HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Gungeoneer-type assholes ...

Fri May 31, 2013, 04:38 PM

Gungeoneer-type assholes breathe a sigh of relief...

Last edited Sun Jun 9, 2013, 03:16 PM - Edit history (5)

Clearly I have their attention. So, listen closely:



Damn the sociopaths who hide from every gun death story and pour out of their caves to cheer at the slightest glimmer of hope that maybe, MAYBE it wasn't one of their insane tribe who did the crime this time.



Damn the apologists for the madness of "gun rights," the glib assholes who wrap themselves in the Constitution to defend gun manufacturer's profits, while children and parents die by the dozens, daily.



Who defend the indefensible tooth and nail, pushing back against all gun safety legislation with equal fervor, so the simplest of it never sees the light of day: damn them.



And if this is who you are, damn you to hell for this.



---

Original story:

(Reuters) - U.S. authorities are investigating a Texas man over threatening letters containing a deadly poison mailed to U.S. President Barack Obama and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a law enforcement official said on Friday.

(snip)

FBI investigators in Texas are questioning a man in New Boston, Texas after his wife called the police to report suspicious activity, the law enforcement source said. The agency is proceeding cautiously, and the man has not been charged, the source added.

Those letters were postmarked May 20 from Shreveport, Louisiana, according to an official briefed on the investigation. They referred to the debate over the nation's gun laws and also were sent to Bloomberg's gun control group in Washington, D.C. Initial tests showed they contained ricin.

Read More: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/31/us-usa-obama-letter-idUSBRE94T0VL20130531

335 replies, 79088 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 336 replies Author Time Post
Reply Gungeoneer-type assholes breathe a sigh of relief... (Original post)
Robb May 2013 OP
olddots May 2013 #1
Snotcicles May 2013 #26
valerief Jun 2013 #126
veganlush May 2013 #2
Twofish Jun 2013 #52
veganlush Jun 2013 #81
PearliePoo2 May 2013 #3
Robb May 2013 #5
otohara May 2013 #27
pintobean May 2013 #29
otohara May 2013 #32
PearliePoo2 May 2013 #30
rl6214 Jun 2013 #101
tblue37 Jun 2013 #67
Robb May 2013 #4
hatrack May 2013 #11
kentauros May 2013 #12
longship May 2013 #23
kentauros May 2013 #24
freshwest Jun 2013 #174
kentauros Jun 2013 #175
freshwest Jun 2013 #176
freshwest Jun 2013 #78
rl6214 Jun 2013 #102
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #148
arely staircase May 2013 #6
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #149
arely staircase Jun 2013 #154
etherealtruth May 2013 #7
Skittles May 2013 #17
abelenkpe May 2013 #20
rl6214 Jun 2013 #103
Skittles Jun 2013 #147
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #150
Skittles Jun 2013 #171
Niceguy1 May 2013 #28
Cali_Democrat May 2013 #8
Robb May 2013 #10
Parable Arable May 2013 #9
kentauros May 2013 #25
Gravitycollapse May 2013 #35
pintobean May 2013 #13
derby378 May 2013 #14
Robb May 2013 #19
leeroysphitz Jun 2013 #168
CreekDog Jun 2013 #220
oneshooter Jun 2013 #230
leeroysphitz Jun 2013 #289
premium Jun 2013 #244
In_The_Wind May 2013 #31
graham4anything May 2013 #33
rl6214 May 2013 #15
Ohio Joe May 2013 #16
Robb May 2013 #34
rl6214 Jun 2013 #105
premium Jun 2013 #108
Eleanors38 Jun 2013 #110
rl6214 Jun 2013 #111
premium Jun 2013 #112
Paladin Jun 2013 #114
premium Jun 2013 #115
derby378 Jun 2013 #169
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #151
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #208
The Magistrate May 2013 #18
freshwest Jun 2013 #79
rl6214 Jun 2013 #106
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #152
JI7 Jun 2013 #159
Progressive dog Jun 2013 #327
HockeyMom May 2013 #21
rl6214 Jun 2013 #107
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #153
DonP Jun 2013 #201
BainsBane Jun 2013 #202
Post removed Jun 2013 #204
BainsBane Jun 2013 #207
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #210
BainsBane Jun 2013 #212
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #213
BainsBane Jun 2013 #214
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #273
BainsBane Jun 2013 #216
busterbrown May 2013 #22
krispos42 May 2013 #36
Robb Jun 2013 #37
krispos42 Jun 2013 #38
Paladin Jun 2013 #39
gejohnston Jun 2013 #40
LineReply k
pintobean Jun 2013 #41
YeahSureRight Jun 2013 #42
Duckhunter935 Jun 2013 #43
ileus Jun 2013 #44
cali Jun 2013 #46
ileus Jun 2013 #47
Robb Jun 2013 #48
cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #54
premium Jun 2013 #60
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #73
cali Jun 2013 #45
aikoaiko Jun 2013 #49
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #62
X_Digger Jun 2013 #71
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #76
AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #116
Fumesucker Jun 2013 #69
former9thward Jun 2013 #50
Comrade Grumpy Jun 2013 #51
meanit Jun 2013 #53
tblue37 Jun 2013 #68
Nye Bevan Jun 2013 #55
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #56
VOX Jun 2013 #57
cali Jun 2013 #58
VOX Jun 2013 #59
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #61
Mugu Jun 2013 #63
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #64
Robb Jun 2013 #65
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #66
gejohnston Jun 2013 #70
freshwest Jun 2013 #177
Dr. Strange Jun 2013 #72
pintobean Jun 2013 #74
Eleanors38 Jun 2013 #113
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #155
Eleanors38 Jun 2013 #222
Robb Jun 2013 #235
pintobean Jun 2013 #236
Robb Jun 2013 #251
pintobean Jun 2013 #282
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #284
Decoy of Fenris Jun 2013 #285
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #75
rl6214 Jun 2013 #109
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #77
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #80
pintobean Jun 2013 #83
Union Scribe Jun 2013 #85
beevul Jun 2013 #180
BainsBane Jun 2013 #82
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #86
BainsBane Jun 2013 #88
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #89
BainsBane Jun 2013 #90
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #92
BainsBane Jun 2013 #93
pintobean Jun 2013 #95
BainsBane Jun 2013 #91
BainsBane Jun 2013 #94
Union Scribe Jun 2013 #84
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #87
aikoaiko Jun 2013 #96
Nye Bevan Jun 2013 #97
Go Vols Jun 2013 #99
BainsBane Jun 2013 #98
premium Jun 2013 #104
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #157
BainsBane Jun 2013 #183
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #237
BainsBane Jun 2013 #184
premium Jun 2013 #218
Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2013 #223
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #265
rl6214 Jun 2013 #100
AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #117
BainsBane Jun 2013 #187
AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #203
BainsBane Jun 2013 #206
AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #221
BainsBane Jun 2013 #260
AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #261
hack89 Jun 2013 #255
BainsBane Jun 2013 #257
hack89 Jun 2013 #262
AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #263
MicaelS Jun 2013 #118
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #119
premium Jun 2013 #120
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #121
premium Jun 2013 #122
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #128
premium Jun 2013 #129
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #130
premium Jun 2013 #131
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #132
premium Jun 2013 #133
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #134
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #162
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #161
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #164
Decoy of Fenris Jun 2013 #165
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #170
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #172
sarisataka Jun 2013 #205
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #160
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #226
Eleanors38 Jun 2013 #224
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #227
Eleanors38 Jun 2013 #238
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #242
Eleanors38 Jun 2013 #245
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #247
Eleanors38 Jun 2013 #250
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #252
Eleanors38 Jun 2013 #254
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #256
The Straight Story Jun 2013 #123
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #124
The Straight Story Jun 2013 #125
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #127
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #135
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #136
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #137
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #139
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #141
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #145
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #182
premium Jun 2013 #142
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #146
oneshooter Jun 2013 #178
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #179
oneshooter Jun 2013 #200
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #181
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #185
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #186
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #189
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #191
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #193
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #195
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #199
oneshooter Jun 2013 #240
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #241
oneshooter Jun 2013 #243
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #246
oneshooter Jun 2013 #290
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #291
WinkyDink Jun 2013 #249
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #258
WinkyDink Jun 2013 #248
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #259
Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2013 #239
AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #266
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #267
AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #268
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #270
AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #272
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #274
AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #286
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #287
AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #288
Decoy of Fenris Jun 2013 #271
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #275
Decoy of Fenris Jun 2013 #277
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #283
Skip Intro Jun 2013 #156
MicaelS Jun 2013 #138
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #140
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #143
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #144
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #167
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #196
Lizzie Poppet Jun 2013 #219
Eleanors38 Jun 2013 #225
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #158
Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2013 #163
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #166
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #188
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #192
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #194
Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #197
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #198
WillyT Jun 2013 #173
malaise Jun 2013 #310
galileoreloaded Jun 2013 #190
Go Vols Jun 2013 #209
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #211
BainsBane Jun 2013 #215
pintobean Jun 2013 #217
BainsBane Jun 2013 #253
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #276
Lizzie Poppet Jun 2013 #278
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #280
Decoy of Fenris Jun 2013 #281
BainsBane Jun 2013 #292
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #295
BainsBane Jun 2013 #293
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #279
Crabby Appleton Jun 2013 #296
snooper2 Jun 2013 #228
oneshooter Jun 2013 #229
snooper2 Jun 2013 #232
oneshooter Jun 2013 #233
snooper2 Jun 2013 #234
AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #264
Duckhunter935 Jun 2013 #269
snooper2 Jun 2013 #294
cali Jun 2013 #231
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #297
BainsBane Jun 2013 #298
Dr. Strange Jun 2013 #301
BainsBane Jun 2013 #302
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #309
Dr. Strange Jun 2013 #313
BainsBane Jun 2013 #315
Dr. Strange Jun 2013 #316
BainsBane Jun 2013 #319
Dr. Strange Jun 2013 #323
BainsBane Jun 2013 #325
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #299
BainsBane Jun 2013 #300
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #304
BainsBane Jun 2013 #307
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #308
BainsBane Jun 2013 #311
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #314
BainsBane Jun 2013 #317
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #318
BainsBane Jun 2013 #320
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #321
BainsBane Jun 2013 #322
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #324
BainsBane Jun 2013 #326
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #328
premium Jun 2013 #329
BainsBane Jun 2013 #330
CokeMachine Jun 2013 #331
BainsBane Jun 2013 #332
Lurker Dave Jun 2013 #303
mwrguy Jun 2013 #305
oneshooter Jun 2013 #306
BainsBane Jun 2013 #312
Iggo Jun 2013 #333
BainsBane Jun 2013 #334
CokeMachine Jul 2013 #335
CokeMachine Jul 2013 #336

Response to Robb (Original post)

Fri May 31, 2013, 04:41 PM

1. Ricin doesn't kill people ---people kill people

 

ass wipe logic at work .

