Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 07:51 PM Jul 2013

Josh Marshall: "Snowden’s pretty screwed."

Snowden Statement Released

Josh Marshall

New at length statement released by Edward Snowden.

The gist of the message is that the Obama administration is using an “extralegal penalty” and violating his human rights by trying to have him extradited back to the United States.

There’s also this article out from Reuters - very strangely put together piece - based on a letter in Spanish which Snowden reportedly sent to Ecuador. The quotes make Snowden sound a little unhinged or perhaps like he’s playing to what he imagines his audience to be in Ecuador. But it also seems possible that the oddness of the language is a product of Reuters translation from Spanish back into English.

Here’s one passage …

“While the public has cried out support of my shining a light on this secret system of injustice, the Government of the United States of America responded with an extrajudicial man-hunt costing me my family, my freedom to travel, and my right to live peacefully without fear of illegal aggression.”

<...>

Tone aside, the gist is consistent with the more formal statement released through Wikileaks, which is that the government of the United States is somehow violating his human rights and acting in an extrajudicial manner by revoking his passport and trying to have him extradited to the United States. At a human level, no doubt, Snowden’s pretty screwed. It’s no fun to have the full force of the United States brought down on you like this. But is Snowden really surprised by any of this?

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2013/07/snowden_statement_released.php



235 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Josh Marshall: "Snowden’s pretty screwed." (Original Post) ProSense Jul 2013 OP
just deserts MjolnirTime Jul 2013 #1
Snowden Should Be Thanked For Exposing The Desecration of The 4th Amendment To The US Constitution cantbeserious Jul 2013 #3
I'll thank him by paying in taxes to keep him imprisoned in the near future. MjolnirTime Jul 2013 #6
The Position - That The 4th Amendment Is To Be Ignored - Is Abundantly Clear cantbeserious Jul 2013 #10
I elected a President and members of Congress to do that. randome Jul 2013 #20
So - You Admit That You Elected Congress To Gut The 4th Amendment Via The Patriot Act cantbeserious Jul 2013 #21
'Gut the 4th Amendment'. How very Libertarian of you. randome Jul 2013 #25
It Was Your Admission Not Mine - We Now Know Where You Stand cantbeserious Jul 2013 #29
You decide the meaning of the term 'gut' and you decide the meaning... randome Jul 2013 #33
You Are The One That Admitted You Supported The Desecration of The 4th Amendment Via The Patriot Act cantbeserious Jul 2013 #35
I admitted nothing of the sort! randome Jul 2013 #40
Thank You For Being Openly Inconsistent - Please Review Your Posts cantbeserious Jul 2013 #53
He also thinks the constitution is just a piece of paper & "no one should be swearing allegiance to" usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #123
You are like a medieval questioner treestar Jul 2013 #67
Only Have Their Words - Their Thoughts Are Their Own cantbeserious Jul 2013 #70
So you support treason, I see! DontTreadOnMe Jul 2013 #77
I Support The US Constitution - It's All In My Words cantbeserious Jul 2013 #78
Before you get to the 4th, how about reading the 3rd! DontTreadOnMe Jul 2013 #81
You do realize there is an entire infrastructure of court and legislative systems... randome Jul 2013 #82
So, Only Wise Old Men Are Capable Of Reading cantbeserious Jul 2013 #126
We have a much more diverse pool of judges in our system. randome Jul 2013 #131
So Citizens Have No Say In Democracy cantbeserious Jul 2013 #132
Where are you coming from? randome Jul 2013 #138
Oh, One Must Mean The Politicians Bought And Paid For By The Oligarchs cantbeserious Jul 2013 #142
just one cliche after another arely staircase Jul 2013 #174
He Cannot Stop Putting Words Into Other People's Mouths emulatorloo Jul 2013 #186
Almost all of them start with "so" arely staircase Jul 2013 #195
That's because the user name fits! nt MADem Jul 2013 #203
One Might Suggest That Some Review Irony In The English Language cantbeserious Jul 2013 #207
One might suggest that, indeed...particularly the phrase "unintentional irony!" nt MADem Jul 2013 #221
Seems One Might Review The Words Of Others Before Casting Such Stones cantbeserious Jul 2013 #208
Cliche Would Not Exist Without A Basis Of Truth cantbeserious Jul 2013 #211
who told you that? arely staircase Jul 2013 #214
Who Told Me What cantbeserious Jul 2013 #216
Not so much truth as simply good adhesive... LanternWaste Jul 2013 #228
I got a pretty good idea where he's coming from! nt MADem Jul 2013 #223
Any time you hear the "So you admit" argument, you know it's just hyperbole. MADem Jul 2013 #202
Seems One Missed The English Class On Irony cantbeserious Jul 2013 #206
Yes--as I said, "unintentional irony," too. I'm assuming that user name wasn't intended to be MADem Jul 2013 #222
Truly It Was Purposeful - Ergo The Education In Irony For Those Not Students Of English cantbeserious Jul 2013 #224
I'll just leave that comment to speak for itself! MADem Jul 2013 #225
Which It Does - Thanks For THe Enthusiasm cantbeserious Jul 2013 #233
! Bobbie Jo Jul 2013 #235
Sixth Amendment seems to be the one Snowden really seems to be trying to arely staircase Jul 2013 #171
What we do not know nineteen50 Jul 2013 #96
We all know that the NSA will have more transparency and less secrecy after this. randome Jul 2013 #99
Then Snowden did help and did achieve nineteen50 Jul 2013 #107
It remains to be seen but yeah, if that's what he wanted, he will have succeeded. randome Jul 2013 #113
I will save my judgement for latter to much nineteen50 Jul 2013 #115
Is that the only law you believe in?? Just the one that suits your purpose? MjolnirTime Jul 2013 #22
I Support The Constitution Which Includes The 4th Amendment cantbeserious Jul 2013 #32
where in the 4th amendment does it say you can give US intelligence secrets to the Chinese? arely staircase Jul 2013 #41
Where In The 4th Amendment Does It Say The Government Can Spy On Citizens cantbeserious Jul 2013 #52
It doesn't. We agree on the NSA data collection. Now back to him giving intell to the Chinese, arely staircase Jul 2013 #62
That The NSA Domestic Surveillance Has Been Exposed Is Not In Doubt - That Snowden Gave Info To cantbeserious Jul 2013 #66
uh, it was in an interview he gave to the Chinese newspaper arely staircase Jul 2013 #75
Was That Before Or After The Guardian Disclosure cantbeserious Jul 2013 #76
it was after the original guardian story which didn't include the info he gave the chinese arely staircase Jul 2013 #86
The HUGE difference is that he blew the whistle to the PRESS, not in secret for personal gain and usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #128
Name the US newspaper he released his secrets to... brooklynite Jul 2013 #135
The Washington Post, you might not count the press abroad, though most others do, even DU via LBN usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #137
giving US intel to the Chinese makes him a traitor arely staircase Jul 2013 #180
He gave it to the PRESS, and that's what WHISTLEBLOWERS do (google it) usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #181
giving specific methods and targets of US clandestine surveilance of China - the the Chinese arely staircase Jul 2013 #187
the targets are EVERYONE, and he told the PRESS (EVERYONE), and that's called WHISTLEBLOWING. usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #189
I believe that you believe that nt arely staircase Jul 2013 #196
He's given intel to the Guardian, Chinese People's Daily, The Washington Post, and Der Spiegel. wtmusic Jul 2013 #158
yeah, he should try that defense before the jury that's in his not-too-distant future arely staircase Jul 2013 #182
Where does it say you can give US intelligence secrets to the Chinese? treestar Jul 2013 #68
It's in the 4th Amendment's fine print. randome Jul 2013 #69
No Where - Do You Suggest Otherwise cantbeserious Jul 2013 #72
So you support traitors giving intelligence information to the Chinese? OilemFirchen Jul 2013 #90
Define Traitor cantbeserious Jul 2013 #119
That's a yes then? OilemFirchen Jul 2013 #150
Seems One Is Grasping At Straws cantbeserious Jul 2013 #210
Seems you are getting a taste of your own medicine emulatorloo Jul 2013 #226
Help me out what specific secrets nineteen50 Jul 2013 #98
really? arely staircase Jul 2013 #102
Are you saying China is to stupid to know the US is spying ? nineteen50 Jul 2013 #104
no arely staircase Jul 2013 #110
Then What Are You Saying cantbeserious Jul 2013 #120
that he gave us intel to the chinese arely staircase Jul 2013 #166
No Proof - Only Insinuation cantbeserious Jul 2013 #209
no him doing it right out in the open in an interview with a Chinese newspaper arely staircase Jul 2013 #213
And What Was Said That Was Not Already Known cantbeserious Jul 2013 #215
i have already posted that upthread arely staircase Jul 2013 #230
+10000!! FirstLight Jul 2013 #42
John F. Kennedy On Secrcey cantbeserious Jul 2013 #54
So Kennedy disbanded the CIA and NSA Progressive dog Jul 2013 #71
So We Are To Understand That Secret Societies Are Not Repugnant To Some cantbeserious Jul 2013 #73
Whatever you choose to think it means Progressive dog Jul 2013 #74
Democracy can not exist nineteen50 Jul 2013 #101
Which one? The Kalahari? Atacama? Antarctica? Apophis Jul 2013 #55
Thank you gleannfia Jul 2013 #103
What damage? it's not like the terrorists didn't know we were listening on them. W T F Jul 2013 #124
I really do think he is "surprised by this". He was just a kid who liked Pepsi & computers. Enter.. Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #2
I'm beginning to think he's not tethered to reality too tightly. KittyWampus Jul 2013 #4
I thought that when this first started HipChick Jul 2013 #7
That's possible too. But, now that we know that Wiki is so heavily involved, I think he's just a... Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #8
Yes. And people are taking advantage of that and him. Whisp Jul 2013 #11
I know what you mean, Whisp. sheshe2 Jul 2013 #125
I agree Blue_Roses Jul 2013 #149
Wikileaks found a patsy. MjolnirTime Jul 2013 #19
and GG was the connector. n/t Whisp Jul 2013 #129
I watched the "Bourne Identity" this weekend and... tridim Jul 2013 #227
It's not just the Bourne Identity wannabe, although you're right, that's likely part of it. randome Jul 2013 #229
It's sounds stupid. Of course, he's NOT convicted.. he ran away like Cha Jul 2013 #15
It's little things like this that cause me concern. I thought WTF? There can't be a conviction.... Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #18
Thanks for pointing that out.. it may seem little but I think Cha Jul 2013 #39
Well you would be wrong. DesMoinesDem Jul 2013 #31
but he thought they wouldn't revoke his passport? arely staircase Jul 2013 #45
