Create new account | My Profile | My Account | My Bookmarks | My Inbox | Help | Log in

Google search

Advanced search

HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » I just can't stop thinkin...

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 09:53 AM

sibelian (7,804 posts)

I just can't stop thinking about Snowden and what a jerk he is.



I feel silly about myself for being drawn in. All along I thought something important was happening but now I see that it was all about Snowden and his appalling personality flaws.

I feel like I've been supporting the wrong guy in a reality TV show.

What did he do again?

84 replies, 11692 views

Thread infoBookmark this threadTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 84 replies Author Time Post
Reply I just can't stop thinking about Snowden and what a jerk he is. (Original post)
 sibelian Jun 2013 OP
LineReply Snowden told America that the Japanese Attacked Pearl Harbor and everyone got upset....
 uponit7771 Jun 2013 #1
LineLineReply That's right...this guy is definitely not on the up-and-up...
 tex-wyo-dem Jun 2013 #47
LineLineReply This may be "legal," but I would wager that someone will
 JDPriestly Jun 2013 #67
LineLineLineReply Remember 2004?
 sofa king Jun 2013 #73
LineLineLineLineNew Reply That is why all these scandal-deniers on DU amaze me.
 JDPriestly Jun 2013 #75
LineLineLineLineLineNew Reply +1000 eom
 Purveyor Jun 2013 #82
LineReply He thought the Iraq war was 'noble'...
 Whisp Jun 2013 #2
LineLineReply Yeap, then tried to say he wasn't. He "trusted" the Bush admin
 uponit7771 Jun 2013 #4
LineLineLineReply Aw, man.
 sibelian Jun 2013 #40
LineLineReply Nope. Some people say he cheered for the Iraq war but no one actually heard him do it.
 Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #7
LineLineLineReply I saw a clip of Snowden last night on O'Donnell.
 Whisp Jun 2013 #9
LineLineLineLineReply I was referring specifically to Greenwald.
 Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #13
LineLineLineLineReply FYI, Hillary supported the Iraq invasion and has never walked that support back.
 Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #14
LineLineLineLineLineReply I'm no Hillary fan.
 Whisp Jun 2013 #19
LineLineLineLineLineLineReply So, you won't vote for her if she makes it past the primaries?
 Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #21
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineReply no, because I can't vote.
 Whisp Jun 2013 #23
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineReply Ooh, tetchy, ain't ya. I wouldn't make that argument and I never have but
 Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #28
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineReply saving what? are you on the NSA payroll?
 Whisp Jun 2013 #38
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineReply American politics are none of your business because you're Canadian
 hamster Jun 2013 #51
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineReply I may be wrong but, in a way, your post looks like you're a bigot.
 Amonester Jun 2013 #60
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineNew Reply I may be wrong
 hamster Jun 2013 #76
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineNew Reply 1. I don't hate America. 2. My sister and her three children are Americans.
 Amonester Jun 2013 #79
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineNew Reply AND, wouldn't you like to know? Amonester the Thought Police.
 hamster Jun 2013 #78
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineNew Reply Hey, I don't care what you think, but...
 Amonester Jun 2013 #80
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineNew Reply Now you're just being difficult.
 hamster Jun 2013 #81
LineLineLineLineReply Does that change the problem that Obama has with the NSA
 JDPriestly Jun 2013 #68
LineLineReply OMG I feel so embarassed for "supporting" him now.
 sibelian Jun 2013 #10
LineLineLineReply the story is about a massive private machine that collects data on us citizens illegally
 xiamiam Jun 2013 #46
LineLineLineLineReply ....
 sibelian Jun 2013 #62
LineLineReply Supported Iraq AND is a Ron Paul supporter?
 tex-wyo-dem Jun 2013 #49
LineLineLineReply yeh, thought that was a bit odd too.
