General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJosh Marshall: "Snowden’s pretty screwed."
Josh Marshall
New at length statement released by Edward Snowden.
The gist of the message is that the Obama administration is using an extralegal penalty and violating his human rights by trying to have him extradited back to the United States.
Theres also this article out from Reuters - very strangely put together piece - based on a letter in Spanish which Snowden reportedly sent to Ecuador. The quotes make Snowden sound a little unhinged or perhaps like hes playing to what he imagines his audience to be in Ecuador. But it also seems possible that the oddness of the language is a product of Reuters translation from Spanish back into English.
Heres one passage
While the public has cried out support of my shining a light on this secret system of injustice, the Government of the United States of America responded with an extrajudicial man-hunt costing me my family, my freedom to travel, and my right to live peacefully without fear of illegal aggression.
<...>
Tone aside, the gist is consistent with the more formal statement released through Wikileaks, which is that the government of the United States is somehow violating his human rights and acting in an extrajudicial manner by revoking his passport and trying to have him extradited to the United States. At a human level, no doubt, Snowdens pretty screwed. Its no fun to have the full force of the United States brought down on you like this. But is Snowden really surprised by any of this?
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2013/07/snowden_statement_released.php
MjolnirTime
(1,800 posts)he'll go down like a squealing rat, sadly. he has no way of limiting the damage he causes at this point.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
MjolnirTime
(1,800 posts)You will, too.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
randome
(34,845 posts)Snowden does not get to fuck with my choices! He is not an elected official. He has no standing to decide for me and everyone else that his interpretation of our rights is the correct one and to hell with anyone who disagrees.
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)Thank You for your candor!
randome
(34,845 posts)To hell with elections. Only your interpretation of Reality counts, right?
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
randome
(34,845 posts)...of the 4th Amendment. It's nice to know that my civil rights as regards elections don't matter to you any longer.
I put my future in your oh-so-capable hands.
Please. Be gentle with me.
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
randome
(34,845 posts)You are deciding what 'Desecration of the 4th Amendment' means. It is not up to you or Snowden to take away my rights to have elected officials make those interpretations for us. You clearly don't understand what a representative Democracy is.
If you don't believe in elections, kindly join Mr. Snowden in Moscow. Or Hong Kong. Or Ecuador.
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)Let's see, who else feels that way, too...
Bush - Constitution 'Just A Goddamned Piece of Paper '
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5578787
FYI
treestar
(82,383 posts)In the Star Chamber. Putting your label on something and then attributing it to the other person, rather than really hearing their thoughts. It's evil, really.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
DontTreadOnMe
(2,442 posts)it's all in your words...
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
DontTreadOnMe
(2,442 posts)Article III of the U.S. Constitution
randome
(34,845 posts)...to interpret the Constitution, right?
To say that 'I support the US Constitution' is to put a very simplistic take on our country's entire history of interpreting and re-interpreting the Constitution.
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
randome
(34,845 posts)The Supreme Court, the Federal court system, etc. They are all vested with the responsibility of interpreting the laws and sometimes the Constitution as they see it. They are appointed to their positions by virtue of the legislators we elect.
That's how the system has worked for a very long time.
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
randome
(34,845 posts)Did you not see the part about the legislators we elect in order to appoint judges?
You can also directly petition for changes.
That's how our representative Democracy works! If you don't like it, then I suggest you get a top secret clearance at an intelligence agency, forge a resume, steal as many documents as you can and hightail it to Hong Kong.
It's where all the 'cool' nerds go!
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)nt
emulatorloo
(44,115 posts)Appears To Think That Is Brilliant 'Gotcha' Debate Strategy.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)go back and look up thread:
"So, I suppose (insert red hearing, strawman, ad hominem, circular argument, question begging fallacy here)"
MADem
(135,425 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
MADem
(135,425 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Not so much truth as simply good adhesive to keep the bumper-sticker fixed onto the car. And taking a bumper-sticker philosophy as its own truth is, at best, intellectual laziness.
