Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
269 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
ZIMMERMAN TRIAL: Day 8, Wednesday, July 3, 2013 (Original Post) GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 OP
Looks like they started early today. N/T GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #1
Hope she allows the wannabe evidence riverwalker Jul 2013 #2
Wannabe evidence is in... (nt) pokerfan Jul 2013 #9
O'Mara wants more time riverwalker Jul 2013 #3
he had time to go on AC360 riverwalker Jul 2013 #57
O'Mara really doesn't want the college records in. Tommy_Carcetti Jul 2013 #4
The course in question taught specifically about SYG law Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #11
sounds like they don't know what the testimony riverwalker Jul 2013 #12
I'm glad the judge boxed his ears warrior1 Jul 2013 #5
yes!!!! riverwalker Jul 2013 #6
School records are admissible. nt Tommy_Carcetti Jul 2013 #7
Goes to Z's motive warrior1 Jul 2013 #8
The evidence is in. bravenak Jul 2013 #10
nice!!! uponit7771 Jul 2013 #16
The defense tries this a lot Nevernose Jul 2013 #13
witness Sonja Boles-Melvin riverwalker Jul 2013 #14
This attorney reminds me of Skeletor.. HipChick Jul 2013 #15
Vladimir Lenin KurtNYC Jul 2013 #32
why did defense bring up bad credit riverwalker Jul 2013 #17
Not at all Lurks Often Jul 2013 #35
Riddle me this Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #18
well, now things get interesting..Zimmerman was the best student uponit7771 Jul 2013 #19
Well he shouldn't plead ignorance on self-defense laws. Tommy_Carcetti Jul 2013 #28
If the defense thought bad credit is prejudicial, why did they bring it up? bravenak Jul 2013 #20
Captain Alexis Francisco Carter riverwalker Jul 2013 #21
BOOM! SYG introduced and Zimmy was one of the best students... Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #22
+1, by a lawyer!! NICE uponit7771 Jul 2013 #23
He learned about stand your ground and self defence . bravenak Jul 2013 #24
How do you have a 1.5 GPA? HipChick Jul 2013 #25
That one class being the only one he was interested in... uponit7771 Jul 2013 #26
...and here comes the Defense to discredit the Captain Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #27
This guy isn't RJ, he's going to make it hard as heck for them uponit7771 Jul 2013 #29
I focused on Florida law .. boom...he's going to be harder to break than RJ. He knows where they're. uponit7771 Jul 2013 #30
All they have is that the course wasn't "specific" to Florida. madaboutharry Jul 2013 #31
They are going for the SYG defense Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #34
BOOM!!!! "did you cover Stand Your Ground"? riverwalker Jul 2013 #33
Look at his eyes Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #36
Isn't this giving... NCTraveler Jul 2013 #37
YES!!!...Good catch, the judge caught it too uponit7771 Jul 2013 #39
The professor isn't giving them what the defense wants. madaboutharry Jul 2013 #40
Where is the Defense going with this?! tia uponit7771 Jul 2013 #38
They want to confuse the jury. But the judge madaboutharry Jul 2013 #42
Did you hear Knock Knock's sigh? avebury Jul 2013 #41
This lawyer on the stand is good, he's going to now explani "imperfect" self defense uponit7771 Jul 2013 #43
"Disproportionate"..... Cuts both ways. Defense wants us to believe it only chelsea0011 Jul 2013 #48
Well now RGR375 Jul 2013 #56
keep dreaming noiretextatique Jul 2013 #184
Alexis Carter - JAG prosecutor and eye candy panAmerican Jul 2013 #44
I have a daughter I would like him to meet.. Ninga Jul 2013 #45
oh yeah riverwalker Jul 2013 #46
I want John Guy to randomly ask, "Hey dad, wanna have a catch?" Tommy_Carcetti Jul 2013 #50
You're right! John Guy has a soothing, calming kind of voice panAmerican Jul 2013 #54
He is very cute.... madaboutharry Jul 2013 #47
While on the topic..... Tommy_Carcetti Jul 2013 #49
"Disparpoetionate deadly force, like a gun shot" says therofessor.. Ninga Jul 2013 #51
the professor....we've come a long way from the first day of the trial uponit7771 Jul 2013 #59
Force meeting force HockeyMom Jul 2013 #52
That isn't the way disproportiante force is applied in self-defense law. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #61
I think Zimmerman had only one hand to "defend" himself Voice for Peace Jul 2013 #62
The same could be said for Trayvon's right to defend himself. Just Saying Jul 2013 #72
Not the way it works. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #78
Total bs Just Saying Jul 2013 #89
Check out the U.S. Army height/weight/age standards. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #97
Zimmy was 185 lbs. Not 200. He is obese now, but did not weigh 200 Lbs at time of shooting. uppityperson Jul 2013 #119
200 lbs. See link. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #125
I was going by what was by his photo, this. Thank you. uppityperson Jul 2013 #132
Trayvon last played football at age 13 JimDandy Jul 2013 #217
Thank you for taking the time to counter the claims. It gets old and I appreciate your doing it. nt uppityperson Jul 2013 #218
Justice requires the truth. Happy to do it. JimDandy Jul 2013 #224
Thanks for the corrrection regarding football. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #233
As have you. Just Saying Jul 2013 #240
I am not a Z fan. I have posted several times that I think he is guilty of manslaughter. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #245
You rock! Just Saying Jul 2013 #241
Awe, thanks! JimDandy Jul 2013 #242
Hockey mom you obviously don't know fl law ceonupe Jul 2013 #187
The major difference in Florida HockeyMom Jul 2013 #204
Wrong ceonupe Jul 2013 #219
Fleeing is the same as retreat HockeyMom Jul 2013 #229
Handgun vs. Hands bravenak Jul 2013 #53
wrong again RGR375 Jul 2013 #58
...and REASONABLE is a judged by Jury as Knock Knock stated in his own filibuster uponit7771 Jul 2013 #60
Reasonable fear. bravenak Jul 2013 #66
I would not follow anybody RGR375 Jul 2013 #74
I haven't seen any proof that his head was beat into the concrete. bravenak Jul 2013 #76
The cuts on the back of his head RGR375 Jul 2013 #116
Maybe they wrestled through those bushes Trayvon was supposedly hiding in. uppityperson Jul 2013 #118
The body of the victim was found nowhere near the concrete. bravenak Jul 2013 #123
Nowhere near the concrete? GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #135
Jump up in surprise and take a few steps? bravenak Jul 2013 #139
Well, hell. Trayvon then managed to tuck his arms back under his body by the time others got there uppityperson Jul 2013 #156
This goes back to that wonderful post saying " Trayvon should have just dodged the bullet" bravenak Jul 2013 #169
Dr. Bao has just testified that TM was alive for 1 to 10 minutes after he was shot. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #247
He also said that Trayvon couldn't move after he was shot. Nt bravenak Jul 2013 #248
don't forget the part where he sez "ya got me!" frylock Jul 2013 #172
and: "You're going to die tonight" noiretextatique Jul 2013 #178
made it, ma! top of the world! frylock Jul 2013 #182
right...how many 17yo kids talk like that in 2013? noiretextatique Jul 2013 #188
keep repeating that lie noiretextatique Jul 2013 #179
Ah, then you get into the reasonable person standard HockeyMom Jul 2013 #68
I read an article riverwalker Jul 2013 #90
My friend the Sensi HockeyMom Jul 2013 #106
Martin was probably afraid for his own life as well he should have been. lumpy Jul 2013 #166
today's link Voice for Peace Jul 2013 #55
Here's the live link I use displacedtexan Jul 2013 #67
thanks very much! I will check it out. Voice for Peace Jul 2013 #198
what the hell? n/t riverwalker Jul 2013 #63
LOL! 4 dozen people calling into the Skype connection Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #64
They don't have their SKYPE account setup correctly HipChick Jul 2013 #70
SKYPE AMATEUR TIME! HipChick Jul 2013 #65
He wanted to be a prosecutor. bravenak Jul 2013 #69
Does that guy sound like Costner to you too? uponit7771 Jul 2013 #71
Yes, he does. pintobean Jul 2013 #73
I predict he will do an excellent closing. Voice for Peace Jul 2013 #199
Yup, riverwalker said the same thing earlier panAmerican Jul 2013 #77
Indeed he does. Not gonna hurt with the mzmolly Jul 2013 #151
is this true about the weapon warrior1 Jul 2013 #75
So says MSNBC legal analyst, Atty Bloom. Ninga Jul 2013 #79
Atty Bloom said the prosecution was to demonstrate that the gun Ninga Jul 2013 #81
Well that's interesting. warrior1 Jul 2013 #83
It is impossible to cock a Kel-Tec PF9. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #82
you'd have to tell me warrior1 Jul 2013 #87
No, it's double action only (DAO) pokerfan Jul 2013 #84
I thought I heard atty Bloom say that the bullet had to be loaded first into the chamber Ninga Jul 2013 #88
All guns have to have that done prior to firing. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #100
Right pokerfan Jul 2013 #115
I heard him cock the gun while exiting his truck on the 911 mzmolly Jul 2013 #152
That type of gun can not be cocked Lurks Often Jul 2013 #235
Semantics. I heard him pull the slide back mzmolly Jul 2013 #243
Not semantics Lurks Often Jul 2013 #244
It is relevant. mzmolly Jul 2013 #250
Then based on your own cite, you have just proven you did not hear the slide drawn back Lurks Often Jul 2013 #252
I heard what sounded like him, readying his gun. mzmolly Jul 2013 #253
Very familiar with those sounds Lurks Often Jul 2013 #254
He was out of his truck by that time. mzmolly Jul 2013 #255
Speculation Lurks Often Jul 2013 #256
Uh huh. mzmolly Jul 2013 #260
Believe what you like, Lurks Often Jul 2013 #262
You didn't see testimony saying he had a bullet mzmolly Jul 2013 #263
Of course he had a bullet in the chamber Lurks Often Jul 2013 #264
Ahhh, protection. mzmolly Jul 2013 #268
My answer had nothing to do with whether the shooting was justified or not, Lurks Often Jul 2013 #269
Listen to the testimony of the firearms expert. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #266
