Tue May 21, 2013, 08:27 PM
All you ... PEOPLE who support breed bans: Let's Play FIND THE PIT BULL!!
Listed below are pictures of ten dogs. None of them are purebred. They are all mixed breeds. ONLY ONE IS PART PIT BULL. Your job is to FIND THE PIT BULL!!
I'll be posting the answers in 1 hour. Dog 02 
Dog 07 
Dog 08 
Dog 22 
Dog 33 
Dog 54 
Dog 58 
Dog 79 
Dog 89 
Dog 111 
|
153 replies, 27276 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
 153 replies |
Author | Time | Post |
 All you ... PEOPLE who support breed bans: Let's Play FIND THE PIT BULL!! (Original post) |
baldguy | May 2013 | OP |
| one_voice | May 2013 | #1 | |
| Buzz Clik | May 2013 | #2 | |
| hollysmom | May 2013 | #4 | |
| Purveyor | May 2013 | #27 | |
| reformist2 | May 2013 | #3 | |
| uppityperson | May 2013 | #5 | |
| Buzz Clik | May 2013 | #6 | |
| truth2power | May 2013 | #7 | |
| Control-Z | May 2013 | #31 | |
| Xithras | May 2013 | #8 | |
| Logical | May 2013 | #9 | |
| defacto7 | May 2013 | #106 | |
| krispos42 | May 2013 | #10 | |
| pinboy3niner | May 2013 | #11 | |
| rustydog | May 2013 | #12 | |
| pinboy3niner | May 2013 | #16 | |
| Chan790 | May 2013 | #17 | |
| defacto7 | May 2013 | #107 | |
| Lone_Star_Dem | May 2013 | #13 | |
| NV Whino | May 2013 | #14 | |
| DevonRex | May 2013 | #21 | |
| Luminous Animal | May 2013 | #15 | |
| Lady Freedom Returns | May 2013 | #18 | |
| OriginalGeek | May 2013 | #19 | |
| DevonRex | May 2013 | #20 | |
| rdharma | May 2013 | #22 | |
| Egalitarian Thug | May 2013 | #59 | |
| eShirl | May 2013 | #113 | |
| one_voice | May 2013 | #23 | |
| Zo Zig | May 2013 | #24 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #25 | |
| rdharma | May 2013 | #28 | |
| flvegan | May 2013 | #29 | |
| rdharma | May 2013 | #33 | |
| flvegan | May 2013 | #39 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #30 | |
| rdharma | May 2013 | #35 | |
| flvegan | May 2013 | #40 | |
| rdharma | May 2013 | #46 | |
| flvegan | May 2013 | #53 | |
| Mr. X | May 2013 | #100 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #103 | |
| Mr. X | May 2013 | #121 | |
| Scootaloo | May 2013 | #108 | |
| FloridaJudy | May 2013 | #124 | |
| smokey nj | May 2013 | #130 | |
| Scootaloo | May 2013 | #109 | |
| uppityperson | May 2013 | #36 | |
| robinlynne | May 2013 | #81 | |
| XemaSab | May 2013 | #99 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #101 | |
| XemaSab | May 2013 | #102 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #105 | |
| XemaSab | May 2013 | #110 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #116 | |
| XemaSab | May 2013 | #125 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #136 | |
| XemaSab | May 2013 | #146 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #147 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #150 | |
| Scootaloo | May 2013 | #104 | |
| GoCubsGo | May 2013 | #123 | |
| blueamy66 | May 2013 | #129 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #134 | |
| blueamy66 | May 2013 | #135 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #138 | |
| blueamy66 | May 2013 | #140 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #141 | |
| blueamy66 | May 2013 | #142 | |
| TheCowsCameHome | May 2013 | #26 | |
| Baitball Blogger | May 2013 | #32 | |
| flvegan | May 2013 | #34 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #37 | |
| CokeMachine | May 2013 | #54 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #70 | |
| rdharma | May 2013 | #38 | |
| flvegan | May 2013 | #41 | |
| rdharma | May 2013 | #49 | |
| Occulus | May 2013 | #139 | |
| rdharma | May 2013 | #143 | |
| Occulus | May 2013 | #145 | |
| rdharma | May 2013 | #148 | |
| Egalitarian Thug | May 2013 | #57 | |
| flvegan | May 2013 | #85 | |
| Orrex | May 2013 | #42 | |