And now you again may infer, however erroneously, a poster's position on the constitution predicated wholly on disagreement with your tertiary premise. Enjoy!
MADem
(135,425 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Start with a false premise, create an impossible scenario...that sort of thing.
That one is aptly named.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
MADem
(135,425 posts)purposeful...
You really should quit while you're far, far behind. You aren't making your case at all.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
MADem
(135,425 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)avoid.
nineteen50
(1,187 posts)can't hurt us.
randome
(34,845 posts)The writing is on the wall. But Snowden ruining his life, causing international uproars and endangering undercover agents was a piss-poor way to go about getting there!
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
nineteen50
(1,187 posts)his goal.
randome
(34,845 posts)But I don't think that's what he wanted. He comes across as very self-involved and cut off from the rest of the world. He wanted to be a hero to the world and now he's blindsided by things not working out for him the way he wanted.
And giving away secrets to Hong Kong and whoever else belies the idea that altruism was his only motivation.
His resume was a lie. I think he's spent most of his life pretending to be someone he isn't.
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
nineteen50
(1,187 posts)shite flying and to many Obama b's posting. I don't care who it is spying on me I don't like it. This isn't political its moral.
MjolnirTime
(1,800 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)and probably the Russians.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)?
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)Others has not been proven, only speculated.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)are you calling Snowden a liar?
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)so what difference does that make?
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)That means he is not a spy, first of all, and number two, it makes him a whistle-blower.
Hope that helps
Edward Snowden is a modern day Paul Revere with a thumb drive full of the news that Tyranny is coming!
brooklynite
(94,501 posts)usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)phew that was easy... next!
Edward Snowden is a modern day Paul Revere with a thumb drive full of the news that Tyranny is coming!
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)that is pretty much what espionage is.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)why is this so hard for some folks to understand?
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)isn't whistleblowing. It is espionage. By your logic, giving the launch codes for Americas nuclear arsenal to the Rodong Sinmun would be whistleblowing.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)good night
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)wtmusic
(39,166 posts)See a pattern?
He's spreading it to anyone and everyone. To anyone who's paying attention, it's obvious that that is to dispel the idea he's on the take of any single entity. People who aren't paying attention and still spooked by the Big Bad Terrorists are now turning against him.
Little wonder.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Sorry. Couldn't resist.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
emulatorloo
(44,115 posts)and finding it unpleasant.
nineteen50
(1,187 posts)did he give?
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)nineteen50
(1,187 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)nt
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)nt
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)is pretty much proof.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Last edited Tue Jul 2, 2013, 01:27 PM - Edit history (1)
specific IP addresses in China being hacked.
FirstLight
(13,360 posts)correct!
it amazes me how many folks here are sure he's a traitor... maybe 'legally' by the secret court system's standards...but aren;t we supposed to be AGAINST secret courts ?
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)Progressive dog
(6,900 posts)and stop flying u2's over Cuba. Glad to hear it, I guess he even kept Hoover from spying on MLK.
Seriously, I'll bet we could even find this kind of sentiment from GW Bush if we looked hard enough.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Progressive dog
(6,900 posts)is fine with me. Even from JFK, talk is not action.
nineteen50
(1,187 posts)without secrets or is it democracy can not survive without information to make good choices.
Apophis
(1,407 posts)gleannfia
(66 posts)The hero worship here is concerning.
W T F
(1,146 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,232 posts)Greenwald & Co., and suddenly he's an international fugitive from justice. I think his statement that he's been "convicted" of nothing sounds strange. Wouldn't he have to come home, face the CHARGES, to get a "conviction" or acquittal? Isn't that how it works?
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)HipChick
(25,485 posts)But It was not well welcomed here on DU
If he has govt computers in his possession...he is pretty screwed..
