Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TalkingDog

(9,001 posts)
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 09:38 AM Feb 2012

32 senators call for 'no containment' strategy for Iran (need'n us a big ol' WAR, 'bout now)

http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/02/16/32_senators_call_for_no_containment_strategy_for_iran

"I know that containment might have been viable for the Soviet Union during the Cold War, but it's not going to work with the current fanatical Islamist regime in Tehran," said Lieberman, referring to Iran's sponsorship of international terrorism, its record of proliferation, and its statements calling for the destruction of Israel. He called containment of a nuclear Iran a "dangerous and deadly illusion."

snip

"[The resolution] makes it very clear that containment is not good enough, that containment is not a fallback position here. If we say we're going to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon, we have to mean it," said Casey, adding that there needed to be a greater sense of urgency on the issue as well.

Ayotte referred to the Thursday morning testimony of Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who told her that Iran represented a "grave threat" to U.S. national security and the security of U.S. allies.

Senators from both parties said Thursday that a diplomatic solution was still the goal and they believed the sanctions on Iran were working, but that a containment strategy was less preferable than a military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities if all else fails

bipartisan fuckheads
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
32 senators call for 'no containment' strategy for Iran (need'n us a big ol' WAR, 'bout now) (Original Post) TalkingDog Feb 2012 OP
No, just one party--Republicans and DINOs. They're the same party. nt valerief Feb 2012 #1
RepubliDINOS SammyWinstonJack Feb 2012 #4
Badda bing! Yeah, I believe he is. nt valerief Feb 2012 #9
Hope they give us the first 32 conscripts from their families for the war. nt nanabugg Feb 2012 #2
lieberman = war spanone Feb 2012 #3
Bite me you chickenhawk warmonger. DCKit Feb 2012 #5
Too bad we can't contain LIARman. hobbit709 Feb 2012 #6
I CANNOT and I WILL NOT support ANY candidate of ANY party who takes this position!!! Douglas Carpenter Feb 2012 #7
This Connecticut Dem is REALLY disappointed in Blumenthal Owlet Feb 2012 #8
 

DCKit

(18,541 posts)
5. Bite me you chickenhawk warmonger.
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 10:21 AM
Feb 2012

If the PNACers succeed in selling U.S. another illegal war, I'll consider this country beyond redemption - we're just too damn stupid to survive.

Owlet

(1,248 posts)
8. This Connecticut Dem is REALLY disappointed in Blumenthal
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 11:39 AM
Feb 2012

I thought he had more integrity than this. First his co-sponsorship of PIPA, now this. He won't get my vote again.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»32 senators call for 'no ...