General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPelican
(1,156 posts)Middle of the US night...
You thought the Trayvon coverage was bad? Wait for the new coverage of the royal baby!
chelsea0011
(10,115 posts)2:30 AM. It woke me from my haze as I wondered what could have happened at this hour. It was a bulletin of Kate entering the hospital. Jeesh!
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Breaking NewsVerified account ?@BreakingNews
Duchess of Cambridge admitted to hospital in London in the early stages of labour, palace confirms - Statement via @NBCNews
https://twitter.com/BreakingNews/status/359200791187308544
I hope it's a GIRL.
She would be in the line of succession to the throne - after Charles and William.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)secondwind
(16,903 posts)JoDog
(1,353 posts)it will be a girl.
Caroline Victoria Elizabeth. Queen Victoria the Second has a nice ring to it.
ananda
(28,856 posts)That would be nice.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)not Queen Diana I?
JoDog
(1,353 posts)of "Charles". So the name would honor a grandparent from both sides. There also is recent history of "Caroline" among European royals.
"Diana" would be lovely, and while I adored her, there were times when she was a divisive figure in British culture. This kid, no matter what the gender, will probably end up having about 6 names. If they do decide to use "Diana" it could be in third place or later.
Remember, the order of names has no bearing on what the child will be called by friends and family or what he/she will chose to be called after possible future coronation. Edward VIII's full name was Edward Albert Christian George Andrew Patrick David. He preferred to be called "David". His younger brother was Albert Frederick Arthur George. At home he answered to "Bertie". When he ascended to the throne, he took the crown as George VI. To today's addition to the family, he will be known as "my great-great-grandfather".
anneboleyn
(5,611 posts)if the baby is a girl (which for some reason we all seem to be thinking will be the case). And since the Brits use middle names -- I believe that would make for Queen Victoria II.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)watching tv early in the morning when they broke with the news that Princess Di had died in a car crash. I'm just so thrilled that her boys are growing up with some of her quailities of working with the poor and I think it is great they serve their country. Not too many American politician's sons or daughters serve in the military. I am also thrilled to see them so happy. I wish both boys all the happiness in the world.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Breaking NewsVerified account ?@BreakingNews
Duchess of Cambridge admitted to hospital in London in the early stages of labour, palace confirms - Statement via @NBCNews
https://twitter.com/BreakingNews/status/359200791187308544
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Palace: Prince William's wife Kate in labor
July 22, 2013 02:40 AM EST | AP
LONDON Palace officials say Prince William's wife, Kate, has been admitted to the hospital in the early stages of labor.
Royal officials said that Kate travelled by car to St. Mary's Hospital in central London. Kate also known as the Duchess of Cambridge is expected to give birth in the private Lindo Wing of the hospital, where Princess Diana gave birth to William and his younger brother, Prince Harry.
The baby will be third in line for the British throne behind Prince Charles and William and is anticipated eventually to become king or queen.
The medical team will be led by royal gynecologist Dr. Marcus Setchell.
-snip-
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20130722/eu-britain-royal-baby/
p.s. I've posted it in DU LBN.
Bosonic
(3,746 posts)CTyankee
(63,901 posts)You made me laugh
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)byeya
(2,842 posts)I thought we fought like hell be rid of these royal douche bags!
byeya
(2,842 posts)ancestors who were kicked out of their own country - Ireland - by the Brits. Throw 'em down a well.
yeh, not into this royal thing either. I think it's nauseating.
I'm sure Kate and whatshisface think so too - not a private moment to be had.
treestar
(82,383 posts)She will cut a lot of ribbons and probably work for some causes.
And raise her children.
She could even start some sort of career if she chose.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Shivering Jemmy
(900 posts)Please post all baby pics in reply to Spitfire of ATJ's post.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)F*ck the monarchists and the entire royal family. Deadbeat lot of them don't do a damn thing and sponge off the public...they should have left the royal tradition to rot with Charles II's head.
I hope she has a gremlin.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)called "Your Majesty" or "Your Highness" without any hint of sarcasm.