Tarheel_Dem
(31,232 posts)useful tool at this point. I think they've calculated that this will hopefully breathe new life into the US vs. Assange debate. They're probably wrong, but I think Julian hopes this will wind up helping him in the end.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)To get their own message out. There is something amiss here.
I think he was talked into this by someone.
Again, I just called him a putz an hour or so ago, and now I'm feeling sorry again for the lost boy.
sheshe2
(83,740 posts)He is being used and he will pay the price.
A lost boy, yes. However he made his decisions, I am sorry to say that they were the wrong ones.
Blue_Roses
(12,894 posts)I think someone helped influence his decision to do this.
MjolnirTime
(1,800 posts)They were able to steal National Secrets and Snowden takes all the blame.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)tridim
(45,358 posts)It's quite obvious that Snowden and his supporters must think the Bourne movies are 100% accurate.
I think this guy fancies himself a Jason Bourne wannabe with a bit of "V" thrown in for good measure.
Such a big imagination, all wasted because he chose to not live in reality. His predicament is his own fault.
randome
(34,845 posts)It's also that some think they can aspire to Ellsberg-level status simply by stealing stuff. The journalistic chops required to receive stolen documents, read them then publish them...wow, how impressive.
Regardless of what Ellsberg says, the comparison between him and Snowden are ludicrous.
Ellsberg had evidence, the Pentagon Papers. Snowden has PowerPoint slides.
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
Cha
(297,138 posts)a whiny little coward. And, he's still whining.. from Russia.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,232 posts)until there's been a trial. DUH!
Cha
(297,138 posts)it could be a big clue as to what's going on in that head of his.
"I haven't been convicted of anything" Why would the US Gov revoke my passport and want to extradite me back to face charges just because I bragged to the world via Greenwald about what I did?!
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)When interviewed by Greenwald he said he knew exactly what would happen to him. He knew he would be smeared by pathetic authoritarians. He knew he would probably spend the rest of his life in prison. His thought process was completely rational and he's not a 'kid'.
Start this video at 20:24 to get some insight so we don't have to read anymore ignorant posts about what you 'really do think'.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)zeemike
(18,998 posts)But that would spoil some theory that he is just crazy and Greenwald is just using him....you attack two people that way.
What gets me is the tone of these attacks....some of them clearly sadistic as calling them rats that will go down...I imagine someone with a look of obvious sick pleasure watching someone being tortured...a dick cheney sort of face.
It is authoritarian for sure, because the harshness of their tone Is intended to intimidate people into compliance...and to shut up this kind of talk about the leader...which in their mind is treason.
randome
(34,845 posts)The guy had been in Hong Kong for less than 24 hours before some DUers were calling him 'courageous' without even taking the time to consider what he was saying and his lack of supporting evidence.
We all try to be objective but we're only human. Too much over-reaction in one direction encourages over-reaction in the other direction.
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
zeemike
(18,998 posts)And I reject the they all do it argument...tit for tat.
It is nothing more than a excuse.
randome
(34,845 posts)But Snowden made some pretty outrageous claims such as he personally being able to spy on the President.
When he wasn't able to provide evidence of that and other things and then made himself look even more naive by saying things like 'I'm not here to hide from justice' from Hong Kong, the pendulum begins to sway in the other direction.
But by that time every faction on DU is fighting to swing it some other way and the result is it doesn't move at all. Which is where we find ourselves today, still seeing post after post after post about Snowden with essentially no new information.
When there is new information, we see 4 or 5 threads all repeating the same thing.
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
zeemike
(18,998 posts)By now we all know your opinion and your theory...and even if true, none of it changes the fact that they DO collect our data clearly a violation of the 4th amendment.
And that is not treason, but living up to your oath to protect and defend the constitution against all enemies forging and domestic...did you get the domestic part?
If you see the constitution being violated you have a duty to expose it.
Bradly Manning did that and was sent to jail and tortured...and is still there...
Snowden fled the country....and frankly that is probably what I would have done too, knowing that there will be no fair trial if he stayed.