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to olddots (Reply #1)

Fri May 31, 2013, 07:31 PM

26. Real men don't use Ricin. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to olddots (Reply #1)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 12:09 PM

126. Babies are people. People kill people. Babies kill babies. Babies kill people.

If only the world had more guns and fewer babies.

Gungeoneer logic.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Fri May 31, 2013, 04:53 PM

2. If all muslims are terrorists

then all gun lovers are terrorists too

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to veganlush (Reply #2)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 12:41 PM

52. Stay classy.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Twofish (Reply #52)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 09:23 PM

81. huh?

?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Fri May 31, 2013, 04:54 PM

3. That didn't take long...

But it does speed things up a bit that the guy's wife busted him. I guess that marriage is over.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to PearliePoo2 (Reply #3)

Fri May 31, 2013, 07:32 PM

27. If I Were Her - I'd Bolt

 

fly somewhere far, far away.

In case it's not him and they let him go.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to otohara (Reply #27)

Fri May 31, 2013, 07:42 PM

29. He's claiming she did it and set him up

 

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57587176/texas-couple-blames-each-other-for-ricin-laced-letters/

A Texas woman has told investigators her husband may have sent ricin-laced letters to President Barack Obama, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Bloomberg's Washington-based gun control group, CBS News' Anna Werner reports. But the woman's husband has accused his wife, saying he was set up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pintobean (Reply #29)

Fri May 31, 2013, 08:00 PM

32. Whoa

 

this should make for an interesting Dateline or 48 Hours.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to otohara (Reply #27)

Fri May 31, 2013, 07:48 PM

30. I read where they have a bunch of kids too.

I feel sorry for those kids, having a fucked-up father (if it's indeed him) and having that notoriety/association pinned on them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PearliePoo2 (Reply #30)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:37 AM

101. Fucked up mother you should say.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to otohara (Reply #27)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 03:36 PM

67. In the most recent article I read, she admitted to sending the letters and then

blaming her husband.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Fri May 31, 2013, 05:01 PM

4. Full text of the letter:

“You will have to kill me and my family before you get my guns. Anyone wants to come to my house will get shot in the face. The Right to bare arms is my constitutional, God-given right and I will exercise that right till the day I die. What’s in this letter is nothing compared to what I’ve got planned for you.”


http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2013/05/31/ricin-letters-investigation-centers-on-small-texas-town/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Reply #4)

Fri May 31, 2013, 05:09 PM

11. . . . . .

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Reply #4)

Fri May 31, 2013, 05:13 PM

12. If only he understood what the "Right to bare arms" truly meant...



However, I do hope they're able to arrest him without any gun violence. What a nut!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kentauros (Reply #12)

Fri May 31, 2013, 07:08 PM

23. But at least he won't be wearing a shirt with sleeves.

How else would one express ones right for bare arms?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to longship (Reply #23)

Fri May 31, 2013, 07:23 PM

24. True.

He also doesn't seem like the kind of guy to roll up his sleeves and get down to business. Then again, orange jumpsuits don't normally allow for that, right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kentauros (Reply #12)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:45 PM

174. The right to bare arms. Do. Not. Start. With. Her.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to freshwest (Reply #174)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 07:50 PM

175. Thanks for the laugh!



Let's all bare arms together

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kentauros (Reply #175)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:05 PM

176. Gives new meaning to that form letter. Not so threatening after all...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Reply #4)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 09:17 PM

78. Isn't this a form letter? Same wording on every wackjob libertarian, GOP, teabag, gun site.

The wording is so close, even the same spelling errors, that I can't help but wonder if they copied it.





Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to freshwest (Reply #78)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:40 AM

102. The actual story doesn't quite fit your narrative

 

Does it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to freshwest (Reply #78)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 04:50 PM

148. You are cute!! Don't you think you should

 

edit this at least five times and include photos or something?? You type are funny -- not really!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Fri May 31, 2013, 05:06 PM

6. the best protection against bad presidents with guns is

a good guy with ricin?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to arely staircase (Reply #6)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 04:52 PM

149. Would that NOW be good gal with ricin?? Jumped the shark didn't you? nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #149)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:01 PM

154. indeed

or better yet, a good angry made for Lifetime Network getting divorced gal with ricin.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Fri May 31, 2013, 05:07 PM

7. So, is this jackass considered a "good guy" with a gun? n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to etherealtruth (Reply #7)

Fri May 31, 2013, 06:28 PM

17. he absolutely symbolizes the NRA

Last edited Fri May 31, 2013, 07:02 PM - Edit history (1)

coward, paranoid, bully

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skittles (Reply #17)

Fri May 31, 2013, 06:45 PM

20. + 1000 nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skittles (Reply #17)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:40 AM

103. Wrong.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rl6214 (Reply #103)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 03:37 PM

147. yes, the NRA is INDEED wrong

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skittles (Reply #17)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 04:53 PM

150. What does his wife symbolize -- care to edit at least five times??

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #150)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:32 PM

171. the mentally ill wife absolves all gun humpers!!!!!!

no edits needed!!!!!!!!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to etherealtruth (Reply #7)

Fri May 31, 2013, 07:40 PM

28. by the controllers

Most people would denounce him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Fri May 31, 2013, 05:08 PM

8. I wonder what his handle at the gungeon is. n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cali_Democrat (Reply #8)

Fri May 31, 2013, 05:09 PM

10. "Was." nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Fri May 31, 2013, 05:08 PM

9. Where has everyone gotten access to ricin all of a sudden?

Have all of our lunatics transformed into Walter White?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Parable Arable (Reply #9)

Fri May 31, 2013, 07:24 PM

25. Well, it's obvious it's all coming from San Francisco:

Ricin Roni.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Parable Arable (Reply #9)

Fri May 31, 2013, 10:58 PM

35. It's actually very easy to produce from castor beans

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Fri May 31, 2013, 05:18 PM

13. If Bloomberg is claiming he was sent poison

 

it might only be sugar.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pintobean (Reply #13)

Fri May 31, 2013, 05:19 PM

14. FTW! (n/t)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to derby378 (Reply #14)

Fri May 31, 2013, 06:42 PM

19. Ricin letters are hilarious!

Comedy gold, eh boys?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Reply #19)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:24 PM

168. Hey, lighten up. Go lecture somewhere else. Sheese.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leeroysphitz (Reply #168)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 08:49 AM

220. he's got almost 100 recs, sounds like his lecture is more popular than yours

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CreekDog (Reply #220)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:19 PM

230. Looks to me like he is rapidly loosing that "popular" vote.

Recs down to 53. Tends to happen to less than truthful postings.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CreekDog (Reply #220)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 07:26 PM

289. Maybe, but you can't deny that people need to lighten up around here.

 

And honestly getting a lot of recs on THIS web site has nothing, I mean NOTHING to do with being right.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Reply #19)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 03:00 PM

244. About as much comedy gold as

 

your 5 time edited thread.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pintobean (Reply #13)

Fri May 31, 2013, 07:51 PM

31. Not funny!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pintobean (Reply #13)


Response to Robb (Original post)

Fri May 31, 2013, 05:19 PM

15. Did you miss the part where it says he has not been charged with anything?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Fri May 31, 2013, 05:23 PM

16. ahhh, another murderous gun nut...

Murder seems to be their response to everything they don't like.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #16)

Fri May 31, 2013, 10:40 PM

34. When all you have is a hammer, the world's full of nails. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Reply #34)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:42 AM

105. And when you are wrong, you are wrong

 

But we ll never find you admitting that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rl6214 (Reply #105)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:46 AM

108. Nope.

 

He edits it 5 times and then posts pictures that have zero to do with the original story, then, to top it off, he launches an attack on member DU'ers.
Pure comedy gold.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to premium (Reply #108)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:57 AM

110. And evidently with DU blessings. NT

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to premium (Reply #108)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:02 AM

111. Didn't notice the five edits

 

That just makes my opinion of him and his little clubhouse go that much higher

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rl6214 (Reply #111)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:04 AM

112. Like I said,

 

pure comedy gold from this one.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to premium (Reply #112)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:32 AM

114. Are those photos of grieving families a source of amusement for you?


I'm not a bit surprised.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Paladin (Reply #114)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:36 AM

115. Nope,

 

what's a source of amusement to me is the fact that Robb's story turned out to be pure bull shit and instead of apologizing or deleting, he posts pics that has nothing to do with the story and then, predictably, launches an attack on member DU'ers.

Seems you also, can't see the irony in this, but, why am I not surprised?

Like I said, more comedy gold.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to premium (Reply #115)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:29 PM

169. Still, you have to admit...

Even if you don't agree with Robb's stand on gun control, at least he's a couple of levels above certain folks who just liked to stir up shit, and now they're curled up on the floor and sucking their thumbs.

That said, yes, that was a heckuva lot of editing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Paladin (Reply #114)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 04:56 PM

151. Are the bullshit edits to avoid the jury funny to you??

 

Same shit different edit??

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Paladin (Reply #114)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:40 PM

208. Wait, that sounds familiar...oh, yeah: "You don't care about dead kids"

From a list of catchphrases beloved by you lot:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/11729858#post125

Great thread to bookmark!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Fri May 31, 2013, 06:30 PM

18. Interesting Times, Sir

The whole 'law-abiding gun owner' line is in the same class as 'jumbo shrimp': the demands of their fantasy lives as heroic slayers of 'thugs' and resistors to 'tyranny' require them to adopt an attitude of 'bending the rules' and 'defying authorities' in the pinch when the gun is in hand. So their actual attitude to the law is not 'I will obey the law' but rather 'I will decide which laws I will obey', and yet still their own conviction they are righteous and law-abiding people allows them to feel they are not criminally inclined when they harbor the intent to break laws at will, and even to believe that they are not criminals when they actually break laws.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Magistrate (Reply #18)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 09:22 PM

79. You keep on posting that, and it gets better every time. Needs to be said. Thanks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Magistrate (Reply #18)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:44 AM

106. And again, when you are wrong you are wrong

 

But the story doesn't fit tour narrative so you won't admit it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Magistrate (Reply #18)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 04:58 PM

152. Please see the edits -- that poor shark has been jumped so many times the last day or so, Sir. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Magistrate (Reply #18)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:14 PM

159. certainly the case with the thug zimmerman

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Magistrate (Reply #18)

Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:50 PM

327. ^^^K&R^^^

Nicely stated.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Fri May 31, 2013, 07:06 PM

21. Take away his guns?

They will now take away his body and put it in prison.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Reply #21)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:44 AM

107. Wrong again

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Reply #21)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 04:59 PM

153. What will they do with his wife??

 

Now that the facts have come out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HockeyMom (Reply #21)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 10:36 PM

201. Apparently it's the wives of "gun nutz" that are assholes and belong in prison

 

funny how that works out in the end.

