General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Obama’s Not Talking About His Health Care Law In This Election
Why Obamas Not Talking About Health CareBy: Jon Walker
January 26, 2012
In addition to the individual mandate being extremely unpopular, opinions about the entire Affordable Care Act have remained negative and been trending downward. The Kaiser Family Foundation poll found 44 percent view the law unfavorably while just 37 percent now view it favorably.
This is why during the State of the Union President Obama gave only the briefest passing mention to his signature health care law, and he didnt even mention it by name. The State of the Union was a political speech. It is now clear that Obama so terribly mismanaged the politics of health care reform that the law is a serious net negative for the Obama campaign.
There is no way Obama could have spent more time talking about the biggest legislative action of his presidency and still have received the incredibly broad approval he did get from people who watched the speech. Dont expect the issue of health care to be brought up by choice by Democrats in the upcoming campaign.

http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2012/01/26/why-obamas-not-talking-about-health-care/

DJ13
(23,671 posts)Which is probably why the elites are pushing so hard to secure the GOP nomination for Romney, as he is the only GOP candidate that cant go on the offensive on that issue.
Loge23
(3,922 posts)I keep hoping they scrap the darn thing and start all over on single pay as the focus.
The problem of health care accessibility and affordability is no solved by this bill, let alone the enforcment of it's most controversial provision: mandatory coverage.
It was a dog from the start, as soon as single-pay was taken off the table.
patrice
(47,992 posts)See HR 676 Expanded & Improved Health Care for All the text of which is linked about half-way down here:
http://www.pnhp.org/
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)From Firedog lake, too.
I wonder if the Kaiser family have any stake in for profit healthcare......
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)http://video.mpbn.net/video/1458187773/
On Earth Day, Obama administration touts healthcare law's green benefits
http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/public-global-health/157319-hhs-touts-healthcare-reform-laws-benefits-on-earth-day
Obama campaign promotes health care law
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/12/obama-campaign-promotes-health-care-law/1
zipplewrath
(16,695 posts)The comment was about the SOTU address. It was notible that there was not even as much mention of it as last year, where he talked about "fixes" needed.
And the congress doesn't really like to mention it at all. Stick 'em in a crowd that is closing the donut hole and they might bring it up. There aren't many other large crowds where they wanna talk about it though, since most folks haven't noticed it, and won't for a long time. The first that may could well be the ones hit by the mandate.
uponit7771
(92,734 posts)zipplewrath
(16,695 posts)You did read the content right? Their point is very clearly stated there.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)It was signed in March 2010.
Pres O talked about it in both his 2010 and 2011 SOTU address.
In the 2012 SOTU he referred to it saying: "I will not go back to the days when health insurance companies had unchecked power to cancel your policy, deny your coverage, or charge women differently than men."
He did and does talk about the Affordable Care Act.
zipplewrath
(16,695 posts)And they noted that he mention a single line, and not by name.
And the reference last year was to something that had to be fixed.
Response to zipplewrath (Reply #30)
AtomicKitten This message was self-deleted by its author.
Better Believe It
(18,630 posts)He said ..........." "
And ....... " "
Why, it's such a big vote getter I thought he'd never stop talking about it!
Thanks for you're information.
If you can't afford private health care insurance in 2014 how much do you think your fine will be?
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)You're title (lol), um, your thread title:
"Why Obamas Not Talking About His Health Care Law IN THIS ELECTION"
Better Believe It
(18,630 posts)
ProSense
(116,464 posts)enjoy this:
Sebelius v Stewart on Health Care
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/01/24/1057963/-Sebelius-v-Stewart-on-Health-Care
Here's another chart from the Kaiser Poll:
SidDithers
(44,332 posts)Sid
great white snark
(2,646 posts)Thank you ProSense.
zipplewrath
(16,695 posts)Constantly suggesting this was anything but a rearrangement of the insurance market won't change the reality. In 10 years we'll be talking about HCR the same way we have been talking about DADT and DOMA.
Uncle Joe
(61,434 posts)I imagine the mandate is the primary reason, that not 1 out of 5 people like it and the mandate hasn't even taken effect yet.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)from the December poll, people do not approve of the mandate:
Uncle Joe
(61,434 posts)thanks for providing the poll.
I believe if anything the mandate will become even less popular once it's enacted after the 2012 elections.
SidDithers
(44,332 posts)Sid
patrice
(47,992 posts)The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/interview-health-reforms-comparative-effectiveness-chief/2012/01/26/gIQAUiPdTQ_blog.html
New, Patient-Centered, Treatment-Effectiveness research underway: An interview with Joe Selby, executive director of the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
"Our mission is to provide useful information that is helpful to patients and their caregivers and clinicians in making medical care decisions. The key things we focus on are questions that patients and clinicians think are important. We want to involve them in the process of doing research and then disseminate information from that research. The novel part of what we were doing is taking substantial guidance from patients."
patrice
(47,992 posts)1. patients
2. CAREGIVERS (emphasis added)
3. clinicians.
= Dialogue amongst health care insurance insurance market users ABOUT health care.
patrice
(47,992 posts)that fact numerous times on this board, but there's a lot of PRETENDING going on around here regarding this particular issue. Why do you all think that is?
Enrique
(27,461 posts)especially the fact that Romney enacted a very similar plan, even as Romney is posing as being against it.
FarLeftFist
(6,161 posts)Better Believe It
(18,630 posts)
Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)Variations of that RW taking point have been circulating the last several days.
See: Priebus, etc....
Go figure.
Adapted and Sanitized for your Convenience.
FarLeftFist
(6,161 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)so that unfavorable number is not all people who don't want reform. Roughly one third of that number are people (such as myself) who want more reform.
When the poll asks the questions: This much reform or more v. Less reform or none, then I will pay attention.
Better Believe It
(18,630 posts)With a single player Medicare for All public health care system.
Vinca
(51,903 posts)If they uphold it, he can bring up all kinds of good things about it. If they toss it, he can run on what should have been done in the first place: Medicare for all.
Life Long Dem
(8,582 posts)...
Obama: I will not go back to the days when health insurance companies had unchecked power to cancel your policy, deny your coverage, or charge women differently than men. (Applause.)
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/01/24/remarks-president-state-union-address

