foreign childbirth.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:01 PM
Jul 2013

Yup... we engaged in a revolutionary war to deny ourselves empathy for a foreign childbirth.

 

Nanjing to Seoul

(2,088 posts)
210. there are millions of children born in foreign countries everyday. let's have empathy of them too
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 12:13 PM
Jul 2013

or is it because this one is the child of a throwback to an era that should be long forgotten and completely abolished.

please!

CTyankee

(63,901 posts)
127. I think that was mine. I self deleted, primarily because it wasn't worth the hassle of moving it...
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 11:51 AM
Jul 2013

I don't really care that much, altho I thought a pool would be amusing. I guess I really didn't think it was important enough for people to get all worked up over it. But evidently, I was wrong...ah, well...

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
44. And thus begins
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 05:08 AM
Jul 2013

months, and probably years, of wall-to-wall Shiny Royal Baby Coverage.

It's gonna be All Baby, All the Time. Just in time for the new Grand Bargain austerity deal, the Trans Pacific job and wage killing agreement, and our government's mass spying on its own citizens.

Renew Deal

(81,855 posts)
81. That's right. The baby is a planned BFEE, Rove distraction. Is she even pregnant?
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 08:19 AM
Jul 2013

This is all planned by TPTB. Bwahahahahaha

 

LordGlenconner

(1,348 posts)
171. Don't worry
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 03:17 PM
Jul 2013

I don't think this will interfere with your mostly joyless existence. There will be another rain cloud coming along soon, I promise.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
173. A 19-post sock opining on my life?
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 03:27 PM
Jul 2013

Coward.

Love how you guys are continually bringing in the new names, though. Gotta get those rec. counts up.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
45. I'm not a big fan of Royalty, in concept or in actuality. That said, I like babies and it's always
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 05:11 AM
Jul 2013

exciting to see first-time parents in action, plus those two do seem like nice enough young folks.

I wish them luck and all the best of health.

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
54. The Great Kate Wait may be over as Kate begins to Dilate
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 06:56 AM
Jul 2013

What will the media over react on once this is over?

Response to Lil Missy (Original post)

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
58. They aren't really going to do that, are they?
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 07:18 AM
Jul 2013

Post an announcement on the gate? With a gazillion media standing right outside the hospital?

Response to Ruby the Liberal (Reply #58)

muriel_volestrangler

(101,300 posts)
61. The BBC has someone at the hospital AND Buckingham Palace
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 07:26 AM
Jul 2013

I guess the media at the hospital is there to play "spot the messenger", so that they can put out a breathless "the message is on its way!" report, followed by the photo of whatever they post at the palace gates.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
187. Maybe you called it foolscap folio ?
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 07:01 PM
Jul 2013

Probably defunct over there now. Was either 8 x 13 or 8 1/2 x 13 1/2 - not sure which.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
188. Never heard that term before
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 07:03 PM
Jul 2013

I have had issues with things hard coded A4 (a European setting) that won't print for nothing here.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
78. Niagara Falls will be dyed blue for a boy or pink for a girl.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 08:12 AM
Jul 2013

Just mentioned on tv news here in the UK. Similar stuff all over the world.

 

Daemonaquila

(1,712 posts)
82. Breaking: People Getting Excited Over Nothing
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 08:23 AM
Jul 2013

It's revolting that this is getting news hype, much less getting people excited.

Franker65

(299 posts)
84. It's just a baby
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 08:27 AM
Jul 2013

I can't really get excited over this - two people I don't know and will never know are having a kid.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,300 posts)
92. In the oppressive monarchy of the United Kingdom, everyone has their baby on the public's dime
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 08:45 AM
Jul 2013

because the queen is a secret commie. National Health Service created 6 July 1948; Prince Charles born 16 Nov 1948. Coincidence? I think not.

PADemD

(4,482 posts)
99. My guess from another post that was removed
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 09:43 AM
Jul 2013

Female
7 pounds 2 ounces
21 inches
Monday, 5:15 p.m (first time labor is usually 10 hours)
Charlotte Diana Caroline Victoria

Byronic

(504 posts)
104. Charlotte!
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 10:06 AM
Jul 2013

An excellent suggestion. I'm hoping for another Princess Charlotte of Wales. The original was enormously popular. Her death in 1817 caused a massive outpouring of grief among the British public perhaps only comparable to the death of Diana.

Her father, King George IV, was admittedly useless and unpopular. His only child was the hope of the House of Hanover. Queen Victoria is iconic the world over, lending her name to an entire age, but had Charlotte not died after childbirth, Victoria almost certainly never would have reigned. Queen Charlotte might have been the legend.

Rowdyboy

(22,057 posts)
107. It would be appropriate. Charlotte is my favorite of the potential female names though
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 11:07 AM
Jul 2013

Alexandra would be nice too.