Sure he knew zeemike Jul 2013 #121
I think it's more of a reaction to the rush to lionize Snowden. randome Jul 2013 #127
And the rush to condemn him as a traitor? zeemike Jul 2013 #139
Any rush to judgment is of course ill-advised. randome Jul 2013 #144
Why do you post that shit again? zeemike Jul 2013 #151
Look up what happens to passports when the US requests extradition. REVOCATION. DevonRex Jul 2013 #232
He's the Beavis and Butthead of spying flamingdem Jul 2013 #84
Do they have pole dancers in Russia? How 'bout gulags, or is that a different country? Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #87
No, but they have Olga and she'll make you dance on a pole flamingdem Jul 2013 #88
"Mee-maw!" randome Jul 2013 #92
Olga makes a mean gumbo and I mean mean flamingdem Jul 2013 #94
"Mee-maw!" ? Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #111
She'll make Comrade Eddie "dance on a pole". I ain't gettin' nowhere near her. Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #105
Libertarians are children alcibiades_mystery Jul 2013 #108
I'm sorry, but children are smarter than Libertarians. As evidenced below: Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #114
I was thinking: If I stole one of the govts cars, could I ask for political asylum? baldguy Jul 2013 #5
since he is so concerned about human rights, any statement on the Anti Gay bill Putin signed ? JI7 Jul 2013 #9
Hey Snowden - this is neither a game nor a movie CakeGrrl Jul 2013 #12
Snowden knew what he was doing was going to have unpleasant personal consequences. But, that leveymg Jul 2013 #13
Snowden is the ultimate whiny little victim. Cha Jul 2013 #14
His immaturity is showing. Big mistake by BAH hiring an adolescent in a 30-yo body. JackN415 Jul 2013 #16
It's really amazing to me that so many self-described liberals would attack a man Marr Jul 2013 #17
Well, ProSense Jul 2013 #23
Pretty obvious that this isn't a liberal forum davidn3600 Jul 2013 #24
I think ProSense Jul 2013 #28
Snowden shouldn't even be the issue anymore davidn3600 Jul 2013 #34
Tell that to Snowden. ProSense Jul 2013 #36
Sorry, no. Because it's a leak, Snowden remains relevant jeff47 Jul 2013 #63
Shrewd. randome Jul 2013 #64
Ah...what else to the story could there possibly be? davidn3600 Jul 2013 #65
How do you have a right to data that is not yours? jeff47 Jul 2013 #234
Thread Winner! This message should be spread far & wide when they screech "IT'S NOT.... Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #122
what the government tells me to - repeat Ad infinitum usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #130
By opposing this hack Snowden...does not imply that domestic spying is supported.. VanillaRhapsody Jul 2013 #38
Have you even looked at the posters that criticize Snowden? davidn3600 Jul 2013 #48
he hasn't "revealed" anything... VanillaRhapsody Jul 2013 #51
you must have missed all the press about the TOP SECRET documents, which has caused a storm around usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #133
Too busy trying to dig up dirt on Snowden Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #152
Oh really? TOP Secret you say????? VanillaRhapsody Jul 2013 #165
yep, TOP SECRET... you need to get out more often, you'd be surprised what you are missing usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #169
Oh I would guess I am here reading at least as much as you if not more....I work from home to clue VanillaRhapsody Jul 2013 #172
then act/post like it usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #177
Speak for yourself VanillaRhapsody Jul 2013 #183
I am, and YOU did when you started posting on a PUBLIC discussion board usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #185
No actually I didn't.... VanillaRhapsody Jul 2013 #191
You saw them? Or did you hear they were Top Secret... Historic NY Jul 2013 #192
LINK usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #194
I have. Where did he blow the lid off anything? CakeGrrl Jul 2013 #134
Tell that to the rest of the world (not to mention DU) usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #140
Opposing Snowden does not equal "SPYING on EVERYONE" VanillaRhapsody Jul 2013 #167
Then why does the Administration declare that al Queda has "changed their tactics" yodermon Jul 2013 #145
I mean in terms of Americans being spied on. CakeGrrl Jul 2013 #164
"panties in a bunch" sexist much? usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #170
why are you saying men never wear panties? Who's the sexist now? VanillaRhapsody Jul 2013 #173
nope, just pointing out the sexist expression is all. usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #175
Okay...don't get your whitey's tighty.....there feel better? VanillaRhapsody Jul 2013 #176
im a boxer man myself, but that doesn't change the point usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #178
Boxers can still crawl up your butt, hate when my boxers get bunched up like that emulatorloo Jul 2013 #197
I don't know about your BVD's but when my panties are bunching...it sucks! VanillaRhapsody Jul 2013 #179
does one have to support him giving US intell to the Chinese to be a liberal too? nt arely staircase Jul 2013 #50
slight correction... though an important one... he gave it to the WORLD via the PRESS usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #136
That, and shills be shillin'. Apophis Jul 2013 #58
Really?? Seriously?? You think we're all authoritarians now because we disagree with you??? Major Hogwash Jul 2013 #153
Snowden is a sideshow...Im talking about the real issue davidn3600 Jul 2013 #200
since when did leaking gov't secrets become a liberal value? quaker bill Jul 2013 #212
I'll venture that many "self-described liberals" don't care for their whistleblowers dispatching.... Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #27
Well I suppose dispatching from the UK would last something under one minute, wouldn't it? wtmusic Jul 2013 #112
I'm "thinking", I could care less what you "think" about a-n-y-t-h-i-n-g. Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #116
Obviously not. wtmusic Jul 2013 #156
This message was self-deleted by its author Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #161
As long as I'm not "manipulated" by you, GG, & Rand Paul, I'm pretty cool. Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #162
Remember how they all closed ranks around the chimp usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #30
I assume you are referring to Greenwald there, who supported Bush and the Iraq war for way too long stevenleser Jul 2013 #37
I'm referring to the M$M and other so called liberals usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #44
Frequently told lies about Glenn Greenwald (LINK) usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #118
He is trying to revise his own history. I would too if I was in his shoes. It's documented in his stevenleser Jul 2013 #163
That's complete and utter NONSENSE, just a smear and distortion to distract, plain and simple. usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #168
The lengths you go through to try to assert he didnt write what he wrote are hilarious! stevenleser Jul 2013 #184
zzzZZZzzz usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #188
ROFLMAO! Yes, that's what I thought. stevenleser Jul 2013 #190
I think far more damning is that prominent Dems like Hillary and Kerry were busy HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #198
Exactly, Marr. Octafish Jul 2013 #46
It's okay if people leak programs under a Republican president, like Bush... Apophis Jul 2013 #57
It's amazing to me how many liberals don't recognize ratfucking. jeff47 Jul 2013 #60
Thanks Captin' Obvious - When the worlds only superpower is after you usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #26
If so, it's thanks in large part to Josh Marshall and the rest of the cowardly press... Octafish Jul 2013 #43
Right. Anyone who disagrees with you or Snowden is a coward. randome Jul 2013 #49
No. Those lackeys who only defend the totalitarians at the expense of BIG story -> SPYING usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #56
No matter one's position on Snowden, Josh Marshall's take is on the mark: randome Jul 2013 #59
Thank you Captin' usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #61
No. Just the people in the press who side with the fascists who spy on America. Octafish Jul 2013 #89
Those would primarily be Republicans, you know. randome Jul 2013 #91
This message was self-deleted by its author Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #83
Eh... Agschmid Jul 2013 #47
Ron Paul on steroids. Turbineguy Jul 2013 #79
Do you think it is possible that Josh Marshall is reading the DU forum? Major Hogwash Jul 2013 #80
Or...YOU are Josh Marshall! Come clean,Major! randome Jul 2013 #85
Have you noticed how they are being ever so careful not to say the obvious about Greenwald. Major Hogwash Jul 2013 #95
That's the only reason I care about getting Snowden back here. randome Jul 2013 #100
Greenwald used him like a marionette. Major Hogwash Jul 2013 #106
I thought that was interesting flamingdem Jul 2013 #109
I care nothing allinthegame Jul 2013 #141
Capt'n Obvious usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #143
Speaking of obvious... Bobbie Jo Jul 2013 #157
Looks good on you usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #159
ROFLMAO!!! Major Hogwash Jul 2013 #204
Well usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #231
Wow, that analysis is breathtaking. senseandsensibility Jul 2013 #93
Other than a few lame PowerPoint slides, what did Snowden reveal? randome Jul 2013 #97
He Revealed TOP SECRET documented evidence, that backs up other FIRST-HAND accounts of WRONGDOING usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #146
He 'revealed' PowerPoint slides that contain only blurbs and one-sentence summaries. randome Jul 2013 #147
TOP SECRET documents that have provided more daylight than anything we've been allowed to see so far usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #148
randome doesn't think top secret documents are evidence of anything DesMoinesDem Jul 2013 #154
The undercurrents of sadistic glee at Snowden's predicament and comeuppance are HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #199
Did you think this was some kind of game?? Major Hogwash Jul 2013 #205
Utterly naive. On the scale of Valentine Michael Smith. randome Jul 2013 #217
Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #117
Two things you never want to happen BlueStreak Jul 2013 #155
Well put. wtmusic Jul 2013 #160
I wouldn't feel very secure if is were Syrian BlueStreak Jul 2013 #193
If I'm Putin, I hold out for absolutely no deployment of ABM systems HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #201
"Trust me" LOL wtmusic Jul 2013 #219
I was thinking exactly the same thing. wtmusic Jul 2013 #218
I think Putin could negotiate to get Assad on "Dancing with the Stars" BlueStreak Jul 2013 #220
 