 Whisp Jun 2013 #50
LineLineLineLineReply Nothing odd about it. The one redeeming quality in
 JDPriestly Jun 2013 #70
LineLineLineLineLineReply odd = supporting the Iraq war. King Paul would not approve. n/t
 Whisp Jun 2013 #72
LineLineNew Reply Most of the libertarians, who are now revered, were initially onboard. Libertarians =
 Tarheel_Dem Jun 2013 #77
LineReply It worked, good, now go, enjoy some Victory Gin
 Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #3
LineLineReply The cut the ration of chocolate! Double Good! nt
 Javaman Jun 2013 #5
LineReply Garbage
 marions ghost Jun 2013 #6
LineLineReply +1
 newfie11 Jun 2013 #8
LineLineReply I find the absolute dichotomy re: Snowden amazing... Either he's a "hero" or a "traitor" to DUers
 hlthe2b Jun 2013 #12
LineLineLineReply Someone can simultaneously be a hero and an asshole.
 morningfog Jun 2013 #27
LineLineLineReply This...
 one_voice Jun 2013 #34
LineLineLineReply Intolerance of ambiguity
 marions ghost Jun 2013 #36
LineLineLineReply I'm with you in this. I am reserving any judgements
 arthritisR_US Jun 2013 #65
LineLineLineReply Why is HE even the subject of discussion?
 JDPriestly Jun 2013 #71
LineLineReply Hey, MG...
 sibelian Jun 2013 #15
LineLineLineReply Too real
 marions ghost Jun 2013 #30
LineReply If only the Obama admin could dig up some dirt on him.
 JW2020 Jun 2013 #11
LineLineReply And then turn him into a cyborg to do their bidding.
 Dash87 Jun 2013 #16
LineLineReply Man, that would be cool.
 sibelian Jun 2013 #17
LineLineReply If only the evil Obama NSA apparatus had caught him before he leaked.
 emulatorloo Jun 2013 #25
LineLineLineReply I was making a comparison to Watergate
 JW2020 Jun 2013 #29
LineLineLineLineReply I know
 emulatorloo Jun 2013 #44
LineReply somehow I suspect
 G_j Jun 2013 #18
LineLineReply I point blank REFUSE to use that THING.
 sibelian Jun 2013 #24
LineLineLineReply the mindset you're satirizing is so prevalent lately...
 carolinayellowdog Jun 2013 #45
LineReply He is mean to ballerinas!
 QC Jun 2013 #20
LineLineReply Oh god. I can't even talk about that. That was the worst part.
 sibelian Jun 2013 #32
LineReply Does being a jerk make his information any less valuable?
 charlyvi Jun 2013 #22
LineLineReply No.
 sibelian Jun 2013 #26
LineReply Sure glad you brought facts and logic to this discussion
 think Jun 2013 #31
LineLineReply I can't help myself!
 sibelian Jun 2013 #33
LineLineLineReply My appologies
 think Jun 2013 #35
LineLineLineLineReply I had the same problem
 marions ghost Jun 2013 #37
LineLineLineLineLineReply LOL
 think Jun 2013 #39
LineLineReply Our govt is a bully
 tblue Jun 2013 #74
LineReply It's worse than you think
 Dragonfli Jun 2013 #41
LineLineReply Do you know what else I heard?
 sibelian Jun 2013 #42
LineLineLineReply !
 OnyxCollie Jun 2013 #57
LineReply Yep. Rumor has it that in the 3rd grade he leaked to his classmaes that 3x9=27
 Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #43
LineReply Just wait until he leaks pictures of Bill with Monica under the desk.
 L0oniX Jun 2013 #48
LineReply I just can't stop thinking about Snowden and what a jerk you are.
 sgtbenobo Jun 2013 #52
LineLineReply LOL! The OP sounds like a 10 year old.
 reformist2 Jun 2013 #55
LineLineLineReply But..... I'm 42....
 sibelian Jun 2013 #59
LineLineLineLineReply I'm so sorry, I see you are joking now! LOL
 reformist2 Jun 2013 #69
LineLineLineReply This message was self-deleted by its author
 sibelian Jun 2013 #61
LineLineReply WHY ARE YOU BEING CRUEL TO ME?!!?!?!???!???!???!?!??!??!??!?!???!???!??!?
 sibelian Jun 2013 #58
LineReply I guess you haven't seen this interview...
 Indi Guy Jun 2013 #53
LineReply He didn't clap his hands when Tinkerbell's life was at stake.
 alfredo Jun 2013 #54
LineReply Would you say the same thing if this happened when Bush was president?
 lark Jun 2013 #56
LineLineReply HE ABANDONED A BALLERINA !!1!111!!!11!1!!!!
 sibelian Jun 2013 #63
LineLineReply This began long before cheney/bush made it worse (and blew its secrecy).
 Amonester Jun 2013 #66
LineReply I take it that everyone who is criticizing Snowden's resume
 JDPriestly Jun 2013 #64
LineNew Reply Me too. He hurt Dear Leader.
 vi5 Jun 2013 #83
LineLineNew Reply How True! How true! Whatever Muad-dib has done...
 sibelian Jun 2013 #84