We mzmolly Jul 2013 #267
That is the seat belt being released. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #258
Funny. He was long out of his automobile at that mzmolly Jul 2013 #259
OK. My timeline was off. You still didn't hear the slide being racked. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #265
The testimony goes against you. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #246
More semantics. I heard what sounded like Z getting his gun ready. Understand? mzmolly Jul 2013 #249
His gun was already ready and needed no further preperation. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #257
I hope you don't shoot an innocent person, mzmolly Jul 2013 #261
This forensic witness is fascinating Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #80
She is very easy to understand, And I think not good for defense. Ninga Jul 2013 #85
Actually in this case ceonupe Jul 2013 #196
BAMB!!! A CONTACT SHOT!!! Meaning the Muzzles was AGAINST the fabric uponit7771 Jul 2013 #86
Yet Zimmerman says riverwalker Jul 2013 #99
Zimmy would've been better off to say "I don't know" rather than try to make things up uppityperson Jul 2013 #121
Well, what would one expect him to say, not that it truly matters. lumpy Jul 2013 #173
Yes. mzmolly Jul 2013 #153
I love this chick! Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #91
She is very smart and I love how she isn't letting him lead her 'round the rosy. madaboutharry Jul 2013 #92
He keeps trying to get her to express an opinion about degrees of safety Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #95
Yep, one sharp cookie! Her testimony about the clothing was in my opinion damaging to Ninga Jul 2013 #96
Defense is blah blah blah, trying to distance jury from her earlier testimony - good grief Ninga Jul 2013 #93
+1 uponit7771 Jul 2013 #94
Very typical questioning when you have nothing to say. madaboutharry Jul 2013 #98
ah, thx...means it most likely hurt them uponit7771 Jul 2013 #101
Defense is doing a good job with her. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #102
I don't think so, they established that the shot was at arms distance at least meaning there had to uponit7771 Jul 2013 #103
She made it clear that the gun was touching the fabric Lisa D Jul 2013 #104
Very clearly stated. Ninga Jul 2013 #110
How does that help the defense when Zimmerman claimed he thought the shot went wide Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #105
Doesn't. Ninga Jul 2013 #108
That he thought he missed is irrelevant to the positions. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #113
Good point, and a damn good reason to restrict people from carrying firearms in public. Hoyt Jul 2013 #122
HOW did Z straddle TM and spread his arms apart, yet TM had his arms under his body? uppityperson Jul 2013 #124
That requires speculaton on my part. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #131
Zimmerman claimed he wasn't sure if he even the gunshot even hit Trayvon. madaboutharry Jul 2013 #111
That is fairly common in self-defense shootings. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #120
And, a good reason Zimmerman and others should not be allowed to carry in public. Hoyt Jul 2013 #126
+1 mzmolly Jul 2013 #154
I haven't read that testimony, do you have a link to it? (Z shooting TM X3 in the back). uppityperson Jul 2013 #127
Google Jane Surdyka GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #145
She said she thought she heard 3 shots. Nothing about shooting into his back. uppityperson Jul 2013 #147
She claims that she saw Z on TM's back, then heard three shots. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #165
Heard her testimony also; never heard her say Martin was shot in the back; lumpy Jul 2013 #177
See my post #191 N/T GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #234
I think she said she heard three shots, not that she saw three shots into the back - hedgehog Jul 2013 #149
Correct. She does not say that the saw the shots, only heard three shots. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #162
Thank you , i had missed that. hedgehog Jul 2013 #170
Here is the testimony GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #191
So much, then, for "You got me!" Lies, lies, lies. WinkyDink Jul 2013 #159
By Zimmerman saying that Martin sat up and quoted (supposidly) Martins lumpy Jul 2013 #210
I am a mom, grandmother and a fair minded person. I think that already too much has been said Ninga Jul 2013 #107
+1 uponit7771 Jul 2013 #109
Having that tiny woman effortlessly pull the trigger for them Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #112
+1 Ninga Jul 2013 #114
Guns aren't designed to require heavy trigger pulls. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #117
Hey - it was the defense that kept trying to make a 4lb trigger pull Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #129
I don't see why they emphasized that. N/T GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #141
of course you wouldn't CatWoman Jul 2013 #221
If you have special insight, please share it. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #237
Two women on the jury RGR375 Jul 2013 #130
Outstanding. I wasn't aware of that. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #137
only one, the parrot lady riverwalker Jul 2013 #176
Well, While There Are Many Positive Comments For Prosecution.... ChiciB1 Jul 2013 #128
Because they want you to keep watching? Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #133
Faux was doing the same ... Myrina Jul 2013 #134
On that note RGR375 Jul 2013 #146
CNN and Headline News have been catering to the Zimmerman ... ThePhilosopher04 Jul 2013 #136
That's why I watch the WFTV live feed and commentary. displacedtexan Jul 2013 #142
I just watched CNN HL for a few minutes and was shocked to see their live chelsea0011 Jul 2013 #181
after testimony that Z studied SYG riverwalker Jul 2013 #138
not really RGR375 Jul 2013 #143
you mean like Trayvon? riverwalker Jul 2013 #174
++ Voice for Peace Jul 2013 #200
Two Women On Jury Are Very "Iffy" Because ChiciB1 Jul 2013 #175
Here you go: Tommy_Carcetti Jul 2013 #183
Yep, That's The One... ChiciB1 Jul 2013 #226
Sorry, Forgot To Mention The Other Case. ChiciB1 Jul 2013 #227
I was fought over in Voir Dire HockeyMom Jul 2013 #216
So The Reality Really Is... ChiciB1 Jul 2013 #228
Because in a nut shell RGR375 Jul 2013 #140
if this is the law riverwalker Jul 2013 #144
It was over at "Initially provokes" Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #148
not a bruise, not a scratch riverwalker Jul 2013 #195
Zimmerman was on the ground RGR375 Jul 2013 #232
Which is moot Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #150
Walks? You have to believe he was in so much of a struggle that he feared for his chelsea0011 Jul 2013 #186
bullshit....zimmerman LIED again noiretextatique Jul 2013 #189
Consider the source. mzmolly Jul 2013 #155
Their recreation video has TM's clothing all wrong. displacedtexan Jul 2013 #160
that's the same stupid meme some keep posting here noiretextatique Jul 2013 #180
The judge has about had it with the defense arguing with her Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #157
That won't go anywhere. No trial has to be extended on the Defense's request. WinkyDink Jul 2013 #163
Thats good to know. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #171
SHUT HIM UP, JUDGE. You have SAID the subject is OVER. WinkyDink Jul 2013 #158
Defense isn't prepared? Ninga Jul 2013 #161
too busy giving interviews riverwalker Jul 2013 #168
Here's the good ish .... uponit7771 Jul 2013 #164
Judge: talk to the hand. n/t riverwalker Jul 2013 #167
Zimmerman's lies about knowing full well how the STG law works Wash. state Desk Jet Jul 2013 #185
just a question here.. What is the difference whether zimmy knew about the SYG laws or not, besides HeroInAHalfShell Jul 2013 #190
Uh....read your last four words. WinkyDink Jul 2013 #193
That he knew what to say to the police to seem innocent, goes against Serinos comments about him uponit7771 Jul 2013 #194
Well that's easy, Wash. state Desk Jet Jul 2013 #197
let's hope he doesn't get away with it this time noiretextatique Jul 2013 #192
What to make of the DNA evidence here? Tommy_Carcetti Jul 2013 #201
No Zimmerman DNA under Trayvons fingernails riverwalker Jul 2013 #202
If I understood correctly, the only place Trayvon's blood was on Zimmerman Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #203
Over half Trayvon's blood was in his pleural cavities csziggy Jul 2013 #251
1. No DNA from Zimmy on TM's hands - mzmolly Jul 2013 #205
#4 excellent point riverwalker Jul 2013 #206
Not that I disagree, but how do you wash your own DNA away from your own hands? Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #225
Thanks. nt Tommy_Carcetti Jul 2013 #207
YW. Just my understanding based upon a brief mzmolly Jul 2013 #211
and none on the cuffs which I think is especially significant Voice for Peace Jul 2013 #214
Yes. Excellent point, I forgot to include. mzmolly Jul 2013 #215
So WHY did the DNA expert just VOLUNTEER that evidence might have been stored incorrectly??? FGSake. WinkyDink Jul 2013 #208
If state plans to finish today, does that mean we don't hear autopsy report? Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #209
It might be stipulated to. Tommy_Carcetti Jul 2013 #212
Regarding Zimmermans weight voteearlyvoteoften Jul 2013 #213
Related: I can explain the weight gain since (w/o jokes!) Nevernose Jul 2013 #220
Really, what was he prescribed? targetpractice Jul 2013 #222
Your basic adderall prescription. Nevernose Jul 2013 #223
Tegretol. Don't know if that is what Z was on, but fits your description. (I take it). nt s-cubed Jul 2013 #230
You're right, but I was wrong Nevernose Jul 2013 #231
Not Trazadone, but Temazepam according to this... targetpractice Jul 2013 #239
I found this on a Zimmerman trial blog. displacedtexan Jul 2013 #236
The rain didn't wash any of the other blood off zimmermans head or nose or the gun, they're uponit7771 Jul 2013 #238