MjolnirTime

(1,800 posts)
1. just deserts
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 07:55 PM
Jul 2013

he'll go down like a squealing rat, sadly. he has no way of limiting the damage he causes at this point.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
20. I elected a President and members of Congress to do that.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:22 PM
Jul 2013

Snowden does not get to fuck with my choices! He is not an elected official. He has no standing to decide for me and everyone else that his interpretation of our rights is the correct one and to hell with anyone who disagrees.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
21. So - You Admit That You Elected Congress To Gut The 4th Amendment Via The Patriot Act
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:23 PM
Jul 2013

Thank You for your candor!

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
25. 'Gut the 4th Amendment'. How very Libertarian of you.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:25 PM
Jul 2013

To hell with elections. Only your interpretation of Reality counts, right?

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
33. You decide the meaning of the term 'gut' and you decide the meaning...
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:30 PM
Jul 2013

...of the 4th Amendment. It's nice to know that my civil rights as regards elections don't matter to you any longer.

I put my future in your oh-so-capable hands.

Please. Be gentle with me.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
35. You Are The One That Admitted You Supported The Desecration of The 4th Amendment Via The Patriot Act
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:31 PM
Jul 2013

eom

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
40. I admitted nothing of the sort!
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:34 PM
Jul 2013

You are deciding what 'Desecration of the 4th Amendment' means. It is not up to you or Snowden to take away my rights to have elected officials make those interpretations for us. You clearly don't understand what a representative Democracy is.

If you don't believe in elections, kindly join Mr. Snowden in Moscow. Or Hong Kong. Or Ecuador.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
123. He also thinks the constitution is just a piece of paper & "no one should be swearing allegiance to"
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:26 PM
Jul 2013

Let's see, who else feels that way, too...

Bush - Constitution 'Just A Goddamned Piece of Paper '
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5578787

FYI

treestar

(82,383 posts)
67. You are like a medieval questioner
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:06 PM
Jul 2013

In the Star Chamber. Putting your label on something and then attributing it to the other person, rather than really hearing their thoughts. It's evil, really.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
82. You do realize there is an entire infrastructure of court and legislative systems...
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:27 PM
Jul 2013

...to interpret the Constitution, right?

To say that 'I support the US Constitution' is to put a very simplistic take on our country's entire history of interpreting and re-interpreting the Constitution.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
131. We have a much more diverse pool of judges in our system.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:35 PM
Jul 2013

The Supreme Court, the Federal court system, etc. They are all vested with the responsibility of interpreting the laws and sometimes the Constitution as they see it. They are appointed to their positions by virtue of the legislators we elect.