So fine, Kate's giving birth. It'll just add another human being that gets tons of media coverage for no greater achievement than being born/married into the right family.
Raine
(30,540 posts)Response to Lil Missy (Original post)
LumosMaxima This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)... having to live life knowing that he/she missed the throne by only a couple of minutes.
I think Kate's belly didn't look big enough for there to be twins.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)Response to ReRe (Reply #20)
LumosMaxima This message was self-deleted by its author.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)kdmorris
(5,649 posts)She doesn't seem big enough and she seems to have made it to her due date. (90% of twins are born before 39 weeks). I just gave birth to twins (via c-section because they wouldn't both get head down) and by the end (37 weeks and 5 days), I measured 53 weeks pregnant (by measuring fundal height). They were due on July 5th, but due to high blood pressure, I was delivered on June 19. Of course, my twins were the biggest ever born at that hospital - 8 lbs 1 oz (21 inches long) and 8 lbs 5 oz (20 inches long) - so maybe I was just huge because my sons were!
I didn't "go into labor" (though I'm not saying it doesn't happen)... I had a scheduled delivery. Most twins are scheduled - whether by induction or by c-section, to better manage the staff that needs to be present and the risk factors involved.
I think it would be great if they have a daughter.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)If so, wondrous congratulations are in order.
kdmorris
(5,649 posts)First week was tough, but we are getting the hang of this now
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)kdmorris
(5,649 posts)Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)I hope you are getting lots of naps...
kdmorris
(5,649 posts)We take shifts... I sleep at night, my husband sleeps in the morning. But I still take naps when possible
Moses2SandyKoufax
(1,290 posts)HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Boudica the Lyoness
(2,899 posts)I hope it is. The Queen has done such a wonderful job. The Queen mum was brilliant during the war. Then there's the other Queens.... all hard workers.
Here's a link to the Royal Baby Monitor.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/royals/royalbaby/5017568/The-Suns-Royal-Baby-live-blog.html
MADem
(135,425 posts)Also, the only English monarchs that have made a real impression upon me, save Henry VIII, were female. I think they do a better job, by and large.
Rhiannon12866
(205,161 posts)The Duchess of Cambridge, 31, was admitted into a London hospital early Monday in the early stages of labor, a palace official confirmed.
With her husband, Prince William, at her side, Duchess Kate was taken to a private wing of St. Marys hospital, the same London facility where William and his brother, Prince Harry, were born.
The duchess traveled by car from Kensington Palace to the Lindo Wing at St Marys Hospital with the Duke of Cambridge, according to a statement released by royal officials.
<snip>
A birth announcement written on official Buckingham Palace letterhead will then be driven to the palace, where it will be placed on the same easel used to announce Prince Williams birth 31 years ago. In addition, the UK Ministry of Defence will mark the royal baby's birth with two gun salutes a traditional sign of respect at London's Green Park and on Tower Wharf at the Tower of London.
http://www.today.com/news/prince-williams-wife-kate-admitted-hospital-early-stages-labor-1C9846018
Getty Images Europe / Middleton family via AFP - Getty Images
Too cute: Prince William and Duchess Kate are shown in their early years.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Rhiannon12866
(205,161 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)OK... it's a first baby, so if it's a totally nat-ur-al birth, it will be a while. Say.... 12 hours? God, this is a tiny woman. I can't imagine they would make her lay in such pain for so long. I hope they give her a pytosin (sp?) drip and an epidural and get it over with. (After all, she IS overdue!) Better all the way around for the Princess AND the baby.
Crunchy Frog
(26,579 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)I don't know anyone who has delivered that way. My niece is going to have her twins that way. Guess I need to study up on this way of birthing! If you know anything about it, do tell us!
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,579 posts)xmas74
(29,674 posts)It speeds up the labor yet doesn't allow the body time to adjust to the increase in labor naturally. Pitocin shows an increased risk of c-sections too, possibly for the reason listed.