riverwalker

(8,694 posts)
2. Hope she allows the wannabe evidence
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 09:07 AM
Jul 2013

I think Z thought he would be a big hero, catching a "perpetrator" hold him at gun point until the police arrived. He would be "one of them".

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
11. The course in question taught specifically about SYG law
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 09:21 AM
Jul 2013

and one of the documents they want to admit was a term paper Zimmerman wrote in 2010.

Thinking this is why they played the Hannity interview where Zimmerman denied knowing anything about SYG before the shooting.

riverwalker

(8,694 posts)
12. sounds like they don't know what the testimony
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 09:22 AM
Jul 2013

will be. Mantei kept saying, well he was on the discovery list, you had the information, you could of found out. I think the defense is pretty worried.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
13. The defense tries this a lot
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 09:25 AM
Jul 2013

Was it last week that both O'Mara and Zimmerman blew off a deposition (last Tuesday night, I believe), and then argued that the witness shouldn't be allowed because the defense hasn't deposed the witness?

And isn't O'Mara who several times now has stipulated that evidence is acceptable before trial, then objected in court? And once claimed that a year and a half wasn't long enough to prepare?

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
35. Not at all
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 10:11 AM
Jul 2013

showing Zimmerman was rejected for bad credit, something many people have gone through at one time or an other, shows he wasn't rejected for reasons that would be more detrimental to the defense's case.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
18. Riddle me this
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 09:50 AM
Jul 2013

Why did the defense argue to block the paper that had the words "bad credit" on it (judge redacted it) and then brought it up anyway on a different piece of paper?

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,173 posts)
28. Well he shouldn't plead ignorance on self-defense laws.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 10:02 AM
Jul 2013

Not that ignorance of the law is an actual defense.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
20. If the defense thought bad credit is prejudicial, why did they bring it up?
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 09:52 AM
Jul 2013

I think he thought the evidence wouldn't be allowed and didn't plan appropriately.

riverwalker

(8,694 posts)
21. Captain Alexis Francisco Carter
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 09:55 AM
Jul 2013

military prosecutor, his former professor. My livestream keeps cutting out ..damn

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
27. ...and here comes the Defense to discredit the Captain
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 10:01 AM
Jul 2013

as an inexperienced teacher who went out of bounds of the course and "tainted" teaching with bad information....

I can smell it.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
30. I focused on Florida law .. boom...he's going to be harder to break than RJ. He knows where they're.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 10:04 AM
Jul 2013

...going

madaboutharry

(40,208 posts)
31. All they have is that the course wasn't "specific" to Florida.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 10:04 AM
Jul 2013

The defense is on shaky ground here. They are dealing with a Captain in the Army.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
34. They are going for the SYG defense
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 10:10 AM
Jul 2013

Prosecution should have defined it - not given the defense the opportunity to do that.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
37. Isn't this giving...
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 10:15 AM
Jul 2013

Isn't this giving the defense the opportunity to argue SYG without actually arguing SYG?

panAmerican

(1,206 posts)
44. Alexis Carter - JAG prosecutor and eye candy
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 10:27 AM
Jul 2013

Sorry, I know this is straying from the topic, but does any other woman in this forum notice those eyes and lips? yum.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,173 posts)
50. I want John Guy to randomly ask, "Hey dad, wanna have a catch?"
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 10:35 AM
Jul 2013

Just in the middle of trial.

Just to throw people off.

And make them bawl their eyes out.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,173 posts)
49. While on the topic.....
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 10:33 AM
Jul 2013

Yesterday's finger prints expert, who testified for all of 2 minutes, was pretty cute as well.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
52. Force meeting force
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 10:46 AM
Jul 2013

Nice that this was talked about. Applies to SYG in Florida too. Many people don't realize this. A gun against a fist is unequal (imperfect as was called) force.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
61. That isn't the way disproportiante force is applied in self-defense law.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 11:02 AM
Jul 2013

I have a Texas Concealed Handgun License and rountinely carry concealed everywhere I go, unless illegal to do so. I am also a senior citizen with a modest disability. If I should be attacked by a healthy, young, male mugger, I would not be able to adequately defend myself without my gun. The mugger enjoys a strong force advantage over me. Because he is the attacker, and because I have no idea of the amount of harm he intends to inflict upon me, and because he has to ability to do that harm, I have the legal right to defend myself using my gun. That is the way portionality of force is determined.

None of what I have just said is in defense of Zimmerman. I am explaining how proportionality of force works. Zimmerman appears to have instigated the confrontation which muddies up who was the agressor, hence the trial.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
62. I think Zimmerman had only one hand to "defend" himself
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 11:04 AM
Jul 2013

Last edited Wed Jul 3, 2013, 01:38 PM - Edit history (1)

because his other was on the gun the whole time, my opinion.

Just Saying

(1,799 posts)
72. The same could be said for Trayvon's right to defend himself.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 11:31 AM
Jul 2013

He had a guy following him and he didn't know what harm he intended to inflict. He may even have known that Zimmerman was armed. Didn't he have the right to fight for his life?

I dont think your example applies here since I don't see Zimmerman as outmatched.

It's really poor law if we allow people to get into altercations and then use deadly force if they are losing. It appears that these laws need to be reviewed and rewritten. We shouldn't be giving gun owners license to kill at their discretion.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
78. Not the way it works.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 11:42 AM
Jul 2013

If the guy that starts the fight attempts to retreat or otherwise tries to quit, then you can't keep on fighting. If you do then you become the agressor and he gets to defend as needed.

You don't get to hit someone for merely following you. If you do, then you have become the agressor.

You don't get to sit on someone and keep hitting them. At that point the person on bottom gets to defend as needed.

Zimmerman was a fat guy going up against a fit football player. Fat guys don't do well in fights.

Just Saying

(1,799 posts)
89. Total bs
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 11:50 AM
Jul 2013

Zimmerman was a bit overweight which gave home a 40 pound weight advantage on Trayvon. He also worked out regularly in a MMA gym. Trayvon was a skinny little twig! He had no real disadvantage and add to it he was armed and Trayvon would be able to fight back. Your bias is showing.

This is exactly what I'm talking about! You're making excuses why a grown man trained to fight and armed had the right to go after a kid with whatever force he chooses.

We need to make gun laws tougher. It's clear to me that gun owners have way too much power with these laws and they pro e to me every day that they don't deserve it.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
97. Check out the U.S. Army height/weight/age standards.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:02 PM
Jul 2013

I have repeated posted that I think Z is guilty of manslaughter, so I am not a defender of his. But I do defend facts.

Here are the military's standards. http://usmilitary.about.com/od/army/l/blmaleweight.htm

Z, age 28, 68 inches, max weight 184lbs. He was 200 lbs. He was fat. All the MMA he ever did was just with the punching bag. Never did get into a ring.

TM, age 17, 71 inches, weight standard 136 to 184 lbs.

Z was a fat guy going up against a football player.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
125. 200 lbs. See link.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:43 PM
Jul 2013
Zimmerman's height is shown as 5?8? (1.73 m); and his weight at 200 lb (91 kg) on the Sanford Police Department Offense Report for February 26, 2012, the night of the shooting. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Trayvon_Martin

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
132. I was going by what was by his photo, this. Thank you.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:52 PM
Jul 2013
Zimmerman's weight was shown as 185 pounds (84 kg) on his Seminole County Sheriff's Office Inmate Booking Information on April 11, 2012, the date of his arrest.[53]

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
217. Trayvon last played football at age 13
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 04:54 PM
Jul 2013
four years before he was murdered. He played in a community rec league with other neighborhood kids at his local park. His interests, since then, had been learning to fly planes as a student pilot.

The day of his death, Trayvon, who was called 'Slimm' by his friends, was described on his autopsy report as a narrow-framed, 5ft 10.5 in, 158 lbs 17 yr old male.

Since you keep posting what Trayvon was doing 4 years ago, let me remind you that Zimmerman was a bouncer 4 years ago. He was fired from that job, though, and at the time of Trayvon's death, he was going to college taking criminal justice classes on self-defense and stand-your-ground defense, and training 3 times a week at a local gym advertised as the best MMA fight gym in the world.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
233. Thanks for the corrrection regarding football.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 09:40 PM
Jul 2013

The murder charge is for the jury to decide. Looks like you are ready to decide without a trial.

Just Saying

(1,799 posts)
240. As have you.
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 01:15 AM
Jul 2013

Zimmerman fans always pull this line out if the old bung hole when they've run out of things to say.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
245. I am not a Z fan. I have posted several times that I think he is guilty of manslaughter.
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 08:21 PM
Jul 2013

But I am a fan of facts. Sometimes I get my own facts wrong and I accept correction. And I have no hesitation of correcting others.