But keep on believing the myth.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonP (Reply #201)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 10:43 PM

202. one threat vs 38,000 homicides a year

brought to you by the nation's gun nuts. Not to mention all the lunatic gun nuts who have threatened the President or their ex-wives.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #202)


Response to Post removed (Reply #204)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:38 PM

207. "Pitiful ilk"

Yes, I'll stand with the "pitiful ilk" of the Democratic Party rather than corporate profits in trying to make this country a safer place. You can continue to celebrate cleptocarcy and the erosion of Democracy that keeps provisions with overwhelming majority support (ranging from 60-90% ) from being passed. As long as the gun lobby continues to profit from murder, especially the deaths of people of color, women and children, all is right with the world.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #207)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:51 PM

210. The overwhelming majority of the overwhelmingly Democratic IL legislature...

...just passed a CCW bill-by a supermajority vote in both houses, and the best you lot can come up with for an
explanation is to blame "downstate Republican voters".

No state whatsoever has repealed any concealed carry law, and the only states that DO have
new gun control laws were already antigun. Can you say 'false consensus'?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False-consensus_effect

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/002210317790049X

The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes

Lee Ross, David Greene, Pamela House

Stanford University USA

Evidence from four studies demonstrates that social observers tend to perceive a “false consensus” with respect to the relative commonness of their own responses. A related bias was shown to exist in the observers' social inferences. Thus, raters estimated particular responses to be relatively common and relatively unrevealing concerning the actors' distinguishing personal dispositions when the responses in question were similar to the raters' own responses; responses differing from those of the rater, by contrast, were perceived to be relatively uncommon and revealing of the actor. These results were obtained both in questionnaire studies presenting subjects with hypothetical situations and choices and in authentic conflict situations. The implications of these findings for our understanding of social perception phenomena and for our analysis of the divergent perceptions of actors and observers are discussed. Finally, cognitive and perceptual mechanisms are proposed which might account for distortions in perceived consensus and for corresponding biases in social inference and attributional processes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #210)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:34 AM

212. False consensus means

Polling data that you don't agree with. Oh, but then you ignore polling data don't you? It's awful when people care about human life, isn't it? So much better when they focus only on their own desire to stockpile weapons and generate corporate profits for merchants of death. You can take comfort in the fact that we don't have a democracy in this country. The forces of death and greed prevail. So keep celebrating the corporate controlled-cleptocracy that fulfills the gun lobby's agenda. It keeps the poor unemployed, starving, and dying from the first world's highest rate of gun violence. All is right in the bloody, diseased world the gun lobby made.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #212)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:47 AM

213. I provide an example of DEMOCRATS disagreeing with you, and the best you can...

...come up with is the equivalent of "You don't care about dead kids"

http://www.democraticunderground.com/11729858#post125

Holy shit, gun control advocacy really is mostly religious belief; when confronted by inconvenient evidence,
you lot chant one of the catchphrases mentioned here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/11729858

and think you've accomplished something. Hell, you've even got an egomanaical charlatan
that's very much the equal of Pat Robertson leading you these days. Preacher Mike knows
how to con the rubes just like Preacher Pat.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #213)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:00 AM

214. YOu provided an example of corporate cleptocracy

A state legislature. Gun control advocacy is a respect for human life about profits and the desire to murder. Democrats do not oppose gun control. In fact, Republican voters don't either, as opposed to their political representatives. Polling data shows that the Tea Party is the only political demographic with majority opposition to gun control. All you've shown is how powerful corporate interests are, and how you approve of their goals.

I don't know what you think you're linking to but the point is obvious. People set political priorities. A respect for human life over profits and guns is a clear moral issue. Some who hold that view are religious, some are not. To pretend that the issue is anything other than a moral concern says a great deal about someone's value system. We as people decide if we will save lives or promote policies that kill. If someone votes for war, they promote policies that kill people. If someone works against universal healthcare, they are making a conscious choice to allow people to die, and the same is true for those who oppose gun control. Politics in general is a series of moral choices. Democrats care about what is just and what is best for the majority of the country rather than a small minority. That is the nature of political responsibility.

Of course we would have better research to gauge gun policy on if the NRA had not succeeded in stifling free speech for decades by prohibiting federally funded research on guns.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #214)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 06:20 PM

273. Instead of Satan, you lot have "the gun lobby" for a boogeyman.

Also, you seem to have missed what you termed a "corporate cleptocracy" did a
couple of weeks ago-right around the time they passed that CCW law:

Shout out to Illinois.14th state to call for a constitutional amendment to rid elections of corp. $

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022933317

http://www.citizen.org/pressroom/pressroomredirect.cfm?ID=3902

note: emphasis added



May 31, 2013

Momentum Grows: Illinois Becomes the 14th State to Back Constitutional Amendment to Allow Limits on Election Spending

Statement of Aquene Freechild, Senior Organizer, Public Citizen’s Democracy Is For People Campaign

Today, Illinois became the 14th state to call for a constitutional amendment to rid elections of corporate money and unlimited spending. This bipartisan action by the Illinois General Assembly demonstrates continuing national momentum to overturn the U.S. Supreme Court’s controversial Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling.

Illinois is the third state in the past month and a half to call for an amendment; West Virginia and Maine passed similar resolutions last month.

The effort in Illinois was bipartisan, underscoring what poll data have shown: People of all political stripes are deeply concerned about corporations having too much influence over our democratic process. A measure calling for a constitutional amendment was on ballots across Illinois in November and was supported by three-quarters of voters.

Illinois ranks fifth among U.S. states in population and has been called the state that most closely mirrors the demographics of the country.




By all means keep rejecting information that contradicts your dogma. That way, you'll continue to
enjoy the same level of success you've been enjoying all along...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #213)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 02:02 AM

216. This guy is so much better than "Preacher Mike"

?w=300&h=225

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Fri May 31, 2013, 07:08 PM

22. I hope the American Flags come out when they catch this guy...

Seriously if I lived near the spot where he is arrested, I’d get some friends and wave our flag..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Fri May 31, 2013, 11:01 PM

36. Wait...

...he didn't shoot him from a mile away with a .50-cal rifle? Or whip up a plastic gun in his basement and shoot Obama on the White House couch during a tour?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to krispos42 (Reply #36)

Sat Jun 1, 2013, 10:00 AM

37. You sound disappointed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Reply #37)

Sat Jun 1, 2013, 10:37 AM

38. The MSN had given me such high expectations.

n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to krispos42 (Reply #38)

Sat Jun 1, 2013, 12:10 PM

39. Disappointed, are you? I hope that's not the case.


Maybe you just forgot to add a sarcasm alert to your post. You've been doing the gun thing for a long time here at DU, so you ought to know how necessary such warnings are.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Sat Jun 8, 2013, 12:33 AM

40. update with a twist

Last edited Sat Jun 8, 2013, 01:13 AM - Edit history (1)

Instead, it's the man's wife. And it could be that the motivation behind the letters had nothing to do with Bloomberg's or Obama's efforts to tighten the nation's gun laws.

"Shannon Richardson has been arrested. ... Shannon's husband, Nathan Richardson, was named as a person of interest after Shannon contacted authorities about a suspicious substance she found in their refrigerator. Nathan Richardson was questioned by the FBI last week and released. ... Attorney John Delk says his client, Nathan Richardson, approached him [last year] about getting a divorce. ... 'We have very good reason to believe it was a setup,' said Delk."

What happened to just filing for divorce? Or was it a publicity stunt to help her not so steller acting career?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Robb (Original post)

Sat Jun 8, 2013, 05:41 AM

42. Texas Terrorist sends poison to Obama, Bloomberg

 

Fixed your headline

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 09:01 AM

43. going to comment

 

now that the facts do not support your narrative.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 09:18 AM

44. Gun nut indeed....

LOL...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ileus (Reply #44)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 09:19 AM

46. you mean apart from the FACT that he didn't do it, his wife did

 

in order to frame him. They're in the midst of a divorce.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cali (Reply #46)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 09:24 AM

47. no no....it was a gun nut, they told me so.

When the story about the mail first hit....

Kinda like they told me it was a gun nut in Boston.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ileus (Reply #47)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 10:16 AM

48. You must be so relieved!

I mean, phew, right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Reply #48)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 12:52 PM

54. No more relieved than you were disheartened Robb. As is evidenced by this whole thread...

 

I mean, awwww, right?

Confirmation bias is a bitch for both sides of most issues.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Reply #48)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 01:24 PM

60. You must be so disappointed!

 

I mean, damn, right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Reply #48)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 04:14 PM

73. I feel your pain. No, really I do!!

 

You must have a sad because you can't blame this on RKBA folks. You are one funny dude -- bless your heart

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 09:18 AM

45. uh, it turned out that it was the wife trying to frame the husband.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 11:08 AM

49. LoL - watching the uninformed indignation was fun.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aikoaiko (Reply #49)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 01:56 PM

62. It will be *most* amusing to refer back to this thread- bookmark it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to X_Digger (Reply #71)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 04:25 PM

76. Ah, yes. Thanks for reposting that.

I note that a couple of the more factually-challenged gun control advocates seem to have given up
gun control advocacy

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #62)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 10:18 AM

116. Bookmarking this thread is the only way to locate it again.

version 5.0 already.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aikoaiko (Reply #49)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 03:43 PM

69. Not uninformed so much as misinformed

But yeah, it's pretty funny in retrospect.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 11:16 AM

50. And you will do another knee jerk post....

when law enforcement makes yet another mistake. You can hardly wait.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 12:38 PM

51. The baiting content of this OP serves no productive purpose.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 12:46 PM

53. So his lawyer says he didn't do it,

and it's case closed? This is far from over.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to meanit (Reply #53)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 03:38 PM

68. No--but his wife's CONFESSION that she did

it and then tried to frame him probably should be taken into consideration.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 12:57 PM

55. Those who advocate not jumping to conclusions are vindicated....

reminds of how *obvious* it was that the Boston Jihadists were actually teabagging tax-protesting types, since they blew up their bombs on April 15.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 01:12 PM

56. Poor Robb -- another epic fail!!

 

Does the bansalot group know their leader jumped the shark?

Happy Sunday!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)


Response to VOX (Reply #57)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 01:17 PM

58. bzzzt fail

 

his wife did it to frame him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cali (Reply #58)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 01:20 PM

59. So I now see. Blitzed my post. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 01:49 PM

61. Kick nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 03:02 PM

63. Kick n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 03:08 PM

64. Why'd you change the original headline, Robb? "Gun nut sends poison to Obama, Bloomberg."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #64)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 03:12 PM

65. Show us on the bear where the gun safety advocate hurt you.

Don't worry, you're among friends.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Reply #65)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 03:34 PM

66. Not the first time one of you lot has been caught peddling faith-promoting rumor

It's okay, Robb- we understand that "higher truth" is more important that grubby fact.