Yes I am rooting for him...and so are others here...and yes I do what to know what happens to him...I like the threads.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)He was too stupid to look that up himself?
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)cool document duude
Tarheel_Dem
(31,232 posts)flamingdem
(39,313 posts)Okay I know I'm overusing Olga, I owe her royalties!
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)Dictionary: Grandmother; how Sheldon Cooper calls his grandma in The Big Bang Theory. Gumbo.
Gumbo!
Tarheel_Dem
(31,232 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,232 posts)She doesn't look happy.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)This painfully childish letter demonstrates it pretty clearly. The guy is complaining that the State Department "unilaterally revoked" his passport! Guess what, M. Snowden? You're a federal fugitive kbnown to be traveling abroad. What the fuck did you think the State Department was going to do? It's common practice to revoke the passport of federal fugitives known to be traveling abroad. Hell, states can petition State to have state level warrants result in passport revocation. The myth of the brilliant Mr. Snowden is fast collapsing. He doesn't seem to grasp the basics. He's a silly little child.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,232 posts)"Take a look on Democratic Underground
They have the gov't paid trolls out, trying to limit the outrage & rebellion on there.
If that is the reaction of hard core Dems to the news stories on the NSA, I want to stoke up some more of it.
Lots of traffic on DU.
It's the most popular Dem internet site, except for Huffy Po - where everything meaningful gets censored."
http://www.dailypaul.com/288556/clapper-and-feinstein-get-caught-lying-big-time#comment-3103138
The idiots are being directed here to "stoke up" the "outrage & rebellion".
baldguy
(36,649 posts)JI7
(89,247 posts)CakeGrrl
(10,611 posts)...and shame on you for getting suckered by Greenwald if he blew smoke up your ass about how this would go.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)doesn't make him a fool, just an extraordinary -- no historical -- figure. That's said without idolizing or even altogether agreeing with what he did.
"Pretty screwed" is one way of putting it.
Cha
(297,138 posts)Heysus.. wtf did he expect?
Snowden should be screwed.. he's screwing around.
thanks ProSense
JackN415
(924 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)who revealed information on the government's secret surveillance state.
Our government is equating the leaking information to the press with espionage-- and Snowden isn't the first NSA leaker they've gone after in that way.
I honestly cannot fathom how anyone can defend that and actually think they're anything but a useful idiot to people in power.
"It's really amazing to me that so many self-described liberals would attack a man who revealed information on the government's secret surveillance state. "
...it's amazing to me that "self-described liberals" would fall for a hack and his allies.
I'm not going to pretend Snowden has credibility and the information released wasn't intentionally distorted.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)I think there are many authoritarians here and a several conservatives in disguise.
Anyone that supports this domestic spying nonsense is no liberal.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Pretty obvious that this isn't a liberal forum
I think there are many authoritarians here and a several conservatives in disguise.
Anyone that supports this domestic spying nonsense is no liberal. "
...some people are convincing themselves of that because shit got real for Snowden.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)The issue is what our government is doing.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)He made himself the issue, and with this statement continues to do so.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Snowden decided what to leak. We don't get to see the whole picture. We only see what Snowden wants us to see.
Here, lemme change the names to demonstrate the point.
On the IRS "Tea party" scandal, Issa decided what to leak. We didn't see the whole picture. We only saw what Issa wanted us to see.
Now, Democrats leaked information destroying Issa's claims, but those weren't widely reported. So the vast majority of the country think Obama ordered the IRS to go after tea party groups.
So Snowden remains quite relevant. Especially with everyone leaping several light years beyond what Snowden has actually leaked (such as "NSA records all phone calls!!!!" .
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)The NSA is spying on and storing data on who we call, for how long, and our e-mails all without probable cause. I dont really care what the rest of the story is...that's a violation of my rights right there.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)The SCOTUS ruled the data belonged to the phone companies in 1979. Legally, they can do whatever they feel like with it. Thus the government doesn't need probable cause against you - you don't own the data.