 

ceonupe

(597 posts)
187. Hockey mom you obviously don't know fl law
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 02:37 PM
Jul 2013

It is clear from your comment you don't know or understand FL law.

It is not fist vs gun just that simple.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
204. The major difference in Florida
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 04:05 PM
Jul 2013

SYG is that you are not under obligation to FLEE. Force still has to meet force. That is what the testimony today with Zimmerman's College Professor was all about, and pointing out. Zimmerman is not claiming SYG in this case, only self denfese. Not the same thing in Florida. Somebody punches you in the face, you cannot pull out a gun and shoot them because your life is NOT in danger, no matter how much you think it might be. Again, the "reasonable person standard" in law applies in FLORIDA TOO. There are concepts in law which are based on simple Common Law Standards. Sorry, I am not about to write a paper here on that. I finished the degree. Zimmey didn't.

 

ceonupe

(597 posts)
219. Wrong
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 04:57 PM
Jul 2013

Under FL law u have zero duty to retreat.

Only time u even have to disengage from the fight is if u started it. Like I said you don't know what you are talking about.


To recap in FL there is zero duty to retreat unless you started confrontation and even then being on your back with no place to escape to is often enough to prove you were attempting to feel.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
229. Fleeing is the same as retreat
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 07:14 PM
Jul 2013

Learn the "legal jargon". The same reading comprehension applies in Florida as the rest of the states.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
53. Handgun vs. Hands
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 10:49 AM
Jul 2013

Unequal force. The defense should have shut up. They wanted to keep this guy talking and then he said gun. That ended that.

 

RGR375

(107 posts)
58. wrong again
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 10:57 AM
Jul 2013

The law allows for an armed individual to shoot an unarmed individual in certain circumstances. Unequal force is still legal If the person was reasonably in fear of life or great bodily harm.

 

RGR375

(107 posts)
74. I would not follow anybody
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 11:34 AM
Jul 2013

But if somebody ended up on top of me for whatever reason and was beating my head into the concrete i would sure as hell would shoot them.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
76. I haven't seen any proof that his head was beat into the concrete.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 11:40 AM
Jul 2013

The physicians assistant did not say it was constant with his head being beat into the concrete. You don't get to shoot someone just because you're losing a fight. If his head was beat into the concrete , why didn't he go with the paramedics. Why no concussion? I need proof that his head was beat into the concrete.
He was itching for a fight and he got it. He lost. He killed the kid.

 

RGR375

(107 posts)
116. The cuts on the back of his head
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:28 PM
Jul 2013

were not caused by the grass. If you are loosing a fight and on the ground with somebody on top of you yes you can shoot the other person if you are in your mind in reasonable fear of death or great harm. You do not actually have to sustain great harm. It just has to be reasonable that it is possible. That is the law and what the jury has to look at with zimmerman. So far the prosecution has not been able to refute that Zimmerman believed he was in reasonable fear.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
118. Maybe they wrestled through those bushes Trayvon was supposedly hiding in.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:34 PM
Jul 2013

So far they've shown Zimmy is a liar and a killer. They have to show a "reasonable person" would be in fear, not just a lying killer.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
123. The body of the victim was found nowhere near the concrete.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:43 PM
Jul 2013

Meaning, if he had his head struck on the concrete, they must have moved, thereby removing the imminent threat of death as Trayvon was found on the grass. He was no longer in fear of death by concrete. That's why he said he was being smothered/suffocated by Trayvons hand, but then that means he couldn't have been the one screaming for help. Meaning, that was Trayvon screaming, since his hand was supposedly covering Mr. Zimmermans mouth.
He is not being truthful.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
135. Nowhere near the concrete?
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:53 PM
Jul 2013

TM was only a few feet away. All that was needed was for TM to jump up in surpise at having been shot, take a step or two, and collapse. It takes a few seconds to die from a heart shot. It isn't instant like on TV.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
139. Jump up in surprise and take a few steps?
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:58 PM
Jul 2013

Not when zimmerman said he got on top of him and held his arms out. Did he say the victim got up and took a few steps? I sure didn't hear that from any of the witnesses. I heard only one person got up. George Zimmerman. Do you think he moved the body from the concrete to the grass? A few feet is a lot when you've been shot through the heart and lungs. Especially when the shooter himself says he held the victim arms out and held him down.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
156. Well, hell. Trayvon then managed to tuck his arms back under his body by the time others got there
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 01:47 PM
Jul 2013

He was quite something. Shot through the heart and lungs. Jumps up. Says "oh gosh, you got me, you got it, you got me". Zimmy pushes T back down, spreads T's arms and straddles him with his hand on T's back. Trayvon somehow manages to get his arms away from Z and tucks them back under his body to finally die.

Good lord. Faced with a skittle bearing monster like that, Z was perfectly justified in shooting him!!!!111111

Extreme

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
169. This goes back to that wonderful post saying " Trayvon should have just dodged the bullet"
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 02:04 PM
Jul 2013

I mean this kid was amazing, the next Spider-Man! Don't forget after he jumped up he moved to the grass, so that nobody would know he was banging Zimmermans head into the concrete. Covering his tracks even in the throes of death.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
247. Dr. Bao has just testified that TM was alive for 1 to 10 minutes after he was shot.
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 11:08 AM
Jul 2013

Dr. Bao was the medical examiner who did the autopsy. Even one minute is adequate time for TM to jump up take a couple of steps and collapse. Plenty of time to pull his hands back under him after Z pulled them out.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
172. don't forget the part where he sez "ya got me!"
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 02:07 PM
Jul 2013

then spins on his heel and collapses to the ground (fade to black).

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
68. Ah, then you get into the reasonable person standard
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 11:20 AM
Jul 2013

What would a "reasonable person" consider to be in fear of life?

riverwalker

(8,694 posts)
90. I read an article
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 11:51 AM
Jul 2013

that said women generally have a higher standard/criteria when it comes to self defense. I wonder what that will mean to this case.
Could it be, because that we women live our entire lives at a physical disadvantage, in a vulnerable physical/social position, we are used to it, it's part of life.
We expect that to use deadly force, it must be a very substantial threat. I don't think Z getting a punch in the nose is going to do it with 6 women on the jury.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
106. My friend the Sensi
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:15 PM
Jul 2013

Good example. Two young 6 foot men were following us in the subway and making lewd remarks to us. We are around 5 feet. She said to me to say nothing and keep walking. We did until one of them tried to grab her from behind. She threw him to the ground and assumed her defensive stance. They showed no weapons, and ran away.

Size and gender here. One would assume that a male of that size would have an advantage over a small woman. However, the extenuating circumstances here was that she was a Martial Arts EXPERT. A Sensi (teacher) is considered an expert, and is licensed.

My friend explained to me afterwards about the 7 deadly pressure points on the body, which she legally could not use unless her life was in danger. She could kill an attacker with a blow to those pressure points. If she had used those on that guy for just grabbing her, she could have been arrested, and at the very least, her license taken away.

I know there are women, and a lot of men, out there who think that just the thread of an attack, or rape, is enough to use a a deadly weapon, or deadly force, but that is not true.

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
166. Martin was probably afraid for his own life as well he should have been.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 01:59 PM
Jul 2013

Perhaps Zimmerman was in fear that Martin would secure the gun and that might have contributed to his fears. If Martin had glimpsed the gun as Zimmermn claims or struggled to get possession of the gun no doubt Zimmerman would have become very fearfull. The resident eye witness who claims the killer was on top subduing the victim at the time of the shot appears to be a more reliable witness.
There is not a doubt that Martin was terribly frightened for his life; that is most likely the reason for his frantic screaming for help. Of course Martin was in fear, he didn't know what the hell was going on or who the hell was pursuing him; little or no mentioned of how Martin was reacting to the pursuer who appeared to be stalking him. Zimmerman should have to answer to the his deadly debacle and be taken out of the public, preferably for enough time to reflect on his actions and feel some remorse and guilt.

displacedtexan

(15,696 posts)
67. Here's the live link I use
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 11:20 AM
Jul 2013
http://www.wftv.com/s/zimmerman-blog/

This is both the live stream and the live blog being covered by good legal analysts on WFTV. I watched the Casey Anthony trial on this channel.
 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
198. thanks very much! I will check it out.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 03:03 PM
Jul 2013

I've found a few other sites that purported to have
good legal analysis and they turned out to be
foxy if you know what I mean.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
73. Yes, he does.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 11:31 AM
Jul 2013

He's also much more likeable than Bernie. He should be handling the bulk of the questioning of the witnesses.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
199. I predict he will do an excellent closing.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 03:04 PM
Jul 2013

His opening was so compelling.. maybe this is
his strength.

Ninga

(8,275 posts)
81. Atty Bloom said the prosecution was to demonstrate that the gun
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 11:45 AM
Jul 2013

could not have been fired by accident.

pokerfan

(27,677 posts)
84. No, it's double action only (DAO)
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 11:46 AM
Jul 2013

which means that the act of pulling the trigger cocks the gun and then drops the hammer.

Ninga

(8,275 posts)
88. I thought I heard atty Bloom say that the bullet had to be loaded first into the chamber
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 11:49 AM
Jul 2013

to properly prepare for firing.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
100. All guns have to have that done prior to firing.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:05 PM
Jul 2013

You can't shoot a chamber that doesn't have a cartridge in it. Chambering a round is part of loading a gun.

pokerfan

(27,677 posts)
115. Right
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:23 PM
Jul 2013

That's called chambering a round. Pulling back the slide strips a cartridge from the magazine and places it into the chamber. Now here's the key point:

In a single action pistol, the act of racking the slide leaves the hammer cocked. Single action pistols also generally have external safeties and are designed to be carried cocked and locked.