That's how the system has worked for a very long time.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
138. Where are you coming from?
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:42 PM
Jul 2013

Did you not see the part about the legislators we elect in order to appoint judges?

You can also directly petition for changes.

That's how our representative Democracy works! If you don't like it, then I suggest you get a top secret clearance at an intelligence agency, forge a resume, steal as many documents as you can and hightail it to Hong Kong.

It's where all the 'cool' nerds go!

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

emulatorloo

(44,115 posts)
186. He Cannot Stop Putting Words Into Other People's Mouths
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 12:24 AM
Jul 2013

Appears To Think That Is Brilliant 'Gotcha' Debate Strategy.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
195. Almost all of them start with "so"
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 12:31 AM
Jul 2013

go back and look up thread:

"So, I suppose (insert red hearing, strawman, ad hominem, circular argument, question begging fallacy here)"

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
228. Not so much truth as simply good adhesive...
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 12:14 PM
Jul 2013

Not so much truth as simply good adhesive to keep the bumper-sticker fixed onto the car. And taking a bumper-sticker philosophy as its own truth is, at best, intellectual laziness.

And now you again may infer, however erroneously, a poster's position on the constitution predicated wholly on disagreement with your tertiary premise. Enjoy!

MADem

(135,425 posts)
202. Any time you hear the "So you admit" argument, you know it's just hyperbole.
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 02:22 AM
Jul 2013

Start with a false premise, create an impossible scenario...that sort of thing.

That one is aptly named.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
222. Yes--as I said, "unintentional irony," too. I'm assuming that user name wasn't intended to be
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 11:17 AM
Jul 2013

purposeful...



You really should quit while you're far, far behind. You aren't making your case at all.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
99. We all know that the NSA will have more transparency and less secrecy after this.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:47 PM
Jul 2013

The writing is on the wall. But Snowden ruining his life, causing international uproars and endangering undercover agents was a piss-poor way to go about getting there!

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
113. It remains to be seen but yeah, if that's what he wanted, he will have succeeded.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:03 PM
Jul 2013

But I don't think that's what he wanted. He comes across as very self-involved and cut off from the rest of the world. He wanted to be a hero to the world and now he's blindsided by things not working out for him the way he wanted.

And giving away secrets to Hong Kong and whoever else belies the idea that altruism was his only motivation.

His resume was a lie. I think he's spent most of his life pretending to be someone he isn't.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

nineteen50

(1,187 posts)
115. I will save my judgement for latter to much
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:15 PM
Jul 2013

shite flying and to many Obama b's posting. I don't care who it is spying on me I don't like it. This isn't political its moral.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
41. where in the 4th amendment does it say you can give US intelligence secrets to the Chinese?
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:36 PM
Jul 2013

and probably the Russians.

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
66. That The NSA Domestic Surveillance Has Been Exposed Is Not In Doubt - That Snowden Gave Info To
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:04 PM
Jul 2013

Others has not been proven, only speculated.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
86. it was after the original guardian story which didn't include the info he gave the chinese
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:29 PM
Jul 2013

so what difference does that make?

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
128. The HUGE difference is that he blew the whistle to the PRESS, not in secret for personal gain and
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:32 PM
Jul 2013

That means he is not a spy, first of all, and number two, it makes him a whistle-blower.

Hope that helps


Edward Snowden is a modern day Paul Revere with a thumb drive full of the news that Tyranny is coming!

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
137. The Washington Post, you might not count the press abroad, though most others do, even DU via LBN
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:39 PM
Jul 2013

phew that was easy... next!


Edward Snowden is a modern day Paul Revere with a thumb drive full of the news that Tyranny is coming!

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
181. He gave it to the PRESS, and that's what WHISTLEBLOWERS do (google it)
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 12:19 AM
Jul 2013

why is this so hard for some folks to understand?

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
187. giving specific methods and targets of US clandestine surveilance of China - the the Chinese
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 12:24 AM
Jul 2013

isn't whistleblowing. It is espionage. By your logic, giving the launch codes for Americas nuclear arsenal to the Rodong Sinmun would be whistleblowing.

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
158. He's given intel to the Guardian, Chinese People's Daily, The Washington Post, and Der Spiegel.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 11:32 PM
Jul 2013

See a pattern?

He's spreading it to anyone and everyone. To anyone who's paying attention, it's obvious that that is to dispel the idea he's on the take of any single entity. People who aren't paying attention and still spooked by the Big Bad Terrorists are now turning against him.

Little wonder.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
69. It's in the 4th Amendment's fine print.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:09 PM
Jul 2013

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
230. i have already posted that upthread
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 12:31 PM
Jul 2013

Last edited Tue Jul 2, 2013, 01:27 PM - Edit history (1)

specific IP addresses in China being hacked.

FirstLight

(13,360 posts)
42. +10000!!
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:37 PM
Jul 2013

correct!

it amazes me how many folks here are sure he's a traitor... maybe 'legally' by the secret court system's standards...but aren;t we supposed to be AGAINST secret courts ?

Progressive dog

(6,900 posts)
71. So Kennedy disbanded the CIA and NSA
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:10 PM
Jul 2013

and stop flying u2's over Cuba. Glad to hear it, I guess he even kept Hoover from spying on MLK.
Seriously, I'll bet we could even find this kind of sentiment from GW Bush if we looked hard enough.

nineteen50

(1,187 posts)
101. Democracy can not exist
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:52 PM
Jul 2013

without secrets or is it democracy can not survive without information to make good choices.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,232 posts)
2. I really do think he is "surprised by this". He was just a kid who liked Pepsi & computers. Enter..
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 07:56 PM
Jul 2013

Greenwald & Co., and suddenly he's an international fugitive from justice. I think his statement that he's been "convicted" of nothing sounds strange. Wouldn't he have to come home, face the CHARGES, to get a "conviction" or acquittal? Isn't that how it works?

HipChick

(25,485 posts)
7. I thought that when this first started
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:05 PM
Jul 2013

But It was not well welcomed here on DU

If he has govt computers in his possession...he is pretty screwed..

Tarheel_Dem

(31,232 posts)
8. That's possible too. But, now that we know that Wiki is so heavily involved, I think he's just a...
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:06 PM
Jul 2013

useful tool at this point. I think they've calculated that this will hopefully breathe new life into the US vs. Assange debate. They're probably wrong, but I think Julian hopes this will wind up helping him in the end.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
11. Yes. And people are taking advantage of that and him.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:09 PM
Jul 2013

To get their own message out. There is something amiss here.

I think he was talked into this by someone.

Again, I just called him a putz an hour or so ago, and now I'm feeling sorry again for the lost boy.

sheshe2

(83,740 posts)
125. I know what you mean, Whisp.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:28 PM
Jul 2013

He is being used and he will pay the price.

A lost boy, yes. However he made his decisions, I am sorry to say that they were the wrong ones.

tridim

(45,358 posts)
227. I watched the "Bourne Identity" this weekend and...
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 12:09 PM
Jul 2013

It's quite obvious that Snowden and his supporters must think the Bourne movies are 100% accurate.

I think this guy fancies himself a Jason Bourne wannabe with a bit of "V" thrown in for good measure.

Such a big imagination, all wasted because he chose to not live in reality. His predicament is his own fault.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
229. It's not just the Bourne Identity wannabe, although you're right, that's likely part of it.
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 12:17 PM
Jul 2013

It's also that some think they can aspire to Ellsberg-level status simply by stealing stuff. The journalistic chops required to receive stolen documents, read them then publish them...wow, how impressive.