Your OP ranks with this one:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/117280286

Three more innocent people shot today in FL
by a previously law abiding gun owner...


http://www.democraticunderground.com/117280286#post31

31. He wasn't law-biding. Previous violent felony arrests.

You have been solidly caught making stuff up for your agenda. Commonly called lying.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/dead-central-fla-beauty-salon-shooting-17509338#.UICHe2_7IkQ

Records in Florida and Rhode Island show Baumet has been previously arrested for domestic assault, felony assault, stalking, burglary and drug possession.

The article doesn't specifically say but I would bet that there are some convictions in there too.

Mugshot here: http://mugshots.com/US-Counties/Florida/Seminole-County-FL/Bradford-Baumet.2558615.html


There was also the African-American white supremacist, the "man with an AK47 in Moscow, Idaho",
and the "gun control activist" that claimed to work for Cease-Fire Oregon in Portland and the United Nations
in Italy-simultaneously...



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Reply #65)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 03:52 PM

70. Not me personally, but

Kikko Smith is a distant cousin. Four handguns and an TEC 9, which the original WP article inaccurately described as a submachine gun.
http://www.fact.on.ca/news/news0101/wp010124.htm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Reply #65)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:11 PM

177. OMG! It took a couple of scans to get the meaning of that. ROTFLMFAO! n/t

You made me laugh out loud. C'mon, milk and cookies for everyone!



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 04:08 PM

72. Good Lord, you've really edited the hell out of your original post.

Started out simply enough...

Gun nut sends poison to Obama, Bloomberg.

(Reuters) - U.S. authorities are investigating a Texas man over threatening letters containing a deadly poison mailed to U.S. President Barack Obama and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a law enforcement official said on Friday.

(snip)

FBI investigators in Texas are questioning a man in New Boston, Texas after his wife called the police to report suspicious activity, the law enforcement source said. The agency is proceeding cautiously, and the man has not been charged, the source added.

Those letters were postmarked May 20 from Shreveport, Louisiana, according to an official briefed on the investigation. They referred to the debate over the nation's gun laws and also were sent to Bloomberg's gun control group in Washington, D.C. Initial tests showed they contained ricin.

Read More: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/31/us-usa-obama-letter-idUSBRE94T0VL20130531


but by the time it's over, I suspect this will be a musical about terrorists trying to infiltrate America and make us carry guns made out of sugar, that can be converted into wiretapping devices (but only by someone who smokes).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dr. Strange (Reply #72)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 04:16 PM

74. Totally screwed the 25 reccers.

 

What a guy. I wonder if any of them would rec calling fellow DUers assholes.
It's also jury proof - alerts on the OP go directly to admin. Talk about gaming the system.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pintobean (Reply #74)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:28 AM

113. Perhaps (he said oh-so cautiously) the plan all along.

 

It seems the OP has more important matters than gun-control and the safety of the public on his mind; to wit, showing his ___________ in front of everyone, and giggling in the dark about how he gets away with it.

And he may have a little help in doing this.

You would think that gun controllers would be happy with three (3) fora/groups in which to pump their gas; the Gungeon (open debate), BansaLot (controlled show) and GD (Guns-Dogs). But no, some have to stage craft a hate fest with impunity, hoping to "alert" someone & have their friends "hide it," and go dancing about with another scalp. Goes on a lot.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eleanors38 (Reply #113)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:06 PM

155. That's their Schick.

 

But some are friends of the family -- so to speak?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #155)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:41 AM

222. And they all show up for the reunion! Imagine!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pintobean (Reply #74)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:13 PM

235. It's 53 reccers, actually. More than half came after the last revision.

Creekdog downthread is mistaken, of course, this never garnered 100 recs. I've only had two threads that topped 100 since DU3, IIRC:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1018132003

and

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022507952

I wonder if any of them would rec calling fellow DUers assholes.


More simply, it would appear many DUers tire of politely hiding their contempt for the selfish assholes who value the profits of gun manufacturers over the lives of the men, women and children killed every year for their efforts.

Goodness knows I do. And I don't think I'm going to, any more.

And:

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Reply #235)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:33 PM

236. Creekdog is never mistaken

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pintobean (Reply #236)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 05:09 PM

251. Well, it seems I was wrong just now.

It's 55 recs, not 53.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Reply #251)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 06:32 PM

282. 56 and counting

 

but we rarely know why people rec. With so many posters mocking this thread, many of the reccers could just be enjoying the entertainment value.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Reply #251)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 06:37 PM

284. I'll rec it for ya, Robb. It *should* be seen far and wide.

Probably not for the reason(s) you intended, though...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #284)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 06:38 PM

285. I'm saving my k/r for a few months from now. :P n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dr. Strange (Reply #72)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 04:17 PM

75. Now that was funny!! Thanks!!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dr. Strange (Reply #72)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:55 AM

109. Now now, don't be so tough on him

 

If you are that tough he will only post in his own little clubhouse so no one but his fellow club members can reply to him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 09:11 PM

77. Resorting to strawmen because your original headline blew up in your face?

Pathetic.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 09:23 PM

80. You *might* want to ease up on the Pat Robertson grade self-righteousness.

I've seen several "red-hot" gun control advocates here at DU flame out over the years, and none of them
are still active...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #80)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 09:44 PM

83. He titled his 5th edit "Here endeth the lesson"

 

A quote from Sean Connery as Jim Malone in the movie "The Untouchables".

Another quote of his:
"They pull a knife, you pull a gun. He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue."

What a violent gun movie.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pintobean (Reply #83)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 09:51 PM

85. I wonder if the reference

was to the lesson he should have learned, or the one he thinks he taught.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Union Scribe (Reply #85)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:30 PM

180. If theres a lesson here at all to be learned...

 

It may be this:

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 09:26 PM

82. They arrested his wife

as you probably know by now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #82)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 09:54 PM

86. But, but, but does the bansalot group know that their

 

fearless leader (maybe not after 5 edits) was/is looking (IMHO) like a total (just can't come up with the correct word)?

Note to jury -- check out the edits in the OP. It's very telling.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #86)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 10:24 PM

88. Juries don't see posts over 24 hours old

Tough luck.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #88)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 10:51 PM

89. Your math or clock is wrong!!

 

I was responding to you -- Unless I slept through Monday, I do believe it's been less than 24 hours since my post (To You), it may be be even less than 1 hour depending on you're clock.

Have a good night.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #89)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 11:03 PM

90. Oh, I hadn't thought of that

I suppose I could oblige you though. I don't suppose it occurred to you that an OP that is ten days old isn't going to have news released since?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #90)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 11:11 PM

92. It did occur to me but maybe not the OP.

 

Have you checked out the edits? All made well after the Jury deadline passed, to me that's gaming the jury system(:shrug. I assume you are also OK with a group host calling all members of a DU group "ASSHOLES". To each their own I guess.

Take Care,
CM

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #92)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 11:13 PM

93. Actually what I'm not okay with

is murder apology. To each his own, I guess. (Not that I'm accusing anyone here of doing that, of course.)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #90)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:09 AM

95. At the time of the original OP

 

it was a she-said, he-said situation. That was pointed out in post #29. Remember, this story came on the heels of another ricin set-up story. Apparently, the OP went with the she-said, due to the letter that was a caricature of a gun nut. That was just too juicy, and fit the OP's narrative. The OP could have been edited as facts were known, but it wasn't. Yesterday, in another thread, the OP got cocky with someone who said they wanted to wait for more facts before commenting on a story. I reminded the OP about this thread, which caused it to get kicked. It's resurrection inspired the editing mess we see now. It's not about facts, it's about the narrative. The actual facts weren't included in any of the edits, just more blaming people here who are not responsible for this crime.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #86)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 11:06 PM

91. It does beg the question that since you hate Democrats so much

. . .

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #86)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 11:40 PM

94. alerter

Robb and the others referred to in this post are Democrats. Just to answer your question and clear up any confusion. Cheers!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 09:49 PM

84. Is there a signup so I can get a text

when you edit this again? I hate missing it when the self-righteous fall on their face, then get up and proceed to do so again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Union Scribe (Reply #84)

Sun Jun 9, 2013, 10:06 PM

87. I hope those face plants don't leave a scar!!!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 06:07 AM

96. It's really low of you to hide behind grieving parents...



...when you merely had to admit you we're wrong.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aikoaiko (Reply #96)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 07:20 AM

97. Not Robb's finest hour. A simple apology and self-delete would have been much better (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nye Bevan (Reply #97)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:29 AM

99. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aikoaiko (Reply #96)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:12 AM

98. Wrong about the fact 38,000 people are killed by guns every year

and gun zealots are more concerned with their own egos than those lives? No, he's not wrong. We witness it every single day.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #98)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:42 AM

104. And what do these pictures have to do with the original story?

 

Or the fact that Robb was wrong and can't admit it, instead, he launches an attack on member DU'ers?

BTW, that 38,000 number, appox. 2/3 are suicides.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to premium (Reply #104)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:10 PM

157. Don't burden that one with facts.

 

I gave up on it when it accused me of hating Democrats. They have what they have and it's all weak -- didn't mean an insult to weak.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #157)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:01 PM

183. Are you suggesting Robb and the "grabalot" group you insulted aren't Democrats?

or that you don't oppose the President's policies on gun control and the position taken by the overwhelming majority of Democrats (and even Republicans)?

You got your feelings hurt. That's so much worse then 38,000 people dying every year.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #183)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:39 PM

237. It's "bansalot" get the term correct please.

 

I do like the term "grabalot" but as far as I know very few guns have been grabbed by real Democrats. There are a few here that do propose confiscating guns but I consider them authoritarians not Democrats.

As for the rest of your post -- thanks but I'm not playing your game.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to premium (Reply #104)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:02 PM

184. The pictures are some of the families who have had loved ones killed from guns

Deal with it. That is what happens when corporate interests and their lackeys promote gun proliferation above human life. Hiding from that reality doesn't make it go away.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #184)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 07:54 AM

218. He gets the story wrong, edits it 5 times,

 

posts pics that have nothing to do with the original story, or the real story, launches an attack on member DU'ers, gets called out on that.
Deal with it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #184)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:59 AM

223. Those grieving families are stage props

Most guns deaths are self-inflicted but instead of treating suicide and depression gun control advocates focus on guns while leaving people in mental torment. You see, if they actually treated the mental illness then the gun would no longer an issue. So, its obviously better for them to allow 20,000 tormented souls kill themselves each year just so gun control advocates have enough puppets to parade around in the name of a political agenda.