| flvegan | May 2013 | #43 | |
| Orrex | May 2013 | #45 | |
| flvegan | May 2013 | #48 | |
| Orrex | May 2013 | #50 | |
| flvegan | May 2013 | #52 | |
| Orrex | May 2013 | #56 | |
| flvegan | May 2013 | #60 | |
| Orrex | May 2013 | #62 | |
| flvegan | May 2013 | #66 | |
| Orrex | May 2013 | #68 | |
| flvegan | May 2013 | #71 | |
| Orrex | May 2013 | #73 | |
| Post removed | May 2013 | #77 | |
| Orrex | May 2013 | #78 | |
| pinboy3niner | May 2013 | #82 | |
| TheCowsCameHome | May 2013 | #114 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #51 | |
| flvegan | May 2013 | #55 | |
| ozone_man | May 2013 | #153 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #47 | |
| darkangel218 | May 2013 | #84 | |
| Gormy Cuss | May 2013 | #87 | |
| LWolf | May 2013 | #115 | |
| nolabear | May 2013 | #83 | |
| RebelOne | May 2013 | #44 | |
| rdharma | May 2013 | #58 | |
| flvegan | May 2013 | #61 | |
| rdharma | May 2013 | #65 | |
| flvegan | May 2013 | #72 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #64 | |
| flvegan | May 2013 | #67 | |
| rdharma | May 2013 | #69 | |
| Orrex | May 2013 | #75 | |
| Orrex | May 2013 | #63 | |
| unblock | May 2013 | #126 | |
| Courtesy Flush | May 2013 | #74 | |
| rhett o rick | May 2013 | #76 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #80 | |
| rdharma | May 2013 | #89 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #90 | |
| rdharma | May 2013 | #92 | |
| Politicalboi | May 2013 | #79 | |
| deathrind | May 2013 | #86 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #88 | |
| deathrind | May 2013 | #91 | |
| rdharma | May 2013 | #93 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #94 | |
| rdharma | May 2013 | #95 | |
| deathrind | May 2013 | #97 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #98 | |
| deathrind | May 2013 | #117 | |
| baldguy | May 2013 | #122 | |
| Ohio Joe | May 2013 | #96 | |
| bowens43 | May 2013 | #111 | |
| randome | May 2013 | #112 | |
| galileoreloaded | May 2013 | #118 | |
| marmar | May 2013 | #119 | |
| randome | May 2013 | #120 | |
| unblock | May 2013 | #127 | |
| Nimajneb Nilknarf | May 2013 | #132 | |
| Nimajneb Nilknarf | May 2013 | #128 | |
| Jazzgirl | May 2013 | #131 | |
| whatchamacallit | May 2013 | #133 | |
| ScreamingMeemie | May 2013 | #152 | |
| NCTraveler | May 2013 | #137 | |
| DainBramaged | May 2013 | #144 | |
| LiberalElite | May 2013 | #149 | |
| Trajan | May 2013 | #151 |
Response to baldguy (Original post)
Tue May 21, 2013, 08:29 PM
1. I don't know...
|
I want to hug them all...
Don't tell dog 111 but that leash makes his ass look fat.  But he's so freakin' cute with his stubby little legs... |
Response to baldguy (Original post)
Tue May 21, 2013, 08:35 PM
2. I hate dogs. Kill them all and let God sort it out.
|
Except dog 58. He looks like he gives great hugs.
  |
Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #2)
Tue May 21, 2013, 08:40 PM
4. that looks like aboxer to me, they like to hit people and othr dogs in play,
Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #2)
Tue May 21, 2013, 09:37 PM
Purveyor (29,876 posts)
27. I'd start with the 'humans'. Look what the hell that we have done with this 'place'... eom
Response to baldguy (Original post)
Tue May 21, 2013, 08:41 PM
uppityperson (115,510 posts)
5. I'll guess 54 but have no clue. A couple I don't think so, but narrowed down to 4.
Response to baldguy (Original post)
Tue May 21, 2013, 08:43 PM
7. I think it's dog 58. Just a guess. I'm no expert... n/t
Response to truth2power (Reply #7)
Tue May 21, 2013, 09:46 PM
Control-Z (15,681 posts)
31. That is my guess too.
Response to baldguy (Original post)
Tue May 21, 2013, 08:46 PM
krispos42 (49,440 posts)
10. #54
|
I know an assault dog when I see one!