In a double-action-only pistol, such as Zimmerman's, the act of racking the slide does NOT cock the hammer. The hammer is always down and there's an internal safety that prevents the firing pin from contacting the cartridge primer unless the trigger is pulled.

It is a very safe pistol. The prosecution's point is that it takes a very deliberate action, a long four pound trigger pull to fire the pistol.

mzmolly

(50,985 posts)
152. I heard him cock the gun while exiting his truck on the 911
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 01:31 PM
Jul 2013

tapes. Not sure if the prosecution will speculate in this vein or not?

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
235. That type of gun can not be cocked
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 09:44 PM
Jul 2013

It works as follows:
1. Insert magazine
2. Pull slide back and release, chambering the first round from the magazine as the slide closes
3. Pull trigger.

Internal safeties prevent the gun from firing until the trigger is pulled.

mzmolly

(50,985 posts)
243. Semantics. I heard him pull the slide back
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 02:13 AM
Jul 2013

chambering the first round....

There is no "internal safety" mechanism.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
244. Not semantics
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 01:19 PM
Jul 2013

There is a very big difference between chambering a round and cocking the hammer and there is an internal safety mechanism or else the gun would fire when dropped.

It is also irreverent to the trial.

mzmolly

(50,985 posts)
250. It is relevant.
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 11:24 PM
Jul 2013

Mark my words.

A firearms expert with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Amy Siewert, examined Zimmerman’s gun and said he had one bullet ready to fire in the chamber as well as a fully loaded magazine when he fatally shot Martin.


http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/07/03/george-zimmerman-trial-trayvon-martin-day-8
 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
252. Then based on your own cite, you have just proven you did not hear the slide drawn back
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 10:46 AM
Jul 2013

Zimmerman did not chamber a bullet while sitting in the truck since the magazine remained full and the model of gun Zimmerman used can NOT be cocked manually.

So what exactly did you hear again?

All your cite proved is that Zimmerman carried the firearm in the condition it was meant to be carried.

mzmolly

(50,985 posts)
253. I heard what sounded like him, readying his gun.
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 05:22 PM
Jul 2013

What part of that confuses you?

Are you familiar with the sound of entering a clip and pulling back a slide?

Listen here >>>>>

at about 2:40 in.
 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
254. Very familiar with those sounds
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 06:05 PM
Jul 2013

and the sound at 2:40 didn't sound like that to me. Maybe a seatbelt being released.

Quite simply regardless of what you heard, the trial testimony and type of handgun it was, means whatever sound occurred it at 2:40 was not the sound of a firearm having the slide pulled back to chamber a round because if that was the case, there would not have been a full magazine in the gun when the shooting occurred.

mzmolly

(50,985 posts)
255. He was out of his truck by that time.
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 06:15 PM
Jul 2013
"Zimmerman had a gun in the chamber," he (Serino) continued. "He got out of the car with the gun ready to shoot. ~ Detective Chris Serino


SOURCE - http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnn-guests-wonder-if-mysteriously-demoted-zimmerman-detective-will-revive-prosecutions-case/

For readers unfamiliar with the way of the gun, a full magazine would indicate that Zimmerman kept an “extra” bullet in the Kel Tec’s chamber.

In other words, Zimmerman loaded the gun, racked the slide to put a round in the chamber (reducing the number of bullets in the magazine by one), removed the magazine, put another round in the magazine, then replaced the magazine in the gun. If Zimmerman had fired two shots, the magazine would have one less cartridge/bullet than its full capacity.


SOURCE - http://www.newsrake.org/index.php?topic=11117.135
 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
256. Speculation
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 06:28 PM
Jul 2013

So he is out of the car, with the cellphone to his hear and chambering a round and pulling another bullet out of his pocket to put in the magazine so it is full? Seriously?

Or

there is a sound on the tape that hasn't been postively identified yet.


And even more importantly, how is relevant to what happened?

mzmolly

(50,985 posts)
260. Uh huh.
Sun Jul 7, 2013, 03:59 AM
Jul 2013

Seriously. Ever rest a phone on your shoulder and complete a task, while engaging in conversation?

How is it relevant? That's a bizarre question.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
262. Believe what you like,
Sun Jul 7, 2013, 07:52 AM
Jul 2013

but I don't see the testimony and available evidence supporting your viewpoint.

It's a perfectly reasonable question, regardless of what either of us think Zimmerman did with the gun, it had no relevance to the shooting itself.

mzmolly

(50,985 posts)
263. You didn't see testimony saying he had a bullet
Sun Jul 7, 2013, 01:58 PM
Jul 2013

in the chamber?

It has relevance, from a legal standpoint.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
264. Of course he had a bullet in the chamber
Sun Jul 7, 2013, 04:01 PM
Jul 2013

that is the standard way to carry a firearm that is being used for protection. There is no responsible trainer that would teach people to carry a gun with an empty chamber for protection.

What I am saying is that since both the chamber and magazine was full, I find it extremely unlikely that he worked the slide on the gun.

mzmolly

(50,985 posts)
268. Ahhh, protection.
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 03:01 AM
Jul 2013
Against a kid with a bag of skittles. I think the term "responsible" trainer, is inaccurate in this case.
 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
269. My answer had nothing to do with whether the shooting was justified or not,
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 08:55 AM
Jul 2013

but to explain why the gun was carried and loaded in the manner it was.

The JURY, the people who have heard ALL of the allowable evidence, will determine whether the shooting was justified or not.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
266. Listen to the testimony of the firearms expert.
Sun Jul 7, 2013, 09:15 PM
Jul 2013

Fully loaded it hold 8 rounds. Immediately after the shooting he surrendered to police. The firearms expert testified that the gun had 7 rounds in it, 6 in the magazine and one in the chamber. The bullet fired into TM makes 8. Therefore, Z had the gun fully loaded.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
265. OK. My timeline was off. You still didn't hear the slide being racked.
Sun Jul 7, 2013, 09:08 PM
Jul 2013

That pistol, fully loaded, has seven in the mag and one in the chamber. 7+1. After firing one shot it then has 6+1.

You are saying that Z carried it with an empty chamber, 7+0, then racked the slide to put one in the chamber, now 6+1. Then he shoots TM, which makes it 5+1. But when he surrendered to the police, immediately after the shooting, his gun had 6+1. Therefore, he was carrying it fully loaded, which is the normal way to carry it.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
246. The testimony goes against you.
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 08:31 PM
Jul 2013

The Kel-Tec PF9 holds seven in the magazine and one in the chamber, for a total of eight rounds. The prosecution firearms/forensics expert testified that Z's gun had six in the magazine and one in the chamber when it was taken from him (total of seven). He had fired one shot, which left him with 6 in the mag and one in the chamber, plus one expended round, total 8.

If Z had started with an empty chamber he would have had a total of 7 rounds in the mag. Chambering a round would leave him with 6+1. Firing one round would leave him with 5+1=6.

Therefore, he was carrying the gun fully loaded, with one in the chamber. Therefore, nobody heard him jack a round into the chamber as there was already one in the chamber.

mzmolly

(50,985 posts)
249. More semantics. I heard what sounded like Z getting his gun ready. Understand?
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 11:21 PM
Jul 2013
<<< Listen to that at about 6:30 in.

A firearms expert with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Amy Siewert, examined Zimmerman’s gun and said he had one bullet ready to fire in the chamber as well as a fully loaded magazine when he fatally shot Martin.


http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/07/03/george-zimmerman-trial-trayvon-martin-day-8

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
257. His gun was already ready and needed no further preperation.
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 07:47 PM
Jul 2013

What you hear at 6:30 in the video is the gun being disassembled.

I have a Kel-Tec P3AT which is the exact same gun except it is chambered for .380 instead of 9mm. I am well familiar with how it works. I carry it daily, fully loaded magazine with one in the chamber.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
80. This forensic witness is fascinating
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 11:44 AM
Jul 2013

I never knew what all went into determining if a weapon was used in a crime. Glad he is having her explain how all of this works.

 

ceonupe

(597 posts)
196. Actually in this case
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 03:03 PM
Jul 2013

4 of the jury people have ones at family members with guns and one has a ccw but does not active carry.

Chances are they know guns and the pros attempt to scare them based on facts of gun operation or to illicit emotional thinking prob won't go well.


While lots of people on DU know very little about guns. (Most thought you don't chamber a round until right before use and had no idea most defensive had guns over the last 20 years have been specificly designed to be carried fully loaded.

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
173. Well, what would one expect him to say, not that it truly matters.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 02:08 PM
Jul 2013

It can't be that Martin died by someone else doing the job.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
91. I love this chick!
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 11:54 AM
Jul 2013

He is dancing around his language trying to be all Mr Confusion and she is rephrasing him so the jury understands.

Hahahahahaha!!!!!!!!

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
95. He keeps trying to get her to express an opinion about degrees of safety
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:02 PM
Jul 2013

and she keeps going back to design considerations.

Ninga

(8,275 posts)
93. Defense is blah blah blah, trying to distance jury from her earlier testimony - good grief
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:00 PM
Jul 2013

he asked her if she visited the gun factory!