Semi-automatic long guns comprise less than 4% of annual gun deaths and even fewer when employed in a rampage. Yet, the focus is almost exclusively on an "assault" weapon ban (even though no military primarily outfits itself with semi-auto only rifles).

Personally, I am relieved that gun control advocates don't own guns. They can't properly identify their own targets, they are wholly lacking in marksmanship and far too many -- as demonstrated by the OP -- are too emotionally agitated to be trusted with lethal force.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nuclear Unicorn (Reply #223)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 05:45 PM

265. I think I love you +1000

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:36 AM

100. Nice spin

 

Didn't play out the way you wanted did it? You keep on spinning it the way it will fit your narrative. Surprise you aren't posting in your private little club house so there can't be any dissenting view expressed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 10:18 AM

117. You seem bitter.

Are you feeling ok? Is there anything we can do to help?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AtheistCrusader (Reply #117)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:09 PM

187. Sure

Get the murder apologists to relinquish their opposition to background checks and gun safes, for starters.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #187)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 10:59 PM

203. Well, calling them 'murder apologists' doesn't foster a productive discussion

however, I am on board with background checks and safe storage requirements. No disagreement with you there.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AtheistCrusader (Reply #203)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:24 PM

206. When there was a thread about the NRA opposing laws

requiring parent to store guns in safes, some on this site actually said that it was unduly burdensome, that it interfered with their "self defense." Those are people without the most basic regard for the lives of children. I say we lock anyone up for 20 years if they gun gets in the wrong hands. End of story.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #206)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 09:32 AM

221. I would call it a rhetorical trick: perfect/enemy of the good.

Reporting requirements when your gun is stolen is no burden at all. In fact, most police departments are QUITE good at returning such stolen property.
Storage requirements may hurt your access to your firearms when you are not there. That's it. There are quick access safes, and you can even let your safe stand open when you are home, allowing unfettered access to the loaded and ready to go firearms.

Pretending it would be a burden (for instance, interfering when you NEED a gun) seems pretty flimsy of an argument to me.

We also have other incentives, like tax-free gun safes, free gun locks, etc.

As for the 20 year thing, I would disagree with you there, if in the case the owner has taken reasonable measures to secure the firearms. I have a co-worker that actually got broken into, alarm cut, and they busted open his Liberty safe and took his guns. I think he did due diligence in preventing that, and no jeopardy should come to him for it. (He also reported the theft, and a week later, the weapons were recovered and returned to him)

Now, had he left them lying in the middle of his living room floor, well, that seems a tad negligent to me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AtheistCrusader (Reply #221)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 05:35 PM

260. I'm talking about parents that leave their guns around

and their kids use them to kill someone. Or the parent that shoots his kid while cleaning a weapon. These people rarely face prosecution. The point is the NRA works assiduously to ensure owners do not take measures to secure firearms, and DUers here defend their actions. So I'm not talking about a 20 yr term for someone who locks the gun in the safe. I'm talking about imprisoning people who leave their guns lying around for children to kill themselves or others with. 20 years is light, as far as I'm concerned.

All the celebrating and nose rubbing after the defeat of background checks exposed as a complete lie the notion that most gun zealots on this site supported all of the presidents measures except the AWB. Many have made clear the only thing they support is more guns.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #260)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 05:38 PM

261. Tend to agree.

We've had (not you and I, but the gungeon as a group) some contentious threads on this. I think the 'nay' side argument boils down to the parent having been 'punished enough' since their kid is dead.

I don't accept that. I can point to two local cases where 'joe citizen' went to jail for leaving a gun in a car with a kid, and getting out, and another where an off-duty officer did the same thing, and got off scot free.

I have a problem with that, just as you. Both are criminal negligence in my mind.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #206)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 05:31 PM

255. No

it was merely pointed out that storage laws have to be written to not run afoul of Heller. Heller, after all, was a case about the DC storage law.

Storage laws are perfectly legal if written correctly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hack89 (Reply #255)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 05:33 PM

257. false

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #257)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 05:39 PM

262. False about Heller? Don't think so. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #257)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 05:39 PM

263. I'm not clear on what you are disagreeing about.

Some safe storage laws are, in fact, a violation of Heller vs. DC. Some are fine. The devil is in the details of the language of the law itself.

There have been some safe storage laws I would not support due to that fact.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 10:55 AM

118. Listen closely to this:

As long as guns are legal, and I may legally own them, am mentally and physically capable of using them properly and safely, I will do so. I will not be shamed, shunned, embarrassed or made to feel some sort of phony remorse into not owning guns. Not by you, not by the Admins on this website, NOT BY ANYONE. Not for ANY reason. If I ever reach the decision to not own guns, it will be solely on my own accord.

And to make it even more clear, I love MY Freedoms more than I love you. I don't care who you are in reality, a relative, a friend, a neighbor, a cor-worker. I am not living or sacrificing on this issue for you. While I am willing to do so on other issues, I draw the line on this one.

Call me whatever filthy names you want. I do not care.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MicaelS (Reply #118)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:10 AM

119. "I love MY Freedoms more than I love you" ... And let me guess...

You will use your guns to murder anyone who you think is 'taking your freedoms'?

Fucking gun nuts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #119)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:37 AM

120. Wow, talk about jumping the shark,

 

that's what you just did.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to premium (Reply #120)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:40 AM

121. Nah...

Just describing the typical gun nut, more willing to murder then talk about gun control.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #121)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:51 AM

122. Yeah, ok, more willing to murder that talk about gun control.

 


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to premium (Reply #122)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 12:10 PM

128. "Listen closely to this"

The whole post comes across as a threat but please... What do the gun nuts suggest as reasonable gun control?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #128)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 12:20 PM

129. This whole thread comes across as Robb being wrong

 

and then when the truth comes, he can't admit he was wrong and issue an apology or self delete, which would have been the honorable thing to do, instead, he edits it 5 times, with each edit getting worse, and then posts pics that have nothing to do with the original thread, then to top it off, he launches an insult filled attack on member DU'ers, and the icing on the cake is that you seem to agree with him.

Listen closely to that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to premium (Reply #129)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 12:30 PM

130. ummm... Yeah, I think Robb and I do agree on this topic

Gun nuts are a problem. Now... Back to what we were talking about, the post I responded to that really had nothing to do with the OP and was just a threat... You find that ok though... Interesting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #130)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 12:36 PM

131. Got it, you and Robb agree that

 

if a thread doesn't go your way, then post pics that have nothing to do with the original thread, insult member DU'ers and call it a day.
Thanks for the revelation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to premium (Reply #131)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 12:39 PM

132. Got it... Insults bad, threats good

Thanks for the revelation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #132)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 12:43 PM

133. 1 is just as bad as the other,

 

but you said you agree with Robb, so that makes you just as bad as what you perceive as a threat.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to premium (Reply #133)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 01:18 PM

134. You consider threats and insults to be the same...

We should get that put into SYG laws right away so the gun nuts have their freedoms to murder anyone who insults them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #134)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:18 PM

162. Good God!!

 

You are not even clever. Where was the threat??? No edits required?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #128)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:16 PM

161. Where in the loving fuck do you see a threat??

 

You are one funny person!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #161)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:22 PM

164. How cute... Another gun nut jumping in...

Like pack animals... Will you give any answers or will you run from them as well?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #164)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:23 PM

165. I'll give you some honest answers, Joe.

No promises you'll like 'em, though. Since this thread appears to be staying up here, I'll go for some dialogue while I wait for a game to install.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #164)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:31 PM

170. Ask me a fucking question and I'll answer.

 

Do you have a question? Or as the five times edited OP are just here to -- holy fuck I can't even imagine what you are trying to do? Again, Robb can end this shit but apparently he's not willing to do so. Did you even read all five edits as they got even more shrill? Bless your heart -- love ya!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #170)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:42 PM

172. Feel free to answer any I've already put out

None of the gun nuts want to touch em... I wonder why?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #172)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:22 PM

205. Difficult, given the static and diversions but I'll try

Since I have purchased a gun rather than inheriting all that I own, I am a gun nut to some.

You will use your guns to murder anyone who you think is 'taking your freedoms'?

No, we have a relatively effective representative democracy and court system. I think that is a good point to redress issues with unconstitutional violations of personal freedoms
What do the gun nuts suggest as reasonable gun control?

I have no idea; I don't talk to gun nuts. I would like to see universal background checks, comprehensive reporting of disqualifying issues by States, reporting requirements for lost or stolen firearms, enforcement of laws regarding criminal liability for damage due to improperly secured firearms, opt-in safety instruction offered through schools.
We should let Zimmerman go right now?

No, there are issues of fact regarding his claim of self defense. He should face trial by jury to determine guilt.

Sorry if I missed a question

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #121)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:14 PM

160. I don't see any discussion from you about gun control here.

 

Just calling a bunch of fellow members murders. You're cool -- well maybe not.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #160)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 11:49 AM

226. You are unaware of gun control proposals put forth by D's? Really?

Not heard a one of them? I suppose this would be a good place to start:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/preventing-gun-violence

What exactly are the gun nuts proposing? Where is the NRA throwing their support? What are your thoughts?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #121)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 11:14 AM

224. Hey, we get it. You can use that language only on those supporting 2A;

 

It is enabled behavior on DU, most realize. But you don't realize that the reason we can't get UBC or legislation to reduce violence is that this kind of language you use cause a lot of far more conservative 2A activists to double, triple down in opposing ANY initiatives. That leads to a question for you: Is it more important; satisfying, pleasureable, to wield smear phrases (receiving some kind of rah-rah cheering from some one) at fellow Democrats, or to actually address problems of crime and violence? So far you seem to have gone with the former.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eleanors38 (Reply #224)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 11:55 AM

227. Don't make them angry? heh... Good luck with that

I remained silent for a long time while the gun nuts got... nuttier. I think I'll just continue to point out the insanity as they are doing some pretty crazy shit... Have you seen this:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014504085

So amazingly stupid, words do not suffice.

Yeah... Good luck giving them the silent treatment, I'll pass.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #227)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 02:13 PM

238. I don't think you'll get anywhere in terms of social policy...

 

...but you should feel better about it, which may be your real concern.

I have read the link and it has been discussed thoroughly here at an earlier time; perhaps you missed that. Did you have a question or point to be made about it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eleanors38 (Reply #238)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 02:57 PM

242. Other then the insanity of the program? No... What is your feelings on it?

Should we let them be? Whats a few more deaths when there are so many every day... Yeah, lets just leave them alone.

Good plan

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #242)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 03:53 PM

245. It occurs to me that the citizens who suffer most from crime are singularly unable to afford...

 

firearms for self-defense, or the training to safely operate them. I have no problem with an organization/foundation absorbing those costs. If a single head of household adult had on his/her own purchased a gun for self-defense, no one in this group (and I suspect a few controllers) would begrudge that person's choice. So why the angst when some entity provides the funding and training?

