Rand Paul: "Humans Will Marry Non Humans Without DOMA"
“I think this is the conundrum and gets back to what you were saying in the opening — whether or not churches should decide this,” Paul said on Glenn Beck’s radio show Wednesday morning. “But it is difficult because if we have no laws on this people take it to one extension further. Does it have to be humans? You know, I mean. So there really are — the question is what social mores, can some social mores be part of legislation?”
“Historically, we did at the state legislative level, we did allow for some social mores to be part of it,” the Kentucky Republican continued. “Some of them were said to be for health reasons and otherwise, but I’m kind of with you, I see the thousands-of-year tradition of the nucleus of the family unit. I also see that economically, if you just look without any kind of moral periscope and you say, what is it that is the leading cause of poverty in our country? It’s having kids without marriage. The stability of the marriage unit is enormous and we should not just say oh we’re punting on it, marriage can be anything.”
Paul had previously said he opposed DOMA, a federal law that prohibited same-sex couples from receiving federal marriage rights and protections. However, he only opposed the law because it potentially gave the Supreme Court an opening to legalize same-sex marriages nationwide.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/06/26/rand-paul-same-sex-marriage-conundrum-leads-to-marrying-animals/
Once again proving he is the biggest dumbass in the Senate.
= new reply since forum marked as read
...there'll never be another ewe? 
Ewe loves me.
We're a happy family . . .
Leaning against a grimy brick wall drinking Woolite.
(Gene Wilder in Woody Allen's "Everything you wanted to know about sex"
Last edited Fri Jun 28, 2013, 02:05 PM - Edit history (1)
Rand Paul’s debate interrupted by Aqua BuddhaThe Kentucky Tea Partier and his Democratic opponent argue about Paul's college days and an old prank kidnapping
By Alex Pareene, October 18., 2010
Rand Paul’s debate last night with Democratic opponent Jack Conway turned very ugly. Conway has begun running ads that reference Paul’s now-infamous membership in a “secret” college group called the NoZe Brotherhood. The Brotherhood was dedicated to “blasphemy,” and they once staged a joke “kidnapping” of a female student, whom they “forced” to worship an idol they called the Aqua Buddha.
All the story shows is that in college, Rand Paul probably enjoyed smoking weed. (And he may not have taken his faith all that seriously.) The woman says the entire thing was “weird” but not especially threatening.*
So at his debate last night, Rand went off on Conway for referencing the incident. Paul went all-out on the aggrieved outrage. He accused Conway of “attacking a man’s religious beliefs to gain higher office.” He said Conway should be ashamed of himself...
“Why did he freely join a group known for mocking, for making fun of people with faith?” Conway asked during the debate. “When is it ever a good idea to tie up a woman and ask her to kneel before a false idol, your god, which you call Aqua Buddha?”
http://www.salon.com/2010/10/18/rand_paul_debate_aqua_buddha/
*Rand-holm Syndrome: “Kidnap” victim defends “THC Party” candidate
...“They never hurt me, they never did anything wrong,” the unnamed woman told GQ, “but the whole thing was kind of sadistic...”
Today, the Washington Post’s Greg Sargent got an exclusive with the woman, who totally vindicated Paul by saying she was never kidnapped! Except that her story did not change, at all — the facts of it are the same — she just doesn’t consider it a proper, illegal kidnapping.
The Paul campaign, obviously, was thrilled to see that false and salacious “kidnapping” story debunked, because words don’t mean anything anymore, which is how he was able to deny “illegally kidnapping” someone while never addressing the actual incident, and now claim that that nonexistent charge was “completely shot down” by a reiteration of what he actually did do.
Also, uh:
In our conversation, she elaborated that she doesn’t want her name in print because she’s a clinical psychologist who works with former members of the military, some of whom are Tea Partyers, and fears that complicating Paul’s Senate run could put her in danger.
http://www.salon.com/2010/08/11/rand_paul_kidnap_victim/
I married mine yesterday. Her name is Amity. She's into weed too.
<a href="http://imgur.com/L8zhoY6"><img src="
" title="Hosted by imgur.com"/></a>
Otherwise, he wouldn't be so obsessed with beastiality. 
and they are marrying them, too.
I tried! 
Can't seem to leave home in the morning without it.
Now, I can MARRY it! Haha! Take THAT Christians!
You're really far out on the deep end of RW libertarian lunacy, aren't you? This is Alex Jones territory.
And Snowden's actions do speak for themselves.
Bye!
Maybe says more about your own experiences than Snowden, but whatever.
That's interesting, the definition of traitor is, "Maybe letting those foreign countries have a look your laptop..." 
That's one of the most ignorant statements I've read here.
Sorry you're so afraid.
We are doomed!!
Or this:
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
Ah, there was this one many years ago, but she left me for a permanent position at Armour Packing Company. I wonder whatever happened to her?
and I can finally have my centaur mate? 
I'll have billions and all the free beer I could drink! 
...never met my cat.
Nor this cat:
is that a goat?
why a duck?
His father must have mated with a poodle, considering that curly mop growing on top of Randy's head.
They are cuter and nicer than crazy Randy.
Also, poodles have better haircuts.
As long as there are 2 consenting parties and they can both say " I do" .Oops I've opened the gates to people with talking birds.....There's an Australian politician named Bernardi who seems to think that gay marriage will lead to bestiality as well....we wonder WTF!!!! 
What a worthless crazy piece of dung.
Will someone slap him in the face already. 
-p
Or Bryan "polygamy" Fischer. These freaks are a dime a dozen.
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
To the tune of...
LMAO
"This is a conundrum, and it gets back to what you were saying …whether or not churches should decide this," Paul said. "And it is difficult, because if we have no laws on this, people take it to one extension further. Does it have to be humans?"
That remark, his office said, wasn't meant to be taken seriously.
"Sarcasm sometimes doesn't translate adequately from radio conversation," his communications director Moira Bagley said. "Sen. Paul did not suggest that striking down DOMA could lead to unusual marriage arrangements. What he was discussing was that having the state recognize marriage without definition could lead to marriages with no basis in reality."
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/06/27/rand-paul-bestiality-comment-sarcasm-office-says/
Yeah, it was sarcasm........
?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328467361039
Just type man marries... into a google search and see what pops up
Rand Paul's wife married an animal.
So they ended up in Congress. Who voted for these nut jobs?!