|
Response to baldguy (Original post)
Tue May 21, 2013, 08:46 PM
11. No fair! You didn't dress the pit bull crosses right for a where's the pit cross challenge...
Response to baldguy (Original post)
Tue May 21, 2013, 08:47 PM
12. You need to get something to help you relax
Response to rustydog (Reply #12)
Tue May 21, 2013, 08:52 PM
16. You obviously haven't considered the pit bulls assisting with breast-feeding in Olive Gardens
Response to baldguy (Original post)
Tue May 21, 2013, 08:51 PM
13. Oh, dog 79 looks a lot like the doggie my daughter adopted from the pound!
|
I don't suppose you know what it is? Ours has longer legs (she's a mutt) and is a tad leaner still, but the resemblance is amazing. There's some lineage shared with whatever that dog is I'd bet.
They're all cute as can be though. |
Response to baldguy (Original post)
Tue May 21, 2013, 08:52 PM
14. Has to be 111 because it's so unlikely
Response to baldguy (Original post)
Tue May 21, 2013, 08:52 PM
15. Good post. When "pit bull" attacks are reported, more often than not
Response to baldguy (Original post)
Tue May 21, 2013, 08:53 PM
Lady Freedom Returns (13,589 posts)
18. I think this is a trick question!
|
#111 has me a bit thrown though.
And oh #8 
And I want them all!!!!! |
Response to rdharma (Reply #22)
Wed May 22, 2013, 07:01 AM
eShirl (18,067 posts)
113. This is the correct answer.
Response to baldguy (Original post)
Tue May 21, 2013, 09:32 PM
25. FIND THE PIT BULL!! answers.
|
Here we go! Here are the answers. Based on the UF College of Veterinary Medicine Dog Breed Identification survey: What kind of dog is that?
http://sheltermedicine.vetmed.ufl.edu/library/research-studies/current-studies/dog-breeds/
We conducted a national survey of dog experts to compare their best guesses for the breeds of dogs in a series of photographs. These visual assessments were compared to DNA breed profiles for the dogs. More than 5,000 dog experts, including breeders, trainers, groomers, veterinarians, shelter staff, rescuers, and others completed the survey. Dog 02
DNA Results: 50% Catahoula Leopard Dog, 25% Siberian Husky, 9.94% Briard, 5.07% Airedale Terrier Dog 07
DNA Results: 25% Irish Water Spaniel, 25% Siberian Husky, 25% Boston Terrier, 8.33% Bull Mastiff Dog 08
DNA Results: 25% Boxer, 25% Alaskan Malamute, 21.95% Sealyham Terrier, 19.67% Pointer Dog 22
DNA Results: 25% Chow Chow, 12.5% German Shepherd, 12.5% Alaskan Malamute, 14.22% Cairn Terrier Dog 33
DNA Results: 37.5% German Shepherd, 12.5% Rottweiler, 12.5% Weimeraner, 11.44% Irish terrier Dog 54
DNA Results: 25% Bulldog, 12.5% Mastiff, 12.5% Boxer, 10.42% Tibetan Mastiff Dog 58
DNA Results: 25% Boxer, 25% Entlebucher Mountain Dog, 25% German Spitz, 9.14% Golden Retriever Dog 79
DNA Results: 25% Doberman Pinscher, 25% Wire Haired Dachshund, 12.5% Samoyed, 12.5% Miniature Schnauzer Dog 89
DNA Results: 25% Bulldog, 25% Boxer, 12.98% Blue Tick Coonhound, 10.9% Weimeraner Dog 111
DNA Results: 25% Basset Hound, 25% American Staffordshire Terrier, 25% Chow Chow, 25% English Cocker Spaniel Remember this anytime you see a news report of a "Pit Bull" biting someone. Trying to identify a dog's breed visually is little better than flipping a coin. The professionals in this survey got 43/100 wrong. And also remember that the Humane Society of the United States, the American Veterinary Association, the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American Kennel Club, the American Bar Association, and the National Canine Research Council - In short, precisely ALL of the people who know the relevant law, medicine & canine behavior – they ALL are opposed to breed specific legislation and breed bans. Anyone who tries to say different is lying to you. Congrats to NV Whino(reply #14), Lady Freedom Returns (Reply #18), DevonRex (Reply #20), and and honorable mention to reformist2 (Reply #3). Thx all for playing! |
Response to rdharma (Reply #28)
Tue May 21, 2013, 09:45 PM
29. "Bred to latch on, take down and kill."