I had pitocin. I also had cytotec. I'd never do it again.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... the baby is REALLY due. And heck, I'm talking marvels that were new and wonderful 30 YEARS AGO! Never had a C-Section. I am sure they are going to take excellent care of Kate and baby.
xmas74
(29,674 posts)It can happen. It's best not to use any of it if not necessary. Letting nature take its course unless absolutely necessary is always the best. It's better for the mother and child, though not as convenient.
Besides, if she's far enough into labor that she's going to the hospital she probably won't need the pitocin, unless her labor stalls.
I had a c-section. It made me realize that one child was enough, especially since every hospital within an hour's drive still has a "one and done" policy in ref to them. No VBAC allowed in this neck of the woods and no doctor will take you on unless you drive into the city.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)Always had them that way, as sis is the straight up and down kind. Tall and thin. No curves. "OliveOil" (er Popeyes girlfriend.) Sis only had two, and she is still tall and thin.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I asked them not to give me pitocin again but the gave it to me anyway. Almost died. Couldn't stop bleeding. I was sooo pissed I made my husband get me my last meal and ate it while they were screaming at me not to eat or drink anything. Once I was full the bleeding stopped. No more kids for me.
xmas74
(29,674 posts)(Ex had been out of town for a couple of weeks and the night he came back was conception. We knew the exact date of conception.)
They started me on cytotec for nearly 24 hours, then moved me to pitocin. While on pitocin they stripped my membranes. I was in labor for a few days and eventually had a c-section. Funny thing was when they went to strip the membranes it was pretty easy, since I found out that they were ready to break on their own. In other words, if they hadn't decided to speed things up I was probably on the verge of natural labor but that would have had me delivering on a Sunday morning, which no one wanted.
woodsprite
(11,911 posts)I think I healed better and was up/ around easier with
my first. I think it was being 7 yrs younger and not dealing
with the pushing and all the bonuses that come with it.
xmas74
(29,674 posts)I was overdue but ready to go into labor at any time when they decided to start inducing with cytotec. After 24 hours the cytotec had me in early labor but it wasn't fast enough. I was then given pitocin, which brought on severe back labor in short order and failed to progress me beyond a 5. 16 hours after the pit was first administered it was decided that I would have my membranes stripped. When they began to strip them they actually broke. So, after all the meds they gave me they realized that I was ready to go into a natural labor within a couple of days anyway. The only problem was that it would have more than likely been a weekend delivery and my hospital doesn't seem to have many of those anymore.
The 7 years younger would have made a big difference for you. VBAC is also a bit harder to go through, at least from what I've been told by others who've actually done it. As of this time, there are still no hospitals that will do it in my neck of the woods.
woodsprite
(11,911 posts)My regular dr was on vacation, so I had the drs who were on call that night. They tried to get my contractions into a regular pattern by hooking me a pitocin drip. After 17 hours, they said they'd only let me labor another 3 before doing a c-sect. They had my IV running at the highest dose of pit and I still hadn't progressed past 4 cm, so we went for the c-sect before there was any sign of increased distress from our daughter.
When my dr. came back from vacation and checked in on me, he had it out with the team of docs on call. He said if they had laid off the pit and let me rest over night, he said that's usually all it takes to give active labor a chance to set in, then they could have started the pit again, if needed. He was not happy.
The VBAC with our son was easy, but I didn't realize how serious the my bleeding issue (retained placenta) had been or that our son had stopped breathing until I got out of surgery. I had been on heparin the whole pregnancy. They usually stop it a few weeks before your due date, but he was 5 wks early and we didn't get that chance. A tumble on some uneven driveway started the ball rolling. My doc was apologizing profusely to me because I had to be checked for drugs due to my "precipitous labor". Apparently it's the law in DE.
I had chosen the repeat c-sect option for our son, but ended up with a forced unmedicated VBAC. It would never had been my choice since I had a friend who died during a VBAC attempt (but her docs had used pitocin during the VBAC -- which is a huge no-no according to my doc).
xmas74
(29,674 posts)Supposedly it's a lawsuit waiting to happen, since it increases the chance of both maternal and fetal death.