Response to sibelian (Original post)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 09:56 AM

Star Member uponit7771 (88,616 posts)

1. Snowden told America that the Japanese Attacked Pearl Harbor and everyone got upset....

...and wanted to attack the Japanese.

That's about it...

A whistleblower is someone who release new information about crap that's illegal IMHO, this is Greenwald looking for a good story and NOT being illegal...

We should be more concentrated on higher scrutiny of the people who get this info

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to uponit7771 (Reply #1)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:25 PM

tex-wyo-dem (3,190 posts)

47. That's right...this guy is definitely not on the up-and-up...

and that is all that really matters. Shoot the messenger, I say!

...and screw the actual unconstitutional crap he exposed...that hardly matters.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to uponit7771 (Reply #1)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:13 PM

JDPriestly (57,936 posts)

67. This may be "legal," but I would wager that someone will

take this to court and challenge whether it is constitutional.

I think it chills speech and association and might well be deemed quite illegal.

What's more. It could cause us trouble internationally. I read an article in Der Standard, a reputable Austrian newspaper, stating that the European Union has been trying in vain to negotiate an agreement with the US that would allow EU citizens to sue for privacy violations in US court and that would require American companies to comply with European privacy laws when operating in the EU. Angela Merkel plans to discuss this with Obama when he visits soon.

This program would permit a sitting president (or someone on his staff) to review the phone records of a political opponent or a member of Congress. That could corrupt our election process because of course the political opponent would not have the same access to the sitting president's phone records -- or e-mail.

This is Watergate times millions. It is disgusting. If true, and as I said, I haven't heard any persuasive denials thus far.

IF they are going to collect this information then we should be given access to our personal files. They should report on what they find out about us TO US.

That is my view. We should have the same information that our government has.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to JDPriestly (Reply #67)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:31 PM

sofa king (10,857 posts)

73. Remember 2004?

Remember how in 2004 the Bush campaign always got to the cameras first to spike the guns of whatever new idea John Kerry wanted to talk about?

Remember how in years prior to that an insider bragged that they were reading the news before it was published?

Quite honestly, I've always assumed it, as the Bush Administration never turned down an easy opportunity to be criminal and malevolent. Perhaps some day we will be more certain about it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sofa king (Reply #73)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:45 PM

JDPriestly (57,936 posts)

75. That is why all these scandal-deniers on DU amaze me.

Can't they see beyond their noses? This is a very dangerous program. The nerds who do this stuff have no concept, no clue about what the repercussions can be for our democracy. What a bunch of loonies. And the DUers in denial are something amazing too. Blaming Snowden. He may well be a jerk, but who cares? Why not focus on the important issues like what kind of problem this causes to our so-called democracy, what jokes it makes of our election process, etc.?

The reactions to this horrible news are amazing to me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to JDPriestly (Reply #75)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 02:59 PM

Star Member Purveyor (29,876 posts)

82. +1000 eom

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Original post)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 09:56 AM

Whisp (24,096 posts)

2. He thought the Iraq war was 'noble'...

 

need anything else be said?

