General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSotomayor Condemns Prosecutor’s Racially Insensitive Remark
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor slammed the racially insensitive comments of a federal prosecutor in a Texas drug case Monday, calling his words "an affront to the Constitution's guarantee of equal protection of the laws," CNN reports. Sotomayor agreed with a majority on the court in declining to review the case, but still took the opportunity to issue a statement condemning the prosecutor's words as well as the Justice Department's reaction to them.
The prosecutorwhom Sotomayor refused to namesaid during cross-examination of a drug conspiracy case: "You've got African-Americans, you've got Hispanics, you've got a bag full of money. Does that tell youa light bulb doesn't go off in your head and say, This is a drug deal?"
"It is deeply disappointing to see a representative of the United States resort to this basic tactic more than a decade into the 21st century," Sotomayor said. "We expect the government to seek justice, not fan the flames of fear and prejudice."
"I hope never to see a case like this again," Sotomayor concluded.
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/sotomayor-condemns-prosecutors-racially-insensitive-remark
fredamae
(4,458 posts)Same 'ol Racist BS and Propaganda from all these decades ago---I believe a majority are catching on and Justice Soto-Mayor's rejection of it will go far, imo.
Enough of this crap.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)The defense attorney originally did not object to the first remarks, but did raise objections to the further improper line of questioning.
But the judge could and should know better than to allow such an argument.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)were tasked with defending this shite had downplayed the remarks, calling them merely "impolitic."
And it wasn't just remark, either--it was a whole line of argument. The DOJ brief downplaying this crap is here--
http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Calhoun-v-United-States-BIO.pdf
They were racist, and disgusting. And Lanny Breuer, signatory to the brief, is rightfully leaving the DOJ on March 1. As head of the Criminal Division of the DOJ, he is one who primarily responsible for advancing this argument. The Solicitor General should take his fair shair of blame, too. And so should the attorney who wrote it. (His name, though not the original prosecutor's name, is on the brief at link.)
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)Did the prosecutor actually say that shit during the trial while cross-examining or whatever? If so, what the living fuck.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)It's disgusting.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)Utterly despicable. Fuck.
Number23
(24,544 posts)I'd like to say all of this is surprising. But of course, it isn't.
Welcome to "post-racial" America.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)You have put a world of hurt on alot of folks here. And it's been damn entertaining to see.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,164 posts)FourScore
(9,704 posts)uponit7771
(90,329 posts)indepat
(20,899 posts)Justice every day. That, my dear Justice Sotomayor, might be the only practical way.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)What did Thomas have to say? He probably agreed with the comments.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)jsr
(7,712 posts)Sotomayor did not name Assistant U.S. Attorney Sam L. Ponder in her statement, but she denounced his questioning of Calhoun, who maintained in court that he did not know that the friends with whom he was traveling were planning a drug deal.
Ponder had asked Calhoun: Youve got African Americans, youve got Hispanics, youve got a bag full of money. Does that tell you a light bulb doesnt go off in your head and say, This is a drug deal?
Sotomayor, who in 2009 became the courts first Hispanic member, said Ponders question was pernicious in its attempt to substitute racial stereotype for evidence, and racial prejudice for reason.
She added: It is deeply disappointing to see a representative of the United States resort to this base tactic more than a decade into the 21st century. Such conduct diminishes the dignity of our criminal justice system and undermines respect for the rule of law. We expect the government to seek justice, not to fan the flames of fear and prejudice.
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)Using the 'n' word would not be any more blatant.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)Total bullshit. Though at msanthrope said, it's all on the DOJ for making a defense of such absurdities. That guy was completely railroaded. Fucking bullshit.
Jasana
(490 posts)but after the Citizen's United decision, I'm learning. I'm afraid I don't like much of what I'm leaning but at least Sostomayor spoke out on this.
politicasista
(14,128 posts)Muchas gracias Justicia Sotomayor.