VBAC was a breeze compared to C-section. The day after pit-induced C-section, I felt like I'd been run over by a truck. The staff kept telling me that I wasn't moving enough, but every muscle hurt.
After the 10-hour VBAC labor, I was up and walking around. C-section baby weight 8 pounds 10 ounces; VBAC baby weight 9 pounds 11.5 ounces.
xmas74
(29,674 posts)I've always heard that, no matter 1st or VBAC, healing time is much quicker and that just stands to reason.
PADemD
(4,482 posts)Had Pitocin and ended up with a c-section. Horrible experience.
xmas74
(29,674 posts)and I felt like every time they increased it was to rush me along. One of the nurses even made a comment about me and bed space, since maternity was full that night and they were putting new admits into swing rooms.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)All Lamaze but one using pitocin.
I can tell you pitocin is not something I would choose just to make a normal delivery faster.
Using this stuff the contraction hits will full force, there is no start and peak, only peak.
kdmorris
(5,649 posts)I had it with my first because my labor had stalled at 4 cm. Instead of having nice valleys and hills on the contraction monitor, the contractions went INSTANTLY to peak and stayed there for 2 minutes. Then I'd get 30 seconds between contractions and then it would go immediately back to full pain. Normal labor "ramps up" from the valley to the peak, so you really only have 30 seconds of intense pain per contraction, instead of the full 3 minutes of intense pain per contraction.
I would never wish that stuff on my worst enemy.
mainer
(12,022 posts)I went through 12 hours of labor and they wanted to speed things up so they gave me pitocin, but no epidural. Never had such pain in my life.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)it gave me 'double peaking' contractions - meaning one ctx would be ending and the next was already going. I had a 3 hour long contraction at one point. ugh, makes me sick to think about how awful it was (I had no epidural and I ended up with a C-section and ptsd)
My next labor - a vbac - was also long, but no augmentation and it was totally bearable and I made it through. There was a HUGE difference. I think Pitocin caused my C-section b/c I just lost it and couldn't cope.
xmas74
(29,674 posts)After being up for a couple of days between the cytotec/pitocin cocktail in my system it was decided that I needed to nap. I was given fentanyl as an iv push. I immediately passed out but woke back up 20 minutes later, vomiting. After nearly 3 days in the hospital I was given a c-section and moved from my room in maternity to the med-surg ward. Med-surg wouldn't allow my baby in the room with me so I got up and pulled myself back over to maternity and tried to take her with me. Finally, they found a bed for me in maternity and put me back.
I hate even thinking about the crap they pushed me.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)my child is 16 and it's just like yesterday when I think of it. Sorry you had to go through that too - it's insane what some hospitals will push on you in the name of protocol.
xmas74
(29,674 posts)They knew I didn't have the support to back me up and that they could get away with it.
Nanjing to Seoul
(2,088 posts)calimary
(81,209 posts)It'd be nice to have some genuinely pleasant news for a change. I'm just so worn-down.
And hey, say what you will, but I like her. I like the idea that the royals can be like regular folks and marry for love. I like that she's a commoner. I like the idea that they want to give their offspring a normal life. I like that someone like him - who was raised to be closer to the people - is gonna be monarch someday. How can he be a good king, even as a figurehead, if he doesn't have a sense of understanding his people?
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)And we have to remember that it is a different culture than ours. The people over there do fight for fairness just as we do, but they also have a great sense of pride in their country, and the Royal family is a deep part of their identity as a country.
duffyduff
(3,251 posts)That makes it even nicer in my view.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)I am a woman, first. And secondly, I am of British descent. Thirdly, I AM HUMAN. Each to their own interests, do you ever consider that before you boast "Who Cares??"
Nanjing to Seoul
(2,088 posts)You care about toe royals?
First: I'm a woman? So because I am a man, I don't care about kids? Sexist. . .nice!
Second: British descent, meaning you are not a British citizen. Meaning you're American. I have Iroquois ancestry. What's your point?