BTW, It is not for me to "let them be" or not. They are adults who make their choices like other adults. I note that you have not explained the "insanity" charge, nor provided any support for your statement of "Whats a few more deaths..."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eleanors38 (Reply #245)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 04:25 PM

247. ummm... They are putting loaded firearms in the hands of people that do not know how to use them...

You think that is normal? That it is ok? They are trying to get people to believe they are safer this way and it's a load of bullshit. They are not giving them even a fraction of the training they should have before taking it home... People will die because of stupidity like this. How many people need to kill/die before stupid is stopped? Or do you prefer they just keep dying and you are good with it?

But yeah... Just don't make the gun nuts angry... They kill when they are angry... Or afraid... Or by accident... They have so many reasons to kill. Fucking gun nuts just don't care who dies as long as they can still try to be one of the ones that gets a kill.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #247)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 04:47 PM

250. I believe these folks are being trained, according to the article.

 

Would you object if someone in "the projects" obtained a gun for self-defense because of frequent break-ins and attacks? Are they different from other citizens, or do you believe people in general should be prevented from obtaining arms for self-defense?

We all start from the standpoint of inexperience; there are some who move beyond that status. That seems to be the case for these folks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eleanors38 (Reply #250)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 05:21 PM

252. So ya got 'don't make them angry' and it's ok to show em enough to be a danger'

Good plans

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #252)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 05:24 PM

254. Can't say if that is "Good plans" since I can't understand what you're saying.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eleanors38 (Reply #254)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 05:31 PM

256. Well, you seem to have two plans...

The first is 'Don't make the gun nuts angry'

The second is 'It's ok for people who can't hold a gun to take one home after a trip to the shooting range' That people learn to use a deadly weapon 'as they go' seems like a good idea to you?

Those are your good plans Good luck with em.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #119)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:56 AM

123. 50 million gun owners and people whine about the less than 0.3% of nuts, bias is what I call it

A larger percent of muslims are terrorists so anyone who goes to a mosque is a "nut" I guess.

Funny how values and ideas work when you apply them to other things.....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Straight Story (Reply #123)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:59 AM

124. When they start crying about how they love their freedoms more then you...

Thats a gun nut.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #124)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 12:01 PM

125. So you are willing to give up freedoms - like abortions, speech, etc because you love me?

That's nice

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Straight Story (Reply #125)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 12:09 PM

127. No but I'm willing to not murder you if you want to talk about removing them

Can't say as much for the gun nuts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #127)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 01:33 PM

135. The only one talking about murder here is you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #135)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 01:36 PM

136. True... I do not use the gun nut euphemism of 'self defense'...

I just call it murder.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #136)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 01:42 PM

137. Deadly self-defense isn't murder, it's justifiable homicide.

Granted, more than a few murderers have claimed self-defense, but that claim doesn't
make it so- nor does it make a legitimate self defense murder.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #137)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 02:00 PM

139. With only one person left alive to tell the story

Of course it was self defense... We should let Zimmerman go right now? Ya think?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #139)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 02:03 PM

141. That's what juries are for.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #141)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 02:28 PM

145. But again no answer...

Gun nuts avoiding answers... What a shock.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #145)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:58 PM

182. Because I wasn't there...and neither were you.

So, unless you're the worlds first scientifically-confirmed remote viewer your opinion (like mine)
is so much hot air.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #139)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 02:04 PM

142. And you don't think cops and DA's investigators

 

can figure out if it was self defense or murder?
Zimmerman is going to trial and using a self defense theory, we'll see if it holds up or not.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to premium (Reply #142)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 02:36 PM

146. Why do gun nuts never give an answer?

Do you think he should get off? Hey, you want insulting people to be a reason to murder... Should Zimmerman be let go?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #146)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:12 PM

178. Only if he is found innocent or not guilty by a jury of his peers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oneshooter (Reply #178)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:16 PM

179. So you think stalking and murdering is ok if it's ok with a Jury?

No opinion of your own? I'm shocked.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #179)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 10:18 PM

200. Are you willing to pull the lever if he is found guilty?

It sounds to me like you have the rope ready.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #146)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 08:56 PM

181. He wasn't there...and neither were you. Kindly go badger people somewhere else.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #181)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:04 PM

185. heh, you came to me

That is ok though, I did not expect anything less. Fuckin gun nuts crack me up

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #185)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:07 PM

186. S'okay- You're not the first "telepsychologist" we've seen here...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #186)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:15 PM

189. heh, anything but answer... You have no opinion? Totally neutral is it?

I think by his own words he stalked and murdered a teenager... You got nothin though huh?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #189)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:19 PM

191. Zimmerman is, at best, an idiot and at worst a murderer. Happy now?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #191)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:26 PM

193. At best an idiot... For stalking and killing a teenager

I see.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #193)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:35 PM

195. You've contacted the relevant authorities with your knowledge of the case, haven't you?

I mean, since you "know" what happened (just like the OP "knew" who sent the ricin letters) it's
your duty as a citizen to inform them...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #195)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:47 PM

199. ahhh... Going to stick with the 'We don't know enough to say' bit huh?

Said in the most innocent of voices, I'm certain. I've seen a few website where they are devoted to the same story... Pretty disturbing places. Annnnd with that, I no longer feel an interest in talking to you any more. I'm off to smoke another bowl and get in some BL2.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #185)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 02:28 PM

240. I repeat my question to you." Are you willing to pull the lever. If he is found guilty"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oneshooter (Reply #240)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 02:55 PM

241. What does 'pulling the lever' have to do with anything?

I do not support the death penalty... Why do gun nuts always go straight to killing? Have you no other method of expression?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #241)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 02:59 PM

243. Since you have already found him guilty without a trial, then you MUST be willing

to show your commitment to peace and tranquility by pulling the lever. Isn't that what all authoritarians do?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oneshooter (Reply #243)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 04:15 PM

246. Opinion on case=Must support death penalty=You want to pull the lever... Did that stretch hurt?

Bwahahahahahaha, what a patently stupid leap to make

I understand why you have soooo much trouble forming your own opinion on the case.... Zimmerman is just so convincing with his story about needing to stalk and kill an unarmed kid to save the neighborhood.... bwahahahahahaha I getcha

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #246)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 07:48 PM

290. Since you have already found him guilty, without a trial, then why wouldn't a person

believe that you are willing to "pull the lever". You are willing to remove his right to trial, why not remove his right ti live.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oneshooter (Reply #290)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 07:52 PM

291. ahhhh, now we get... 'having an opinion on a case=I want remove his right to trial'... bwahahahahaha

You guys are too funny

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oneshooter (Reply #243)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 04:41 PM

249. OFGS, your logic is insane. Who said anything about the DP (except you)?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WinkyDink (Reply #249)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 05:33 PM

258. How do you interprate "pull the lever"?

I know of no other meaning in the context it was used

How do you read it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #181)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 04:39 PM

248. You know what "I love more than you"? FREEDOM OF SPEECH. SO KINDLY SHOVE

 

YOUR KINDLY.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WinkyDink (Reply #248)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 05:35 PM

259. That nice... You love freedom of speech so I should shut up...

And LOTS OF CAPS WITH IT... Why the anger? Are you going to get violent and start shooting?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #146)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 02:19 PM

239. Zimmerman should stand trial.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #124)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 05:51 PM

266. If I love my right not to have unlawful searches and siezures against myself more

than I love some anonymous person on the street, and some terrorist kills that person because I didn't allow my rights to be violated, and that terrorist exploited our rights to get into a position to take said person out, what kind of a nut does that make me?

Because I do value my rights more than I value my OWN life, let alone joe anonymous citizen.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AtheistCrusader (Reply #266)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 05:53 PM

267. You need your gun to protect us from terrorists... hehe

It gets better and better all the time

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #267)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 06:01 PM

268. Except that's not what I said at all.

I specified search and seizure, not the 2nd amendment.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AtheistCrusader (Reply #268)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 06:06 PM

270. oh sorry... That was as close to sense as I could make of it

What does anything here have to do with search and seizure? What are you going on about?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #270)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 06:19 PM

272. Holy shit, it's only 3 posts upthread.

"124. When they start crying about how they love their freedoms more then you..."
"That's a gun nut..."

Other grammar issues aside, you specified freedomS. Plural.

I happen to love some enumerated freedoms more than XYZ random person, let alone my own life, unrelated to firearms. What kind of nut does it make me that I value my right to be secure in my person and possessions against unreasonable search and seizure?

Invasive, unwarranted search and seizure is a hot topic today. Many progressives are rallying against it. What kind of NUTS ARE WE for wanting to preserve our enumerated civil liberties?

(An acceptable answer is that you like special pleading for ONE civil liberty you don't happen to like, and that you didn't mean freedomS, plural)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AtheistCrusader (Reply #272)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 06:22 PM

274. Ahhh, I see where you are going... Wrapping yourself in the constitution. How special

I've never said anything about removing the 2nd, though you imply I have... So gun control = repeal 2nd? Is that what you think I'm saying? Is that what you cherry picked out of that? Good try, I'll give you credit for it being better then 'don't make them angry' heh, still non-sense though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #274)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 06:49 PM

286. You defined loving a freedom more than another person's life as 'gun nuttery'.

Your definition, not mine. Not sure why you're off about the 2nd, or implying I said anything about it, other than it is ALSO a civil right.

You used the expansive 'freedoms', not me. I love the judicial restraint of the 4th and 5th amendments more than my own life, let alone that of a random stranger, and will always fight to preserve them. What kind of NUT DOES THAT MAKE ME?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AtheistCrusader (Reply #286)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 06:55 PM

287. Non-sense, I was paraphrasing teabaggers and gun nuts, hence the single quotes

They love their 'freedoms' and usually get violent when people talk about gun control... You know, they straight away take it to 'they are comin for our guns'. But of course... You knew all that and are trying to put words in my mouth

Do you have trouble forming an opinion on Zimmerman as well? None of the gun nuts seem to be able to... So strange.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #287)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 07:24 PM

288. Uh-huh, sure.

Ok then.

Zimmerman? Appears to be guilty given the public evidence, but I think the prosecution will have a hard time getting a jury to agree. Why?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AtheistCrusader (Reply #268)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 06:09 PM

271. I wouldn't bother, AC.

Your efforts would be met with only deliberate misrepresentation. I'd suggest saving your time and energy for more constructive matters.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Decoy of Fenris (Reply #271)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 06:23 PM

275. Yeah, when gun nuts talk it is always misrepresented...

And they never... EVER do it themselves, so best to be quiet

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #275)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 06:27 PM

277. Sorry, I wasn't talking to you nor do I have any intention to do so. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Decoy of Fenris (Reply #277)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 06:33 PM

283. You don't get the funny part where your buddy does exactly what you warned him of being done?

I thought it was funny I understand why you don't want to put out your opinion though... None of you seem to want to, it's all 'not enough evidence to tell yet'... So interesting. But... You don't want to talk

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Straight Story (Reply #123)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:09 PM

156. +1000. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #119)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 01:57 PM

138. I never threatened anyone.

Nor did I imply a threat, nor did I mean one in any way, shape fashion or form.