Regardless of what Ellsberg says, the comparison between him and Snowden are ludicrous.

Ellsberg had evidence, the Pentagon Papers. Snowden has PowerPoint slides.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

Cha

(297,138 posts)
15. It's sounds stupid. Of course, he's NOT convicted.. he ran away like
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:18 PM
Jul 2013

a whiny little coward. And, he's still whining.. from Russia.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,232 posts)
18. It's little things like this that cause me concern. I thought WTF? There can't be a conviction....
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:20 PM
Jul 2013

until there's been a trial. DUH!

Cha

(297,138 posts)
39. Thanks for pointing that out.. it may seem little but I think
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:33 PM
Jul 2013

it could be a big clue as to what's going on in that head of his.

"I haven't been convicted of anything" Why would the US Gov revoke my passport and want to extradite me back to face charges just because I bragged to the world via Greenwald about what I did?!

 

DesMoinesDem

(1,569 posts)
31. Well you would be wrong.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:29 PM
Jul 2013

When interviewed by Greenwald he said he knew exactly what would happen to him. He knew he would be smeared by pathetic authoritarians. He knew he would probably spend the rest of his life in prison. His thought process was completely rational and he's not a 'kid'.

Start this video at 20:24 to get some insight so we don't have to read anymore ignorant posts about what you 'really do think'.

&t=20m24s

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
121. Sure he knew
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:21 PM
Jul 2013

But that would spoil some theory that he is just crazy and Greenwald is just using him....you attack two people that way.

What gets me is the tone of these attacks....some of them clearly sadistic as calling them rats that will go down...I imagine someone with a look of obvious sick pleasure watching someone being tortured...a dick cheney sort of face.

It is authoritarian for sure, because the harshness of their tone Is intended to intimidate people into compliance...and to shut up this kind of talk about the leader...which in their mind is treason.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
127. I think it's more of a reaction to the rush to lionize Snowden.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:32 PM
Jul 2013

The guy had been in Hong Kong for less than 24 hours before some DUers were calling him 'courageous' without even taking the time to consider what he was saying and his lack of supporting evidence.

We all try to be objective but we're only human. Too much over-reaction in one direction encourages over-reaction in the other direction.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
139. And the rush to condemn him as a traitor?
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:42 PM
Jul 2013

And I reject the they all do it argument...tit for tat.
It is nothing more than a excuse.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
144. Any rush to judgment is of course ill-advised.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:46 PM
Jul 2013

But Snowden made some pretty outrageous claims such as he personally being able to spy on the President.

When he wasn't able to provide evidence of that and other things and then made himself look even more naive by saying things like 'I'm not here to hide from justice' from Hong Kong, the pendulum begins to sway in the other direction.

But by that time every faction on DU is fighting to swing it some other way and the result is it doesn't move at all. Which is where we find ourselves today, still seeing post after post after post about Snowden with essentially no new information.

When there is new information, we see 4 or 5 threads all repeating the same thing.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
151. Why do you post that shit again?
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:59 PM
Jul 2013

By now we all know your opinion and your theory...and even if true, none of it changes the fact that they DO collect our data clearly a violation of the 4th amendment.
And that is not treason, but living up to your oath to protect and defend the constitution against all enemies forging and domestic...did you get the domestic part?
If you see the constitution being violated you have a duty to expose it.
Bradly Manning did that and was sent to jail and tortured...and is still there...
Snowden fled the country....and frankly that is probably what I would have done too, knowing that there will be no fair trial if he stayed.

Yes I am rooting for him...and so are others here...and yes I do what to know what happens to him...I like the threads.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
232. Look up what happens to passports when the US requests extradition. REVOCATION.
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 01:23 PM
Jul 2013

He was too stupid to look that up himself?

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
88. No, but they have Olga and she'll make you dance on a pole
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:32 PM
Jul 2013

Okay I know I'm overusing Olga, I owe her royalties!

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
92. "Mee-maw!"
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:38 PM
Jul 2013

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
94. Olga makes a mean gumbo and I mean mean
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:42 PM
Jul 2013

Dictionary: Grandmother; how Sheldon Cooper calls his grandma in The Big Bang Theory. Gumbo.

Gumbo!

Tarheel_Dem

(31,232 posts)
105. She'll make Comrade Eddie "dance on a pole". I ain't gettin' nowhere near her.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:55 PM
Jul 2013

She doesn't look happy.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
108. Libertarians are children
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:56 PM
Jul 2013

This painfully childish letter demonstrates it pretty clearly. The guy is complaining that the State Department "unilaterally revoked" his passport! Guess what, M. Snowden? You're a federal fugitive kbnown to be traveling abroad. What the fuck did you think the State Department was going to do? It's common practice to revoke the passport of federal fugitives known to be traveling abroad. Hell, states can petition State to have state level warrants result in passport revocation. The myth of the brilliant Mr. Snowden is fast collapsing. He doesn't seem to grasp the basics. He's a silly little child.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,232 posts)
114. I'm sorry, but children are smarter than Libertarians. As evidenced below:
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:10 PM
Jul 2013
"Take a look on Democratic Underground

They have the gov't paid trolls out, trying to limit the outrage & rebellion on there.

If that is the reaction of hard core Dems to the news stories on the NSA, I want to stoke up some more of it.

Lots of traffic on DU.

It's the most popular Dem internet site, except for Huffy Po - where everything meaningful gets censored."


http://www.dailypaul.com/288556/clapper-and-feinstein-get-caught-lying-big-time#comment-3103138


The idiots are being directed here to "stoke up" the "outrage & rebellion".

CakeGrrl

(10,611 posts)
12. Hey Snowden - this is neither a game nor a movie
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:14 PM
Jul 2013

...and shame on you for getting suckered by Greenwald if he blew smoke up your ass about how this would go.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
13. Snowden knew what he was doing was going to have unpleasant personal consequences. But, that
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:15 PM
Jul 2013

doesn't make him a fool, just an extraordinary -- no historical -- figure. That's said without idolizing or even altogether agreeing with what he did.

"Pretty screwed" is one way of putting it.

Cha

(297,138 posts)
14. Snowden is the ultimate whiny little victim.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:15 PM
Jul 2013

Heysus.. wtf did he expect?

Tone aside, the gist is consistent with the more formal statement released through Wikileaks, which is that the government of the United States is somehow violating his human rights and acting in an extrajudicial manner by revoking his passport and trying to have him extradited to the United States

Snowden should be screwed.. he's screwing around.

thanks ProSense

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
17. It's really amazing to me that so many self-described liberals would attack a man
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:19 PM
Jul 2013

who revealed information on the government's secret surveillance state.

Our government is equating the leaking information to the press with espionage-- and Snowden isn't the first NSA leaker they've gone after in that way.

I honestly cannot fathom how anyone can defend that and actually think they're anything but a useful idiot to people in power.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
23. Well,
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:24 PM
Jul 2013

"It's really amazing to me that so many self-described liberals would attack a man who revealed information on the government's secret surveillance state. "

...it's amazing to me that "self-described liberals" would fall for a hack and his allies.

I'm not going to pretend Snowden has credibility and the information released wasn't intentionally distorted.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
24. Pretty obvious that this isn't a liberal forum
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:25 PM
Jul 2013

I think there are many authoritarians here and a several conservatives in disguise.

Anyone that supports this domestic spying nonsense is no liberal.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
28. I think
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:27 PM
Jul 2013

"Pretty obvious that this isn't a liberal forum

I think there are many authoritarians here and a several conservatives in disguise.