Third: You are human. Okay, so because I don't give a shit about the royal's birth, I am not human. Sexist and elitist.
Why don't I care? Because it does not affect my life or the lives of anyone outside their family. WHO GIVES A RAT'S ASS???.
I didn't care about Beyonce's little bashion of goodness either. I didn't care about American "royalty" either. Why should I care about someone in another country, especially someone who doesn't do shit?
If an American's interest is in royal sponges that make oodles of money and produce nothing, so be it. And I can look at the news and say "NEXT!"
Inspired
(3,957 posts)for you to open this thread, read through it, and post a snarky comment. To make yourself feel, somehow, better...more enlightened...than those who are excited about this. How very elitist and somewhat 'royal' of you.
I think this is a good human interest story. I wish Will and Kate all the best.
I hope they have a girl and they name her Diana.
Maybe you could have said "NEXT" when you read the title of this thread?
Shivering Jemmy
(900 posts)For someone who doesn't care.
Sounds like you care a whole lot. Sounds like it's eating you.
RobinA
(9,888 posts)not give a rat's ass with a little more civility.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)Nanjing to Seoul
(2,088 posts)Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)much everywhere else on the internet and in the media and around water coolers etc throughout the world.... But feel free to hate on....Because,.....
let me be the first to say...(clears throat)...WHO CARES!?!?!?!
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"WHO CARES!?!?!?!"
Anyone who invests the time to write in this thread regardless of the rationalizations to the contrary, I would think.
treestar
(82,383 posts)A descendant of William the Conqueror. Directly in line for the monarchy.
calimary
(81,209 posts)By age alone, we're an unruly teenager in the family of nations. We haven't outgrown the kiddie table or sippy cups in comparison to some of them - that have been around for one or two or three THOUSAND years. We don't have that, here. And sometimes there's something in me that yearns for that kind of long chain of connectivity through the ages.
Maybe it's because I myself am adopted. I don't have a family history, except for one that was grafted on when I was two weeks old (as I've been told). At least until very recently, when I did an adoption search and after almost a year, finally found some information that connects me partially - somewhere.
I have no blood lines connecting me to anyone but my own two children who both came outta me. I can't look back to any ancestors or generational elders who hold any personal connection to me, or who passed on their eye color or the shape of their chins - OR their propensity for breast cancer or bad teeth, or their ability to sing, or their tendency toward personality disorders, or ANY of that. I have no clue as to what "runs in my family" because it's never applied to me. Try filling out a medical history form and having to put N/A (Not Applicable) when you're asked whether your mother, sister, grandmother, aunt, or someone else in your biological family had cancer or diabetes or depression or any of that. Try looking at your personal file in elementary school (that you weren't really supposed to see) and notice that, high up there near the top, somebody typed in "ADOPTED" - in big red capitol letters. A scarlet letter indeed. Seven of them, as a matter of fact. I am a living, breathing, walking, talking sequester, if you will. John Donne once wrote that "no man is an island." But I've felt like one for my whole life (my adoptive parents, who were the only parents I ever knew, told me when I was four, I think - really young).
So I willingly concede that point - about history and connectivity through the ages - and how it resonates with me personally. And pretty deeply, too, if you really wanna know.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)I'd venture that 1/2 of all daughters born here are refered to as princess during their early years. Many of the wealthy continue to treat their daughters as princesses for a very long time after adulthood.
There is a curiosity for sure.
calimary
(81,209 posts)Gotta admit, when my daughter was born, I secretly felt - "gee, she's eligible for Prince William..."
Heck, we've all been through at least SOME of that, especially us girls.
Btw - she actually preferred Prince Harry.
Crunchy Frog
(26,579 posts)politicat
(9,808 posts)Because that would be a great line of succession. Royalty has had millennia of no girls aloud. It's time to put the change in law into practice.
edbermac
(15,937 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)npk
(3,660 posts)Even further down the royal hierarchy he goes.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)npk
(3,660 posts)I was just teasing a Harry a bit.
edbermac
(15,937 posts)The closer you are in line to the top, the more restrictions you have. Wills has to keep his nose clean while Harry parties hearty and gets laid every chance he gets.
npk
(3,660 posts)He does sure know how to party.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)He's been going down, down, down for decades.