Response to flvegan (Reply #29)
Tue May 21, 2013, 09:48 PM
33. No. I didn't.
|
And this phony "quiz" didn't throw me off.
You lose. Go get another tat as a consolation prize!  |
Response to baldguy (Reply #30)
Tue May 21, 2013, 09:50 PM
35. Riiiiiight! If your family enjoys dog fighting!
Response to rdharma (Reply #35)
Tue May 21, 2013, 09:53 PM
40. You saying all families with a pit bull enjoy dog fighting?
Response to flvegan (Reply #40)
Tue May 21, 2013, 10:00 PM
46. No, not all.
|
You mad at me because I saw though the stilted "quiz" question?
 |
Response to Mr. X (Reply #100)
Wed May 22, 2013, 02:19 AM
108. We don't ignore where the breed originated
|
We just point out that it's largely irrelevant to any given individual of that breed. It's a question of training and owner responsibility.
If anyone's ignoring breed histories, I'm afraid it's the advocates of breed bans. Find me a dog breed that doesn't have at least some roots in maiming other living things. Please. The #1 most popular dog in America, the Labrador retriever is a descendant of ship mastiffs - dogs bred and trained to tear up anyone not part of he crew who came aboard. It's got gundog ancestry as well, which is where the "retriever" part comes from. Newfoundlands show the mastiff ancestry even more clearly. The #2, Yorkshire terrier, was like most terriers bred to, well, grab other animals and shake them around until limbs fly off. In the yorkie's case, this was rats. it was also used as a pit dog against smaller "game" - rats, other small dogs, cats, whatever might bring in the money. 
They also do this, which is cool, I guess. #3, the German shepherd is one of the classic "tough" dogs; originally derived to kill the shit out of wolves and other dogs who came near its flocks, then put in top tier for police and military uses. Most dog attacks in the world probably come at the teeth of a german shepherd; but so long as someone in a uniform holds the leash, it's not added to statistics. #4, golden retriever, large spaniel and probably the other half of the labrador's ancestry. Alright, seems this guy was only used to pick up critters that were already dead, and do so carefully. #5, beagle, scent hound. Bred to chase foxes in large packs. Fox hunts usually ended up with the hounds ripping the animal to shreds. This was apparently "jolly good sport," or something. Probably right up there with a terrier in how much carnage they can cause to your furniture, and the amount of terror they inflict on neighborhood cats, squirrels, and whatever else. #6, dachshund, another scent hound. Like the beagle. only with badgers. In my experience, one of the most consistently foul-tempered breeds ever. Them and the goddamned cocker spaniels. #7, boxer, mastiff type. descended from the german "bullenbaiser" which, if my three years of High school German doesn't fail me, means "bull-baiter." Originally used as a savage-game hunter (bears, boars, that sort of thing), then brought into the fighting ring, then trained as military attack dogs. Nowadays most famous for being tough-looking cuddlywumpuses who are more likely to run away from a huffy kitten than bark at it. #8, poodle, gun dog. If assholes who wanted to have a "tough" dog knew anything, we'd be hearing about poodle attacks and pit bulls would be counsidered frou-frou. Don't let their silly show bouffants fool you, a standard poodle is a big, strong, ill-tempered animal who should not be trusted with anything that might at any point be considered as tasting somewhat like a pork chop. The breed history doesn't point towards any particular meanness.. .but then you remember, they're french, and the idea of a foul-tempered dog with a bad haircut that is still inexplicably popular with women makes sense 
(I kid, I love poodles, but seriously, they're fluffy dingos, keep your eye on 'em) #9, shih-tzu, a non-working dog of "ancient" type. Specially bred to look oriental because, well, Victorians did stupid shit like that. Probably descended in great part from the Lhasa apso and Pekingese, two breeds that were so dangerous, so evil and maniacal, that the Ancient chinese had to breed deformities like squished heads and rickety shoulder gircles into them just ot keep them under countrol (this is joking, save that the two breeds are known to be rather agressive to strangers. Most shih tzus I've happened across were perfectly nice and not at all like a Lhasa apso nightmare-dog) #10, Miniature Schnauzer, herding type (they look like terriers, but