And that little bit of reality is actually extremely important. If you want to fix this, you can't just say "Stop the NSA!!" as you have been doing. You need a new law that protects the data.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,232 posts)ABOUT SNOWDEN".
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)Edward Snowden is a modern day Paul Revere with a thumb drive full of the news that Tyranny is coming!
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)two different issues...
You need a new hero to worship. Snowden got a Greenwald snow job...
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)Those posters say NOTHING about what he's revealed. They don't want to talk about that.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)he has 4 computers full supposedly....where is this revelation?
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)Last edited Tue Jul 2, 2013, 12:28 AM - Edit history (1)
around the world, and look... wouldn't you know it, even right here on DU... this very thread even
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)and hitting as a group every thread about him.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)ppppppffffffftttttttt!
Then why is he wandering around like a ghost at a Soviet Airport this very moment? If he actually had something....wouldn't he release something to get some leverage right about now....you know to get his citizenship..er...uh...passport back? Hell even Russia and Equador don't want him!
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)you in... Wonder how much you know about the outside world when you are wandering around the Moscow Airport..hmmm?
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Who died made you MY Judge?
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)good night
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)crawl back from whereever you slithered out from.....
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)the Culper Spy ring was secret and still people are clueless about it.
Snowden has not produced the "corpus delicti" and he hasn't demonstrated anything either, other than a power point. Saying you had documents and evidence is quite different if you produce them..Personally I think he sucked up a lot of stuff that he thought was secret, but he hasn't got a clue about it. The day he testifiies in court and shows how it worked, is the day I'll listen.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)google it... hint, it's on the guardian's web site (not to mention most other newspapers in the world).
Or are you on a U.S. military base?
That would explain a LOT.
good night.
CakeGrrl
(10,611 posts)As I've said in another thread, the documents released show that
1) There are prerequisites that have to be met for collecting data on NON-AMERICANS ABROAD;
2) If the search involves an American who is not the target, the information on that individual has to be LIMITED and must include REMOVAL OF THEIR IDENTITY.
But just because Snowden said the NSA/government has the potential to monitor your communications, everyone who decided to believe the worst took that as proof that it was actually happening.
He produced no proof that Americans were being monitored randomly/at will/without a warrant.
What is it that you think some people are avoiding? There's nothing new that has been revealed.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)as DU polls have consistently shown from the start that not only are DUers overwhelming against the UNPRECEDENTED SPYING on EVERYONE, but that they also support the Patriot for blowing the whistle to let us all know what is going on, with DOCUMENTED evidence... stand by, there is more to come.
Edward Snowden is a modern day Paul Revere with a thumb drive full of the news that Tyranny is coming!
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)which has not been shown to be happening yet has it? Potential doesn't mean necessarily actual does it?
yodermon
(6,143 posts)thanks to Snowden? They've all but called for their fainting couch over this guy.
But, yeah, there's nothing new that he revealed.
CakeGrrl
(10,611 posts)That's what has so many panties in a bunch - "Obama's reading my e-mail, oh NOES!!!".
But he isn't.
But what you point out IS the damage he's really caused. And he should go to prison for it.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)emulatorloo
(44,115 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)FYI
Apophis
(1,407 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Do you think that Snowden is a hero?
Do you think that Snowden's act of leaking national secrets to fuck up the country's relations with the EU is beneficial?
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)Anyone that supports the surveillance state is authoritarian. This stuff is straight out of Orwell.
You got the NSA building a multi-billion dollar facility in the middle of the Utah desert that is designed to spy on not just Americans, but our allies, and the world. And for what purpose? To provide us with an illusion of safety?
And we are supposed to just trust the government and this secret FISA court that our constitutional rights are not being violated? How would we know if they are or not?
And think of it like this...what's to stop the NSA from spying on FISA judges or even SCOTUS judges and blackmailing them?