Adenoid_Hynkel
(14,093 posts)Why do the British continue to pay people millions of pounds a year to think they're better than everyone else?
Nanjing to Seoul
(2,088 posts)the royals out in 1781 after Yorktown?
PADemD
(4,482 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Yup... we engaged in a revolutionary war to deny ourselves empathy for a foreign childbirth.
Nanjing to Seoul
(2,088 posts)or is it because this one is the child of a throwback to an era that should be long forgotten and completely abolished.
please!
TeamPooka
(24,220 posts)PADemD
(4,482 posts)CTyankee
(63,901 posts)I don't really care that much, altho I thought a pool would be amusing. I guess I really didn't think it was important enough for people to get all worked up over it. But evidently, I was wrong...ah, well...
TeamPooka
(24,220 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)months, and probably years, of wall-to-wall Shiny Royal Baby Coverage.
It's gonna be All Baby, All the Time. Just in time for the new Grand Bargain austerity deal, the Trans Pacific job and wage killing agreement, and our government's mass spying on its own citizens.
chimpymustgo
(12,774 posts)Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)This is all planned by TPTB. Bwahahahahaha
LordGlenconner
(1,348 posts)I don't think this will interfere with your mostly joyless existence. There will be another rain cloud coming along soon, I promise.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Coward.
Love how you guys are continually bringing in the new names, though. Gotta get those rec. counts up.
LordGlenconner
(1,348 posts)Maybe the sun won't come out tomorrow.
PADemD
(4,482 posts)Welcome to DU!
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)exciting to see first-time parents in action, plus those two do seem like nice enough young folks.
I wish them luck and all the best of health.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I want a girl! Embarrassingly enough I have been waiting for this.
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)What will the media over react on once this is over?
Response to Lil Missy (Original post)
LumosMaxima This message was self-deleted by its author.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Post an announcement on the gate? With a gazillion media standing right outside the hospital?
Response to Ruby the Liberal (Reply #58)
LumosMaxima This message was self-deleted by its author.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Tradition, I guess.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,300 posts)I guess the media at the hospital is there to play "spot the messenger", so that they can put out a breathless "the message is on its way!" report, followed by the photo of whatever they post at the palace gates.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Our media is only focusing on the hospital.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)CNN had a pic of it.
Pretty classy!
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Its what you call foolscap : here its called legal.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Never heard of that before. Here we have letter (8.5x11" and legal (8.5x14"
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Probably defunct over there now. Was either 8 x 13 or 8 1/2 x 13 1/2 - not sure which.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)I have had issues with things hard coded A4 (a European setting) that won't print for nothing here.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)and if it's a boy, "Bubba"
Silent3
(15,192 posts)Stop imposing gender roles like that!
B Calm
(28,762 posts)like male royalty!
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Will it still become king of UK?
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Just mentioned on tv news here in the UK. Similar stuff all over the world.
Daemonaquila
(1,712 posts)It's revolting that this is getting news hype, much less getting people excited.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Franker65
(299 posts)I can't really get excited over this - two people I don't know and will never know are having a kid.
Orrex
(63,199 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,300 posts)because the queen is a secret commie. National Health Service created 6 July 1948; Prince Charles born 16 Nov 1948. Coincidence? I think not.
Orrex
(63,199 posts)It all makes sense now.
It. All. Makes. Sense.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)PADemD
(4,482 posts)Female
7 pounds 2 ounces
21 inches
Monday, 5:15 p.m (first time labor is usually 10 hours)
Charlotte Diana Caroline Victoria
An excellent suggestion. I'm hoping for another Princess Charlotte of Wales. The original was enormously popular. Her death in 1817 caused a massive outpouring of grief among the British public perhaps only comparable to the death of Diana.
Her father, King George IV, was admittedly useless and unpopular. His only child was the hope of the House of Hanover. Queen Victoria is iconic the world over, lending her name to an entire age, but had Charlotte not died after childbirth, Victoria almost certainly never would have reigned. Queen Charlotte might have been the legend.
Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)Alexandra would be nice too.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Byronic
(504 posts)Despite the (understandable) mockers and nay-sayers in this thread, it IS a rather historic birth. The first time, regardless of the sex of the child, that we will witness the birth of a future monarch. I remain hopeful of the birth of a new Charlotte of Wales. I don't mean to be sexist, but a future George the Millionth, would be a bit of a letdown in the circumstances.
Oh, and can the Commonwealth realms that are still dragging their feet on the new Succession Law get a wiggle on. The tiny Future Queen Lottie is not amused!
REP
(21,691 posts)A Ceinwen ap Rees of Cymru, and not another Germanic prince(ss) who speaks no English if Wales must have a monarch.
Believe me, nobody would want to hark back to the grim days of the Hanoverians. I was referring to Princess Charlotte as an individual, (seeing as the name has appeared on several shortlists) and the fact that her popularity stood in stark contrast to that of her father 'Prinny.'
I happen to be a Welshman, and have sympathy with your point.
REP
(21,691 posts)My family is originally from what used to be Gwynedd and Merionnydd (even after emigrating, my great grandmother's wedding in Kansas was still recorded in Bala). They settled in one of the many planned Welsh communities in the US (first Wisconsin then Arvonia, Kansas). Along with the black hair and aversion to sunlight, I seem to have inherited the "didn't we try go get away from those people?" attitude of my family.
Byronic
(504 posts)Ha! I'm with you on that one. Although immemorial Cymru is bathed in sunshine at the moment.
I'm always terribly disappointed that whereas St Patrick's Day is celebrated worldwide, and the Scots always export their identity everywhere, that the Welsh are rather more circumspect. St David's Day attracts hardly a peep on here, for instance.
Ah well.
Man of Gwent, here!
REP
(21,691 posts)And there's all those places with Welsh names: Bangor, Bryn Mawr, Arvonia, etc. So there may not be a lot of whatever it is one does on St David's day, but we did name many towns.
Where I'm from originally, there's a couple chapters of the St David Society (here in California, no one knows what that is and no one can say or spell my name).
But when a people are famous for perfect pitch, singing and poetry - well, that's going to lose every time to binge-drinking and public barfing. Also, to be fair, even Welsh aren't quite sure if the national foliage is a daffodil or a leek.
I celebrate St Patrick's (who, if he existed, was Welsh) Day by wearing a button that reads "Fuck Off - I'm Welsh."
PADemD
(4,482 posts)We have a Bangor and the local St. David's Society, who march every year in the local Celtic Classic festival.
http://www.celticfest.org/festival_information
BTW, Welsh heritage here, too.
Arvonia is (was; it's a suburb now) just next door in Kansas.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)Wouldn't that be funny?
Julie
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)Oh wait, no it's not. Glad to see the tight-ass contingent is up and about this am.
Julie
UnseenUndergrad
(249 posts)And neither are really poor, insipid jokes that play on the old "black men as sexual predators and cuckolders seducing the married white wimmens" stereotype.
Still, maybe it's the South Asian genes from Diana bursting back onto the scene.
City Lights
(25,171 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)... but then again, I'm sure I get excited over things people don't get either.
It's always good to see people happy and smiling.
S.A.M
(162 posts)I am sorry...why should we Americans care about what happens in the British Royal Family? Wasn't the British crown responsible for millions of death? Read your history books please. Come on people! Grow up! Stop living in Disney World!
"Was the British Crown responsible for millions of deaths?"
I'm contemplating how literally to take the question.
I shall err on the side of 'no.'
Which British monarch was responsible for millions of deaths?
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)a LOOOONG time. (Since I don't know nothin' 'bout birthin' no babies, I'm asking those who have been through it.)