Anyone that supports this domestic spying nonsense is no liberal. "

...some people are convincing themselves of that because shit got real for Snowden.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
63. Sorry, no. Because it's a leak, Snowden remains relevant
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:58 PM
Jul 2013

Snowden decided what to leak. We don't get to see the whole picture. We only see what Snowden wants us to see.

Here, lemme change the names to demonstrate the point.

On the IRS "Tea party" scandal, Issa decided what to leak. We didn't see the whole picture. We only saw what Issa wanted us to see.

Now, Democrats leaked information destroying Issa's claims, but those weren't widely reported. So the vast majority of the country think Obama ordered the IRS to go after tea party groups.

So Snowden remains quite relevant. Especially with everyone leaping several light years beyond what Snowden has actually leaked (such as "NSA records all phone calls!!!!&quot .

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
64. Shrewd.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:00 PM
Jul 2013

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]
 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
65. Ah...what else to the story could there possibly be?
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:03 PM
Jul 2013

The NSA is spying on and storing data on who we call, for how long, and our e-mails all without probable cause. I dont really care what the rest of the story is...that's a violation of my rights right there.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
234. How do you have a right to data that is not yours?
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 10:22 PM
Jul 2013

The SCOTUS ruled the data belonged to the phone companies in 1979. Legally, they can do whatever they feel like with it. Thus the government doesn't need probable cause against you - you don't own the data.

And that little bit of reality is actually extremely important. If you want to fix this, you can't just say "Stop the NSA!!" as you have been doing. You need a new law that protects the data.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,232 posts)
122. Thread Winner! This message should be spread far & wide when they screech "IT'S NOT....
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:23 PM
Jul 2013

ABOUT SNOWDEN".

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
130. what the government tells me to - repeat Ad infinitum
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:35 PM
Jul 2013

Edward Snowden is a modern day Paul Revere with a thumb drive full of the news that Tyranny is coming!
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
38. By opposing this hack Snowden...does not imply that domestic spying is supported..
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:33 PM
Jul 2013

two different issues...

You need a new hero to worship. Snowden got a Greenwald snow job...

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
48. Have you even looked at the posters that criticize Snowden?
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:40 PM
Jul 2013

Those posters say NOTHING about what he's revealed. They don't want to talk about that.

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
133. you must have missed all the press about the TOP SECRET documents, which has caused a storm around
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:36 PM
Jul 2013

Last edited Tue Jul 2, 2013, 12:28 AM - Edit history (1)

around the world, and look... wouldn't you know it, even right here on DU... this very thread even

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
165. Oh really? TOP Secret you say?????
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 11:58 PM
Jul 2013

ppppppffffffftttttttt!

Then why is he wandering around like a ghost at a Soviet Airport this very moment? If he actually had something....wouldn't he release something to get some leverage right about now....you know to get his citizenship..er...uh...passport back? Hell even Russia and Equador don't want him!

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
172. Oh I would guess I am here reading at least as much as you if not more....I work from home to clue
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 12:13 AM
Jul 2013

you in... Wonder how much you know about the outside world when you are wandering around the Moscow Airport..hmmm?

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
192. You saw them? Or did you hear they were Top Secret...
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 12:27 AM
Jul 2013

the Culper Spy ring was secret and still people are clueless about it.

Snowden has not produced the "corpus delicti" and he hasn't demonstrated anything either, other than a power point. Saying you had documents and evidence is quite different if you produce them..Personally I think he sucked up a lot of stuff that he thought was secret, but he hasn't got a clue about it. The day he testifiies in court and shows how it worked, is the day I'll listen.

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
194. LINK
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 12:30 AM
Jul 2013

google it... hint, it's on the guardian's web site (not to mention most other newspapers in the world).

Or are you on a U.S. military base?

That would explain a LOT.

good night.

CakeGrrl

(10,611 posts)
134. I have. Where did he blow the lid off anything?
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:37 PM
Jul 2013

As I've said in another thread, the documents released show that

1) There are prerequisites that have to be met for collecting data on NON-AMERICANS ABROAD;
2) If the search involves an American who is not the target, the information on that individual has to be LIMITED and must include REMOVAL OF THEIR IDENTITY.

But just because Snowden said the NSA/government has the potential to monitor your communications, everyone who decided to believe the worst took that as proof that it was actually happening.

He produced no proof that Americans were being monitored randomly/at will/without a warrant.

What is it that you think some people are avoiding? There's nothing new that has been revealed.

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
140. Tell that to the rest of the world (not to mention DU)
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:43 PM
Jul 2013

as DU polls have consistently shown from the start that not only are DUers overwhelming against the UNPRECEDENTED SPYING on EVERYONE, but that they also support the Patriot for blowing the whistle to let us all know what is going on, with DOCUMENTED evidence... stand by, there is more to come.


Edward Snowden is a modern day Paul Revere with a thumb drive full of the news that Tyranny is coming!

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
167. Opposing Snowden does not equal "SPYING on EVERYONE"
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 12:00 AM
Jul 2013

which has not been shown to be happening yet has it? Potential doesn't mean necessarily actual does it?

yodermon

(6,143 posts)
145. Then why does the Administration declare that al Queda has "changed their tactics"
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:47 PM
Jul 2013

thanks to Snowden? They've all but called for their fainting couch over this guy.

But, yeah, there's nothing new that he revealed.

CakeGrrl

(10,611 posts)
164. I mean in terms of Americans being spied on.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 11:53 PM
Jul 2013

That's what has so many panties in a bunch - "Obama's reading my e-mail, oh NOES!!!".

But he isn't.

But what you point out IS the damage he's really caused. And he should go to prison for it.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
153. Really?? Seriously?? You think we're all authoritarians now because we disagree with you???
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 11:02 PM
Jul 2013

Do you think that Snowden is a hero?
Do you think that Snowden's act of leaking national secrets to fuck up the country's relations with the EU is beneficial?



 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
200. Snowden is a sideshow...Im talking about the real issue
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 01:30 AM
Jul 2013

Anyone that supports the surveillance state is authoritarian. This stuff is straight out of Orwell.

You got the NSA building a multi-billion dollar facility in the middle of the Utah desert that is designed to spy on not just Americans, but our allies, and the world. And for what purpose? To provide us with an illusion of safety?

And we are supposed to just trust the government and this secret FISA court that our constitutional rights are not being violated? How would we know if they are or not?

And think of it like this...what's to stop the NSA from spying on FISA judges or even SCOTUS judges and blackmailing them?

Im sorry...I understand there may have been good intentions behind this whole thing. But this way, way too much power for the government to have. The opportunity for abuse is very, very real.

quaker bill

(8,224 posts)
212. since when did leaking gov't secrets become a liberal value?
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 07:18 AM
Jul 2013

Stated that I have turned down such jobs because I would not choose to swear such an oath. However if I did make such a promise, my liberal values would have me keeping it for pretty much anything that has been revealed here. Saying what you mean and meaning what you say, has always seemed liberal to me.

This could be a heavy moral challenge if keeping the secret put lives at risk, but short of that, the obligation would seem quite real and very difficult to violate for me.

I choose to live a life where such promises are not required.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,232 posts)
27. I'll venture that many "self-described liberals" don't care for their whistleblowers dispatching....
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:26 PM
Jul 2013

from such liberal bastions as CHINA, and the former USSR.

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
112. Well I suppose dispatching from the UK would last something under one minute, wouldn't it?
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:03 PM
Jul 2013

What the hell are you thinking?