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
102. Defense is doing a good job with her.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:09 PM
Jul 2013

They are making sure that she testifies that the gun was touching, and only barely touching, the fabric. They are setting up to claim there was distance between the fabric and TM's skin.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
103. I don't think so, they established that the shot was at arms distance at least meaning there had to
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:13 PM
Jul 2013

...be minimum and maximum distance since the barrol was only touching the fabric she also didn't differientiate how deep into the fabric just that if it was wrapped around the gun it would've left a different burn mark

TM was not a pillow

Lisa D

(1,532 posts)
104. She made it clear that the gun was touching the fabric
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:13 PM
Jul 2013

and that it also could have been pushing into the fabric. The pattern would be the same.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
105. How does that help the defense when Zimmerman claimed he thought the shot went wide
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:13 PM
Jul 2013

and he missed, reholstered, and straddled Trayvon with his arms apart?

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
113. That he thought he missed is irrelevant to the positions.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:21 PM
Jul 2013

People are highly stressed under those kind of conditions and perceptions can be mistaken. There are lots of incidents of people firing all the rounds in their gun and not remembering they fired any, of people not remembering correctly the number of rounds fired, of thinking they missed when they didn't, of thinking they hit when they missed, etc.

Read Massad Ayoob's book, "Stressfire".

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
122. Good point, and a damn good reason to restrict people from carrying firearms in public.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:42 PM
Jul 2013

I'm sure Zimmerman -- and many others toting guns on our city streets -- read the book with the full title, "Stressfire, Vol. 1 (Gunfighting for Police: Advanced Tactics and Techniques) . Doesn't that sound like something that will protect us from the yahoo standing behind our kids at Chuck E Cheeze.

Here's some other Ayoob books for the gun cultists --

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51W%2BA-luAnL._SL160_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-dp,TopRight,12,-18_SH30_OU01_AA160_.jpg

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51mfq2vZpPL._SL160_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-dp,TopRight,12,-18_SH30_OU01_AA160_.jpg







Zimmerman likely posed and practiced in front of a mirror often so that he could pull his gun and kill an unarmed teenager in an instant.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
124. HOW did Z straddle TM and spread his arms apart, yet TM had his arms under his body?
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:43 PM
Jul 2013

Simple question. I understand he could easily have been confused as things happened under stress, but how is the "spread arms apart" yet they were tucked under his body explained? If it was by "confusion", then why should ANY of Z's testimony be held in ANY way accurate?

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
131. That requires speculaton on my part.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:51 PM
Jul 2013

That I see there are two major explanations plus a combination.

1. Z was confused.

2. Z straddled and pulled TM's arms out. TM was still alive, just barely. Z turned to address the neighbor that had just shown up and TM pulled his own arms back under him, then died. It takes 10 to 15 seconds to die from a heart shot, not instantly like on TV.

3. Combination of both. Z tried to pull the arms out but only got them a little way out. (Most likely.)

Z was still wrong for his actions that started the road to this tragedy. It was foreseeable as possible, even likely, and meets the definition of manslaughter.

madaboutharry

(40,208 posts)
111. Zimmerman claimed he wasn't sure if he even the gunshot even hit Trayvon.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:17 PM
Jul 2013

Zimmerman's story is a total fabrication.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
120. That is fairly common in self-defense shootings.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:40 PM
Jul 2013

In shooting situations, people are under extreme stress. I used to know a cop who was in a shoot-out with a perp. The perp fired first and hit the cop's partner (non-fatal, he recovered fully), the cop fired three rapid shots at close range, all of them went into the ceiling. The perp fired another shot that went wild. The cop realized what he was doing, gained control of himself, and shot the perp in the heart. All of that in a few seconds that seemed like minutes.

The mind does strange things under extreme stress.

Remember the testimony of the woman who claimed she saw Z straddle TM's back and then heard him shoot him three times into TM's back? That's an example of what can happen in that kind of stress.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
145. Google Jane Surdyka
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 01:14 PM
Jul 2013

Normally I would find the link. I am out of time. Have to get ready for work or I will be late. Be back Friday.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
147. She said she thought she heard 3 shots. Nothing about shooting into his back.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 01:19 PM
Jul 2013
http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-george-zimmerman-trial-surdyka-20130626,0,3787069.story
Defense attorney Don West pressed Surdyka on inconsistencies in her testimony. Surdyka said several times she heard three pops or shots;

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
177. Heard her testimony also; never heard her say Martin was shot in the back;
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 02:24 PM
Jul 2013

in fact she testified that the person on top was the one who got up and off the other on the ground and walked around holding his head; obviously the shooter.
Perhaps Zimmerman's nose and head injuries occured during the struggle on the ground, hence holding his head while pacing back and forth.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
149. I think she said she heard three shots, not that she saw three shots into the back -
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 01:23 PM
Jul 2013

I've been wondering if there has been evidence presented that there was only one shot - the one that killed Mr. Martin.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
162. Correct. She does not say that the saw the shots, only heard three shots.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 01:56 PM
Jul 2013

Yes, there was only one shot. Textimony was today by the police firearms expert.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
170. Thank you , i had missed that.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 02:06 PM
Jul 2013

Unless you listen to every minute, it's hard to get a run down of the testimony.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
191. Here is the testimony
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 02:44 PM
Jul 2013
Time 28:50 to 29:30

She is not able to reconcile what she claims she saw with the fact that TM was shot in the chest.

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
210. By Zimmerman saying that Martin sat up and quoted (supposidly) Martins
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 04:19 PM
Jul 2013

last words uponing dying, Zimmerman wasn't even sure that he had shot Martin.
Perhaps all of Zimmerman's story wasn't fabrication, but in certain crucial parts of the it appears he put into use a helluva of a lot of fabrication.

Ninga

(8,275 posts)
107. I am a mom, grandmother and a fair minded person. I think that already too much has been said
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:15 PM
Jul 2013

about guns, shooting, gun coming in close contact with clothing, this gun or that gun, pulling the trigger double action, bla blah blah

Giving the jury lots of visuals of Travon being shot at close range....

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
117. Guns aren't designed to require heavy trigger pulls.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:30 PM
Jul 2013

In fact, a heavy trigger pull makes a handgun more dangerous and it become more difficult to keep on target during a heavy trigger pull. An example of that was the recent shooting in NYC where the police hit several bystanders.

My 4'10" wife can pull the triggers on all of our guns.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
237. If you have special insight, please share it.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 09:47 PM
Jul 2013

Otherwise, your condescending insults accomplish nothing.

 

RGR375

(107 posts)
130. Two women on the jury
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:49 PM
Jul 2013

have ccw permits and i guarantee that they do not have heavy trigger pulls on their weapons. I took my daughters weapon and had a trigger job on it.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
137. Outstanding. I wasn't aware of that.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:57 PM
Jul 2013

Neither the prosecution nor the defense will be able to spread much BS about guns then.

riverwalker

(8,694 posts)
176. only one, the parrot lady
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 02:21 PM
Jul 2013

Juror B37

B37, first presented to the court on the second day of jury selection, Tuesday, June 11, is memorable as the woman with many pets: 3 dogs, 4 cats, a parrot, a crow with one wing, two lizards . . . it seemed almost an aside when she also mentioned two daughters. She has lived in Seminole county for 18 years, and has been married for 20. She has two children, a 26-year-old and a 24-year-old.

She was another juror with explicit disdain for the press, saying the best “use for newspapers is for the parrot’s cage, that’s a better use than reading.” When asked directly if she trusts the media, she answered firmly, “I do not.”

She recalled the protest marches in the area as “rioting.” Her recollection of the shooting is that it was an “unfortunate incident,” but that she had not formed an opinion about what happened. She further recalled that Zimmerman had been involved in a scuffle, lat at night, and a “boy of color” had been killed.
It is notable that B37 is the only juror to have previously possessed a license to carry a concealed firearm (termed a CCW, “concealed carry weapons,”in Florida), although she had allowed the license to expire and no longer carried a firearm (and apparently did so rarely if at all when she was licensed). Her husband still owns guns, however, and B37 expressed no uncertainty about her ability to use and shoot a gun, saying she has gone to the range shooting.

When questioned by the defense on final voir dire she affirmed that “I’ll just follow the law,” in evaluating the evidence and coming to a verdict.

ChiciB1

(15,435 posts)
128. Well, While There Are Many Positive Comments For Prosecution....
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:46 PM
Jul 2013

Just turned to HLN channel and most are saying the prosecution witnesses are making the DEFENSE look much better.

I'm kind of into Wimbledon right now, a huge Novak fan and don't really want to see Murray advance, but he's back on target right now. However, I do like Andy.

Anyway, can anyone please tell me WHY they are giving high fives to DEFENSE??

Myrina

(12,296 posts)
134. Faux was doing the same ...
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:53 PM
Jul 2013

.... they & CNN/HLN both have similar agendas IMHO.

Faux was on in my employer's cafeteria yesterday & just after the witnesses specifically detailed how Zimmy's injuries and what the witnesses saw of the "fight" DID NOT GEL with Defense's claim that his 'head was bashed into the pavement', during the next break the Faux bimbo was all breathlessly gasping "... Martin was repeatedly smashing Mr. Zimmerman's skull into the pavement!!"

Uh, what???