Im sorry...I understand there may have been good intentions behind this whole thing. But this way, way too much power for the government to have. The opportunity for abuse is very, very real.
quaker bill
(8,224 posts)Stated that I have turned down such jobs because I would not choose to swear such an oath. However if I did make such a promise, my liberal values would have me keeping it for pretty much anything that has been revealed here. Saying what you mean and meaning what you say, has always seemed liberal to me.
This could be a heavy moral challenge if keeping the secret put lives at risk, but short of that, the obligation would seem quite real and very difficult to violate for me.
I choose to live a life where such promises are not required.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,232 posts)from such liberal bastions as CHINA, and the former USSR.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)What the hell are you thinking?
Tarheel_Dem
(31,232 posts)wtmusic
(39,166 posts)How does it feel to be manipulated?
Response to wtmusic (Reply #156)
Tarheel_Dem This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,232 posts)Thanks for asking.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)And put on their flags... that was when the masks were taken off... They have tried to put them back on, but that horse has left the barn long ago.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)No one here did.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)Your statement is dubious at best, or a deliberate smear at worse.
Care to share any direct quotes from GG to redeem your allegation?
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023145218
Just as I thought, you have nothing... just repeat false accusations to distract and distort.
:shakes-head:
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)own preface:
http://www.bookbrowse.com/excerpts/index.cfm?fuseaction=printable&book_number=1812
That is the preface to his book. He wrote it. That is how he describes his opinion of the Iraq war at that time. This is what I wrote two weeks before the invasion. This too, is documented for posterity. http://www.network54.com/Forum/142834/message/1047272702/Reasons+for+attacking+Iraq+exposed+as+lies%2C+lies+and+damned+lies
So yes, I feel entitled to say that Greenwald's judgment sucks and that he supported the Iraq War and Bush long after anyone with a brain cell in their heads should have turned away from him. And I do not accept the judgment of someone who missed that one so badly. Even almost all the Democrats who voted for IWR, did not support Bush going to war in March and regretted their votes by then.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)Anyone who thinks he was a fan of the iraq war or bush is being deliberately misleading at this point.
He explains quite CLEARLY that he was not too involved in politics at that time (like most) and had faith in our system of government with all of it's checks and balances that it would do the right thing at the end of the day.
That describes (or used to, until we have been hit by these whacko totalitarians) the vast majority of Americans (or people anywhere).
BUT after he started paying closer attention...
"All that has changed. Completely. Over the past five years, a creeping extremism has taken hold of our federal government, and it is threatening to radically alter our system of government and who we are as a nation. This extremism is neither conservative nor liberal in nature, but is instead driven by theories of unlimited presidential power that are wholly alien, and antithetical, to the core political values that have governed this country since its founding.
And the fact that this seizure of ever-expanding presidential power is largely justified through endless, rank fear-mongeringfear of terrorists, specificallymeans that not only our system of government is radically changing, but so, too, are our national character, our national identity, and what it means to be American."
does that sound like someone who was on-board with what the fucking crazies were doing, huh?
"What first began to shake my faith in the administration was its conduct in the case of Jose Padilla, a U.S. citizen arrested in May 2002 on U.S. soil and then publicly labeled "the dirty bomber." The administration claimed it could hold him indefinitely without charging him with any crime and while denying him access to counsel.
I never imagined that such a thing could happen in modern America that a president would claim the right to order American citizens imprisoned with no charges and without the right to a trial. In China, the former Soviet Union, Iran, and countless other countries, the government can literally abduct its citizens and imprison them without a trial. But that cannot happen in the United Statesat least it never could before. If it means anything to be an American citizen, it means that we cannot be locked away by our government unless we are charged with a crime, given due process in court, and then convicted by a jury of our peers."
well, well, well... he doesn't seemed very pleased by the totalitarians actions at all...
"It is not desirable or fulfilling to realize that one does not trust one's own government and must disbelieve its statements, and I tried, along with scores of others, to avoid making that choice until the facts no longer permitted such logic."
sounds like someone who had put a hell of a lot of thought into his opinions, and did not just leap to conclusions. A person who makes considered, thoughtful, decisions.
