General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPelosi To GOP: ‘Duh!,’ Women Should Be Included In A Hearing About Contraception
By Igor Volsky
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) echoed Democrats concerns about Republicans excluding female witnesses from a hearing focusing on President Obamas new regulation requiring insurers and employers to provide birth control in their health insurance plans. This is an issue about womens health and I believe that womens health should be covered in all fo the insurance plans, Pelosi insisted at her press briefing this morning, refuting the GOPs claim that the debate should focus on religious liberties.
Where are the women? And thats a good question for the whole debate. Where are the women? she asked. Imagine, having a panel on womens health and then not having any women on the panel, duh!:
Watch it:
- more -
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/02/16/427068/pelosi-to-gop-duh-women-should-be-included-in-a-hearing-about-contraception/
CAPHAVOC
(1,138 posts)Icicle
(121 posts)Using that logic, insurance should cover abortion.
CAPHAVOC
(1,138 posts)In Obamacare the insurance companies can keep 15% of all the money. No questions asked. The more that is spent the more they make. Why do you think they love Obamacare?
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)enjoy your brief visit
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)No Pap tests? No breast cancer screenings? No prostate screenings? No colonoscopy? My insurance not only paid for these once a year, they were REQUIRED to maintain the coverage. Part of that whole "Wellness" package they do now. An ounce of prevention (BC) is worth a pound of cure (abortion).
CAPHAVOC
(1,138 posts)As we follow Greece over the cliff.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)Same for the others I mentioned. Wellness screenings.
Why do you think it should only cover illness and accidents? You don't think preventive care is less expensive than a devasting illness that can cost hundreds of thousands?
CAPHAVOC
(1,138 posts)Original Medicare for everyone without all the frills is the way to go. Part A and Part B. I think it should kick the insurance companies out of the mix. Health is no longer an insurable interest. Fund it with a progressive tax on all income.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)ultrasounds, blood tests, mris, colonoscopies, etc, can.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Poor Richard's Almanack and how an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, do they?
Didn't think so.
CAPHAVOC
(1,138 posts)But if you had Medicare for illness and accidents. And that is what I think should happen. You could afford a checkup. Also change the Tort Laws for malpractice. That reminds me. I gotta get my Almanac.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)picture entirely and just make Single Payer the way for everyone to receive their medical care. And it saves the system a great deal of money to prevent as much as they can rather than practicing (and footing the bill for) fire engine medicine.
CAPHAVOC
(1,138 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
CAPHAVOC
(1,138 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Not if one is not ill."
...you're not making a lick of sense with all your comments in this thread. You think you are, but you're not.
CAPHAVOC
(1,138 posts)Wait till 2014.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)I doubt it will be a long one.
CAPHAVOC
(1,138 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)But I've been around DU nearly seven years and have a pretty decent nose for BS.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)and this one is full of
I think Medicare as started in the 60's is a good plan. What is wrong with that? Why not make it for everyone? If you think that is BS OK. I don't. Nobody even tries to. Let the Docs be Docs. The insurance companies love the AHCP. Docs hate it.
LeftishBrit
(41,205 posts)CAPHAVOC
(1,138 posts)But here a lot of it is a waste. To make the Docs not get sued.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Over and over again, I hear remarks by Democrats referencing that Repubs didn't allow this or didn't allow that. Usually, even the minority party has SOME control over panels and such.
BumRushDaShow
(128,848 posts)and by their rules, control the committee scheduling, functioning, and who can testify. I think the current Senate rules allow a minority party to hold a hearing but I need to verify.
BumRushDaShow
(128,848 posts)needs to be out there blasting the hell of Issa and his whole dysfunctional party.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)Come on, sisters, we want to hear it from your own lips how you think contraception is evil. SHOW US pictures of your quiverful household of kids. LEAD by YOUR example!!!!!
chrisa
(4,524 posts)They were probably scratching their heads, wondering why women should have any say in this at all.
eissa
(4,238 posts)I've been searching for a picture taken at either an Afghan or Egyptian conference on women's rights featuring an all-male panel of clerics, and of course no women in attendance. Would LOVE to see that pics alongside that of this panel of clergy. Oh, the captioning fun we would have!!