 

RGR375

(107 posts)
146. On that note
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 01:15 PM
Jul 2013

I thought that it was funny that a retired federal judge on fox who believes that zimmerman should be convicted! Said that the judge has screwed it so bad that if he is convicted it will probably be thrown out on appeal.

 

ThePhilosopher04

(1,732 posts)
136. CNN and Headline News have been catering to the Zimmerman ...
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:55 PM
Jul 2013

the entire time. They're cherry-picking what they want to hear that implies self-defense and ignoring glaring problems with the Zimmerman story that do not add up. While you can spin each individual testimony to jive with self-defense, the totality of the evidence, especially when common sense is applied, will show this was murder - manslaughter at the absolute very least.

displacedtexan

(15,696 posts)
142. That's why I watch the WFTV live feed and commentary.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 01:06 PM
Jul 2013

HLN's commercials and stupid commentary were making me crazy.

chelsea0011

(10,115 posts)
181. I just watched CNN HL for a few minutes and was shocked to see their live
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 02:30 PM
Jul 2013

Twitter feed with people shouting for acquittal. Really?

riverwalker

(8,694 posts)
138. after testimony that Z studied SYG
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 12:58 PM
Jul 2013

in his class, and therefore LIED on the Hannity interview, some talking head attorney on CNN said "well, sure there are some minor inconsistancies". No, he LIED. All the talking heads are pro Zimmerman, I don't know why, I don't care. Only the 6 women on the jury matter.

 

RGR375

(107 posts)
143. not really
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 01:08 PM
Jul 2013

There is no law in Florida called stand your ground. Hard to study a law that does not exist. Stand your ground was just a nick name given when Florida modified it's laws to give people the same rights outside of their home that they had in their home. (no duty to retreat)

riverwalker

(8,694 posts)
174. you mean like Trayvon?
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 02:09 PM
Jul 2013

or does the law only apply to gun owners? Can unarmed people people defend themselves as well or only if they pack heat?

ChiciB1

(15,435 posts)
175. Two Women On Jury Are Very "Iffy" Because
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 02:12 PM
Jul 2013

I think one of them has a son/daughter who wanted to go into or studied law enforcement, another one had stated that there had been a lot of suspicious people in and around her neighborhood from time to time. They "could" be thankful for a person who was willing to be a helpful citizen such as GZ. Crap shoot.

Maybe they will take ALL testimony into consideration and his aggressiveness, because there are such things as BAD cops. Depends on their mind set.

My personal story...

Maybe 2 1/2 years ago, very close to where I live there was a young 20 year old male shot by an off-duty officer. We are very good friends of the and girlfriend and the family of this young kid. My grandson went to school with him too. They were coming home (walking) and yes they had been drinking and were making noise. It was around 11:30/12:00 AM and they made the mistake of deciding to play the game "ding-dong-bell." You run up to a door, ring the bell, run and hide. What many would consider a silly prank. Really depends on how any given person sees it. When I was younger we did all kinds of silly stuff, today many may feel threatened. But a 911 call is almost always available.

UNFORTUNATELY, they rang the bell of an off-duty officer who got mad, grabbed his gun, NOT a taser, or anything else less threatening. They take their cruisers home here so his vehicle was in his driveway. He puts flip-flops on, runs down the street after the 2 kids, gets the one on the ground and shot him in the head. He died instantly. I think the officer said he was resisting arrest. He was off duty though and not in uniform. The kids did live on the same street about 3 houses down. So just going home actually.

Sure, the prank wasn't the smartest thing to do, but did it really rise to the level that one of them should be shot and killed?? And if he felt a need to shoot, why not some place other than the head?

Officer got a suspension WITH pay for 2 weeks I think, then that was the end of it. There was local outrage, high school kids held marches and all the rest, but to this day I'm told the officer has never faced any charges. Don't know if he quit the force, could have because so many people were outraged. He also owned a small local bar or something of that sort. AND, he didn't have the cleanest record when internal affairs reports were released.

This is Florida. Officer stated he was mad because it could have woken his baby up and I "think" SYG was used here too. The officer's name was Hernandez or Fernandez, I could be wrong, but the kids name was Tyler Spann. Just saw the girlfriend a couple of weeks ago and she said the family filed a civil lawsuit against him but wasn't sure of the status. OH, if it matters to anyone, Tyler was white.

Now that I think of it, I can google it to check what's happening. But this is just another case that I find excessive force and/or attitude came into play.

ChiciB1

(15,435 posts)
226. Yep, That's The One...
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 06:28 PM
Jul 2013

I sure screwed up on Verdoni's name though. But the story is true. And his friend said it NEVER happened that way.

Having known about this one personally, I've worried from the get go about this trial. And I must add something else. I, as so many others following this case are very outraged, but it really has another "feel" when you know the deceased, or you're close to someone who actually lived it from day one. There are stages you go through as it unfolds that keep your head spinning. I won't elaborate, but when you finally hit that brick wall that says you MUST stop, you can do no more, you get to go on yet another emotional trip. This trip leaves you feeling helpless, hopeless and full of fury.

Whenever I see TM's parents my stomach knots up because of that "after feeling!" With all my heart I want them to at least have some JUSTICE. Nothing will bring him back, the child they loved so fervently. But getting a cold hard slap in your face when you know that a legal system was able to twist facts into a pretzel, that made their son "the perp" isn't something many of us can imagine. I only witnessed the terrible grief of those closest to him, I didn't have to wear it as a shroud from then on.

Sorry, kind of got carried away. I just have such a visceral reaction when I look at GZ, who appears not to fully understand a certain reality TM'z parents are going through.

JMHO

ChiciB1

(15,435 posts)
227. Sorry, Forgot To Mention The Other Case.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 06:32 PM
Jul 2013

So, so similar. So young to learn such harsh lessons. Words aren't enough.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
216. I was fought over in Voir Dire
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 04:39 PM
Jul 2013

Negligence Case. Parents of Special Needs child, who was hurt on the playground, sued the school district because of the actions of her Special Needs TA. First, I have a Paralegal Degree. Second, I was employed as a Special Needs TA for a public school district. Third, I have two Special Needs children.

As the Clerk said to me when she saw my profile, "Oh, man." "This is going to to LONG". Yes, it was. I knew fully well how to get disqualified from service, but that would have meant lying which I couldn't do on many levels. I was interviewed back and forth. Endless. This was a civil suit, not even criminal.

The Plaintiffs Attorney (Special Needs child's parents) wanted me on the jury. The Defense (School District) Attorney didn't. I suppose I "knew too much" for the Defense? The Defense Attorney GLARED at me every time he saw me. Whatever. Although I knew fully well what SHOULD have been done, without hearing testimony, I couldn't say what WAS done. Based on that, I could not make any assumptions based solely on my occupation, as a mother, or my degree.

I was sat by the Plaintiffs, but it was settled out of court. Thank you, thank you!

ChiciB1

(15,435 posts)
228. So The Reality Really Is...
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 06:38 PM
Jul 2013

We are seeing a tiny snippet of what goes on all the time. GZ & his family have already filed a lawsuit against NBC and if they win that, they get to "keep on smilin!"

Glad to hear that they did get a settlement at the very least. Bless you and your children.

 

RGR375

(107 posts)
140. Because in a nut shell
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 01:02 PM
Jul 2013

The law professor they had on the stand gave very good testimony on Florida's self defense law. Even on florida statute 776.041 use of force by aggressor. If the jury goes by the law zimmerman walks.

riverwalker

(8,694 posts)
144. if this is the law
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 01:13 PM
Jul 2013

Zimmerman didn't exhaust every reasonable means. He reached for his gun within seconds. If he had, then Trayvon would have bruises etc.

2011 Florida Statutes

776.041?Use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
(1)?Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or

(2)?Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:
(a)?Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or(b)?In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.

Duer 157099

(17,742 posts)
148. It was over at "Initially provokes"
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 01:20 PM
Jul 2013

But ok yeah, even if you let that one slip, there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that GZ "exhausted every reasonable means to escape" ESPECIALLY when you look at the photos of his hand taken at the police station. Not even a broken fingernail.

 

RGR375

(107 posts)
232. Zimmerman was on the ground
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 09:19 PM
Jul 2013

Can't get up and run away when you are pinned to the ground at that point he had no more means to exhaust.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
150. Which is moot
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 01:28 PM
Jul 2013

The judge specifically told the jurors to "not bother" (paraphrasing) with the back and forth between the Captain and Attorney Knock-Knock because she would give them exact instructions on applying the law before they go to adjudicate.

chelsea0011

(10,115 posts)
186. Walks? You have to believe he was in so much of a struggle that he feared for his
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 02:35 PM
Jul 2013

life and a jury finds it reasonable. There is no evidence of that yet and probably won't be unless the defense has something. And a jury will be hard pressed to find self defense without Zimmerman taking the stand. And they will hold it against him even if they ca n't.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
189. bullshit....zimmerman LIED again
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 02:40 PM
Jul 2013

you folks are ridiculous. try freerepublic.com for people as equally fact-impaired as yourself.

displacedtexan

(15,696 posts)
160. Their recreation video has TM's clothing all wrong.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 01:55 PM
Jul 2013

Right off the bat, they're blatantly distorting the facts.

And no one questions why GZ didn't know the damned street names (there are 3).

And when GZ says he drove past TM, then says, "He's walking toward me now," well, DUH! He was on his way home, and you put yourself in his path, Asswipe.