Response to wtmusic (Reply #156)

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
30. Remember how they all closed ranks around the chimp
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:29 PM
Jul 2013

And put on their flags... that was when the masks were taken off... They have tried to put them back on, but that horse has left the barn long ago.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
37. I assume you are referring to Greenwald there, who supported Bush and the Iraq war for way too long
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:32 PM
Jul 2013

No one here did.

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
44. I'm referring to the M$M and other so called liberals
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:39 PM
Jul 2013

Your statement is dubious at best, or a deliberate smear at worse.

Care to share any direct quotes from GG to redeem your allegation?

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
118. Frequently told lies about Glenn Greenwald (LINK)
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:18 PM
Jul 2013
Frequently told lies about Glenn Greenwald
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023145218

Just as I thought, you have nothing... just repeat false accusations to distract and distort.

:shakes-head:
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
163. He is trying to revise his own history. I would too if I was in his shoes. It's documented in his
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 11:48 PM
Jul 2013

own preface:

During the lead-up to the invasion, I was concerned that the hell-bent focus on invading Iraq was being driven by agendas and strategic objectives that had nothing to do with terrorism or the 9/11 attacks. The overt rationale for the invasion was exceedingly weak, particularly given that it would lead to an open-ended, incalculably costly, and intensely risky preemptive war. Around the same time, it was revealed that an invasion of Iraq and the removal of Saddam Hussein had been high on the agenda of various senior administration officials long before September 11. Despite these doubts, concerns, and grounds for ambivalence, I had not abandoned my trust in the Bush administration. Between the president's performance in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, the swift removal of the Taliban in Afghanistan, and the fact that I wanted the president to succeed, because my loyalty is to my country and he was the leader of my country, I still gave the administration the benefit of the doubt. I believed then that the president was entitled to have his national security judgment deferred to, and to the extent that I was able to develop a definitive view, I accepted his judgment that American security really would be enhanced by the invasion of this sovereign country.


http://www.bookbrowse.com/excerpts/index.cfm?fuseaction=printable&book_number=1812

That is the preface to his book. He wrote it. That is how he describes his opinion of the Iraq war at that time. This is what I wrote two weeks before the invasion. This too, is documented for posterity. http://www.network54.com/Forum/142834/message/1047272702/Reasons+for+attacking+Iraq+exposed+as+lies%2C+lies+and+damned+lies

So yes, I feel entitled to say that Greenwald's judgment sucks and that he supported the Iraq War and Bush long after anyone with a brain cell in their heads should have turned away from him. And I do not accept the judgment of someone who missed that one so badly. Even almost all the Democrats who voted for IWR, did not support Bush going to war in March and regretted their votes by then.
 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
168. That's complete and utter NONSENSE, just a smear and distortion to distract, plain and simple.
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 12:07 AM
Jul 2013

Anyone who thinks he was a fan of the iraq war or bush is being deliberately misleading at this point.

He explains quite CLEARLY that he was not too involved in politics at that time (like most) and had faith in our system of government with all of it's checks and balances that it would do the right thing at the end of the day.

That describes (or used to, until we have been hit by these whacko totalitarians) the vast majority of Americans (or people anywhere).

BUT after he started paying closer attention...

"All that has changed. Completely. Over the past five years, a creeping extremism has taken hold of our federal government, and it is threatening to radically alter our system of government and who we are as a nation. This extremism is neither conservative nor liberal in nature, but is instead driven by theories of unlimited presidential power that are wholly alien, and antithetical, to the core political values that have governed this country since its founding.

And the fact that this seizure of ever-expanding presidential power is largely justified through endless, rank fear-mongering—fear of terrorists, specifically—means that not only our system of government is radically changing, but so, too, are our national character, our national identity, and what it means to be American."


does that sound like someone who was on-board with what the fucking crazies were doing, huh?

"What first began to shake my faith in the administration was its conduct in the case of Jose Padilla, a U.S. citizen arrested in May 2002 on U.S. soil and then publicly labeled "the dirty bomber." The administration claimed it could hold him indefinitely without charging him with any crime and while denying him access to counsel.

I never imagined that such a thing could happen in modern America— that a president would claim the right to order American citizens imprisoned with no charges and without the right to a trial. In China, the former Soviet Union, Iran, and countless other countries, the government can literally abduct its citizens and imprison them without a trial. But that cannot happen in the United States—at least it never could before. If it means anything to be an American citizen, it means that we cannot be locked away by our government unless we are charged with a crime, given due process in court, and then convicted by a jury of our peers."


well, well, well... he doesn't seemed very pleased by the totalitarians actions at all...

"It is not desirable or fulfilling to realize that one does not trust one's own government and must disbelieve its statements, and I tried, along with scores of others, to avoid making that choice until the facts no longer permitted such logic."


sounds like someone who had put a hell of a lot of thought into his opinions, and did not just leap to conclusions. A person who makes considered, thoughtful, decisions.

I encourage all to read the whole thing (http://www.bookbrowse.com/excerpts/index.cfm?fuseaction=printable&book_number=1812), if you haven't already, to see just how insidious, and downright deceitful these baseless allegations are... it's enough to make one sick, actually.

but take comfort in KNOWING that these whacko claims are ALL politically motivated, and only articulated by a tiny, yet vocal, minority here on DU, FORTUNATELY, and why we are so lucky to have this AWESOME site!

good night, all
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
184. The lengths you go through to try to assert he didnt write what he wrote are hilarious!
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 12:23 AM
Jul 2013

Oh yes, the "he wasn't involved in politics at the time" assertion.

That's funny! Yes, you had to be a total political junkie to know that Bush and his cronies were lying us into Iraq. You had to have some double secret special information to figure that out except... the UN Weapons Inspectors reported three weeks before the invasion that after months of searching all the suspected sites they had found no WMD and that report was televised and made available to all.

And what was Greenwald doing at the time in 2003? He was a partner in his own law firm and had been a practicing attorney for nine years. He wasn't a hermit living in a cave. You want to tell me that a well connected litigation attorney who had worked for one of the top merger and acquisition firms in NYC, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wachtell,_Lipton,_Rosen_%26_Katz , was ignorant of the news? That he didn't know better? That he had no concept of politics at the time?

That's what you are trying to sell here?

 

HardTimes99

(2,049 posts)
198. I think far more damning is that prominent Dems like Hillary and Kerry were busy
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 01:09 AM
Jul 2013

voting to go to war in Iraq. If Greenwald can't be excused for waking up utnil afterwards, then what the fuck is Hillary's and Kerry's excuse???? And why aren't they considered accessories before the fact to Bush's war crimes????? That's what Greenwald's detractors must answer for their smears of him to carry any weight with me. Jesus H. Christ it makes me sick: Gebhardt and Daschle reach a Rose Garden Concordat with Bush to take Iraq off the table for the 2002 mid-terms. Where is their fucking accountability????? No, let's impeach Greenwald because he didn't come out against Bush before March 2003.

Greenwald's detractors want to have their cake and eat it too. Because Greenwald did not come out against Bush until after Iraq, he's somehow less than legit. BUT Hillary and Kerry get to vote for Iraq and create conditions for death, destruction and TORTURE and their legitimacy is without question???? Give me a fucking break.

 

Apophis

(1,407 posts)
57. It's okay if people leak programs under a Republican president, like Bush...
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:50 PM
Jul 2013

but not okay if it happens under a Democrat president, like Obama.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
60. It's amazing to me how many liberals don't recognize ratfucking.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:53 PM
Jul 2013

But I am impressed at just how well this plan is coming together. Republicans are gonna do better in 2014 than they did in 2010.

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
26. Thanks Captin' Obvious - When the worlds only superpower is after you
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:25 PM
Jul 2013

It's not really news that you are in deep shit.

