Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 08:01 AM Jul 2013

Edward Snowden, True Hope for Change

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/07/16-9



***SNIP

When the story of the mass NSA surveillance first broke out, Obama swiftly moved to defend this secret program as his officials continued to lie about its extent and their justification for it. He portrayed it as a choice between security and freedom, conflating the two issues as he argued how we “can't have 100 percent security, and also then have 100 percent privacy..."

Here we are seeing an administration that blatantly violates the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution; "unreasonable searches and seizures", justifying it with secret courts and secret interpretations of the law. When their wrongdoing was exposed, they diverted public attention through a coordinated mass propaganda using the tired bipartisan sound-bites of 'threats to national security'.

Snowden’s saga triggered a tidal wave of awakening that no campaign of lies can put to rest. As US officials continuously repeat the baseless rhetoric of 'aiding the enemy', calling the young whistleblower a traitor, questions have emerged regarding the legitimacy of the Obama regime itself.

The overarching question is; Who really broke the law? Who engaged in acts that were clearly unconstitutional? Who has not only harmed national security, but the security of the whole world? Who has undermined diplomacy among nations, encouraging them to play to age-old cold war games? Who uses a colonial mentality, bullying small countries and undermining their sovereignty? Who has brought terror, turning the world into a battlefield, killing innocent people with assassination drone attacks and signature strikes?
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Edward Snowden, True Hope for Change (Original Post) xchrom Jul 2013 OP
LOL, that hope poster is so ironically hysterical tridim Jul 2013 #1
Here's an alternative. AllINeedIsCoffee Jul 2013 #5
Comrade Snowdon? pgr Jul 2013 #2
Interesting. k&r for exposure. n/t Laelth Jul 2013 #3
Yeah, ProSense Jul 2013 #4
The one liners are flying in here as the facts flee..... think Jul 2013 #6
Well the fleas are a biting hootinholler Jul 2013 #7

tridim

(45,358 posts)
1. LOL, that hope poster is so ironically hysterical
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 08:09 AM
Jul 2013

Snowden is a freaking loser, not a vessel of hope.

 

pgr

(36 posts)
2. Comrade Snowdon?
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 08:28 AM
Jul 2013

He can't even figure out how to get out of his own trap and he is "hope"?

If that loser is the best we can do why even bother?

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
7. Well the fleas are a biting
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 09:01 AM
Jul 2013

I don't blame the juicy facts for running away. Besides many who have posted the one liners are in a fact free environment, unless a fact can be twisted to become a shocker headline.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Edward Snowden, True Hope...