There's so much wrong with HLN's coverage that just makes me want to scream.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
171. Thats good to know.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 02:07 PM
Jul 2013

It seems like they are racking up lists of denied requests for accommodation. Seems they blew off a large chunk of folks who were listed as potential witnesses in discovery.

Wash. state Desk Jet

(3,426 posts)
185. Zimmerman's lies about knowing full well how the STG law works
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 02:35 PM
Jul 2013

reminds me and I don't have a link,about a former co-worker of Zimmerman's description of Zimmy.If I recall correctly the two worked at a car dealership and Zimmy was a prankster who tried to curb his competition by making a co-worker look like a bad guy.

The c0-worker of Zimmerman's described him as two faced lying sack of shit who will say anything to support his lies.
The guy essentially give a description of a narcissistic sociopath.
He believed that based on his experiences with Zimmerman that Zimmerman will probably get away with the crime. The article was published early on .

The description of Zimmerman actually fits the investigating cops two sided view of Zimmerman's story- he's either a very good lier or he's telling the truth. Same cop that testified the other day who's bottom line rec. was charge him with manslaughter.
That bottom line means more than you think.

The fact that Zimmerman knew full well how the STG law works than lied about it seems to support the notion that Zimmerman fabricated a story that he thought was full proof-,
I want to add to that ,-that if he is a sociopath and I think he is, than Zimmerman most likely figured nobody of authority would look into his course studies in attempt to get an angle on his mind set. you know police agencies don't always share information -,he may have figured that they wouldn't have any reason to conduct a full investigation of the shooting because he thought his story was full proof. Little did he know national outrage and massive media coverage would soon be on his trail.

It is always the unforeseeable- things that happen that they cannot see as a possible obstacle to either lie over or groom over as it occurs.Socio's are groomers.

Zimmerman's lies about the co-worker and his sick twisted need to destroy the man were all told to management at the car dealership he worked for.

Again Zimmerman was described as a two faced balded faced lier on a mission.
Here's the catch-the co-worker went on to say ,he always gets away with it.
Zimmerman alway gets away with it.



 

HeroInAHalfShell

(330 posts)
190. just a question here.. What is the difference whether zimmy knew about the SYG laws or not, besides
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 02:41 PM
Jul 2013

he said he didn't know.


lets say he knew, what would that mean besides he is a liar?

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
194. That he knew what to say to the police to seem innocent, goes against Serinos comments about him
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 02:52 PM
Jul 2013

...to some degree because if Z knew what to say of course he would seem credible

Wash. state Desk Jet

(3,426 posts)
197. Well that's easy,
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 03:03 PM
Jul 2013

Where do the lies begin and where do those lies end?


Do you try to look in between those lies or read in between the lines of those lies in effort to find the truth about what one is really saying or stating ?

When you are trying to catch a criminal you do,but if one tells or is telling the truth-than the truth is the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

What it looks is Zimmerman prepped himself and if that is true than Zimmerman prepped himself long before he shot Travon Martin.

But that is just an opinion -.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
192. let's hope he doesn't get away with it this time
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 02:44 PM
Jul 2013

it's increasing crystal clear that zimmerman is a sociopath who is incapable of remorse, and a pathological liar. IF he had just told the truth and accepted responsibility for what he did...but it is also clear that his is not capable of telling the truth. i had an acquaintance like that...she would lie about what she had for breakfast.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,173 posts)
201. What to make of the DNA evidence here?
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 03:30 PM
Jul 2013

Since this isn't a whodunit and that Zimmerman killed Trayvon is not in dispute, obviously DNA isn't going to play the same role as in cases where the defendant's role as perpetrator is in question.

That said, I'm sure there's some relevance of the DNA evidence as it relates to the respective parties' theories of how events took place. Just wondering if anyone here can summarize how the DNA evidence may be played as it relates to the parties here.

riverwalker

(8,694 posts)
202. No Zimmerman DNA under Trayvons fingernails
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 03:39 PM
Jul 2013

only half listening and trying to pack for 4th, but I did hear that. The human skull weighs 11-12 pounds, to lift Z's head and "bash repeatedly" would surely leave some residue on Trayvon's fingernails.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
203. If I understood correctly, the only place Trayvon's blood was on Zimmerman
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 03:42 PM
Jul 2013

was his right cuff and the front right shoulder.

If Trayvon had him pinned down - wouldn't he have had more blood on him from shooting Trayvon in the chest?

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
251. Over half Trayvon's blood was in his pleural cavities
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 12:14 AM
Jul 2013

Collapsing his lungs. He had one very small hole in his chest. His heart stopped beating immediately. There was about 2700 milliters of blood between the two pleural cavities (human body holds about 5 liters - 5000 milliliters).

There wasn't even much blood on Trayvon's sweat shirt.

My husband's comment about the locations of Trayvon's blood on Zimmerman - He got some on his cuff when he pushed Trayvon off or jumped on the dying teenager to "subdue" him. He was still holding his gun in his left hand, reached up to grab or check his head, transferring blood to high right shoulder.

One of the witnesses I don't think was called at trial because she made public appearances with Benjamin Crump said she saw Zimmerman walking back and forth grabbing his head in sort of a "What the hell did I just do?" attitude. My husband has thought for a year that Zimmy may have bashed himself in the head with the gun when he did that.

Zimmerman also had a bit of Trayvon's blood on the back of his jacket, probably from when he was handcuffed behind his back.

mzmolly

(50,985 posts)
205. 1. No DNA from Zimmy on TM's hands -
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 04:08 PM
Jul 2013

which means holding Z down, suffocating and pounding his head, after a punch to the face, is not supported by the DNA evidence. DNA can be found in blood, saliva, mucus etc.

2. No DNA from TM on the gun, which means there is no DNA evidence to support a struggle for the gun.

3. DNA from GZ on TM's lower hooded shirt, = GZ perhaps tackling TM at some point?

4. TM had his own DNA on his hands, which means it's not likely the rain washed away all of Z's DNA, that should be on TM's hands if GZ's account is credible.

I didn't catch all of the DNA analysis, but that's what I gathered in the portion that I watched.

riverwalker

(8,694 posts)
206. #4 excellent point
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 04:11 PM
Jul 2013

4. TM had his own DNA on his hands, which means it's not likely the rain washed away all of Z's DNA, that should be on TM's hands if GZ's account is credible.

mzmolly

(50,985 posts)
211. YW. Just my understanding based upon a brief
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 04:22 PM
Jul 2013

observation of some of the DNA evidence. I wasn't able to pay very close attention, unfortunately.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
208. So WHY did the DNA expert just VOLUNTEER that evidence might have been stored incorrectly??? FGSake.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 04:17 PM
Jul 2013

Just answer the questions, Bud.

Duer 157099

(17,742 posts)
209. If state plans to finish today, does that mean we don't hear autopsy report?
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 04:19 PM
Jul 2013

Or is that scheduled for today? Or not at all?

voteearlyvoteoften

(1,716 posts)
213. Regarding Zimmermans weight
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 04:26 PM
Jul 2013

His doctor Lindzee teatified that Z was 5'7"
and 205 when she examined him. That was soon after the killing . So Sanford PD scale is off by 20 LBs??????

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
220. Related: I can explain the weight gain since (w/o jokes!)
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 05:04 PM
Jul 2013

He was on prescription speed at the time he killed Trayvon. I'm sure his attorneys discouraged its continued use.

targetpractice

(4,919 posts)
222. Really, what was he prescribed?
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 05:26 PM
Jul 2013

Interested to know where you learned that.

He's on some anti-depressants now (don't know which ones), but they can cause increased appetite.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
223. Your basic adderall prescription.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 05:31 PM
Jul 2013

And that one anti-seizure drug that psychiatrists commonly give to non-epileptics that are on meds that make it difficult to fall asleep. It starts with a T

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
231. You're right, but I was wrong
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 08:06 PM
Jul 2013

That's the drug I was thinking of, but the drug Zimmerman was on was trazadone (plus the aforementioned adderall). A close relative of mine has taken both T drugs at one point.

targetpractice

(4,919 posts)
239. Not Trazadone, but Temazepam according to this...
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 11:21 PM
Jul 2013
http://www.examiner.com/article/the-prescription-drugs-george-zimmerman-was-taking-when-he-killed-trayvon-martin

I don't know anything about that particular drug.

Whatever the medication, finding the correct dosages for any psychotropic medications is very tricky... From my own experiences, I don't think folks taking certain medications (e.g. Ambien) should be allowed to carry fully-loaded guns. These meds really do affect state-of-mind, executive decision-making, and risk taking.

Despite those side effects, choosing to take psych medication is a voluntary.

displacedtexan

(15,696 posts)
236. I found this on a Zimmerman trial blog.
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 09:46 PM
Jul 2013

_______________ ¶___
| The STFU Truck ||l ""|""\__,_
| _____________|||__|__|__|]
(@)@)******(@)(@)****(@) it's time to take a ride.



*********************

Almost everyone commenting there was pro Zimmerman, and some of them even claimed that Martin "just got lucky when the rain washed all of the DNA off of him."

Seriously, are people that stupid, or are they just Pure D Mean?

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
238. The rain didn't wash any of the other blood off zimmermans head or nose or the gun, they're
Wed Jul 3, 2013, 10:43 PM
Jul 2013

...not thinking logically

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ZIMMERMAN TRIAL: Day 8, W...