yup, they're more related to german shepherds). While not exactly agressive, they are hugely intelligent, which leads to a situation where thye can become the alpha animal in the houseghold if the human isn't prepared. They are also very protective and, given the high rate of training failure, this can lead to the animal becoming snappy, prone to aggression displays, and otherwise being an unworkable asshole of a dog. If the AKC recognized the APBT, it would very likely come in at #3, and yes, its background is a breed bred to chew up other dogs in a fighting ring. So are several other breeds, from boston terriers, to pugs, to the shar pei. It's my feeling that it's this lack of recognition that leads to at least some of the problem; there's no real oversight of the breeding practices, the breed is not normalized via dog shows and the like, and as the OP shows, any dog can look vaguely like a pit bull and thus every dog that attacks can get called a pit bull by someone. |
Response to Scootaloo (Reply #108)
Wed May 22, 2013, 12:20 PM
124. I am owned by one of those vicious German Shepherds
Response to FloridaJudy (Reply #124)
Wed May 22, 2013, 03:04 PM
130. One of the most aggressive dogs I've walked was an intact male Puggle.
Response to baldguy (Reply #25)
Tue May 21, 2013, 09:50 PM
uppityperson (115,510 posts)
36. Very interesting breakdown of mixes, thank you. I ruled out the basset, never guessed chow and sprin
Response to baldguy (Reply #25)
Wed May 22, 2013, 01:08 AM
99. What was the breed identification methodology?
Response to baldguy (Reply #101)
Wed May 22, 2013, 01:33 AM
102. Did they use the blood test or the saliva test?
Response to XemaSab (Reply #125)
Wed May 22, 2013, 07:19 PM
136. So, your objection to the DNA testing is based on a CYA disclaimer on a retailers web store?
|
OOOKAAAY......
And I'll assume you've given up trying to refute the methodology for selecting the dogs? Good. Let's see what the actual people who conducted the survey say about the DNA testing. Here's another survey from Levy, et al from 2010: DNA Analysis:
• MARS VETERINARY™, Lincoln, Nebraska, performed the DNA analyses and reported to have “an average accuracy of 84% in first-generation crossbred dogs of known parentage” • All of the breeds identified by the adoption agencies were in the MARS database • Breeds must comprise at least 12.5% of the dog’s make-up to be reported Adopting agencies identifications • All dogs had been identified as mixed breeds at time of adoption • 16 dogs had been described as a specific breed mix • 4 dogs were only identified by a “type” (2 “shepherd” mixes and 2 “terrier” mixes) • 1 dog had been identified by both a specific breed (Chow Chow) and a “type” (terrier) DNA and Adoption Agency Comparison • Only 25% (4/16) of the dogs identified by agencies as specified breed mixes were also identified as the same predominant breeds by DNA (3 were only 12.5% of the dogs’ composition) • No German Shepherd Dog ancestry was reported by DNA in the 2 dogs identified only as “shepherd mixes” by adoption agencies • In the 3 dogs described as terrier mixes, a terrier breed was only identified by DNA in one dog • In 15 of the 16 dogs, DNA analyses identified breeds as predominant that were not proposed by the adoption agencies CONCLUSIONS • There is little correlation between dog adoption agencies’ identification of probable breed composition with the identification of breeds by DNA analysis • Further evaluation of the reliability and validity of visual dog breed identification is warranted • Justification of current public and private polices pertaining to breed specific regulations should be reviewed http://nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/uploaded_files/tinymce/Voith%20poster.pdf And here's a second survey, confirming the results of the first: The low percentage of agreement between visual and DNA identification may be partially explained by perception biases. However, DNA identification of the proportion of purebred breeds in mixed breed dogs is not perfect either, nor do the laboratories that provide such analyses claim to be infallible. The average accuracy of identification of the breeds in an individual dog can be expected to decrease as the heterogeneity of its ancestors increases. Canine Heritage™ states that their accuracy of identification of known registered purebred dogs is 99%. Wisdom Panel™ currently reports a 90% average accuracy of identification of F1 crosses of known registered purebred dogs.