I encourage all to read the whole thing (http://www.bookbrowse.com/excerpts/index.cfm?fuseaction=printable&book_number=1812), if you haven't already, to see just how insidious, and downright deceitful these baseless allegations are... it's enough to make one sick, actually.
but take comfort in KNOWING that these whacko claims are ALL politically motivated, and only articulated by a tiny, yet vocal, minority here on DU, FORTUNATELY, and why we are so lucky to have this AWESOME site!
good night, all
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Oh yes, the "he wasn't involved in politics at the time" assertion.
That's funny! Yes, you had to be a total political junkie to know that Bush and his cronies were lying us into Iraq. You had to have some double secret special information to figure that out except... the UN Weapons Inspectors reported three weeks before the invasion that after months of searching all the suspected sites they had found no WMD and that report was televised and made available to all.
And what was Greenwald doing at the time in 2003? He was a partner in his own law firm and had been a practicing attorney for nine years. He wasn't a hermit living in a cave. You want to tell me that a well connected litigation attorney who had worked for one of the top merger and acquisition firms in NYC, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wachtell,_Lipton,_Rosen_%26_Katz , was ignorant of the news? That he didn't know better? That he had no concept of politics at the time?
That's what you are trying to sell here?
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)good night
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)voting to go to war in Iraq. If Greenwald can't be excused for waking up utnil afterwards, then what the fuck is Hillary's and Kerry's excuse???? And why aren't they considered accessories before the fact to Bush's war crimes????? That's what Greenwald's detractors must answer for their smears of him to carry any weight with me. Jesus H. Christ it makes me sick: Gebhardt and Daschle reach a Rose Garden Concordat with Bush to take Iraq off the table for the 2002 mid-terms. Where is their fucking accountability????? No, let's impeach Greenwald because he didn't come out against Bush before March 2003.
Greenwald's detractors want to have their cake and eat it too. Because Greenwald did not come out against Bush until after Iraq, he's somehow less than legit. BUT Hillary and Kerry get to vote for Iraq and create conditions for death, destruction and TORTURE and their legitimacy is without question???? Give me a fucking break.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Thank you for putting it into words.
Apophis
(1,407 posts)but not okay if it happens under a Democrat president, like Obama.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)But I am impressed at just how well this plan is coming together. Republicans are gonna do better in 2014 than they did in 2010.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)It's not really news that you are in deep shit.
:shakes-head:
Octafish
(55,745 posts)...who are so afraid of the government that they scared to point out the big story: illegal NSA spying on America and the bigger story: the destruction of the First Amendment.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)Those folks are worse than cowards, or lackeys, they are TRAITORS to our constitution.
randome
(34,845 posts)Snowden is screwed. You may not like it but it's Reality.
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)Obvious
Octafish
(55,745 posts)The same fascists who make war on innocent nations for their oil and go unpunished.
The same fascists who loot the banks and get the taxpayers to foot the tab and go unpunished.
The same fascists who allow the destruction of the nation in order to keep from raising taxes on the wealthy.
Them.
You? You can say or write or believe what you want.
That's my point.
randome
(34,845 posts)With some Democratic cowardice thrown in for good measure.
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
Response to Octafish (Reply #43)
Tarheel_Dem This message was self-deleted by its author.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)You list this one buddy... my freedom to travel, ... And IMO rightfully so.
Turbineguy
(37,317 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)How he is an accomplice to Snowden's betrayal.
randome
(34,845 posts)He can rot in Moscow or an Ecuadorian embassy if he chooses but I want to know how that relationship with Greenwald developed.
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Even Snowden's own father said that he thought that his son was being manipulated.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)The father sounds like a decent guy and he's not impressed with Wikileaks advising his son. Can't imagine what he's going through.
allinthegame
(132 posts)About Greenwald...however the longer this young man stays in the Moscow airport the longer he has to reflect about how "unspecial" he really is.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)Strikes Again!