Greenwad was cheering for that too, wasn't he?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Whisp (Reply #2)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 09:58 AM

Star Member uponit7771 (88,616 posts)

4. Yeap, then tried to say he wasn't. He "trusted" the Bush admin

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to uponit7771 (Reply #4)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 11:17 AM

sibelian (7,804 posts)

40. Aw, man.


You mean he's the BAD GUY?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Whisp (Reply #2)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:07 AM

Luminous Animal (27,310 posts)

7. Nope. Some people say he cheered for the Iraq war but no one actually heard him do it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Luminous Animal (Reply #7)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:11 AM

Whisp (24,096 posts)

9. I saw a clip of Snowden last night on O'Donnell.

 

and yes, he did say Iraq and noble, Snowden did. Anyone who has those thoughts about that mass murder conducted by a dry drunk sociopath has got to have some granite in his head.

I'm not going looking but it's been mentioned often here often enough that Greenwad was more supportive of Bush's blunder than he was a critic of. And that he's a suckin' Rand and libertarian supporter.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Whisp (Reply #9)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:13 AM

Luminous Animal (27,310 posts)

13. I was referring specifically to Greenwald.

And yes. It was also mentioned often that Al Gore invented the internet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Whisp (Reply #9)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:14 AM

Luminous Animal (27,310 posts)

14. FYI, Hillary supported the Iraq invasion and has never walked that support back.

and yes, he did say Iraq and noble, Snowden did. Anyone who has those thoughts about that mass murder conducted by a dry drunk sociopath has got to have some granite in his head.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022990949#post9

Copied and added to my journal for the time that Hillary runs for President.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Luminous Animal (Reply #14)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:21 AM

Whisp (24,096 posts)

19. I'm no Hillary fan.

 

at all.

At least most of the others faked some sort of apology that could almost pass for one, but not her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Whisp (Reply #19)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:23 AM

Luminous Animal (27,310 posts)

21. So, you won't vote for her if she makes it past the primaries?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Luminous Animal (Reply #21)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:25 AM

Whisp (24,096 posts)

23. no, because I can't vote.

 

and don't start in on me about american politics is none of my business because I am Canadian. I've heard enough of that shit here. Reminds me of the stupidity of freedom fries.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Whisp (Reply #23)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:29 AM

Luminous Animal (27,310 posts)

28. Ooh, tetchy, ain't ya. I wouldn't make that argument and I never have but

I'm saving your statement for future reference, anyway.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Luminous Animal (Reply #28)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:49 AM

Whisp (24,096 posts)

38. saving what? are you on the NSA payroll?

 



I will not be supporting a Clinton, ever. Even, heaven forbid!, she does get the Presidency I will be as respectful of her as a Democrat as so many here are toward Obama - and that means fun times for me and I should be able to do that with freedom, like it is done to Obama now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Whisp (Reply #23)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:44 PM

hamster (101 posts)

51. American politics are none of your business because you're Canadian

 

Probably a French Canadian judging by how offended you are at the term, freedom fries. Wanna know who else is of French Canadian descent? Hillary Clinton. That's who. I really do wonder about you, ''Whisp" if that even is your real name. Let me see your birth certificate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to hamster (Reply #51)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:01 PM

Amonester (11,541 posts)

60. I may be wrong but, in a way, your post looks like you're a bigot.

Until that birth-certificate snark, which may seem like the whole thing is some kind of satirical or something.

But if you really disdain French Canadians, you will be alerted on here. So which is which?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Amonester (Reply #60)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:48 PM

hamster (101 posts)

76. I may be wrong

 

but it seems to me that you're the bigot with all your hate against America. Alert away. I regret but having only one Hamster screen name to give to my country.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to hamster (Reply #76)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 02:05 PM

Amonester (11,541 posts)

79. 1. I don't hate America. 2. My sister and her three children are Americans.