Better Believe It
(18,630 posts)making it impossible for people to buy coverage.
Gee .... who would have thunk?
And right .... they can't "cancel" your insurance policy. Again, they can simply jack up the premiums making it impossible to continue your policy. Isn't that right?
Unless there is something in the Health Insurance Industry and Big Pharma Protection Act that curtails insurance policy premiums that I'm unfamiliar with.
Life Long Dem
(8,582 posts)Pure community rating prohibits insurance rate variations based on demographic characteristics such as age or gender, whereas adjusted or modified community rating allows insurance rate variations based on demographic characteristics such as age or gender.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_rating
Community rating comes from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act
Response to Life Long Dem (Reply #38)
Better Believe It This message was self-deleted by its author.
Better Believe It
(18,630 posts)That's what I thought.
"adjusted or modified community rating allows insurance rate variations based on demographic characteristics such as age or gender."
Not only can they set their rates the insurance industry can reduce and change benefits provided.
Well, of course they can!
They play a major role in the for profit medical care industry.
And as long as that continues we will continue to be screwed by them.
Health care is a for profit private industry, not a universal health care service
Life Long Dem
(8,582 posts)ACR is a group that is charged the same premium.
They can't charge a higher premium to any individual to cancel your insurance like you were saying, because the whole group would need to be dropped. Dropping the whole group by raising premiums would cost them.
A rating method under which a health plan or MCO divides its members into classes or groups based on demographic factors such as geography, family composition, and age, and then charges all members of a class or group the same premium. The plan cannot consider the experience of a class, group, or tier in developing premium rates. Also known as modified community rating.
http://www.termwiki.com/EN:adjusted_community_rating_%28ACR%29
bvar22
(39,909 posts)...wait until 2014 when The Mandate kicks in,
and 40 - 70 MILLION (predicted uninsured by 2014) already hard pressed Working Class Americans are forced to BUY Junk "Bronze" Insurance.
Even with a "subsidy", most will STILL be forced to write a BIG check every year to a RICH Insurance Corporation
for a product that most won't be able use due to high Co-Pay/Deductibles.
Most of these Americans are NOT aware of what is coming in 2014.
When these MILLIONS find out,
they will NOT be happy.
They WILL Blame the Democrats,
and rightly so.
The smartest thing the Democrats did was to delay The Mandate until AFTER the 2012 elections,
because after The Mandate kicks in,
Democrats will be unelectable for a generation.
girl gone mad
(20,634 posts)And Democrats will have to own the misery.
Young people are already squeezed by student loan debt and a crap job market. Now they will be forced to buy a defective product which the vast majority of them will not derive any real benefit from.