Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

slay

(7,670 posts)
Sat Feb 4, 2012, 03:08 AM Feb 2012

Here's a story I'm only allowed to post here! "Super Bowl bust: U.S. government seizes 307 domains"

*evidently some people don't consider this extreme action national news*

Super Bowl bust: U.S. government seizes 307 domains for violating NFL copyrights

Target sites assumed guilty until proven innocent under U.S. law

by Fox Van Allen | Last updated 1:40PM EST on February 3, 2012

"While many sports fans are preparing for Sunday's Super Bowl by organizing parties and shopping for TVs, the U.S. government is preparing in a different way. Just yesterday, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency seized 307 different domains suspected of violating NFL copyrights. Of those, 16 were suspected of illegal streaming. The rest were allegedly selling counterfeit NFL merchandise.

The seizure was conducted under U.S. civil law, not criminal law. That means the affected parties need to prove that the internet domains were not engaging in illegal activity to get them back — an ugly mirror image of the country's usual "innocent until proven guilty" right. Many of the domains were not being operated by U.S. groups. Because they used U.S. domain suffixes .net, .com, and .org, however, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency was empowered to act."

more at: http://www.tecca.com/news/2012/02/03/ice-nfl-website-seizure-superbowl/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's a story I'm only allowed to post here! "Super Bowl bust: U.S. government seizes 307 domains" (Original Post) slay Feb 2012 OP
No comments? malthaussen Feb 2012 #1
GD seems like an appropriate forum for this. MineralMan Feb 2012 #2
Good for the government joeglow3 Feb 2012 #3
poor analogy Motown_Johnny Feb 2012 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author Obamanaut Feb 2012 #4
 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
3. Good for the government
Sat Feb 4, 2012, 11:03 AM
Feb 2012

If I made the comment that the police can't stop me from stabbing someone until they prove I am stabbing them (ideally, in a court of law), I would be laughed at. Yet, threaten people's ability to steal shit for free online and they suddenly accept this shitty logic. I will bet you anything these sites were in fact streaming games illegally and/or selling illegal merchandise. They will have their day in court. However, the idea that people are incapable of seeing a crime occuring right in front of them is beyond stupid.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
5. poor analogy
Sat Feb 4, 2012, 02:21 PM
Feb 2012

intent can be prosecuted under criminal law


using taxpayer money to conduct raids that are then taken to civil court isn't right

Response to slay (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here's a story I'm only a...