I suggest you should re-read the rules once more.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Amonester (Reply #60)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 02:04 PM

hamster (101 posts)

78. AND, wouldn't you like to know? Amonester the Thought Police.

 

The thought police want inside of my head/the thought police are alive on this thread. - please sing to the tune of Cheap Trick's, "The Dream Police"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to hamster (Reply #78)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 02:08 PM

Amonester (11,541 posts)

80. Hey, I don't care what you think, but...

there are rules to follow here.... and I don't make them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Amonester (Reply #80)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 02:23 PM

hamster (101 posts)

81. Now you're just being difficult.

 

I don't understand why you feel the need to cyber-bully me. First, you pick me out of all the people on this thread, verbally attack me, ask me "which is which?" and then after you ask me what I mean, you say that you don't care what I think. Just quit with all the head games, man. Or woman. Stop trying to control the thread

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Whisp (Reply #9)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:17 PM

JDPriestly (57,936 posts)

68. Does that change the problem that Obama has with the NSA

out of control and the money, etc. spent on private contractors and the huge number of private contractors with top security clearances? All of those things really trouble me.

Who cares whether Snowden is right-wing?

I care about our democratic form of government which appears to be a bit of a joke right now considering that a sitting president and his staff can have ready access to so much personal information about people opposing them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Whisp (Reply #2)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:12 AM

sibelian (7,804 posts)

10. OMG I feel so embarassed for "supporting" him now.


Oh, hang on, I never did.

So, uh, what was this story all about in the beginning? I've forgotten.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Reply #10)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:22 PM

xiamiam (4,906 posts)

46. the story is about a massive private machine that collects data on us citizens illegally

and whose very existence and profit is reliant upon people staying stupid

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to xiamiam (Reply #46)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:04 PM

sibelian (7,804 posts)

62. ....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Whisp (Reply #2)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:29 PM

tex-wyo-dem (3,190 posts)

49. Supported Iraq AND is a Ron Paul supporter?

Sounds more than a bit ironic.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to tex-wyo-dem (Reply #49)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:35 PM

Whisp (24,096 posts)

50. yeh, thought that was a bit odd too.

 

The crazed libertarian squawkers that bow to the idol of racist and sexist and homophobic fuckface Paul,
and like that spotlight on them don't sound too bright, so maybe that's it.

I think we will find a lot more oddities about this guy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Whisp (Reply #50)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:22 PM

JDPriestly (57,936 posts)

70. Nothing odd about it. The one redeeming quality in

Randers and libertarian types is that they do support and want to protect civil liberties.

If the Rand, libertarian affiliations bother you, doesn't it bother you that a Democratic administration is full of those types in that they hire companies that hire a lot of the anti-social types as outside contractors and then give them the highest security clearances. That might be troubling, but just that Snowden happens to be one of them is not a problem.

I would bet that the Obama government is full of Rand followers and libertarians. Greenspan, who was re-appointed by Clinton to the Fed was a close pal of Ayn Rand and probably a libertarian. There is nothing new or shocking about this. Why are the libertarian, Rand affiliations so troubling in Greenspan.

I don't agree with Ayn Rand or libertarian types but they have been involved in Democratic administrations for a long, long time, and no one seemed to object before.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to JDPriestly (Reply #70)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:24 PM

Whisp (24,096 posts)

72. odd = supporting the Iraq war. King Paul would not approve. n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Whisp (Reply #2)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:49 PM

Tarheel_Dem (31,129 posts)

77. Most of the libertarians, who are now revered, were initially onboard. Libertarians =

Republicans who wanna smoke dope & get laid, per Thom Hartmann.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Original post)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 09:57 AM

Puzzledtraveller (5,937 posts)

3. It worked, good, now go, enjoy some Victory Gin

and your ration of chocolate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Puzzledtraveller (Reply #3)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 09:58 AM

Star Member Javaman (60,941 posts)

5. The cut the ration of chocolate! Double Good! nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Original post)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 09:58 AM

marions ghost (19,841 posts)

6. Garbage

There are two journalists with excellent cred backing him up.