There is no one on this website worth going to prison for.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MicaelS (Reply #138)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 02:01 PM

140. How will you be protecting your freedoms then?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #140)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 02:05 PM

143. Perhaps by heckling people on Internet forums.

Hey, it works for some people...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #143)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 02:23 PM

144. Could be but...

Gun nuts are not very funny... Their 'jokes' often involve murder. I've also yet to see one heckle with any success, they all just seem to converge on anyone that wants any type of gun control and let their true colors fly. It's fascinating.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #144)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:24 PM

167. Maybe Robb can come back to this thread and hold his own water??

 

You(s) aren't as clever as you pretend to be? Time to feed the dog before he accuses my of some kind of threat. Makes as much sense to me as your accusations.

Your buddy could end this shit with a simple delete or admit he was/is wrong in this particuliar case. Egos are a hard thing to get over -- don't you think??

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #167)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:37 PM

196. I think the OP took off...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #196)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 08:41 AM

219. Too busy frantically posting gun threads in GD...

 

...before Skinner finally comes to his senses and reinstates the prohibition.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lizzie Poppet (Reply #219)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 11:41 AM

225. Interesting point. The strongest controller suit is elitism..

 

In some urban centers, in some academic circles, in Hollywood, ALWAYS in the traditional MSM, and in the upper reaches of Democratic Party organizations. The hold this rather small group has is all out of proportion to their numbers and way beyond their ability to argue policy and effect legislative proposals.

But that culture of elitism is not fully understood, except as some of it can be explained by DU's acceptance of legitimized hatred and intolerance in the name of "compassion."

My god, they have a lot of leeway, esp. since the approach is primitive and smacks of The Scarlet Letter. And it is so obvious.

I'll say here and now that most DUers are sick of the "takeover" of GD by gun issues (and to some extent, dogs), and would like to see guns discussed in the TWO (2) groups formally established, and not the THREE (3) that have ceded.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #119)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:13 PM

158. Good God!!

 

If the OP's shit didn't already smell (after 5 edits and much mis-direction) -- You just jump in with the same bullshit? Bless your ever loving heart?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #119)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:21 PM

163. That's happening a lot?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nuclear Unicorn (Reply #163)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:23 PM

166. Gun nuts say it all the time

Look at any teabagger rally, they love the violence.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #166)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:11 PM

188. Then quote three, with links. It should be easy for you if people "say it all the time"

I doubt you can, as you've been busy "Colonizing" this thread:


"Sergeant Colon had had a broad education. He’d been to the School of My Dad Always Said, the College of It Stands to Reason, and was now a postgraduate student at the University of What Some Bloke In the Pub Told Me."
- Jingo, Terry Pratchett

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #188)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:22 PM

192. You want evidence of teabaggers threatening violence... Seriously?

ok, let me google that for you:

https://www.google.com/#q=teabaggers+threatening+violence&spell=1&sa=X&ei=qIi2UYL-LeXwyAGrhoCwDw&ved=0CCgQvwUoAA&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.47534661,d.aWc&fp=2f45833179edba2e&biw=1680&bih=904

hmmm. 2.3 million results... That enough for you?

"I doubt you can, as you've been busy "Colonizing" this thread:"

Funny... From my end it appears as though I responded to one person then had the gun nut posse jump on me.

BTW... What I did up there... Where I gave you an answer to your question... It's good form, you should learn from it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #192)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:32 PM

194. Not one quote with links. Why am I not surprised?

Do you prefer a gasoline or electric auxiliary, and how many poles do you set out?




Anyway, I doubt you'll be moving away from armed police presence anytime soon. You lot
tend to drop all qualms about people with guns when they're protecting you...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #194)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:37 PM

197. ohhhhh... You are a 'I need to protect myself from the gubmint' types

Have you heard they are stockpiling ammunition to come get you with the UN?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ohio Joe (Reply #197)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:43 PM

198. I am? That's news to me, as I don't even own a gun.

Your self-estimate of your own telepsychological skills is ...somewhat lacking.

added on edit:

May we assume that your other posts are of similar accuracy?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:44 PM

173. HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!!

 


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WillyT (Reply #173)

Tue Jun 18, 2013, 07:27 PM

310. Kick again

and rec

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:17 PM

190. overly emotional and irrelvant. this OP is a joke.

 

boring.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:47 PM

209. Woman sends poison letters

then blames it on her husband.

Where is the gun link to this plz?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Go Vols (Reply #209)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:02 AM

211. There isn't a gun link. The OP "just knew" a 'gun nut' sent them...

...like those that "just knew" the Boston Marathon bombings were done by antigovernment
teabaggers. Hence the original headline:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=thread&address=10022928786&info=1#edits

Gun nut sends poison to Obama, Bloomberg.

The ones that got the Marathon bombings wrong mostly slunk away quietly. The OP (and friends) in this case
instead chose to double down on the stereoypes and spittle-flecked invective

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #211)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:13 AM

215. Authorities had letters

full of gun nuttery, which you know if you've read a paper anytime in the past two weeks. You resurrect an old thread and that blame the OP because it's not up to date. It's cynical and assumes people are stupid enough to believe your games.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #215)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 05:48 AM

217. friendly_iconoclast didn't resurrect this thread

 

I explained to you, in post #95, how it was resurrected. You seem to have ignored that, and created your own reality.

It's cynical and assumes people are stupid enough to believe your games.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pintobean (Reply #217)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 05:23 PM

253. every time he or someone else posts it

The thread is resurrected. Robb edited it, but you all are the ones keeping it alive. I could edit old threads all day long, but no one would see them. It would go entirely unnoticed. Some here seem to relish the attention, and keep running back for more. As much as gun zealots love to portray themselves as victims to Democratic party ideology, we know full well the real victims are the 38,000 a year slaughtered due to gun violence. Robb's words don't kill anyone. Guns do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #253)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 06:24 PM

276. Robb *could* have owned up to getting it wrong and deleted the OP.

Unfortunately, that would have required a certain ...something... that he seems not
quite capable of. Instead, we got "look how sad those poopyhead gun <insert slur of choice>
made the poor people feel"...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #276)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 06:28 PM

278. The sun *could* rise in the north, too.

 

Both have roughly the same probability of occurring...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lizzie Poppet (Reply #278)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 06:31 PM

280. Hey, people don't *always* live down to your expectations of them.

Call me an optimist...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lizzie Poppet (Reply #278)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 06:31 PM

281. I'd say the sun rising in the north has a higher probability.

Given that astronomical conditions could theoretically produce a realignment of the planet's orientation in relation to the sun.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #276)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 12:45 AM

292. You continue to interpret the issue as narrowly as possible

He, like the FBI and everyone else, was wrong that the male gun nut sent the letter. Instead, his wife took advantage of the insanity of gun nuttery to send letters out of some sort of sick vendetta with her husband. That does nothing to change the fact that huge numbers of people die in this country and certain elements simply do not care. But ignore that, because those lives are inconsequential. All that matters is the feelings of gun zealots, who obsession with portraying themselves as victims is clearly far more important to them than human life. Being wrong on one event doesn't change the overall fact that there is a clear moral choice between life and death, and human life doesn't hold the same importance for gun zealots as it does for the rest of humanity. They view their capacity to stockpile untraceable weapons as more important than the lives of 38,000 Americans every year, just as Republicans consider their tax dollars more important than the lives of hungry children or high infant mortality rates that result from the lack of healthcare. We all make our political choices. Some will always choose themselves, regardless of the consequences. Humanity is a mixed bag. No one can be argued into being a compassionate human being. It's simply a question of character.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #292)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 12:34 PM

295. We know, we know- you lot claim to be morally superior to "*those* people"

Apparently then you should not be held to the same standards as those you term gun zealots- standards like
'concern for factual accuracy' and 'avoidance of threadjacking'.

"..by any means neccessary" and all that...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to BainsBane (Reply #215)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 06:29 PM

279. And when the contents of those letters fit a stereotype, why *not* go all in?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Go Vols (Reply #209)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 11:30 PM

296. In the mind of the OPer nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:02 PM

228. This thread is the example of a clusterfuck

 

Yo Robb come back and edit again so your OP will make sense please?


So far I've got ricin, bloomberg, soda, guns, Obama, and a married soon to be divorced couple pointing fingers LOL

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Reply #228)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:15 PM

229. He can't/won't do that.

He is safe in his personal fiefdom, where all is good and anyone who asks "bothersome" questions is promptly banned. Thus assuring that all who remain are in lockstep and under control.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oneshooter (Reply #229)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:35 PM

232. so that means we keep this kicked?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Reply #232)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:37 PM

233. Yea, it kinda looks that way. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oneshooter (Reply #233)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:40 PM

234. cool, I know if I had an OP that went downhill and made me look stupid

 

I would probably just hope it dies down after 24-48 hours---

Wait for Du'ers to get on the next shiny thing-

But, my theory is if it stays up past 48 hours the OP might decide it is time to intervene.

Let's start the clock now, 12:40PM CST

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to snooper2 (Reply #234)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 05:42 PM

264. I think there's a timer that prevents him from

editing it after too long.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AtheistCrusader (Reply #264)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 06:04 PM

269. oh well

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AtheistCrusader (Reply #264)

Wed Jun 12, 2013, 08:47 AM

294. We should pull him back to his OP then to try it..

 

Give us all some edumacation on if it's still an option

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Tue Jun 11, 2013, 12:20 PM

231. How contemptible. You completely altered your OP.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Thu Jun 13, 2013, 12:47 AM

297. Kick just for kicks.

 

Where art you now!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Thu Jun 13, 2013, 08:23 AM

298. For an example of what the OP is talking about

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #298)

Tue Jun 18, 2013, 04:00 PM

301. That link doesn't say anything about Obama or Bloomberg being poisoned.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dr. Strange (Reply #301)

Tue Jun 18, 2013, 04:03 PM

302. WTF are you talking about?

Why does it need to?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #302)

Tue Jun 18, 2013, 07:25 PM

309. Maybe because the OP'er edited it to change the entire meaning.

 

The current version is what you see after all of the edits.

FYI here are the edits (except the final one):

Edit History
This post has been edited 6 times. Hide all

0.Sun Jun 9, 2013, 08:00 AM - Original version with no edits. (Hide)
Original version with no edits.