http://www.animalfarmfoundation.org/files/Transcribed-Interview-with-Dr_-Victoria-Voith.pdf Reports of DNA analyses of percentages of purebred dog breed ancestry, while accurate most of the time, are not infallible. The laboratories providing such analyses may have qualifiers in their reports stating that there is an 85% or 90% validity of the results and indicate which results have lower confidence levels. Different testing laboratories may report different results depending on which dogs were used to develop their standards and how the laboratories analyze the samples. As the tests are refined, the same laboratory may report slightly different results at different points in time.
http://www.nathanwinograd.com/linked/misbreed.pdf Over at least three different surveys, the accuracy of DNA tests used is advertized as being up to 99% from the manufacturers, up to 90% observed for F1 crosses, and up to 85% observed for F2 crosses. In the same surveys, the accuracy for visual breed identification of mixed breeds by professional dog experts ranges from 16% to 43%. So - FOR A THIRD TIME - if you have any actual peer-reviewed data to show that DNA testing is not accurate, show us. now you need to put up or shut up. |
Response to baldguy (Reply #136)
Wed May 22, 2013, 08:47 PM
146. "an average accuracy of 84% in first-generation crossbred dogs of known parentage"
Response to blueamy66 (Reply #129)
Wed May 22, 2013, 06:13 PM
134. 25% of a particular breed is considered "predominant".
|
"Each dog in the survey had at least 25% of a single breed in its DNA profile. A response was considered accurate if it named any of the breeds DNA analysis had detected in the dog, no matter how many other breeds had been detected, and whether or not the breed guessed was a predominant breed in the dog, or only had been detected in a trace amount. Since, in almost every dog multiple breeds had been detected, there were lots of opportunities to be correct."
http://www.nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/blog/how-long-before-we-discard-visual-breed-identification-a-new-survey-confirms-that-even-dog-experts-cant-tell-just-by-looking/ If this is a Pit Bull: 
25% American Staffordshire Terrier, 25% Boxer, 25% Soft Coated Wheaton Terrier, 18.66% Great Dane then this is a Pit Bull also: 
25% Basset Hound, 25% American Staffordshire Terrier, 25% Chow Chow, 25% English Cocker Spaniel |
Response to baldguy (Original post)
Tue May 21, 2013, 09:47 PM
Baitball Blogger (44,836 posts)
32. I bet he's going to tell us they all have pitbull in them.
Response to baldguy (Reply #37)
Tue May 21, 2013, 10:09 PM
54. This works just the same as you trying to figure out what an assault weapon is.
|
Your are all for the media defining assault weapons but not Pit Bulls? BTW, I've never seen an assault weapon kill anything but I had a Pomeranian killed by your preferred assault dog. Had to track down his head after your assault dog ripped it off his neck. Ban them all -- if it saves one child or Pomerian it's worth it. Dontcha think??
|
Response to flvegan (Reply #34)
Tue May 21, 2013, 09:52 PM
38. No "Pit Bulls" shown...........
|
I saw it. I called it. Nice try!
|
Response to rdharma (Reply #143)
Wed May 22, 2013, 08:41 PM
145. The last one shown above. Dog #111.
Response to Occulus (Reply #145)