Shoot the messenger. Tear him apart. But he has enlightened many people to the truth.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to marions ghost (Reply #6)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:08 AM

newfie11 (8,159 posts)

8. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to marions ghost (Reply #6)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:13 AM

Star Member hlthe2b (96,629 posts)

12. I find the absolute dichotomy re: Snowden amazing... Either he's a "hero" or a "traitor" to DUers

It feels like I am nearly alone in still withholding any conclusion as the story continues to unfold...?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to hlthe2b (Reply #12)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:28 AM

morningfog (18,115 posts)

27. Someone can simultaneously be a hero and an asshole.

 

I have no problem with praising someone's actions while recognizing all the human failings they contain.

In my opinion, he is already a hero. He may also be an asshole and may be motivated by self interests. I don't really care about that. It doesn't change that I think what he did was right. The same goes for Manning, Assange and Greenwald.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to hlthe2b (Reply #12)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:33 AM

one_voice (20,043 posts)

34. This...

Either he's a "hero" or a "traitor" to DUers


You're not alone. He's neither to me, I mean I have said 'oh that's not good, or that's old news' but I haven't come to any conclusion about the whole situation.

I said this last night:
It's semantics as far as I'm concerned. I don't think he's a hero or a traitor. I have no strong feelings one way or the other about him.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2989321


I don't think we've heard everything, there's more to come. I'm not going to jump on either bandwagon, that's how you end up with broken ankles.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to hlthe2b (Reply #12)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:43 AM

marions ghost (19,841 posts)

36. Intolerance of ambiguity

"the early selection of and maintenance of one solution in a perpetually ambiguous situation"

http://faculty.virginia.edu/haidtlab/jost.glaser.political-conservatism-as-motivated-social-cog.pdf

---------

---IMO it's an indicator of the importance of the topic to people--how much they protect their own POV in light of new and shocking information.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to hlthe2b (Reply #12)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:12 PM

Star Member arthritisR_US (7,147 posts)

65. I'm with you in this. I am reserving any judgements

until the light of reason begins to shine. I don't foresee that happening for a few days yet, at least.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to hlthe2b (Reply #12)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:23 PM

JDPriestly (57,936 posts)

71. Why is HE even the subject of discussion?

It's what he is saying that is the problem.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to marions ghost (Reply #6)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:15 AM

sibelian (7,804 posts)

15. Hey, MG...


Uh, last sentence of my OP? Hinty hinty?













(I'm not doing it. Never ever EVER as long as I live will I stoop to using that stupid sarcasm tag. It's like the "Heavy IRONY" sign that popped up on-screen during that Monty Python sketch).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Reply #15)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:29 AM

marions ghost (19,841 posts)

30. Too real

What you wrote. It's like not knowing it's The Onion it's so real. LOL You captured the mentality we are seeing in a nutshell. (Lost on me initially at least in a glance).

OK thanks. myself

Here's a rec for penance...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Original post)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:12 AM

JW2020 (169 posts)

11. If only the Obama admin could dig up some dirt on him.

 

Maybe they could bug his psychiatrist's office and really find out what kind of creep he is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to JW2020 (Reply #11)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:16 AM

Dash87 (3,220 posts)

16. And then turn him into a cyborg to do their bidding.

Assimilate! Resistance is futile!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to JW2020 (Reply #11)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:16 AM

sibelian (7,804 posts)

17. Man, that would be cool.


Hey, maybe he'll turn out to be GAY? That would be awesome.

Do I sound confused?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to JW2020 (Reply #11)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:26 AM

Star Member emulatorloo (41,177 posts)

25. If only the evil Obama NSA apparatus had caught him before he leaked.

Because as you know they know EVERYTHING about EVERYBODY.

Sorry bro, it doesn't add up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to emulatorloo (Reply #25)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:29 AM

JW2020 (169 posts)

29. I was making a comparison to Watergate

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to JW2020 (Reply #29)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:01 PM

Star Member emulatorloo (41,177 posts)

44. I know

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Original post)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:18 AM

G_j (40,347 posts)

18. somehow I suspect

you forgot the sarcasm thingie...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to G_j (Reply #18)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:25 AM

sibelian (7,804 posts)

24. I point blank REFUSE to use that THING.


It is an ABOMINATION AGAINST ALL TASTE AND GOOD SENSE. And you can see from my capitalisation that my feelings on this matter are VERY STRONG.

