Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmowreader

(50,529 posts)
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 06:14 PM Jun 2013

Regarding the Philadelphia building collapse, I have been thinking...

does the fact that Sean Benschop, the excavator operator, was Smoking Reefers before the collapse negate the facts that...

(1) there were people not directly associated with the work in a place where the building could fall on them, and

(2) the building being demolished was not fitted with supports to reduce the odds that it would fall on the people who weren't supposed to be close enough to it to get hit by it?

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Regarding the Philadelphia building collapse, I have been thinking... (Original Post) jmowreader Jun 2013 OP
(3) The people handling the demolition didn't know what they were doing? SharonAnn Jun 2013 #1
the whole job was for 10k way to low for qualified work ceonupe Jun 2013 #2
 

ceonupe

(597 posts)
2. the whole job was for 10k way to low for qualified work
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 06:28 PM
Jun 2013

10k for a demo in a city with very close buildings is way to low if everything is followed correcly and proper engineering studies have been done.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Regarding the Philadelphi...