Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ZRT2209

(1,357 posts) Tue Jul 16, 2013, 07:37 AM Jul 2013

Juror B37, a grisly ghoul, probably planned to profit off Trayvon's death from the get go

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Juror B37, a grisly ghoul, probably planned to profit off Trayvon's death from the get go (Original Post) ZRT2209 Jul 2013 OP

Question from Cooper. "What stood out to you"? Answer from B37. "Not a whole lot" LOL chelsea0011 Jul 2013 #1

even morons can serve on juries apparently ZRT2209 Jul 2013 #2

As someone once stated "He was tried by 12 cretins, tried and true" hobbit709 Jul 2013 #3

Question from Cooper. "When Serino said George Zimmerman was being more of less truthful, chelsea0011 Jul 2013 #4

chelsea0011

(10,115 posts)

1. Question from Cooper. "What stood out to you"? Answer from B37. "Not a whole lot" LOL

Reply to ZRT2209 (Original post)

Tue Jul 16, 2013, 07:40 AM

Jul 2013

ZRT2209

(1,357 posts)

2. even morons can serve on juries apparently

Reply to chelsea0011 (Reply #1)

Tue Jul 16, 2013, 07:41 AM

Jul 2013

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)

3. As someone once stated "He was tried by 12 cretins, tried and true"

Reply to ZRT2209 (Reply #2)

Tue Jul 16, 2013, 07:43 AM

Jul 2013

chelsea0011

(10,115 posts)

4. Question from Cooper. "When Serino said George Zimmerman was being more of less truthful,

Reply to ZRT2209 (Reply #2)

Tue Jul 16, 2013, 07:46 AM

Jul 2013

did that make an impression on you"? Answer from juror B37. "....., yes it made a BIG impression on me". Nevermind the jurors were asked to strike that part of testimony from Serino from the evidence. Again. LOL

Reply to this discussion