THAT'S WHAT.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Reply #24)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:16 PM

carolinayellowdog (3,247 posts)

45. the mindset you're satirizing is so prevalent lately...

that the satirical intention flies over people's heads-- but that too is part of the story here

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Original post)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:22 AM

QC (26,371 posts)

20. He is mean to ballerinas!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to QC (Reply #20)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:30 AM

sibelian (7,804 posts)

32. Oh god. I can't even talk about that. That was the worst part.


When that story broke, my work colleagues stared at me and asked if I wa OK because I had stopped typing mid-sentence. Apparently I had turned pale and my mouth was just hanging open with a little bit of drool sliding down my jaw. Glassy-eyed. Still as Death.

I mean, how could anyone be mean to a ballerina? Just so cruel.

Everything changed in that moment.

I feel empty. Hollow.

I could go on.

(I really could, you know, for a very long time.)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Original post)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:24 AM

charlyvi (6,537 posts)

22. Does being a jerk make his information any less valuable?

Does he have to be a nice guy for his information to be true?

Richard Nixon was a disgraced crook, but he still went to China. He still signed the law that created the EPA.

Woody Allen had an affair with his girlfriend's adopted daughter, whom he later married. Does that make his movies any better or worse?.

Bad guys can do good things, good guys can do bad things. People are not one dimensional.

Sorry to be preachy, but it's a pet peeve of mine.

















Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to charlyvi (Reply #22)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:27 AM

sibelian (7,804 posts)

26. No.


It doesn't.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Original post)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:30 AM

think (11,641 posts)

31. Sure glad you brought facts and logic to this discussion

 

I never knew Snowden was a jerk.

Ron Wyden and Mark Udall must be jerks as well

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/06/justice-department-electronic-frontier-foundation-fisa-court-opinion

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to think (Reply #31)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:32 AM

sibelian (7,804 posts)

33. I can't help myself!


I just can't! After I supported him all that time.

Hours and hours of support.

It's a very emotional moment for me, you know? Him turning out to be such a big poopyhead after that ... thing he did, whatever it was. I can't remember.








(whistle....)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Reply #33)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:34 AM

think (11,641 posts)

35. My appologies

 

my sarcasm detector isn't working this AM....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to think (Reply #35)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:44 AM

marions ghost (19,841 posts)

37. I had the same problem

drink this

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to marions ghost (Reply #37)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:49 AM

think (11,641 posts)

39. LOL

 

On my way to grab another cup of joe as we speak....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to think (Reply #31)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:41 PM

tblue (16,350 posts)

74. Our govt is a bully

I don't side with bullies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Original post)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 11:33 AM

Dragonfli (10,622 posts)

41. It's worse than you think

You should know, according to John Yoo's third cousin's hairdresser, there is a scandal involving a litter of kittens a canvass bag and a river just below a bridge. It's bad, real bad.

He is a monster, I hope good men like John come forward and teach this monster a lesson!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Dragonfli (Reply #41)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 11:34 AM

sibelian (7,804 posts)

42. Do you know what else I heard?


I heard he touched a GOAT once.

A GOAT.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Reply #42)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:57 PM

OnyxCollie (9,958 posts)

57. !

 



Goat equals comedy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Original post)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 11:45 AM

Tierra_y_Libertad (50,414 posts)

43. Yep. Rumor has it that in the 3rd grade he leaked to his classmaes that 3x9=27

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Original post)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:28 PM

L0oniX (31,493 posts)

48. Just wait until he leaks pictures of Bill with Monica under the desk.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Original post)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:44 PM

sgtbenobo (327 posts)

52. I just can't stop thinking about Snowden and what a jerk you are.

 

Did someone get chocolate in your peanut butter? Poor thing.

This is why we can't have nice things!

