Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,728 posts)
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 06:50 PM Feb 2012

Marriage equality might go on Washington ballot.

Opponents of same-sex marriage intended to quickly file a referendum aimed at repealing the law, and if they are able to collect enough valid signatures — 120,577 — between now and June 6, the law will be put on hold until the November election.


http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2017497028_gaymarriage14m.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Marriage equality might go on Washington ballot. (Original Post) RandySF Feb 2012 OP
You mean like Prop H8? KamaAina Feb 2012 #1
It's almost certainly going on the ballot (just like domestic partnerships did in 2009) MrCoffee Feb 2012 #2
I seroiusly doubt they will be able to get the needed signatures Bandit Feb 2012 #3
Sadly, they will MrCoffee Feb 2012 #4
I would imagine that the court decisions customerserviceguy Feb 2012 #5
I live in WA marlakay Feb 2012 #6
Seems they have two routes to try and stop equality - going for both? FreeState Feb 2012 #7
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
1. You mean like Prop H8?
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 07:00 PM
Feb 2012

That just got royally smacked down by the same Ninth Circuit that covers Washington?

MrCoffee

(24,159 posts)
2. It's almost certainly going on the ballot (just like domestic partnerships did in 2009)
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 07:04 PM
Feb 2012

Domestic partnerships were upheld 53% - 47%


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Referendum_71_(2009)

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
3. I seroiusly doubt they will be able to get the needed signatures
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 07:04 PM
Feb 2012

It has been found unconstitutional now three seperate times in Federal Court...

MrCoffee

(24,159 posts)
4. Sadly, they will
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 07:06 PM
Feb 2012

WA is a divided state..east of the Cascades is conservative. Seattle keeps WA blue.

See post 2...In 2009, domestic partnerships went to the voters and it was upheld 53-47. I think marriage equality will be upheld as well.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
5. I would imagine that the court decisions
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 11:18 PM
Feb 2012

that have held that petition signers can be identified will keep down the secret haters, only the openly homophobic will affix their names proudly to a measure that's anti-equality.

They might possibly get the signatures, but the people of Washington will vote to affirm freedom, as they have twice in the past on this issue.

marlakay

(11,447 posts)
6. I live in WA
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 11:55 PM
Feb 2012

Its going to be a interesting election with legalizing gay marriage and pot on same ballot. We need to get our the youth vote who are more open minded...

FreeState

(10,570 posts)
7. Seems they have two routes to try and stop equality - going for both?
Tue Feb 14, 2012, 12:09 AM
Feb 2012
So now let’s talk about Washington. By the time you watch this, the Governor will probably have signed marriage equality into law. But just like in California with Prop 8, the law doesn’t take effect right away. Anti-gay activists have a few months to gather signatures to stop us from marrying. They could try to overturn the law with a referendum, which requires about 120,000 signatures and would delay the law’s start until after the election in November. Or they could try to invalidate it with an initiative, which would require 240,000 signatures, but it would probably allow marriages to start sometime between now and the election. Or they could do both, but that could work against them if voters get confused about two competing anti-gay measures.


http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Marriage equality might g...