General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan The NSA Listen to All Youz Callz? POLL
Out of curiosity let's see what the breakdown is-
3 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
The NSA has links and hooks into every telephony network/switch in existence and can listen to your conversations with a few clicks of a button | |
3 (100%) |
|
Telecom employees with clearance have to put a Lawful Intercept in place on the switch hosting the subscriber based on a FISA or criminal warrant | |
0 (0%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
hlthe2b
(107,410 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)For example, one has to have clearance to even be able to view the LI (lawful intercept) documentation on manufacturer switches. It's a whole seperate component on any switching system that the normal telecom employee can't even access.
Here's a the first primer one should read to begin to understand-
http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/communications-assistance-law-enforcement-act
hlthe2b
(107,410 posts)That's what happens when government moves to the extremes in secrecy and when even small incidents of officials being less than fully truthful come to light. The public will (rightfully) question everything.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)and you know what, setting up a LI is more of a pain in the fucking ass than you think it is....
Actually, you can search for yourself. Go on google and try to find any documentation from Avaya, Huawei, BroadSoft, Nortel, Siemens, Acme Packet or Metaswitch on how to enable a LI on a subscriber.
Hatchling
(2,323 posts)Like "Person of Interest" and all the NCIS and cop shows that show the "good guys" tappping into data banks to catch the "bad guys" are conditioning us to accept this. You notice they rarely if ever go into the necessity to get warrants for this?
And while they may not be listening in to all our calls they have the ability to do do whenever they want to.
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)Your contempt for DUers is showing.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)They don't even want to learn, it's easier to have outrage---
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)What they are doing, and have been doing since the 70's is "hoovering" telecoms and now internet traffic into databases and then analyzing the hoovered data at their leisure. They are not, at least the NSA is not, sitting there with earphones monitoring individual calls. They have been spending tens of billions of dollars for decades building giant database systems. This is Stasi State 2.0. It is a whole different ball game.
NightWatcher
(39,360 posts)They posses the ability but rarely the desire to do so.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)NightWatcher
(39,360 posts)One_Life_To_Give
(6,036 posts)Lots of ways to illegally tap phone conversations. You remember the Infrared Laser beam bounced off of Secretary of Defense office window? Are we to believe that Voice Scramblers have been available and in use by security people for years but they are never needed? As a practical matter the bulk of phone calls go thru certain hubs. Those like e-mail servers can be illegally taped. Which allows for an amazing amount of data to be electronically searched. Now while listening to 50,000 simultaneous phone calls discerning which one is about a mole in the Pentagon or someone planning to Bomb a Marathon is a challenge.
By the way how many foreign intelligence services are probably also listening in around key hubs in New York or DC?
snooper2
(30,151 posts)You focus your resources on how/where to put certain taps. You can't just put a optical splitter on every piece of fucking fiber in the World. LOL...
I'm sure Gigamon would love that though, they would be a 10 Billion dollar company
"As a practical matter the bulk of phone calls go thru certain hubs"
Do you have any idea how many Class 4 switches exist in the World?