Carry on.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sgtbenobo (Reply #52)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:54 PM

reformist2 (9,841 posts)

55. LOL! The OP sounds like a 10 year old.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to reformist2 (Reply #55)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:00 PM

sibelian (7,804 posts)

59. But..... I'm 42....


sniff

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Reply #59)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:19 PM

reformist2 (9,841 posts)

69. I'm so sorry, I see you are joking now! LOL


You're actually one of the reasonable people.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to reformist2 (Reply #55)

sibelian This message was self-deleted by its author.

Response to sgtbenobo (Reply #52)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:59 PM

sibelian (7,804 posts)

58. WHY ARE YOU BEING CRUEL TO ME?!!?!?!???!???!???!?!??!??!??!?!???!???!??!?


I'm all emotionally disturbed now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Original post)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:52 PM

Indi Guy (3,992 posts)

53. I guess you haven't seen this interview...

Please watch, then comment on his motives...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Original post)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:52 PM

Star Member alfredo (59,806 posts)

54. He didn't clap his hands when Tinkerbell's life was at stake.

Obscure reference for us old farts.


BTW, intelligence work fucks with your mind.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Original post)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:56 PM

Star Member lark (22,197 posts)

56. Would you say the same thing if this happened when Bush was president?

So, Bush and Obama do a lot of the same things for national security, but whatever Obama does is OK and anyone who says otherwise is a "dog"?

That's what this seems like anyway.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to lark (Reply #56)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:06 PM

sibelian (7,804 posts)

63. HE ABANDONED A BALLERINA !!1!111!!!11!1!!!!


How can you talk about NATIONAL SECURITY at a time like THIS?














(whistle....)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to lark (Reply #56)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:13 PM

Amonester (11,541 posts)

66. This began long before cheney/bush made it worse (and blew its secrecy).

Obama did what he could to reign it back within legal boundaries, without him ending up being labeled as BEING WEAK ON TERRA by you know who...

Besides, do you really think mcLame/palin or rmoney/lyan wouldn't have made it even worse?

So what it seems like to you is a false impression.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Original post)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:07 PM

JDPriestly (57,936 posts)

64. I take it that everyone who is criticizing Snowden's resume

has a perfect one themselves, has always gotten along with everyone, graduated with honors from school, passed every test, can run a mile in less than eight minutes, has low cholesterol, eats only the healthiest foods, finishes every task, keeps a clean house, pays every bill on time, always returns calls, can play a couple of musical instruments, repair computers and violins, speak five languages, leap over ponds, recite all the poems of Emily Dickinson and has a top secret or whatever security classification.

Well, bully for y'all, cause I'm not so perfect, and I know it, and I'm willing to admit it.

To me, Snowden looks like your usual nerdy misfit. The information he has appears at this point to be real. We haven't heard any big denials from the government.

As for Snowden, who really cares? It's his message that counts.

Don't shoot the messenger. Think about what his message, if true, means for our democracy. If you think about that, your anger will shift from Snowden to the NSA types who are destroying our self-government.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to sibelian (Original post)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 03:03 PM

vi5 (13,305 posts)

83. Me too. He hurt Dear Leader.

 

I shall not forgive him for that. It's too important that we respect and revere and defer to our leaders (Democratic only) and trust them. The minute people start speaking out and raising questions and bringing things like "the constitution" into it, no good can come of that. We just need to trust, stay silent, and obey. And at all costs praise our leaders (Democratic only). We don't want these leaders (Democratic only) to become demoralized and get the sads and then not be willing to lead us and tell us what to think and what to be outraged about.

I only hope our leaders (Democratic only) can forgive the treasonous among us and agree to continue to shine their beacons on light our way so we can see the way in these dark times of doubters and traitors.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to vi5 (Reply #83)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 04:26 AM

sibelian (7,804 posts)

84. How True! How true! Whatever Muad-dib has done...


...it is not our place to question.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread

General Discussion (Forum)
DU Home | Latest Threads | Greatest Threads | Forums & Groups | My Subscriptions | My Posts

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2023 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.