Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThey want to kill the New Deal just as much as we want to save it.
I view GOP policies like cutting funding for the USPS, public education, infrastructure maintenance, the arts, or hell basically anything except defense spending, as being strategically useful to them. Every time they defund social programs, it makes them less useful to people and it makes it easier for them to argue that "govt isn't effective." The failure of Dems to explain what's going on here and/or even colluding with them, is one of the great political failures of our age.
It's lately become a truism of sorts in progressive circles that conservatives don't really care about anything but keeping taxes low for rich people. I agree that it is a prime directive, but I'm not convinced that it's the only thing they care about. They have a very deep antipathy toward government for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is that they believe it takes their money and gives it to people they dislike. (The fact that they benefit as well is irrelevant --- they believe they deserve it, those "others" don't.)
...
Wondering about how this fits into their historical patterns, I asked Rick Perlstein about it the other day. He agreed with Kilgore that they are confused and I think that's right. They are being offered things they should, by all rights, be thrilled to take. But they are afraid that by taking the president up on his offers to "reform entitlements" they'll lose the bigger argument. They're probably wrong about that --- degrading the social insurance programs will make them less reliable and less popular. But they aren't willing to take that risk. And I, for one, am grateful.
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/they-want-to-kill-new-deal-just-as-much.html
...
Wondering about how this fits into their historical patterns, I asked Rick Perlstein about it the other day. He agreed with Kilgore that they are confused and I think that's right. They are being offered things they should, by all rights, be thrilled to take. But they are afraid that by taking the president up on his offers to "reform entitlements" they'll lose the bigger argument. They're probably wrong about that --- degrading the social insurance programs will make them less reliable and less popular. But they aren't willing to take that risk. And I, for one, am grateful.
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/they-want-to-kill-new-deal-just-as-much.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 769 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They want to kill the New Deal just as much as we want to save it. (Original Post)
phantom power
Feb 2013
OP
It's high time we added Social Security and Medicare amendments to the constitution.
reformist2
Feb 2013
#1
reformist2
(9,841 posts)1. It's high time we added Social Security and Medicare amendments to the constitution.
I'm so tired of the Repugs tossing these basic rights around like political footballs. Sadly, amendments are the only way these jerks will understand.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)2. They're shills for the Plutocracy, nothing more. n/t