Wed May 22, 2013, 09:14 PM
148. Oh, brother!
|
Pretty watered down! Dog 111 25% Basset Hound 25% American Staffordshire Terrier 25% Chow Chow 25% English Cocker Spaniel |
Response to baldguy (Original post)
Tue May 21, 2013, 09:55 PM
42. Put them in a room with somebody and see which one mauls the person to death
Response to flvegan (Reply #43)
Tue May 21, 2013, 09:58 PM
45. ^^^Posts as though he knows a great deal more than he does. n/t
Response to Orrex (Reply #45)
Tue May 21, 2013, 10:02 PM
48. ^^^ Clueless, and should prove up his claim or shut up. n/t
Response to Orrex (Reply #50)
Tue May 21, 2013, 10:07 PM
52. ^^^ Has nothing to add, proves my point in reference to clueless. n/t
Response to flvegan (Reply #52)
Tue May 21, 2013, 10:10 PM
56. ^^^Thinks PETA is a serious organization but calls me clueless
Response to Orrex (Reply #56)
Tue May 21, 2013, 10:13 PM
60. ^^^ Can't argue his way out of a wet paper bag. n/t
Response to flvegan (Reply #60)
Tue May 21, 2013, 10:14 PM
62. ^^^Takes the bait every single time but thinks I'm clueless
Response to Orrex (Reply #62)
Tue May 21, 2013, 10:16 PM
66. ^^^ STILL can't properly argue a point. Is laughable at best. n/t
Response to flvegan (Reply #66)
Tue May 21, 2013, 10:17 PM
68. ^^^Hook, line & sinker every single time
Response to Orrex (Reply #68)
Tue May 21, 2013, 10:19 PM
71. ^^^ Reaffirmation of cluelessness. Address what you said, please. n/t
Response to flvegan (Reply #71)
Tue May 21, 2013, 10:20 PM
73. ^^^How do you keep a pit bull apologist in suspense?
Response to Post removed (Reply #77)
Tue May 21, 2013, 10:26 PM
78. ^^^How do you keep a pit bull apologist in suspense?
Response to pinboy3niner (Reply #82)
Wed May 22, 2013, 07:04 AM
114. Hold my beer and watch this ^<^><^>^<^>^<>^<^
|
Impressed yet?
|
Response to baldguy (Reply #51)
Tue May 21, 2013, 10:09 PM
55. Not the first time on this topic, sadly.
Response to baldguy (Reply #47)
Tue May 21, 2013, 11:05 PM
84. Lmao!!!
|
The pit bull kitty cracked me up  |
Response to Orrex (Reply #42)
Tue May 21, 2013, 10:43 PM
nolabear (40,726 posts)
83. DUzy! Not this post but the whole slap fight following.
|
It don't get any more DU than that. Thanks guys!
 |
Response to flvegan (Reply #61)
Tue May 21, 2013, 10:16 PM
65. Again....... I got the "trick question" correct!
Response to rdharma (Reply #65)
Tue May 21, 2013, 10:20 PM
72. See post #64. No need to tell you twice. n/t
Response to baldguy (Reply #64)
Tue May 21, 2013, 10:17 PM
67. baldguy with the bigtime win! LOL!!!!
Response to rdharma (Reply #69)
Tue May 21, 2013, 10:21 PM
75. Because it's defenseless, like those poor, sweet, cuddly pit bulls
Response to baldguy (Original post)
Tue May 21, 2013, 10:15 PM
63. If you've seen one pit bull, you've seen a maul
Response to deathrind (Reply #91)
Tue May 21, 2013, 11:51 PM
93. What happened with the "Find the Pit Bull" game?
|
Oooops! No pit bull...... Who could have thought of that?
|
Response to baldguy (Original post)
Wed May 22, 2013, 12:02 AM
Ohio Joe (20,396 posts)
96. Curse you!
|
Now I wish I had a dog here to hug
 |
Response to baldguy (Original post)
Wed May 22, 2013, 05:42 AM
112. You finally drove me over the edge. I would never say this under ordinary circumstances.
|
Fuck dogs!
[hr] [font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font] [hr] |
Response to baldguy (Original post)
Wed May 22, 2013, 11:01 AM
marmar (75,258 posts)
119. GD has really gone to the dogs.
Response to randome (Reply #120)
Wed May 22, 2013, 02:57 PM
unblock (51,227 posts)
127. that's bull, dawg!
Response to marmar (Reply #119)
Wed May 22, 2013, 03:14 PM
132. I think it is safe to say that baldguy is putting on the dog, at the very least.
Response to baldguy (Original post)
Wed May 22, 2013, 03:01 PM
128. I don't know what a pit bull looks like, but Dog 89 looks like the curr that micturated on my boots.
Response to whatchamacallit (Reply #133)
Fri May 31, 2013, 10:07 AM
152. I don't have a dog in this fight (mine's a Sheltie), but 1. that's a Wikipedia page
|
and 2. I don't see any of the major organizations that actually care about animal welfare supporting any of what appears to be just a list of legislation by possibly uninformed and vote-mongering politicians.
I don't think the exercise is pointless at all. I was wrong on the one I thought was a pittie (54). I'm sure most of us, even the "pitbull enthusiasts," here were wrong. |