Byronic

(504 posts)
118. but not in the House of Windsor
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 11:24 AM
Jul 2013

Despite the (understandable) mockers and nay-sayers in this thread, it IS a rather historic birth. The first time, regardless of the sex of the child, that we will witness the birth of a future monarch. I remain hopeful of the birth of a new Charlotte of Wales. I don't mean to be sexist, but a future George the Millionth, would be a bit of a letdown in the circumstances.

Oh, and can the Commonwealth realms that are still dragging their feet on the new Succession Law get a wiggle on. The tiny Future Queen Lottie is not amused!

REP

(21,691 posts)
167. But some would still prefer
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:54 PM
Jul 2013

A Ceinwen ap Rees of Cymru, and not another Germanic prince(ss) who speaks no English if Wales must have a monarch.

Byronic

(504 posts)
170. Indeed!
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 03:16 PM
Jul 2013

Believe me, nobody would want to hark back to the grim days of the Hanoverians. I was referring to Princess Charlotte as an individual, (seeing as the name has appeared on several shortlists) and the fact that her popularity stood in stark contrast to that of her father 'Prinny.'

I happen to be a Welshman, and have sympathy with your point.

REP

(21,691 posts)
191. I wondered if perhaps there was a 'th' missing from your username
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 08:11 PM
Jul 2013

My family is originally from what used to be Gwynedd and Merionnydd (even after emigrating, my great grandmother's wedding in Kansas was still recorded in Bala). They settled in one of the many planned Welsh communities in the US (first Wisconsin then Arvonia, Kansas). Along with the black hair and aversion to sunlight, I seem to have inherited the "didn't we try go get away from those people?" attitude of my family.

Byronic

(504 posts)
199. Aversion to sunlight!
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 02:14 AM
Jul 2013

Ha! I'm with you on that one. Although immemorial Cymru is bathed in sunshine at the moment.

I'm always terribly disappointed that whereas St Patrick's Day is celebrated worldwide, and the Scots always export their identity everywhere, that the Welsh are rather more circumspect. St David's Day attracts hardly a peep on here, for instance.

Ah well.

Man of Gwent, here!

REP

(21,691 posts)
205. Y Drych has been published since 1851
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 04:28 AM
Jul 2013

And there's all those places with Welsh names: Bangor, Bryn Mawr, Arvonia, etc. So there may not be a lot of whatever it is one does on St David's day, but we did name many towns.

Where I'm from originally, there's a couple chapters of the St David Society (here in California, no one knows what that is and no one can say or spell my name).

But when a people are famous for perfect pitch, singing and poetry - well, that's going to lose every time to binge-drinking and public barfing. Also, to be fair, even Welsh aren't quite sure if the national foliage is a daffodil or a leek.

I celebrate St Patrick's (who, if he existed, was Welsh) Day by wearing a button that reads "Fuck Off - I'm Welsh."

PADemD

(4,482 posts)
209. Are you originally from PA?
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 11:11 AM
Jul 2013

We have a Bangor and the local St. David's Society, who march every year in the local Celtic Classic festival.

http://www.celticfest.org/festival_information

BTW, Welsh heritage here, too.

JNelson6563

(28,151 posts)
123. My day is ruined, my conscience heavily burdened...
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 11:41 AM
Jul 2013

Oh wait, no it's not. Glad to see the tight-ass contingent is up and about this am.

Julie

UnseenUndergrad

(249 posts)
172. Nope.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 03:26 PM
Jul 2013

And neither are really poor, insipid jokes that play on the old "black men as sexual predators and cuckolders seducing the married white wimmens" stereotype.

Still, maybe it's the South Asian genes from Diana bursting back onto the scene.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
117. I don't get the excitement....
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 11:23 AM
Jul 2013

... but then again, I'm sure I get excited over things people don't get either.

It's always good to see people happy and smiling.

 

S.A.M

(162 posts)
119. Is this the equivalent of Snow White having a kid?
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 11:29 AM
Jul 2013

I am sorry...why should we Americans care about what happens in the British Royal Family? Wasn't the British crown responsible for millions of death? Read your history books please. Come on people! Grow up! Stop living in Disney World!

Byronic

(504 posts)
120. Hmm...
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 11:36 AM
Jul 2013

"Was the British Crown responsible for millions of deaths?"

I'm contemplating how literally to take the question.

I shall err on the side of 'no.'

Which British monarch was responsible for millions of deaths?

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
122. Is it me or is this labor going on
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 11:38 AM
Jul 2013

a LOOOONG time. (Since I don't know nothin' 'bout birthin' no babies, I'm asking those who have been through it.)

spin

(17,493 posts)
126. If you find out, please let me know. Currently I find watching grass grow more interesting. (n/t)
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 11:46 AM
Jul 2013

Byronic

(504 posts)
129. You shouldn't care
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 11:57 AM
Jul 2013

You are an American with no interest in European constitutional monarchy (I'm just guessing here but I feel I am on safe ground). Do not attempt to care. Do not open threads concerning this topic. They will bore you.

