Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRomney Criticizes Afghan Pullout Plan, but Obama Is Eager for the Debate
Romney Criticizes Afghan Pullout Plan, but Obama Is Eager for the Debate
By MARK LANDLER and HELENE COOPER
WASHINGTON It did not take long for Mitt Romney to pounce on Defense Secretary Leon E. Panettas statement Wednesday that American troops could end their combat role in Afghanistan by mid-2013, 18 months sooner than expected. Within hours, Mr. Romney lambasted it as naïve and misguided.
But President Obama, far from disavowing the Pentagon chief, seems eager to debate his Republican critics about a withdrawal timetable that his advisers contend is strategically sound, and which also happens to be politically popular. The White House said that Mr. Panettas remarks reflected the presidents resolve, supported by his experience in Iraq, not to wage a war without end in Afghanistan.
The president made clear that U.S. forces are in Afghanistan to accomplish a mission, and they will not stay in Afghanistan forever, and they will not stay in Afghanistan any longer than is necessary to accomplish that mission, said the press secretary, Jay Carney, when asked about Mr. Romneys charges.
Though Republican candidates have often successfully used foreign policy against Democrats, they have struggled to turn Mr. Obamas handling of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to their advantage, largely because polls show that a majority of Americans favor getting out of both countries as quickly as possible. Mr. Romney charged that the United States, by putting a more precise timeline on its military planning, was giving the Taliban and others a chance to wait out the Americans.
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/03/us/politics/obama-glad-to-debate-romney-on-afghanistan-pullout.html
By MARK LANDLER and HELENE COOPER
WASHINGTON It did not take long for Mitt Romney to pounce on Defense Secretary Leon E. Panettas statement Wednesday that American troops could end their combat role in Afghanistan by mid-2013, 18 months sooner than expected. Within hours, Mr. Romney lambasted it as naïve and misguided.
But President Obama, far from disavowing the Pentagon chief, seems eager to debate his Republican critics about a withdrawal timetable that his advisers contend is strategically sound, and which also happens to be politically popular. The White House said that Mr. Panettas remarks reflected the presidents resolve, supported by his experience in Iraq, not to wage a war without end in Afghanistan.
The president made clear that U.S. forces are in Afghanistan to accomplish a mission, and they will not stay in Afghanistan forever, and they will not stay in Afghanistan any longer than is necessary to accomplish that mission, said the press secretary, Jay Carney, when asked about Mr. Romneys charges.
Though Republican candidates have often successfully used foreign policy against Democrats, they have struggled to turn Mr. Obamas handling of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to their advantage, largely because polls show that a majority of Americans favor getting out of both countries as quickly as possible. Mr. Romney charged that the United States, by putting a more precise timeline on its military planning, was giving the Taliban and others a chance to wait out the Americans.
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/03/us/politics/obama-glad-to-debate-romney-on-afghanistan-pullout.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 914 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Romney Criticizes Afghan Pullout Plan, but Obama Is Eager for the Debate (Original Post)
ProSense
Feb 2012
OP
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)1. Mitt should be pissing in his designer underwear.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)2. Obama got Osama
Thank you. Debate over.
BeyondGeography
(39,370 posts)3. 12 years is insufficient
Riiiiight.
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)4. Mitt wants the largest, strongest military we've ever had.
He needs a war to justify his plan. Oh well, maybe he can outline his plan to create new wars to justify the need for a military budget we can't afford.