0. Gun nut sends poison to Obama, Bloomberg.
(Reuters) - U.S. authorities are investigating a Texas man over threatening letters containing a deadly poison mailed to U.S. President Barack Obama and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a law enforcement official said on Friday.

(snip)

FBI investigators in Texas are questioning a man in New Boston, Texas after his wife called the police to report suspicious activity, the law enforcement source said. The agency is proceeding cautiously, and the man has not been charged, the source added.

Those letters were postmarked May 20 from Shreveport, Louisiana, according to an official briefed on the investigation. They referred to the debate over the nation's gun laws and also were sent to Bloomberg's gun control group in Washington, D.C. Initial tests showed they contained ricin.

Read More: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/31/us-usa-obama-letter-idUSBRE94T0VL201305311.Sun Jun 9, 2013, 08:00 AM - Unexplained edit. (Hide)
Unexplained edit.

0. Gun nuts are assholes.
(Reuters) - U.S. authorities are investigating a Texas man over threatening letters containing a deadly poison mailed to U.S. President Barack Obama and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a law enforcement official said on Friday.

(snip)

FBI investigators in Texas are questioning a man in New Boston, Texas after his wife called the police to report suspicious activity, the law enforcement source said. The agency is proceeding cautiously, and the man has not been charged, the source added.

Those letters were postmarked May 20 from Shreveport, Louisiana, according to an official briefed on the investigation. They referred to the debate over the nation's gun laws and also were sent to Bloomberg's gun control group in Washington, D.C. Initial tests showed they contained ricin.

Read More: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/31/us-usa-obama-letter-idUSBRE94T0VL201305312.Sun Jun 9, 2013, 08:14 AM - Unexplained edit. (Hide)
Unexplained edit.

0. Gun nut assholes breathe a sigh of relief...
Despite early reports, THIS time their tribe wasn't responsible.

But don't worry gundamentalists! Another asshole will kill someone on your behalf soon!

(Reuters) - U.S. authorities are investigating a Texas man over threatening letters containing a deadly poison mailed to U.S. President Barack Obama and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a law enforcement official said on Friday.

(snip)

FBI investigators in Texas are questioning a man in New Boston, Texas after his wife called the police to report suspicious activity, the law enforcement source said. The agency is proceeding cautiously, and the man has not been charged, the source added.

Those letters were postmarked May 20 from Shreveport, Louisiana, according to an official briefed on the investigation. They referred to the debate over the nation's gun laws and also were sent to Bloomberg's gun control group in Washington, D.C. Initial tests showed they contained ricin.

Read More: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/31/us-usa-obama-letter-idUSBRE94T0VL201305313.Sun Jun 9, 2013, 11:28 AM - Unexplained edit. (Hide)
Unexplained edit.

0. Gungeoneer-type assholes breathe a sigh of relief...
Despite early reports, THIS time their tribe wasn't responsible.

But don't worry gundamentalists! Another asshole will kill someone on your behalf soon!
(Reuters) - U.S. authorities are investigating a Texas man over threatening letters containing a deadly poison mailed to U.S. President Barack Obama and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a law enforcement official said on Friday.

(snip)

FBI investigators in Texas are questioning a man in New Boston, Texas after his wife called the police to report suspicious activity, the law enforcement source said. The agency is proceeding cautiously, and the man has not been charged, the source added.

Those letters were postmarked May 20 from Shreveport, Louisiana, according to an official briefed on the investigation. They referred to the debate over the nation's gun laws and also were sent to Bloomberg's gun control group in Washington, D.C. Initial tests showed they contained ricin.

Read More: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/31/us-usa-obama-letter-idUSBRE94T0VL201305314.Sun Jun 9, 2013, 01:11 PM - Unexplained edit. (Hide)
Unexplained edit.

0. Gungeoneer-type assholes breathe a sigh of relief...
Clearly I have their attention. So, listen closely:

Damn the sociopaths who hide from every gun death story and pour out of their caves to cheer at the slightest glimmer of hope that maybe, MAYBE it wasn't one of their insane tribe who did the crime this time.
Damn the apologists for the madness of "gun rights," the glib assholes who wrap themselves in the Constitution to defend gun manufacturer's profits, while children and parents die by the dozens, daily.

Who defend the indefensible tooth and nail, pushing back against all gun safety legislation with equal fervor, so the simplest of it never sees the light of day: damn them.

And if this is you, damn you to hell.

---

Original story:


(Reuters) - U.S. authorities are investigating a Texas man over threatening letters containing a deadly poison mailed to U.S. President Barack Obama and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a law enforcement official said on Friday.

(snip)

FBI investigators in Texas are questioning a man in New Boston, Texas after his wife called the police to report suspicious activity, the law enforcement source said. The agency is proceeding cautiously, and the man has not been charged, the source added.

Those letters were postmarked May 20 from Shreveport, Louisiana, according to an official briefed on the investigation. They referred to the debate over the nation's gun laws and also were sent to Bloomberg's gun control group in Washington, D.C. Initial tests showed they contained ricin.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #302)

Wed Jun 19, 2013, 08:52 AM

313. The OP was about "Gun nut sends poison to Obama, Bloomberg."

You said
For an example of what the OP is talking about...


Your link has nothing about poisoning Obama or Bloomberg.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dr. Strange (Reply #313)

Wed Jun 19, 2013, 08:49 PM

315. Nor do most of the posts in this thread

Why focus on mine? Most are grown men relishing in victimhood.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #315)

Wed Jun 19, 2013, 09:44 PM

316. Yours is one of the few responses that links to another thread...

as an example of the OP. (Or at least one version of the OP.)

Also, yours is post 298, which is twice a prime, and is a nontotient number.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dr. Strange (Reply #316)

Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:36 AM

319. Will that be on the test?

You mean you don't like my opinion. Is it so hard to be honest?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #319)

Thu Jun 20, 2013, 11:07 AM

323. It will be on the pop quiz.

Oops, I've said too much.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dr. Strange (Reply #323)

Thu Jun 20, 2013, 11:54 AM

325. Sure, you would say pop

One of thoooose people.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Tue Jun 18, 2013, 02:48 PM

299. Kick -- that's all

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #299)

Tue Jun 18, 2013, 03:49 PM

300. LOL

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #300)

Tue Jun 18, 2013, 04:46 PM

304. Thanks for the "Lots of Love" -- you're making me blush!!

 

Good to see we agree on this OP. Your approval means the world to me!!

Have a great day!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #304)

Tue Jun 18, 2013, 06:40 PM

307. I'm amused how you all love to bask in victimhood

Know what I do when I see an offensive post? I alert on it. I don't keep kicking it. I will needle the poster about his comments, to be sure, but I see no reason to compound the insult. To each his own.

Hugs and kisses.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #307)

Tue Jun 18, 2013, 07:01 PM

308. Thanks again -- love ya.

 

Maybe if the Op'er would just delete his 5 times edited post all would be fine. Apparently you agree that editing to change the whole meaning of a thread after it is Jury proof is fine. I call that deceitful. But to each their own. I'm sure you were also against the continued kicking or the MM posts, weren't you??

Anyway, Have a great night! I have pool league tonight so please don't think I'm ducking out.

Take Care,
CM

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #308)

Wed Jun 19, 2013, 01:42 AM

311. Yet rather than alerting

you keep kicking. Very strange indeed.

I don't know what MM posts are. But if they are the peanut butter ones, I'm okay with it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #311)

Wed Jun 19, 2013, 11:45 AM

314. You do know that it is jury proof after 24 hours.

 

And yes, I'll keep kicking it occasionally. Especially when it illustrates that some animals are more equal than others.

Have a great day!!

Note to jury -- I'm not calling anyone an animal. It's a reference to Animal Farm.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #314)

Wed Jun 19, 2013, 10:23 PM

317. Jury proof but not alert proof

I've sent alerts on old posts. They go to the administrators. But you all relish basking in victimhood.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #317)

Wed Jun 19, 2013, 10:53 PM

318. If it makes you feel better then it is so!!

 

Have a good night!!

That's all I can say since the hunters are watching me. The NSA has nothing on that group!

Have a great night!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to BainsBane (Reply #320)

Thu Jun 20, 2013, 11:05 AM

321. Nice self portrait -- Thank you!!

 

Have a great day

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #321)

Thu Jun 20, 2013, 11:06 AM

322. Talking to you is always so intellectually stimulating

I learn so much.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #322)

Thu Jun 20, 2013, 11:10 AM

324. Quit it with all of the compliments -- you'll make me blush!!

 

I'm just trying to communicate on a level that will keep you and the juries happy.

Sunshine on my shoulders makes me happy!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #324)

Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:36 PM

326. I'm sorry that talking about anything of substance

Last edited Thu Jun 20, 2013, 01:41 PM - Edit history (1)

without making personal attacks and getting posts hidden is such a struggle for you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #326)

Thu Jun 20, 2013, 01:29 PM

328. Huh!!

 

Please edit so I can understand your post.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #328)

Thu Jun 20, 2013, 01:35 PM

329. Good luck with that. nt.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #328)

Thu Jun 20, 2013, 01:42 PM

330. done

Two words transposed. I'm sure that will make all the difference in your response.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #330)

Thu Jun 20, 2013, 01:45 PM

331. I'll get right back to you on that!

 

I'm sure you're waiting with baited breath.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #331)

Thu Jun 20, 2013, 01:47 PM

332. Consult the dictionary

and we can chat later.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Tue Jun 18, 2013, 04:43 PM

303. Kick--

for posterity's sake.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Tue Jun 18, 2013, 05:23 PM

305. Gun cultists don't care who dies

as long as they can have their precious.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mwrguy (Reply #305)

Tue Jun 18, 2013, 05:40 PM

306. If you truly believe that, then you need help.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oneshooter (Reply #306)

Wed Jun 19, 2013, 03:07 AM

312. Seems a logical conclusion to me

They advance policies that result in the highest homicide rate in the First World.
They simply refuse to acknowledge the consequences of gun proliferation.
It's like being a neocon cheer leading for war and pretending that casualties are totally unrelated. You all have blocked yourself off from the results of the policies you work toward, I suppose as I way to keep looking yourselves in the mirror. Meanwhile, the rest of us the country pays for that disassociation from reality.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BainsBane (Reply #312)

Thu Jun 20, 2013, 01:48 PM

333. ^^^ RIGHT HERE.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 07:08 PM

334. Kick

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robb (Original post)

Mon Jul 1, 2013, 11:01 PM

335. Kick

 

Was going to let this sink until the OPer became self rightous in another group.

Go transparency!!! -- and yes my transparency page is open for all to see. Had to beat a couple of posters to that.



edit: spelling

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CokeMachine (Reply #335)

Sun Jul 14, 2013, 04:30 PM

336. Kick

 

Please check out all of the edits to the OP. They are very informative!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread