General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe numbers NOBODY wants you to see. Military spend now TRIPLE that of cold war, 50% higher than
GW Bush
Inflation adjusted chart
See the following for the numbers each year :-
http://www.davemanuel.com/2010/06/14/us-military-spending-over-the-years/
From this it can be seen that current military spending is now far higher than it was during the height of the cold war and the Vietnam war.
But the current numbers very significantly understate the true level of National Security spending.
The government is trying to cover up the true levels by hiding a long list of military spend in other departmental budgets.
E.G. the cost of maintaining America's nuclear arsenal, which is booked to the Department of Energy.
E.G. the increased costs of Veterans pensions and medical care that are a direct result of the wars (they are not included in the Pentagon budget).
Neither is the massive ramp up in DHS spending for domestic spying etc.
In 2011 the true level of military spending was about $930bn.
For 2012 true military spending increased VERY substantially to $1,219bn.
The REAL National Security budget - the numbers NOBODY wants you to see :-
http://www.truth-out.org/archive/item/94731:the-real-us-national-security-budget-the-figure-no-one-wants-you-to-see
N.B. CBO spending plans show that military spending is planned to increase every year from 2014 to 2023 - rising by well over $100bn from 2012 levels by 2023.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"The numbers NOBODY wants you to see. Military spend now TRIPLE that of cold war, 50% higher than GW Bush"
...nonsense.
The President's 2014 budget shows a decrease in the defense spending.
The FY 2014 Base Budget provides $526.6 billion, a reduction of $0.9 billion from the FY 2013 annualized continuing resolution level of $527.5 billion, and is consistent with Administration-wide efforts to make tough program choices within current funding constraints. This budget adjusts programs that develop and procure military equipment, re-sizes ground forces, slows the growth of compensation and benefit programs, continues to make better use of Defense resources by reducing lower priority programs, and makes more disciplined use of defense dollars.
http://comptroller.defense.gov/defbudget/fy2014/FY2014_Budget_Request_Overview_Book.pdf
The defense budget has gone down every year since 2012, a total of about $4 billion (http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2014/assets/defense.pdf) since then.
In fact, the defense budget, including war spending, has gone done drastically since President Obama took office. The drop is even more drastic if the sequestration is left in place.
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/04/12/1861201/pentagon-cut-spending/
dsc
(52,504 posts)that would be 7/12 of a year.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)since then."
Hee, hee, hee, you funny Prosense.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)The defense budget has gone down every year since 2012, a total of about $4 billion (http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2014/assets/defense.pdf) since then.
In fact, the defense budget, including war spending, has gone done drastically since President Obama took office. The drop is even more drastic if the sequestration is left in place.
Those are facts. The budget has gone down since 2012, and it has drastically gone down, including war spending. since he took office
http://comptroller.defense.gov/defbudget/fy2014/FY2014_Budget_Request_Overview_Book.pdf
Make this easy for you:
FY 2008 (Oct 2007 to Sep 2008) - $665 billion
FY 2009 (Oct 2008 to Sep 2009) - $666 billion
FY 2010 (Oct 2009 to Sep 2010) - $691 billion
FY 2011 (Oct 2010 to Sep 2011) - $687 billion
FY 2012 (Oct 2011 to Sep 2012) - $645 billion
FY 2013 (Oct 2012 to Sep 2013) - $614 billion
FY 2014 (Oct 2013 to Sep 2014) - $615 billion
The FY 12 through FY 14 budgets was/will be $20 billion to $50 billion less than the FY 2009 budget.
It spiked in his first year, but has dropped drastically since then, about $45 billion through FY 2012, and will drop by about $75 billion through FY 2014.
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)Claiming that the defense budget is the defense budget without war spending may be your best work.
Outstanding.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Claiming that the defense budget is the defense budget without war spending may be your best work. "
I made no such claim, and both fell: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023296589#post5
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)When one exclaims "Nonsense!" about something it is common custom for the person exclaiming to be disagreeing with something said.
If the OP stated that it is higher than it was two years ago, that would be nonsense.
The fact that the defense budget has gone down is, however, irrelevant to the Non-sensibility of the statement that it is higher than during the cold war, or higher than during the Bush presidency.
(Only a person long accustomed to implying that unemployment is not a huge problem because the rate is lower than in 2009 would make such an error.)
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)What a shock!
GlashFordan
(216 posts)Hehehehe
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)Should I be saying: welcome back?
In any case, enjoy your stay.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)because, as noted upthread, our military and overall "security" budget could be only 1/20th of what it is and it would still be too high. Absolute insanity, it makes me wish I lived in another country that cared for its people instead of controlling every human on the planet.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Now if we had Medicare for All, then I'd feel safer.
Heywood J
(2,515 posts)don't make you feel safer? Or any one of the repeatedly-cancelled vehicles? They cost about the same.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Thank you for this post. K&R
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Obscene. And the lies are the middle finger to all of us, on top.
mick063
(2,424 posts)It didn't exist before 2001. A whole new Department created to "keep us safe".
The money for this department should be included with respect to defense spending. It is, after all, for defense.
The "shell game" crap with respect to defense spending doesn't get past me. Claiming that defense spending is decreasing, while ignoring the costs of an entire new department, is nothing short of propaganda.
Homeland Security and Dept. of Defense must be lumped together to give us the true picture of federal costs for defense.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)...and the quagmire in Afghanistan.
But you are not accountable. Politics is easy.