:shakes-head:

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
43. If so, it's thanks in large part to Josh Marshall and the rest of the cowardly press...
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:38 PM
Jul 2013

...who are so afraid of the government that they scared to point out the big story: illegal NSA spying on America and the bigger story: the destruction of the First Amendment.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
49. Right. Anyone who disagrees with you or Snowden is a coward.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:40 PM
Jul 2013

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
56. No. Those lackeys who only defend the totalitarians at the expense of BIG story -> SPYING
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:49 PM
Jul 2013

Those folks are worse than cowards, or lackeys, they are TRAITORS to our constitution.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
59. No matter one's position on Snowden, Josh Marshall's take is on the mark:
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 08:52 PM
Jul 2013

Snowden is screwed. You may not like it but it's Reality.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
89. No. Just the people in the press who side with the fascists who spy on America.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:33 PM
Jul 2013

The same fascists who make war on innocent nations for their oil and go unpunished.

The same fascists who loot the banks and get the taxpayers to foot the tab and go unpunished.

The same fascists who allow the destruction of the nation in order to keep from raising taxes on the wealthy.

Them.

You? You can say or write or believe what you want.

That's my point.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
91. Those would primarily be Republicans, you know.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:37 PM
Jul 2013

With some Democratic cowardice thrown in for good measure.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

Response to Octafish (Reply #43)

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
80. Do you think it is possible that Josh Marshall is reading the DU forum?
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:26 PM
Jul 2013
Because I said that over 2 frickin' weeks ago!!!

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
85. Or...YOU are Josh Marshall! Come clean,Major!
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:29 PM
Jul 2013

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
95. Have you noticed how they are being ever so careful not to say the obvious about Greenwald.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:42 PM
Jul 2013

How he is an accomplice to Snowden's betrayal.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
100. That's the only reason I care about getting Snowden back here.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:49 PM
Jul 2013

He can rot in Moscow or an Ecuadorian embassy if he chooses but I want to know how that relationship with Greenwald developed.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
106. Greenwald used him like a marionette.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:55 PM
Jul 2013

Even Snowden's own father said that he thought that his son was being manipulated.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
109. I thought that was interesting
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:57 PM
Jul 2013

The father sounds like a decent guy and he's not impressed with Wikileaks advising his son. Can't imagine what he's going through.

allinthegame

(132 posts)
141. I care nothing
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:44 PM
Jul 2013

About Greenwald...however the longer this young man stays in the Moscow airport the longer he has to reflect about how "unspecial" he really is.

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
143. Capt'n Obvious
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:45 PM
Jul 2013

Strikes Again!


Edward Snowden is a modern day Paul Revere with a thumb drive full of the news that Tyranny is coming!

senseandsensibility

(17,000 posts)
93. Wow, that analysis is breathtaking.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:40 PM
Jul 2013

Uh, I think we all knew that. He's paying the price for what he did, and apparently some get great joy from that fact alone. Excellent. Now can we talk about what he revealed? No? I guess Marshall and his ilk need to revel in Snowden's being "screwed" for a few more days or months. When they get tired of it, can we talk about what he revealed? Still no?

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
97. Other than a few lame PowerPoint slides, what did Snowden reveal?
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 09:44 PM
Jul 2013

There is a reason punditry and DU are both about evenly divided on this subject. In the absence of hard proof, rational people can interpret what Snowden has 'revealed' in different ways.

What has he revealed that you think everyone should agree on?

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
146. He Revealed TOP SECRET documented evidence, that backs up other FIRST-HAND accounts of WRONGDOING
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:48 PM
Jul 2013

hello...

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
147. He 'revealed' PowerPoint slides that contain only blurbs and one-sentence summaries.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:52 PM
Jul 2013

If Snowden had this all-encompassing access he claims, why was he only able to steal PowerPoint slides? How about an email from the President? Why do all the hundreds of thousands of employees of all the Internet providers not support his claims?

Are they all being blackmailed, perhaps?

Besides, Recursion's thread shows his latest leak -that the data comes from the FBI and requires 4 levels of approval before getting seen by anyone. Funny how Snowden never bothered to point that out until he leaked a document that directly disproves his claims.

Weird, huh? I agree.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
148. TOP SECRET documents that have provided more daylight than anything we've been allowed to see so far
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 10:54 PM
Jul 2013

And form what I hear, and have been reading, there are plenty more where that came from, so stay tuned my friend


Edward Snowden is a modern day Paul Revere with a thumb drive full of the news that Tyranny is coming!

 

DesMoinesDem

(1,569 posts)
154. randome doesn't think top secret documents are evidence of anything
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 11:11 PM
Jul 2013

At least that is the talking point he is sticking with. And out of all of the Snowden smearers on DU he is the only person using that talking point, which tells you how incredibly stupid it is. Apparently he needs Snowden to personally demo these programs for him to prove anything. But when it comes to Snowden's resume he doesn't even need to see it to declare it is all lies. Not the most consistent person, but consistency isn't a requirement for smearing.

 

HardTimes99

(2,049 posts)
199. The undercurrents of sadistic glee at Snowden's predicament and comeuppance are
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 01:25 AM
Jul 2013

not that far beneath the surface. Very unbecoming of a supposedly progressive board.

I'm really disappointed to see Marshall joining in the pile-on. I expected more of him as a defender of the perogatives of the Fourth Estate. Well, at least he hasn't joined David Gregory (yet) in insinuating (or Dianne Feinstein in stating baldly) that Greenwald is a "traitor." But there's still time for that.

Maybe then we'll get to hear a discussion of what Snowden revealed. Or maybe we'll have to content ourselves with discussions in Der Spiegel, Le Monde, The Guardian, ad infinitum.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
205. Did you think this was some kind of game??
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 02:45 AM
Jul 2013

Did you not expect the U.S. federal government to use everything at our disposal to prevent some snot-nosed kid from ruining everything we, as a nation, have accomplished over the last 60 years of delicate negotiations with our European allies, China, and Russia??

Really??

Sounds kind of naive to me.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
217. Utterly naive. On the scale of Valentine Michael Smith.
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 08:44 AM
Jul 2013

Do you grok me?

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

Response to ProSense (Original post)

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
155. Two things you never want to happen
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 11:23 PM
Jul 2013

Last edited Tue Jul 2, 2013, 12:27 AM - Edit history (1)

1) You end up an a trading piece the Russians can use as they please whenever they please, realizing that Obama will give them just about anything for that piece.

2) Your fate depends on how trustworthy Putin is.

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
160. Well put.
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 11:36 PM
Jul 2013

With Putin now going on about "our American friends" I would not be feeling very secure at that airport.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
193. I wouldn't feel very secure if is were Syrian
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 12:28 AM
Jul 2013

Or European, for that matter. There is no telling what Obama would give Putin in exchange for Snowden. I think Putin can pretty much get his whole Christmas list filled right here.

 

HardTimes99

(2,049 posts)
201. If I'm Putin, I hold out for absolutely no deployment of ABM systems
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 01:31 AM
Jul 2013

in countries that border Russia. And if I'm Snowden, that's a trade I think the interests of humanity would justify.

Trust me, whatever one thinks of Snowden or Putin, those ABM systems in countries that border the Russian Federation are inherently and deeply destabilizing.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
220. I think Putin could negotiate to get Assad on "Dancing with the Stars"
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 10:37 AM
Jul 2013

Maybe get Russian recognized as the second official language in the US.

Certainly Putin can make sure that he gets a Super Bowl ring EVERY year now.

He is the proverbial kid in a candy store, and the proprietor really wants him to have every bit of candy in the place.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Josh Marshall: "Snowden’s...