PADemD
(4,482 posts)Apophis
(1,407 posts)spin
(17,493 posts)Byronic
(504 posts)You are an American with no interest in European constitutional monarchy (I'm just guessing here but I feel I am on safe ground). Do not attempt to care. Do not open threads concerning this topic. They will bore you.
However, there will be people interested (however distantly) in the events of today. Those with a knowledge of British history may be intrigued by the fact that for the first time we are guaranteed - regardless of sex - that the baby is likely (barring tragic circumstances) to one day inherit a throne with a thousand year history connected to it. Regardless of your view of monarchy, this is clearly no ordinary celebrity birth.
The poor wee thing has no idea what it is being born into.
Also, some people just REALLY like newborn babies. They are cute.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)Really. Why is it skin off your ass to allow people to celebrate the birth of a child without all the moaning and whining and bitching by those who think their disdain for the royal couple is somehow relevant?
Hide thread is your friend.
City Lights
(25,171 posts)No one said you should care. If you don't care, then just ignore it.
REP
(21,691 posts)Yes, there are untold thousands of babies being brought forth into this world at this time, but only one is the perfect rich white babee of our dearest of dear, close, personal friend Kate! She's so pretty and perfect and wonderful (or so I keep being told) and her baby will fulfill all my hopes and dreams!
zOMG BABEEZ! BABEEZ! (foams at mouth and rolls on floor) baaaaaaaaabeeeeeeeeeeeeeez!!!!!!11!!!!!!
Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)Pope Francis Blesses Pregnant Duchess
In a surprise stopover on his way to Brazil the Pope paid an impromptu visit to the Royal Kensington Hospital in London to offer benedictions to the future monarch.
guardian.co.uk, Monday 22 July 2013 16.00 BST
More:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk-news/2013/jul/22/pope-duchess-cambridge-labour-hospital
CTyankee
(63,901 posts)PLEASE...
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)I just thought adding the Pope would make it the perfect DU news story of the day!
CTyankee
(63,901 posts)I can't imagine being in labor and having the Pope walk in...
Of course, I would vomit if he even dared to make a statement...
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)And don't forget to trash "duchess" too .
lastlib
(23,208 posts)Talk about a "welfare queen"....!!
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)sorry if I cannot even pretend to be interested. I just added this to point out how some folk are really concerned about the royal family, but the poor all around them, not so much.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Beaverhausen
(24,470 posts)William's late mother did much to help the poor. I think she taught her son well.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)some of us will just start to trash these threads.
Byronic
(504 posts)I'm sure you and your happy band of thread trashers will succeed marvellously.
You have logic and spittle on your side. We have merely fantasy held up by a thread of gossamer.
But, you know, it's probably summer where you are. You could choose to enjoy yourself, to do an act of kindness, to chase a butterfly, to allow a bunch of folks to enjoy their harmless thread.
Or you could trash it.
Quite frankly the Earth won't wobble on its axis whichever path you choose. But if you choose to 'trash' could you please do it in a funny imaginative way, please? It's hot. Kate is about to pop, and aggression is just awfully tiresome on such a day.
Byronic
(504 posts)You know, nice university. Beats Oxford in the Boat Race almost half the time.
olddots
(10,237 posts)n.t.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)take my word on this... it is NOT fun.
Byronic
(504 posts)A hot, sticky, suffocating nightmare of waiting.
Media scrums are not pretty or comfortable sights.
mainer
(12,022 posts)I know a lot of people here don't give a shit about the royal baby but I, as a mother, can't help but feel some female sympathy for any other female undergoing the painful process of birth.
anneboleyn
(5,611 posts)miserable.
markiv
(1,489 posts)if there ever were one
markiv
(1,489 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)poor child, being born into a satellite of a surveillance state, likely to be surveilled more than anyone else in the world in his or her upcoming lifetime!
Response to Lil Missy (Original post)
Post removed
Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)the same time she did....I prefer a little girl...The world needs MORE women.
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)anneboleyn
(5,611 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)How often can you say that about Monday!!
Thank you for starting this thread, Lil Missy.
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)ie