Edward Snowden is a modern day Paul Revere with a thumb drive full of the news that Tyranny is coming!
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)I'll never be able to get that image out of my mind now!!!
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)Edward Snowden is a modern day Paul Revere with a thumb drive full of the news that Tyranny is coming!
senseandsensibility
(17,000 posts)Uh, I think we all knew that. He's paying the price for what he did, and apparently some get great joy from that fact alone. Excellent. Now can we talk about what he revealed? No? I guess Marshall and his ilk need to revel in Snowden's being "screwed" for a few more days or months. When they get tired of it, can we talk about what he revealed? Still no?
randome
(34,845 posts)There is a reason punditry and DU are both about evenly divided on this subject. In the absence of hard proof, rational people can interpret what Snowden has 'revealed' in different ways.
What has he revealed that you think everyone should agree on?
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)hello...
randome
(34,845 posts)If Snowden had this all-encompassing access he claims, why was he only able to steal PowerPoint slides? How about an email from the President? Why do all the hundreds of thousands of employees of all the Internet providers not support his claims?
Are they all being blackmailed, perhaps?
Besides, Recursion's thread shows his latest leak -that the data comes from the FBI and requires 4 levels of approval before getting seen by anyone. Funny how Snowden never bothered to point that out until he leaked a document that directly disproves his claims.
Weird, huh? I agree.
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)And form what I hear, and have been reading, there are plenty more where that came from, so stay tuned my friend
Edward Snowden is a modern day Paul Revere with a thumb drive full of the news that Tyranny is coming!
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)At least that is the talking point he is sticking with. And out of all of the Snowden smearers on DU he is the only person using that talking point, which tells you how incredibly stupid it is. Apparently he needs Snowden to personally demo these programs for him to prove anything. But when it comes to Snowden's resume he doesn't even need to see it to declare it is all lies. Not the most consistent person, but consistency isn't a requirement for smearing.
HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)not that far beneath the surface. Very unbecoming of a supposedly progressive board.
I'm really disappointed to see Marshall joining in the pile-on. I expected more of him as a defender of the perogatives of the Fourth Estate. Well, at least he hasn't joined David Gregory (yet) in insinuating (or Dianne Feinstein in stating baldly) that Greenwald is a "traitor." But there's still time for that.
Maybe then we'll get to hear a discussion of what Snowden revealed. Or maybe we'll have to content ourselves with discussions in Der Spiegel, Le Monde, The Guardian, ad infinitum.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Did you not expect the U.S. federal government to use everything at our disposal to prevent some snot-nosed kid from ruining everything we, as a nation, have accomplished over the last 60 years of delicate negotiations with our European allies, China, and Russia??
Really??
Sounds kind of naive to me.
randome
(34,845 posts)Do you grok me?
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
Response to ProSense (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)Last edited Tue Jul 2, 2013, 12:27 AM - Edit history (1)
1) You end up an a trading piece the Russians can use as they please whenever they please, realizing that Obama will give them just about anything for that piece.
2) Your fate depends on how trustworthy Putin is.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)With Putin now going on about "our American friends" I would not be feeling very secure at that airport.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)Or European, for that matter. There is no telling what Obama would give Putin in exchange for Snowden. I think Putin can pretty much get his whole Christmas list filled right here.
HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)in countries that border Russia. And if I'm Snowden, that's a trade I think the interests of humanity would justify.
Trust me, whatever one thinks of Snowden or Putin, those ABM systems in countries that border the Russian Federation are inherently and deeply destabilizing.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)ok.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)We just might start seeing Assad in a whole new light.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)Maybe get Russian recognized as the second official language in the US.
Certainly Putin can make sure that he gets a Super Bowl ring EVERY year now.
He is the proverbial kid in a candy store, and the proprietor really wants him to have every bit of candy in the place.