However, there will be people interested (however distantly) in the events of today. Those with a knowledge of British history may be intrigued by the fact that for the first time we are guaranteed - regardless of sex - that the baby is likely (barring tragic circumstances) to one day inherit a throne with a thousand year history connected to it. Regardless of your view of monarchy, this is clearly no ordinary celebrity birth.

The poor wee thing has no idea what it is being born into.

Also, some people just REALLY like newborn babies. They are cute.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
132. What's it to you?
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 12:13 PM
Jul 2013

Really. Why is it skin off your ass to allow people to celebrate the birth of a child without all the moaning and whining and bitching by those who think their disdain for the royal couple is somehow relevant?

Hide thread is your friend.

City Lights

(25,171 posts)
135. Whether or not you care is entirely your choice.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 12:37 PM
Jul 2013

No one said you should care. If you don't care, then just ignore it.

REP

(21,691 posts)
165. Because zOMG BABEEZ!! and we're all bestest BFFs with "Kate"
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:36 PM
Jul 2013

Yes, there are untold thousands of babies being brought forth into this world at this time, but only one is the perfect rich white babee of our dearest of dear, close, personal friend Kate! She's so pretty and perfect and wonderful (or so I keep being told) and her baby will fulfill all my hopes and dreams!

zOMG BABEEZ! BABEEZ! (foams at mouth and rolls on floor) baaaaaaaaabeeeeeeeeeeeeeez!!!!!!11!!!!!!

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
125. It's Official!!!
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 11:43 AM
Jul 2013
Pope Visits Royal Baby

Pope Francis Blesses Pregnant Duchess

In a surprise stopover on his way to Brazil the Pope paid an impromptu visit to the Royal Kensington Hospital in London to offer benedictions to the future monarch.

guardian.co.uk, Monday 22 July 2013 16.00 BST

More:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk-news/2013/jul/22/pope-duchess-cambridge-labour-hospital

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
130. Had you going there for a minute
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 11:59 AM
Jul 2013


I just thought adding the Pope would make it the perfect DU news story of the day!

CTyankee

(63,901 posts)
133. You sure did!
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 12:31 PM
Jul 2013

I can't imagine being in labor and having the Pope walk in...

Of course, I would vomit if he even dared to make a statement...

lastlib

(23,208 posts)
137. I think she's having a baby just so she can collect more welfare!!
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 12:39 PM
Jul 2013

Talk about a "welfare queen"....!!

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
138. The duchess of who?
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 12:40 PM
Jul 2013

sorry if I cannot even pretend to be interested. I just added this to point out how some folk are really concerned about the royal family, but the poor all around them, not so much.

Beaverhausen

(24,470 posts)
142. It's possible for many of us to be excited about the baby AND concerned about the poor
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 12:52 PM
Jul 2013

William's late mother did much to help the poor. I think she taught her son well.

Byronic

(504 posts)
146. Well done!
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 01:13 PM
Jul 2013

I'm sure you and your happy band of thread trashers will succeed marvellously.

You have logic and spittle on your side. We have merely fantasy held up by a thread of gossamer.

But, you know, it's probably summer where you are. You could choose to enjoy yourself, to do an act of kindness, to chase a butterfly, to allow a bunch of folks to enjoy their harmless thread.

Or you could trash it.

Quite frankly the Earth won't wobble on its axis whichever path you choose. But if you choose to 'trash' could you please do it in a funny imaginative way, please? It's hot. Kate is about to pop, and aggression is just awfully tiresome on such a day.

Byronic

(504 posts)
200. Absolutely right
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 02:17 AM
Jul 2013

A hot, sticky, suffocating nightmare of waiting.

Media scrums are not pretty or comfortable sights.

mainer

(12,022 posts)
147. Over 12 hours now. She'll be exhausted
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 01:18 PM
Jul 2013

I know a lot of people here don't give a shit about the royal baby but I, as a mother, can't help but feel some female sympathy for any other female undergoing the painful process of birth.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
159. lol
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:14 PM
Jul 2013


poor child, being born into a satellite of a surveillance state, likely to be surveilled more than anyone else in the world in his or her upcoming lifetime!

Response to Lil Missy (Original post)

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
166. She's gone into labour? Then she joined MILLIONS of other women worldwide who went into labour
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:48 PM
Jul 2013

the same time she did....I prefer a little girl...The world needs MORE women.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
202. Monday was a very good day.
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 02:24 AM
Jul 2013

How often can you say that about Monday!!

Thank you for starting this thread, Lil Missy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking: The Dutchess Ka...